Abstract
Luzon Island is a complex setting of seismicity and magmatism caused by the subduction of the South China Sea lithosphere and the presence of a major strike-slip fault system, the Philippine Fault. Previous studies of the structure of this subduction zone have suggested that a ridge subduction system resulted in a slab tearing along the ridge. On the other hand, the Philippine Fault plays an important role in understanding how major strike-slip faults deform and displace at a continental scale. To constrain the lithospheric geological structure in the area and refine the slab tearing model, we performed a P- and S-wave seismic tomography travel time inversion using local earthquakes. The dataset has been combined from seismic phases reported by the International Seismological Centre and new pickings from six broadband seismic stations in northern Luzon. The three-dimensional P- and S-wave velocity models in Luzon Island were analyzed by applying the LOTOS package with a one-dimensional velocity model obtained from the VELEST program. Our tomographic images indicate contrasting velocity structures across the Philippine Fault to a depth of 60 km. Therefore, we suggest that the Philippine Fault might be a lithospheric structure that displaces both the crust and the upper mantle. The results also indicate regions of low-velocity slab windows from a depth of 40 km, which are interpreted as the sites of slab tearing. Compared with focal mechanisms and earthquake occurrence in this region, we propose that slab tearing extends from the fossil ridge and creates regional kinematic perturbations. The tearing produces shallow upwelling magma to stay in the chambers beneath the crust, which is in contrast to the magmatic system observed in other regions.
1 Introduction
Subduction zones are the most active tectonic boundaries on Earth’s surface, showing great variations of volcanism, earthquakes, arc curvatures, and slab properties (; ; ). In some subduction zones, the nature of the subduction process is modified by preexisting fossil ridges, which were spreading centers before subduction (; ). One of the most controversial characteristics of these structures is the different behaviors of magmatism due to the interaction between the subducting slab, the mantle wedge, and the subducting ridge (). In some fossil ridge subduction zones, the cessation of volcanism appears and develops a volcanic gap zone. The Nazca and Juan Fernández Ridges were considered examples of volcanic gaps formed by the consumption of fossil ridges possibly by causing a flat slab event (; ); however, recent studies suggest that the passage of the Juan Fernández might cause a large scale eruption in the future (). In contrast, volcanism might be enhanced as a result of ridge subduction in some places where slab tearing occurs. A typical example is the enhanced volcanism of the Aleutian Ridges by the formation of a slab window beneath Kamchatka (). The different behaviors of the volcanic systems related to ridge subduction might be explained by the different tectonic responses in each particular region, for example,: flattening of slab dip, subduction rollback, and formation of slab windows ().
The Luzon island arc is a region in which the South China Sea oceanic lithosphere has been consumed along the Manila Trench since the Miocene (). As a result, a system of active earthquakes and volcanoes is well developed (Figure 1A). Compared to other ridge subduction systems in the world, the South China Sea ridge subduction system has been less studied to date. The ridge subduction of the South China Sea along the Manila Trench was first proposed based on the distribution and characteristics of two magmatic systems in North Luzon: the active east volcanic chain and the extinct west volcanic chain (). Further investigation of earthquake distribution and focal mechanism data suggests a change in dip angles of the slab caused by the subduction of an extinct spreading ridge—the Scarborough seamount accreted at North Luzon at 16oN (; ), which is consistent with a change in slab deep angle between latitude 16oN and 17oN observed from earthquake occurrences and the slab model (cross sections BB’ and CC’ in Figure 1B). Seismic tomographic studies in this region also support the slab tearing model by imaging the large-scale slab geometry and slab window using P-wave travel time seismic tomography (; ). The global P-wave seismic tomography also shows possible images of the slab windows at a depth of less than 100 km at latitude 16oN to 18oN (cross sections AA’, BB’ and CC’ in Figure 1B). These studies have provided evidence for a discontinuity of the slab at depths deeper than 100 km at the extension of the fossil ridge. However, the shallow structure at a local scale, particularly the S-wave velocity in the Luzon island, has not been well constrained.
FIGURE 1
Meanwhile, most previous studies on volcanic systems used geochemical methods to identify the characteristics of lavas and magmatic rocks in the region (
Another major question is the tectonic role of the Philippine Fault in this area. The Philippine Fault is a major left-lateral strike-slip fault that cuts along the whole Philippine Archipelago and extends from Mindanao to northern Luzon (
In this study, we performed a simultaneous P- and S-wave seismic tomography of the crust and upper mantle of Luzon Island from local earthquakes to obtain high-resolution tomographic images of subsurface structures. By using both P- and S-wave velocity models, we obtained independent results, which provided reliable evidence for the same structures. The tomographic results also verified the slab tearing caused by the ridge subduction of the South China Sea and identified the sources of regional magmatism. Based on those findings, we constrained the lithospheric geological structure in the area and refined the slab tearing model. We also observed considerable velocity contrasts at both crustal and upper mantle levels across the Philippine Fault to a depth of 60 km. This allowed us to estimate the depth of the Philippine Fault, which may have cut through the crust and reached the upper mantle.
2 Tectonic settings
Luzon Island is part of the Philippines islands and is made up of assemblages of active and inactive terranes, metamorphosed rocks, sedimentary basins, and ophiolite complexes (
Located between the aforementioned two opposite subduction zones is the major 1300-km left lateral Philippine Fault (Figure 1A). The Philippine Fault is considered a trench-linked strike-slip fault behind a subduction zone—the Philippines Trench, particularly the East Luzon Trough in the North Luzon area, as a consequence of oblique subduction (
Volcanoes and magmatic systems are well developed on Luzon Island, which is interpreted to be related to the east-dipping subduction along the Manila Trench (
3 Data and method
3.1 P- and S-wave travel time data
The data used in this study are the P- and S-wave arrival times of regional earthquakes compiled from different sets of data, such as from the International Seismology Centre Bulletin (ISC) from 2000 to 2016 (86 stations) and the six broadband stations operated by the cooperation of the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS) and Institute of Earth Sciences (IES), Academia Sinica from 2014 to 2016 (Figure 2). The locations and periods of the PHIVOLCS - IES stations are listed in the Supplementary Material (Supplementary Table S1). The events were selected within a maximum distance of 8o from a chosen center point of Luzon island (121oN, 16.5oE) with all depths and magnitudes. The data from the ISC bulletin are the first P- and S-wave arrival times of these earthquakes recorded from stations in Luzon Island and the Taiwan region. We handpicked the first P- and S-wave arrival times from the PHIVOLCS-IES station waveform and then calculated the travel times for each event-station pair. These readings obtained from broadband stations were used to improve the quality of the travel time database, especially the S-wave readings. The two databases were then combined to have a total of 92,950 P-wave readings and 49,087 S-wave readings from 21,134 events.
