In the published article, there was an error. The authors interpreted a tephra layer as the initial phase of the Cleetwood eruption (called “Phase 1” in the manuscript), when this layer is part of the Llao Rock tephra fall, an eruption that preceded the Cleetwood by ∼200 years. None of the raw data in the paper are incorrect (thickness, grain size, componentry, etc.), rather just the interpretation of that layer. All mentions of Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 have been changed to Llao Rock, lower Cleetwood, and upper Cleetwood, respectively. All calculations related to Phase 2 (now referred to as “lower Cleetwood” following Young, 1990) and Phase 3 (“upper Cleetwood”, also following Young, 1990) of the Cleetwood eruption are still valid and interpretations do not change. The isopach map and subsequent erupted volume calculations for Phase 1 (now interpreted as being Llao Rock) become irrelevant because, although our thickness data are consistent with Young’s (1990) measurements of Llao Rock, they were calculated with the incorrect vent location. Removing “Phase 1” from the total calculated volume (non-DRE) of the Cleetwood eruption now gives a volume of 1.18 km3 (as opposed to 1.44 km3 previously), all other interpretations and conclusions remain unchanged.
A correction has been made to the following sections in the article: Abstract, Geologic Background, The Cleetwood Eruption, Results, Field Observations and Measurements, Results, Componentry, Results, Eruption Source Parameters, Discussion, The Cleetwood Eruptive Sequence, Conclusion.
Corrections were also made to Figure 1 and Figures 4–13. A correction was made to Tables 1 and 2. An error was also corrected in Supplementary Figure S4 and Supplementary Table S3.
The updated article content and supplementary material can be found in the original article.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
magma fragmentation, tephra dispersal, grain-size distribution, eruption source parameters, fractal dimension, explosive volcanism
Citation
Wiejaczka J and Giachetti T (2023) Corrigendum: Using eruption source parameters and high-resolution grain-size distributions of the 7.7 ka cleetwood eruption of mount mazama (Oregon, United States) to reveal primary and secondary eruptive processes. Front. Earth Sci. 11:1182638. doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1182638
Received
09 March 2023
Accepted
21 March 2023
Published
06 April 2023
Volume
11 - 2023
Edited and reviewed by
Antonio Costa, National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology (Bologna), Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Wiejaczka and Giachetti.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Joshua Wiejaczka, jwiejacz@uoregon.edu
This article was submitted to Volcanology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.