Abstract
The north-south striking landform perpendicular to the dominant collision zone between the Indian and Eurasian plates was constructed in east-southern Tibet (EST) during the Late Miocene. The building processes remain ambiguous, partly owing to the lack of recognition of crustal-scale architecture. Here we deployed an east-west-oriented 120 km-long short-period dense array across the northwestern corner of EST. Results from P-wave receiver functions show a mid-crustal ductile detachment atop the crystalline basement of the eastern Lhasa terrane that has displaced the overlying crust including the upper part of the Yardong-Gulu Rift (YGR) eastward for about 100 km and an offset Moho geometry left behind beneath the Nyainqentanghla Range. Combined previous studies on the vertical heterogeneity in crustal strength beneath the YGR, a synthetic view implies a decoupled crustal architecture of EST to respond the dynamic interactions between the eastward extrusion of the Tibetan Plateau and the northward penetration of the Indian plate that constitutes the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis. The integrated processes eventually brought active landform construction in the plateau’s interior and partly contributing to the contemporaneous intensification of monsoon in SE Asia.
1 Introduction
Globally, an orogenic process generally leads to linear mountain construction that is parallel to the dominant collision zone. However, in the Tibetan Plateau, besides its prominently high topography and low relief, a very unique morphology is presented in the east-southern Tibetan Plateau, where the high Nyainqentanghla Range (NR) (peak at 7,016 m) and the Yardong-Gulu rift zone (YGR) strike in a northeasterly direction that is nearly perpendicular to the dominant collision zone between the Indian and Eurasian plates (Figure 1A). More interestingly, the onset of the mountain construction along the Nyainqentanghla Range and rifting along the YGR has been geochronologically constrained to take place during the Late Miocene (Pan and Kidd, 1992; ; ; ), a time that post-dated the time when southern Tibet has been unchanged in altitude since the Mid-Miocene (Spicer et al., 2003). Moreover, uplift of the Tibetan Plateau, driven by the collision of India, is widely regarded to rise as a coherent entity (Tapponnier et al., 2001). Thus, what drove the northeast-oriented topographic construction has been ambiguous, as to how the deep process of Indian penetration is coupled to the deformation in the shallower crust in east-southern Tibet remains unclear.
FIGURE 1
While plate tectonic theory provides a general explanation of geophysical and surface structural features, the details of how deep geodynamics and other kinematic parameters of continent-continent collision cause specific features at local scales are uncertain. Many studies have interpreted surface structures within the Tibetan plateau as accommodating lateral extrusion or anisotropic features as highlighting mantle geodynamics (
In this study, we describe a 120 km-long short-period dense array profile collected across the northwestern corner of east-southern Tibet. The combined image is interpreted along with previous geologic and geophysical data to evaluate regional kinematic processes associated with the ongoing eastward extrusion of the Tibetan Plateau and indentation of the Indian Plate around the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis. This Late Miocene chaotic but active tectonic events in EST will thus shed new lights on understanding tectonic interactions between India and Eurasia after amalgamation.
2 Geological background
The currently ongoing India-Eurasia collision uplifted the Himalayan-Tibetan orogenic belt and further constructed the whole Tibetan Plateau to its current elevation (
In the eastern Lhasa terrane (east-southern Tibet, EST), it shows a typically different topography relative to other parts of the Lhasa terrane (Figure 1B). First of all, there is the largest rift zone, i.e., the NE-striking Yardong-Gulu rift system (YGR). Along its footwall, it exhumed the highest NE-striking Nyainqentanghla Range (NR) at 10–8 Ma in the plateau’s interior (Pan and Kidd, 1992;
Besides the NR and YGR, there is the NE-striking Namche-Barwa Mountain Range (NBR) locating along the easternmost segment of the YZS to the south (Figure 1A). It is part of the subducted Indian crust and has contributed dominantly to construction of the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis (EHS) (Xu et al., 2012). The NBR has experienced crustal-scale exhumation through the deep crust at 22–18 Ma to the shallower crust at 6–2 Ma (Xu et al., 2012). Rapid exhumation of the NBR was constrained to commence since ∼8 Ma of Late Miocene in age (
3 Data and methods
The P wave receiver function method is widely used to study the structure of the crust and upper mantle by inversion of broadband seismic station data (Langston, 1979; Kumar et al., 2006). The dense nodal array was employed in this study. The teleseismic waveforms used in this study were collected in the north section of the YGR from October to November 2019 (Figure 2A). The observation system was a nearly NW nodal array composed of 92 three-component nodes (Magseis Fairfield ZLand 3C) with 5 Hz corner frequency spaced at 1 km. Nodal seismometers record signals at higher frequencies than that of the broadband seismometers, which resulted in a higher theoretical vertical resolution (Wu et al., 2017). Moreover, the shorter station spacing improves the lateral resolution, compensating for fewer recorded teleseismic events (Tian et al., 2015). Numerous experiments have demonstrated that the receiver functions calculated from seismic data with dense nodal arrays can image more details than those by the broadband station (Leahy et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2017; Saikia et al., 2017; Ward and Lin, 2017;
FIGURE 2