FIGURE 2

Distribution of (A) earthquake events and (B) seismic stations used in this study. The green triangles indicate stations in the ISC catalog, purple triangles indicate stations of the PHIVOLCS-IES network, and circles indicate earthquakes with colors indicating depth.
The ISC catalog data set is large but may contain data errors and poor-quality source locations (
The workflow of this study included: 1) an 1D reference velocity model inversion using the program VELEST (
3.2 1D velocity model
In a local tomographic inversion, an appropriate one-dimensional reference velocity model is required and is used as an input for the inversion (
FIGURE 3

(A) 1D velocity model showing results of VELEST inversion (gray line) from a wide range of input velocity models (dash line). The blue line indicates the chosen lowest RMS 1D velocity model. The references model used: CRUST 1.0 (
TABLE 1
| Depth (km) | Velocity (km/s) |
|---|---|
| 0 | 4.800 |
| 10 | 6.011 |
| 20 | 6.356 |
| 25 | 6.654 |
| 30 | 7.237 |
| 35 | 7.577 |
| 60 | 7.814 |
| 80 | 7.988 |
| 150 | 8.232 |
| 200 | 8.669 |
The starting 1D P-wave velocity model resulted from VELEST for seismic tomographic inversion.
3.3 3D seismic tomography
The 3D seismic tomography inversion was conducted using the LOTOS program for the whole data set (
The input of the program includes a 1D reference model, P- and S-wave traveltimes and locations of selected earthquakes, and seismic stations. The 3D tomographic inversion starts with the initial source location from the inversion of travel time using the input 1-D velocity model. In this step, the source location is calculated based on calculating a goal function that reflects the probability of the event at a current point (
In the next step, the tomographic inversion was carried out in several iterations. In each iteration, earthquakes were relocated using a modified bending tracing method based on a previously updated 3D velocity model (
4 Resolution validations of the tomographic image
In seismic tomography inversion, assessing the validity of the inversion is a major challenge and different tests have been proposed that can be grouped into two types: sampling test and synthetic test. The usage and theory of these tests have been discussed in detail in previous studies (
In the sampling test, different subsets of the whole data are used to do the tomographic inversion, then the individual resultant images are compared. There are different statistical resampling techniques used in seismic tomography, for example,: jackknifing, bootstrap (
The synthetic test is another widely used tool in seismic tomography (
In this study, to have a detailed assessment of the quality of inversion, we considered different tests, including the odd-event test and two synthetic tests, namely, the checkerboard resolution test (CRT) and the freeform synthetic test (
4.1 Checkerboard resolution test
We applied a classic checkerboard resolution test by setting a synthetic model of alternating positive and negative anomalies for horizontal and vertical slices. The amplitude of the anomalies was ±7% with different block sizes of 40 km, 50 km, and 60 km to check the quality of the inverted model for structures with different sizes. In the vertical sections, we created blocks with a depth size of 50 km and defined a change of pattern at a depth of 20 km.
The results of horizontal CRT for a grid size of 50 km are shown in Figures 4, 5, while grid sizes of 40 km and 60 km are shown in Supplementary Figure S3, S4; CRTs for the vertical sections are shown in Supplementary Figure S5.
FIGURE 4

Results of the checkerboard resolution test for P-wave at depth layers with a lateral grid interval of 50 km in the longitudinal and latitudinal directions. The layer depth is shown below each map.
FIGURE 5

Results of the checkerboard resolution test for S-wave at depth layers with a lateral grid interval of 50 km in the longitudinal and latitudinal directions. The layer depth is shown below each map.
In general, the P-wave has a higher resolution quality than the S-wave because of the greater number of crosscut ray paths (Supplementary Figure S1, S2). In the horizontal sections, for the most part from depths of 0–50 km, the P-wave checkerboard could be well recovered in the whole region of Luzon Island, while the offshore region of Luzon Island (north of 19oN) was poorly recovered. For the S-wave, most regions of Luzon Island could be well recovered from 10 to 40 km, and poorly recovered in the deeper part.
In the vertical section (Supplementary Figure S5), the checkerboard test could be well recovered in the inland part to the depth of 70 km in most sections. The CRT results indicated that, for most regions of Luzon Island, the tomographic images could be considered reliable with the highest resolution from a depth of 20–50 km, while the deeper parts should be interpreted with caution. After some trial and error runs, we chose the optimal parameters to represent velocity perturbations, which are shown in Supplementary Table S2. We applied these model parameters to all the other quality tests and tomography inversions.
4.2 Odd-even test
In this test, we split real picking data (Figure 2A) into odd and even groups. Each group data was set as independent input data for inversion analysis. While the checkerboard test or freeform synthetic test are used to determine how the structures can be restored, the odd/even test is used to assess the effect of random noise on the tomographic results. If there are major differences between tomographic results from the odd and even datasets, the random noise may have a notable influence on the inversion, and the seismic tomographic may contain more uncertainties. The results of the odd/even test are shown in Figure 6 and show a horizontal section for P-wave and S-wave. Two layers of each test are presented: one for the shallow layer at 20 km and one for a deeper layer at 40 km. These results from odd/even events were then compared to each other.
FIGURE 6

Results of the odd/even test in horizontal tomographic images. The data are divided into two subsets based on the number of events and performed independent inversion.
For the P-wave results, the models showed a very high correlation for the inland area in both horizontal sections (the left two columns in Figure 6). Most of the structures with different sizes were preserved in odd and even data inversion. However, both the P- and S-wave results showed a lower degree of correlation for regions with less ray path coverage (Supplementary Figure S1, S2). This reflects a higher degree of randomness and requires caution when interpreting the structure there.
4.3 Freeform synthetic test
Finally, we performed a freeform synthetic test in horizontal and vertical sections (assuming the model with 2D variation and the medium was invariant along the third axis, or named as 2.5D model in explosion Geophysics) to verify the quality of the seismic tomography inversion with structures. The horizontal section freeform velocity model of this synthetic test was integrated from the information of the regional tectonic features in Figure 1 and previously reported tomographic images to design the model as shown in Figure 7. The proposed velocity anomalies were ±6% for P-wave and ±8% (higher amplitude) for S-wave to resemble the previous inversion results (
FIGURE 7

Results of the synthetic test with the realistic configuration of patterns in horizontal sections. The proposed velocity structure of the synthetic test referred to the regional tectonic features of Fig.1 to design the model.
5 Analyzed results
As stated in the synthetic test, the main model was obtained by inversion of data using five iterations. The tomographic inversion results in P-wave travel time misfit reduced from 0.523s to 0.441s (15.56% reduction) and S-wave travel time misfit reduced from 0.758s to 0.560s (26.1% reduction). The values of the mean residual and their reduction of P- and S-wave during each iteration are presented in Table 2, while Figures 8A,B show histograms of the P- and S-wave travel time misfit before and after the final iteration, respectively. Figure 8C shows the locations of the earthquakes before and after the inversion, which we will discuss in the next section.
TABLE 2
| Iteration | P rms | P rms reduction | S rms | S rms reduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.5299 | - | 0.7619 | - |
| 2 | 0.4679 | 11.87% | 0.6143 | 19.37% |
| 3 | 0.4512 | 14.84% | 0.5871 | 22.93% |
| 4 | 0.4449 | 16.03% | 0.5716 | 24.97% |
| 5 | 0.4421 | 16.56% | 0.5645 | 25.91% |
The P-wave and S-wave residuals from tomographic inversion.
FIGURE 8

Travel time residual histogram (A) before and (B) after the tomographic inversion. The blue and green bars indicate P-wave and S-wave; (C) map showing the earthquake locations change after the inversion, and the arrow indicates points from the original locations to the relocated locations.
The results of seismic tomographic inversion in Luzon Island are presented as horizontal slices of P-wave perturbations (Figure 9) and S-wave perturbations (Figure 10). These images show the velocity anomalies compared with the initial 1D velocity model at the depth of 10 km, 20 km, 30 km, 40 km, 50 km, and 60 km. In P- and S-wave tomographic results, red colors denote the slow velocity anomalies and blue colors indicate high-velocity anomalies. Although the LOTOS program inverts P- and S-wave velocity simultaneously, the link between them is relatively weak and can be considered as independent parameters (
FIGURE 9

Map view of P-wave tomography of different depths. The red and blue colors denote slow and fast velocity perturbations, respectively. Gray lines indicate the subducting slab from the Slab 2 model (
FIGURE 10

Map view of S-wave tomography of different depths. The symbols and abbreviations are the same as those in Figure 9.
Some seismic velocity zones with high values of anomalies could be noted at the slice of shallow depth of 10 km–30 km, as shown in Figures 9, 10. This higher degree of anomaly level might be due to the presence of the high contrasting velocity structure, e.g., subducting slab and magmatic structures (volcanoes and magma chamber) in the study area. Both the absolute velocity of P- and S-wave were much lower in the shallow depth compared to the deeper depth, therefore, the velocity anomalies at the horizontal slice at 10–30 km were generally higher than at a depth of 40–60 km. As a result, we focused on the structures with higher velocity anomalies in the shallow portion.
In the northern Luzon region, the Central Cordillera Range appeared as a region of mostly high-velocity anomalies, except the eastern region near inactive volcanoes, which appeared as a low-velocity zone at the depth of 10 km (16oN-18oN, Figures 9, 10). However, at depths of 20 km and 30 km, contrasting velocity anomaly patterns in the mountain range across the Philippine Fault could be seen, with the western side appearing as a high-velocity zone while the eastern side showed prominent low-velocity anomalies up to 9%. The Cagayan Valley Basin appeared as a mostly high-velocity zone with some small zones of low-velocity in the north and west. To the east, the North Sierra Madre mountain range was characterized by high-velocity anomalies, while low-velocity zones could be found in the South Sierra Madre. To the south, the Zambales Ophiolite Complex consistently appeared as a high-velocity zone. The Central Valley Basin appeared as a high-velocity zone, which shows a sharp velocity contrast with the northeast Philippine Fault and southeast South Sierra Madre up to a depth of 40 km.
Horizontal P- and S-wave velocity models showed high-velocity anomalies of 8%–10% in the west of Luzon Island from a depth of 10 km up to 60 km (Figures 9, 10). These anomalies were interpreted as the subducting slab of the South China Sea lithosphere, which agrees with the relocated earthquake distribution and reference slab model (gray lines). In the east of Luzon Island, the high-velocity anomalies combined with relocated earthquakes parallel to the East Luzon Trough may represent the subducting Philippines Sea Plate slab.
Low-velocity anomalies of up to 8% of both P- and S-wave could be found in most areas of Luzon Island under both active and inactive volcanoes (Figures 9, 10). These low-velocity anomalies exhibited a very high Vp/Vs. ratio (>1.8), suggesting that these low-velocity regions might indicate the area of magmatic storage. The shallow magmatic storage from seismic tomography images characterized by low velocity, especially low S-wave anomalies, and high Vp/Vs. ratio are quite common in subduction zones settings (
FIGURE 11

P- and S-wave velocity perturbations and Vp/Vs. for selected profiles along 18oN, 17oN, 16oN, 15oN, and 14oN (A–E). The locations of these profiles are in Figure 1. The black arrows indicate the migration path of magmas or melts from the mantle wedge. Red triangles denote the active volcanoes and white triangles denote inactive volcanoes. Dots indicate the locations of the relocated earthquakes. Abbreviations: PF: Philippines Fault; BF: Bangui Fault; PV; Pinatubo volcano; TV: Taal volcano; other abbreviations are the same as Figure 1. See the text for more details.
6 Discussion
6.1 Comparison with previous studies
Our tomographic results and relocation of earthquakes have provided new images of the velocity structures beneath Luzon Island. Compared with seismic tomographic studies that focused on the regional and global scales of Southeast Asia and the Taiwan region (
6.2 Accreted terranes in the tomographic images
Different accreted terranes have been proposed as constituting Luzon Island, including ophiolites, continental fragments, and island arc elements (
From our results, we could observe the distinctive velocity anomalies corresponding to the surface geological structures. These showed similarities to the Taiwan region, which previous studies have referred to as the Mindoro-Luzon-Taiwan region (
6.3 The depth of the Philippine Fault
The contrast in velocity anomalies of the accreted terranes can also be used to trace the fault systems in the area, in which the faults act as boundaries between the surface geological structures, namely, the Philippine Fault separates the Cordillera Central from Ilocos Trough in the north region (from 16oN—18oN) and from Central Valley Basin in the central region (15oN—16oN) (Figures 11A,B), and the Bangui fault separates the Cordillera Central and Cagayan Valley Basins (Figures 9, 10; Figure 11A). In this section, we examine the velocity contrast at the deeper depth to have a first order of estimation for the depth of the Philippine Fault.
In horizontal slices (Figures 9, 10), at the depth of 20 km–40 km, the Philippine Fault was well defined by the contrast velocity anomalies between the structures on two sides of the fault. In addition, the relocated earthquakes aligned clearly along the fault from the depth of 10–40 km, especially at the northern tip of the fault (15.5oN—18.5oN, Figures 9, 10). At the deeper depth, there were a few events aligned along the faults: scattered events at 16oN-18.5oN at 50 km, two events at 16oN, and six events at 18oN at a depth of 60 km (Figures 9, 10). In the vertical sections (Figure 11), it was clearer to see the Philippine Fault from velocity contrast in both P- and S-wave tomography and Vp/Vs. images in different segments of the fault. In all cross sections, we could observe the significant velocity contrast across the Philippine Fault from the surface to at least 60 km, while in cross sections CC’ and DD’ (Figures 11C,D), the velocity contrast might extend to the depth of 80 km. With the assessment that our tomographic models can be reliable up to 50 km in the horizontal section and up to a maximum of 70 km in the vertical section, we suggest that the observed velocity contrast across the Philippine Fault is reliable to a depth of at least 50 km. This observation of velocity contrast on two sides of the Philippine Fault is consistent with the tomographic images from joint inversion of P-wave local and teleseismic tomography (
Figure 12 shows the focal mechanisms of shallow earthquakes (Figure 12A) and their corresponding P- and T-axes with depths of less than 60 km (Figure 12B) overlapping the P-wave velocity anomalies at 40 km. These focal mechanisms corresponding to shallow earthquakes with hypocenter depths of less than 60 km were combined from NEIC (Sipkin, 1994) and CMT solutions (
FIGURE 12

(A) Focal mechanism of the shallow earthquake overlying the 50 km depth P-wave anomalies in the study region. The focal mechanisms from earthquakes with hypocenter depths of less than 60 km, combined from NEIC and CMT solutions from 1981 to 2013; numbers indicate the depth in kilometers of selected earthquakes. The oblique stripe denotes the region of suspected slab tearing where earthquakes with normal faulting occur. (B) P- and T-axes of the same earthquakes in (A).
6.4 Slab tearing locations
The slab tearing along the fossil ridge of the South China Sea in the Manila Trench has been proposed using evidence of geochemistry, seismicity, and seismic tomography (
The focal mechanism of the shallow earthquakes also supports our calculation of the place of slab tearing (Figure 12). In general, we observed the normal faulting at the outer trench, which shows an extension regime. On the other hand, thrust faulting is the dominant focal mechanism of the subducting slab. However, abnormal earthquakes, which have east-west strike normal focal mechanisms, are found in the extent of the larger proposed slab tearing region (Figure 12) with depths ranging from 15 km to 35 km. These events have a north-south T-axis and a nearly vertical P-axis, corresponding to a north-south extensional regime at the crustal level. This regime fits with our observation of seismic tearing and mantle upwelling in this region, suggesting that the slab tearing may cause the crust to extend in the northeast-southwest direction, thus producing these normal earthquakes in the lower crust. This pattern may imply a change in crust deformation and stress accumulation induced by ridge subduction and slab tearing.
From these observations of seismic tomography and focal mechanisms, we suggest that the fossil ridge of the South China Sea has been subducting beneath Luzon Island and creating slab-tearing regions at a depth of 40 km.
6.5 Subsurface magmatic feeding systems
To constrain the relationship between the volcanic system and the subduction of the South China Sea slab, S-wave velocity and Vp/Vs. ratio were used to trace the subsurface magmatic chamber and feeding veins because the S-velocity and Vp/Vs. ratio are relatively sensitive to the content of fluids and melts (
FIGURE 13

Tomographic images of the P-wave velocity model from this study (in the black frame) compared with the global teleseismic model UU-P07 for three profiles at 17°N (BB′-(A)), 16°N (CC′-(B)), and 15°N (DD′-(C)). Black dots indicate the earthquakes, small dots indicate the relocation observed in this study, and big dots indicate data from the EHB catalog. Thick black lines indicate the subduction slab from the Slab 2 model.
In our seismic tomography images, the slab tearing was identified in two regions, as seen in Figure 12. In the vertical section of these regions, the magmatism from slab tearing could be observed at cross sections AA’, BB’, and CC’ where low-velocity bodies ascended through the slab (Figures 11A–C). This observation fits the deeper structure from the model UU-P07 where low-velocity regions were present underneath the subducting slab (Figures 1B, 11A,B). These low-velocity regions can be interpreted as the ascendant of the asthenosphere to the continental crust (
On the other hand, for the southern region, a deep source of magmatism was identified as the mechanism that feeds magma to the volcanoes. In vertical sections (DD’ and EE’ cross sections in Figure 11), the low-velocity anomalies fit well with the occurrences of active volcanoes (the Taal and Pinatubo). The magma resulting from the partial melting of the mantle wedge comes from a depth of at least 100 km (Figure 13C) and rises to accumulate in the magma chamber at a depth of 30–50 km before ascending to feed the surface volcanoes. A thermal model suggests the depth of partial melting by dehydration of subducted slab in the island arc system is likely to be deeper than 100 km (
The lack of low-velocity regions at a depth deeper than 100 km at the site of slab tearing regions (Figures 13A,B) might indicate an absence of magmatism from partial melting of the mantle wedge. Another observation is that the volcanoes in the regions related to the slab tearing (around 16oN to 18oN) are mostly inactive, in contrast to the very active volcanoes to both the north and south of these regions. In the subduction regions associated with high bathymetric relief, the phenomenon of reduced volcanism is quite common, which might be explained by the absence of a sufficiently deep slab to generate arc volcanism (
7 Conclusion
In this study, we performed a P- and S-wave travel time seismic tomographic inversion on Luzon Island. The tomographic images resulting from the inversion were used to determine and interpret the major structures at the upper mantle level and crustal level.
Figure 14 summarizes the result of our study and proposes the tectonic model of the Luzon region. We identified the seismic velocity contrast corresponding to the different geological structures, which are separated by the Philippine Fault. The relocated earthquakes from this study combined with the reference focal mechanisms were used to trace the fault in the crust. Medium to large strike-slip earthquakes occurring in the crust may suggest a brittle mechanism. At the upper mantle level, we continued to observe the seismic velocity differences across the fault up to the depth of 60 km, where ductile deformation takes place. From these observations, we conclude that the Philippine Fault is a lithospheric structure that cuts through the crust and offsets the upper mantle.
FIGURE 14

Tectonic model of Luzon Island showing the magma formation source from both the mantle wedge melting and asthenosphere upwelling from slab tear sites. The slab tearing occurs in the region where the fossil ridge is subducted. In the central region, the Philippine Fault cuts through the whole crust and offsets the upper mantle.
The tomographic results confirm the presence of slab-tearing regions extended from the fossil ridges in the northern Luzon region. The observation is supported by the unusual extension regime from the focal mechanism in the suspected area in the crust. This slab tear causes the upwelling of the asthenosphere that ascends through the subducting slab. In addition, it also might create a deep slab absence, and hinder the formation of the magma at the mantle wedge. In regions outside of the slab tearing areas, the mantle wedge partial melting occurs and feeds melt material to the subsurface magma chambers and the active volcanoes.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
C-NN, B-SH, and T-YL initiated the original idea and conceptualized research. P-FC and VN provided comments and discussion. IN, BB, and AM performed the collection of the PHIVOLCS and IES seismic network data used in this study. All co-authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and the manuscript writing led by C-NN, T-YL, and B-SH. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study was funded by the Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST) under grant numbers CT0000.02/22-23 and VAST06.02/23-24, and by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan under grants MOST 108-2116-M-001-011, MOST 108-2116-M-001-010-MY3, and MOST 109-2119-M-001-011.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate the staff of the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, and Academia Sinica for collecting the data used in this study. We thank Ivan Koulakov for helping in running the LOTOS tomographic code. We would like to thank two reviewers for their constructive suggestions and comments.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2023.1213498/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AmaruM. (2007). Global travel time tomography with 3-D reference models. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
2
ArmadaL. T.HsuS. K.DimalantaC. B.YumulG. P.JrDooW. B.YehY. C. (2020). Forearc structures and deformation along the Manila Trench. J. Asian Earth Sci.X (4), 100036. 10.1016/j.jaesx.2020.100036
3
AurelioM. A. (2000). Shear partitioning in the Philippines: constraints from Philippine Fault and global positioning system data. Isl. Arc9, 584–597. 10.1111/j.1440-1738.2000.00304.x
4
AurelioM.BarrierjE.GaulonR.RanginC. (1997). Deformation and stress states along the central segmentof the Philippine Fault: implications to wrench fault tectonics. J. Asian Earth Sci.15, 107–119. 10.1016/s0743-9547(97)00001-9
5
BarrierE.HuchonP.AurelioM. (1991). Philippine Fault - a key for philippine kinematics. Geology19, 32–35. 10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<0032:pfakfp>2.3.co;2
6
BautistaB. C.BautistaM. L. P.OikeK.WuF. T.PunongbayanR. S. (2001). A new insight on the geometry of subducting slabs in northern Luzon, Philippines. Tectonophysics339, 279–310. 10.1016/s0040-1951(01)00120-2
7
BertinD.LindsayJ. M.CroninS. J.de SilvaS. L.ConnorC. B.CaffeP. J.et al (2022). Probabilistic volcanic hazard assessment of the 22.5–28° S segment of the central volcanic zone of the andes. Front. Earth Sci.10, 875439. 10.3389/feart.2022.875439
8
BijwaardH.SpakmanW.EngdahlE. R. (1998). Closing the gap between regional and global travel time tomography. J. Geophys Res-Sol Ea.103, 30055–30078. 10.1029/98jb02467
9
BluthG. J. S.DoironS. D.SchnetzlerC. C.KruegerA. J.WalterL. S. (1992). Global tracking of the So2 clouds from the june, 1991 mount-pinatubo eruptions. Geophys. Res. Lett.19, 151–154. 10.1029/91gl02792
10
CastilloP. R.NewhallC. G. (2004). Geochemical constraints on possible subduction components in lavas of Mayon and Taal Volcanoes, southern Luzon, Philippines. J. Petrology45, 1089–1108. 10.1093/petrology/egh005
11
ChenP. F.SuP. L.OlavereE. A.SolidumR. U.HuangB. S. (2020). Relocation of the April 2017 Batangas, Philippines, earthquake sequence, with tectonic implications. Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci.31, 273–282. 10.3319/tao.2020.01.31.01
12
DefantM. J.JacquesD.MauryR. C.DeboerJ.JoronJ. L. (1989). Geochemistry and tectonic setting of the Luzon arc, Philippines. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.101, 663–672. 10.1130/0016-7606(1989)101<0663:gatsot>2.3.co;2
13
DziewonskiA. M.ChouT. A.WoodhouseJ. H. (1981). Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth86 (B4), 2825–2852. 10.1029/jb086ib04p02825
14
Eberhart-PhillipsD.ReynersM. (2001). A complex, young subduction zone imaged by three-dimensional seismic velocity, Fiordland, New Zealand. Geophys. J. Int.146, 731–746. 10.1046/j.0956-540x.2001.01485.x
15
EkströmG.NettlesM.DziewońskiA. M. (2012). The global CMT project 2004–2010: centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes. Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors200, 1–9. 10.1016/j.pepi.2012.04.002
16
EngdahlE. R.van der HilstR.BulandR. (1998). Global teleseismic earthquake relocation with improved travel times and procedures for depth determination. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.88, 722–743. 10.1785/bssa0880030722
17
FanJ. K.WuS. G.SpenceG. (2015). Tomographic evidence for a slab tear induced by fossil ridge subduction at Manila Trench, South China Sea. Int. Geol. Rev.57, 998–1013. 10.1080/00206814.2014.929054
18
FanJ. K.ZhaoD. P.DongD. D. (2016). Subduction of a buoyant plateau at the Manila Trench: tomographic evidence and geodynamic implications. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems17, 571–586. 10.1002/2015gc006201
19
FanJ. K.ZhaoD. P.DongD. D.ZhangG. X. (2017). P-wave tomography of subduction zones around the central Philippines and its geodynamic implications. J. Asian Earth Sci.146, 76–89. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.05.015
20
FitchT. J. (1972). Plate convergence, transcurrent faults, and internal deformation adjacent to southeast Asia and the western Pacific. J. Geophys. Res.77, 4432–4460. 10.1029/jb077i023p04432
21
GillJ. (1981). Orogenic andesites and plate tectonics. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.
22
GutscherM. A.MalavieilleJ.LallemandS.CollotJ. Y. (1999). Tectonic segmentation of the North andean margin: impact of the carnegie ridge collision. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.168, 255–270. 10.1016/s0012-821x(99)00060-6
23
HamburgerM. W.CardwellR. K.IsacksB. L. (1983). “Seismotectonics of the northern Philippine island arc,” in The tectonic and geologic evolution of Southeast asian seas and islands: Part 2 (Washington, D.C: American Geophysical Union), 1–22.
24
HayesG. P.MooreG. L.PortnerD. E.HearneM.FlammeH.FurtneyM.et al (2018). Slab2, a comprehensive subduction zone geometry model. Science362, 58–61. 10.1126/science.aat4723
25
HollingsP.WolfeR.CookeD. R.WatersP. J. (2011). Geochemistry of tertiary igneous rocks of northern Luzon, Philippines: evidence for a back-arc setting for alkalic porphyry copper-gold deposits and a case for slab roll-back?Econ. Geol.106, 1257–1277. 10.2113/econgeo.106.8.1257
26
HsuY. J.YuS. B.LovelessJ. P.BacolcolT.SolidumR.LuisA.et al (2016). Interseismic deformation and moment deficit along the Manila subduction zone and the Philippine Fault system. J. Geophys Res-Sol Ea.121, 7639–7665. 10.1002/2016jb013082
27
HsuY. J.YuS. B.SongT. R. A.BacolcolT. (2012). Plate coupling along the Manila subduction zone between Taiwan and northern Luzon. J. Asian Earth Sci.51, 98–108. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.01.005
28
HuaY. J.ZhangS. X.LiM. K.WuT. F.ZouC. Y.LiuL. (2019). Magma system beneath Tengchong volcanic zone inferred from local earthquake seismic tomography. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.377, 1–16. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.04.002
29
HungT. D.YangT.LeB. M.YuY.XueM.LiuB.et al (2021). Crustal structure across the extinct mid‐ocean ridge in South China sea from OBS receiver functions: insights into the spreading rate and magma supply prior to the Ridge cessation. Geophys. Res. Lett.48 (3), e2020GL089755. 10.1029/2020gl089755
30
HusenS.QuinteroR.KisslingE.HackerB. (2003). Subduction-zone structure and magmatic processes beneath Costa Rica constrained by local earthquake tomography and petrological modelling. Geophys. J. Int.155, 11–32. 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2003.01984.x
31
JegoS.MauryR. C.PolveM.YumulG. P.BellonH.TamayoR. A.et al (2005). Geochemistry of adakites from the Philippines: constraints on their origins. Resour. Geol.55, 163–188. 10.1111/j.1751-3928.2005.tb00239.x
32
JiangX. D.HinY.McNuttM. K. (2004). Lithospheric deformation beneath the Altyn Tagh and West Kunlun faults from recent gravity surveys. J. Geophys Res-Sol Ea.109. 10.1029/2003jb002444
33
KarigD. E. (1983). Accreted terranes in the northern part of the philippine Archipelago. Tectonics2, 211–236. 10.1029/tc002i002p00211
34
KarigD. E.SarewitzD. R.HaeckG. D. (1986). Role of strike-slip faulting in the evolution of allochthonous terranes in the Philippines. Geology14, 852–855. 10.1130/0091-7613(1986)14<852:rosfit>2.0.co;2
35
KisslingE.EllsworthW. L.EberhartphillipsD.KradolferU. (1994). Initial reference models in local earthquake tomography. J. Geophys Res-Sol Ea.99, 19635–19646. 10.1029/93jb03138
36
KoulakovI. (2009). LOTOS code for local earthquake tomographic inversion: benchmarks for testing tomographic algorithms. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.99, 194–214. 10.1785/0120080013
37
KoulakovI.SmirnovS. Z.GladkovV.KasatkinaE.WestM.El KhrepyS.et al (2018). Causes of volcanic unrest at Mt. Spurr in 2004-2005 inferred from repeated tomography. Sci. Rep.8, 17482. 10.1038/s41598-018-35453-w
38
KoulakovI.SobolevS. V. (2006). A tomographic image of Indian lithosphere break-off beneath the Pamir-Hindukush region. Geophys. J. Int.164, 425–440. 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2005.02841.x
39
KoulakovI. (2013). Studying deep sources of volcanism using multiscale seismic tomography. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.257, 205–226. 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2013.03.012
40
KoulakovI.VargasC. A. (2018). Evolution of the magma conduit beneath the galeras volcano inferred from repeated seismic tomography. Geophys. Res. Lett.45, 7514–7522. 10.1029/2018gl078850
41
KoulakovI. Y.KukarinaE. V.GordeevE. I.ChebrovV. N.VernikovskyV. A. (2016). Magma sources in the mantle wedge beneath the volcanoes of the Klyuchevskoy group and Kizimen based on seismic tomography modeling. Russ. Geol. Geophys.57, 82–94. 10.1016/j.rgg.2016.01.006
42
KoulakovI.YudistiraT.LuehrB.-G.WandonoP, (2009). Svelocity and VP/VS ratio beneath the Toba caldera complex (Northern Sumatra) from local earthquake tomography. Geophys. J. Int.177, 1121–1139. 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2009.04114.x
43
Kuo‐ChenH.WuF. T.RoeckerS. W. (2012). Three‐dimensional P velocity structures of the lithosphere beneath Taiwan from the analysis of TAIGER and related seismic data sets. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth117. 10.1029/2011jb009108
44
LallemandS.FontY.BijwaardH.KaoH. (2001). New insights on 3-D plates interaction near Taiwan from tomography and tectonic implications. Tectonophysics335, 229–253. 10.1016/s0040-1951(01)00071-3
45
LaskeG.MastersG.MaZ.PasyanosM. (2013). Update on CRUST1. 0—a 1-degree global model of Earth’s crust. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 2658.
46
LeeT. Y.LawverL. A. (1994). Cenozoic Plate reconstruction of the South China sea region. Tectonophysics235, 149–180. 10.1016/0040-1951(94)90022-1
47
LevinV.ShapiroN.ParkJ.RitzwollerM. (2002). Seismic evidence for catastrophic slab loss beneath Kamchatka. Nature418, 763–767. 10.1038/nature00973
48
LiC.van der HilstR. D. (2010). Structure of the upper mantle and transition zone beneath Southeast Asia from traveltime tomography. J. Geophys Res-Sol Ea.115, B07308. 10.1029/2009jb006882
49
NakajimaJ.MatsuzawaT.HasegawaA.ZhaoD. (2001). Three‐dimensional structure of V<i>p</i>, V<i>s</i>, and V<i>p</i>/V<i>s</i> beneath northeastern Japan: implications for arc magmatism and fluids. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth106, 21843–21857. 10.1029/2000jb000008
50
NurA.BenavrahamZ. (1983). Volcanic gaps due to oblique consumption of aseismic ridges. Tectonophysics99, 355–362. 10.1016/0040-1951(83)90112-9
51
ParcutelaN. E.DimalantaC. B.ArmadaL. T.YumulG. P. (2020). PHILCRUST3.0: new constraints in crustal growth rate computations for the Philippine arc. J. Asian Earth Sci. X4, 100032. 10.1016/j.jaesx.2020.100032
52
PaigeC. C.SaundersM. A. (1982). Lsqr - an algorithm for sparse linear-equations and sparse least-squares. Acm Trans. Math. Softw.8, 43–71. 10.1145/355984.355989
53
PapaleoE.CornwellD. G.RawlinsonN. (2017). Seismic tomography of the North Anatolian Fault: new insights into structural heterogeneity along a continental strike-slip fault. Geophys. Res. Lett.44, 2186–2193. 10.1002/2017gl072726
54
PolatG.OzelN. M.KoulakovI. (2016). Investigating P- and S-wave velocity structure beneath the Marmara region (Turkey) and the surrounding area from local earthquake tomography. Earth Planets Space68, 132. 10.1186/s40623-016-0503-4
55
RaoofJ.MukhopadhyayS.KoulakovI.KayalJ. R. (2017). 3-D seismic tomography of the lithosphere and its geodynamic implications beneath the northeast India region. Tectonics36, 962–980. 10.1002/2016tc004375
56
RawlinsonN.FichtnerA.SambridgeM.YoungM. K. (2014). Seismic tomography and the assessment of uncertainty. Adv. Geophys.55, 1–76. 10.1016/bs.agph.2014.08.001
57
RawlinsonN.SpakmanW. (2016). On the use of sensitivity tests in seismic tomography. Geophys. J. Int.205, 1221–1243. 10.1093/gji/ggw084
58
RosenbaumG.GasparonM.LucenteF. P.PeccerilloA.MillerM. S. (2008). Kinematics of slab tear faults during subduction segmentation and implications for Italian magmatism. Tectonics27, n/a. 10.1029/2007tc002143
59
RosenbaumG.MoW. (2011). Tectonic and magmatic responses to the subduction of high bathymetric relief. Gondwana Res.19, 571–582. 10.1016/j.gr.2010.10.007
60
RuffL.KanamoriH. (1980). Seismicity and the subduction process. Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors23, 240–252. 10.1016/0031-9201(80)90117-x
61
ŞengörA. M. C.ZabcıC.Natal'inB. A. (2019). Continental transform faults: congruence and incongruence with normal plate kinematics. Transform Plate Boundaries Fract. Zones2019, 169–247. 10.1016/B978-0-12-812064-4.00009-8
62
SmithW. H.SandwellD. T. (1997). Global sea floor topography from satellite altimetry and ship depth soundings. Science277, 1956–1962. 10.1126/science.277.5334.1956
63
StephanJ. F.BlanchetR.RanginC.PelletierB.LetouzeyJ.MullerC. (1986). Geodynamic evolution of the taiwan Luzon Mindoro belt since the late eocene. Tectonophysics125, 245–268. 10.1016/0040-1951(86)90017-x
64
SternR. J. (2002). Subduction zones. Rev. Geophys.40, 3-1–3-38. 10.1029/2001RG000108
65
TatsumiY. (1989). Migration of fluid phases and genesis of basalt magmas in subduction zones. J. Geophys. Research-Solid Earth Planets94, 4697–4707. 10.1029/jb094ib04p04697
66
TatsumiY.SakuyamaM.FukuyamaH.KushiroI. (1983). Generation of arc basalt magmas and thermal structure of the mantle wedge in subduction zones. J. Geophys. Res.88, 5815–5825. 10.1029/jb088ib07p05815
67
ThorkelsonD. J. (1996). Subduction of diverging plates and the principles of slab window formation. Tectonophysics255, 47–63. 10.1016/0040-1951(95)00106-9
68
UmJ.ThurberC. (1987). A fast algorithm for two-point seismic ray tracing. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.77, 972–986. 10.1785/bssa0770030972
69
Van Der SluisA.Van der VorstH. (1987). Numerical solution of large, sparse linear algebraic systems arising from tomographic problems, Seismic tomography. Dordrecht: Springer, 49–83.
70
VenzkeE.WundermanR.McClellandL.SimkinT.LuhrJ.SiebertL.et al (2002). Global volcanism, 1968 to the present. Smithsonian Institution. Global Volcanism Program Digital Information Series, GVP-4, Available at: http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/.
71
VogtP. (1973). Subduction and aseismic ridges. Nature241, 189–191. 10.1038/241189a0
72
WadatiK.OkiS. (1933). On the travel time of earthquake waves.(Part II). J. Meteorological Soc. Jpn. Ser. II11, 14–28. 10.2151/jmsj1923.11.1_14
73
WrightC.KuoB. Y. (2007). Evidence for an elevated 410 km discontinuity below the Luzon, Philippines region and transition zone properties using seismic stations in Taiwan and earthquake sources to the south. Earth Planets Space59, 523–539. 10.1186/bf03352715
74
WyssM.HasegawaA.NakajimaJ. (2001). Source and path of magma for volcanoes in the subduction zone of northeastern Japan. Geophys. Res. Lett.28, 1819–1822. 10.1029/2000gl012558
75
YangT. F.LeeT.ChenC. H.ChengS. N.KnittelU.PunongbayanR. S.et al (1996). A double island arc between Taiwan and Luzon: consequence of ridge subduction. Tectonophysics258, 85–101. 10.1016/0040-1951(95)00180-8
76
YouS. H.GungY.LinC. H.KonstantinouK. I.ChangT. M.ChangE. T. Y.et al (2013). A preliminary seismic study of Taal volcano, Luzon island Philippines. J. Asian Earth Sci.65, 100–106. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2012.10.027
77
YuS. B.HsuY. J.BacolcolT.YangC. C.TsaiY. C.SolidumR. (2013). Present-day crustal deformation along the philippine Fault in Luzon, Philippines. J. Asian Earth Sci.65, 64–74. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.12.007
78
YumulG. P.DimalantaC.BellonH.FaustinoD. V.De JesusJ. V.TamayoR. A.et al (2000). Adakitic lavas in the central Luzon back‐arc region, Philippines: lower crust partial melting products?Isl. Arc9, 499–512. 10.1111/j.1440-1738.2000.00297.x
79
YumulG. P.DimalantaC. B.Gabo-RatioJ. A. S.QueañoK. L.ArmadaL. T.PadronesJ. T.et al (2020). Mesozoic rock suites along western Philippines: exposed proto-South China Sea fragments?J. Asian Earth Sci. X4, 100031. 10.1016/j.jaesx.2020.100031
80
ZandtG. (1981). Seismic images of the deep-structure of the san-andreas fault system, central coast ranges, California. J. Geophys. Res.86, 5039–5052. 10.1029/jb086ib06p05039
81
ZhaoD. P.AsamoriK.IwamoriH. (2000). Seismic structure and magmatism of the young Kyushu subduction zone. Geophys. Res. Lett.27, 2057–2060. 10.1029/2000gl011512
82
ZhuL. P. (2000). Crustal structure across the San Andreas Fault, southern California from teleseismic converted waves. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.179, 183–190. 10.1016/s0012-821x(00)00101-1
Summary
Keywords
Luzon, tomography, slab tearing, magmatic system, the Philippine fault
Citation
Nguyen C-N, Huang B-S, Lee T-Y, Chen P-F, Nguyen VD, Narag I, Bautista BC and Melosantos A (2023) Slab tearing and lithospheric structures in Luzon island, Philippines: constraints from P- and S-wave local earthquake tomography. Front. Earth Sci. 11:1213498. doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1213498
Received
28 April 2023
Accepted
19 September 2023
Published
10 October 2023
Volume
11 - 2023
Edited by
Claudia Piromallo, National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology (INGV), Italy
Reviewed by
Stefano Solarino, Università di Genova, Italy
Luis E. Lara, Austral University of Chile, Chile
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2023 Nguyen, Huang, Lee, Chen, Nguyen, Narag, Bautista and Melosantos.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Bor-Shouh Huang, hwbs@earth.sinica.edu.tw
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.