(A) the green triangles is the station deployment point; the black diamonds is the 70 km piercing point of RFs; the red triangles are the station locations in (C, D), respectively; (B) the teleseismic distribution map used to calculate the receiver function; (C, D) The upper panel shows the superimposed RFs of different events at some stations of along the line, and the lower panel shows the arrangement of RFs of different events; the black dashed line marks the Pms transition phase that represents the occurrence of Moho.
A total of 98 teleseismic events with Ms≥5.1 was recorded during the observation period of ∼40 days. Poor quality dataset was removed by signal-to-noise ratio calculation and manual selection, and 32 available seismic events were retained (Figure 2B) (
In order to highlight the regional crustal structure (Ward et al., 2018) and compare with the results from previous study (Zhang et al., 2013), the receiver functions were smoothed for a stacking radius window of 1 and 3 km (Figures 3B,C). The stacking of the RFs has a good consistence of the main structures with those obtained by broadband data, but also has more details. The common conversion point (CCP) stacking (Zhu, 2000a;
FIGURE 3

(A) Topographic elevation map between survey line, NR: Nyainqentanglha Range. YGR: Yardong-Gulu rift. NCL: Namco Lake; (B) and (C) are the results of RFs superimposed with a Gaussian filter parameter value of 2.5 for a superimposed distance window of 0 km and 3 km radius for all events; (D) is the depth images of all event RFs were superimposed using CCP. To compare the results of different methods, blue, purple and red triangles are used to represent the crustal features (upper crust, middle crust and Moho).
4 Results
The migrated receiver function image is shown in Figure 4A. Combined with previous studies on Moho depth from broadband receiver function (Zhang et al., 2013; Tian et al., 2015), the interface with high amplitude at 70–78 km in our study represents the Moho geometry. It is at depths of 78 km beneath the NR and then lifts to approx. 70 km to the east of the YGR (Figure 4B). More importantly, the Moho geometry is offset right beneath the NR (Figure 4B), a scenario that is consistent with Ps analysis for an identification of a weakening to disappearing Moho amplitude (Zhang et al., 2013). A sequence of weak interfaces with low amplitude are presented as well beneath the NR, which can be traced from the mantle depths, through the offset Moho, to the upper crust. They show strong amplitude against the overlying shallower crust. Additionally, a prominent intracrustal interface appears at depths of 50 km throughout the entire profile, which shows as being a low velocity layer in previous tomographic studies (Tian et al., 2015). This intracrustal interface appears with a typically weak amplitude of concave downward in the middle of the profile. Along with surface observations of the YGR, the RF imagery connecting the YGR with a sequence of interface terminations can be traced downward to merge with the identified intracrustal shear zone at approx. 50 km. On the other side, a sequence of strong interface terminations right beneath the NR is seen from depths of 50 km, through the offset Moho, downward to the mantle depth. At further deeper depths of approx. 120 km, combined with previous studies by Shi et al. (2015), the discrete strong negative interfaces on both sides of the YGR possibly represents the torn lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (Figure 4B), but the western segment beneath the NR is much deeper than that of the eastern segment.
FIGURE 4

(A) is the migration image of the receiver function of the survey line; (B) marked with the main seismic phase on the image.
Previous tomographic studies by Liang et al. (2016) has documented the significant lithospheric-scale thermal influence from the asthenospheric upwelling beneath this NR (Figure 5A). We superimpose the tomographic results onto our RF results (Figure 5B) and a synthetic view drives to interpret that the domain outlined by weak interfaces may have been affected by the tectonothermal activities from the upwelling asthenosphere through the torn LAB dominantly beneath the NR (Figure 5C). Meanwhile, the original ductile normal fault of the YGR is seen to have cut through into the mantle depth, which was later displaced into two parts by the intracrustal detachment atop the crystalline basement (Figure 5D). The overlying segment has moved eastward for about 100 km from the original segment (Figure 5D). Meanwhile, the concave downward interface beneath the NR is highly derived from stress accumulation to accommodate the uplift of the NR.
FIGURE 5

(A) Tomographic studies by Liang et al. (2016), the thick black solid line is the calculated Moho depth, the color chart below shows the S-wave velocity; (B) Consistence between previous tomographic results with our RF results for outlining crustal-scale features; (C) Crustal partial melting after upwelling asthenosphere; (D) Delineation of an intra-crustal shear zone for a decoupled crustal architecture beneath east-southern Tibet. NR, Nyainqentanglha Range. YGR, Yardong-Gulu rift. NCL, Namco Lake. LVL, Low velocity layer.
5 Discussion on kinematic mechanism driving active landform construction
Previous tomographic studies have outlined a weakly decoupled lithospheric extension of southern Tibet (Tian et al., 2015). In our study, the overall RF imagery further displays a 100 km-eastward displacement of the upper part of the YGR original normal fault and the dominant influence to the mid-to-lower crust beneath the NR and adjacent regions on both sides (Figures 5D, 6A). This displacement between the surface exposure and the Moho offset is however not evidenced beneath the southern part of the YGR in the MT profile (Wang et al., 2017) (Figures 1B, 6B). The overall architecture implies a geodynamic adjustment from extension through compressive stress to extension for landform construction during extrusion. The next step is to formulate the mechanism behind.
FIGURE 6

Comparison on the displacement between the surface exposure of the Yardong-Gulu rift and the Moho offset. (A) Results from a combined tomographic survey line (Tian et al., 2015) and this study across the northern segment of the Yardong-Gulu rift, (B) results from the MT survey line across the southern segment of the Yardong-Gulu rift (Wang et al., 2017).
5.1 Regional geodynamics
Previous seismic studies have clearly outlined the variation in underthrusting geometry of the Indian plate (Li et al., 2008; Zhao et al., 2010; Replumaz et al., 2013;
With the onset of the plateau-wide collapse since the Middle Miocene (
5.2 Landform construction of the east-southern Tibetan Plateau
Figure 7 presents a sketch showing kinematic processes in landform construction of northern EST from an integrated analysis of both the crustal architecture from our newly obtained seismic profile and previous studies in geophysics and petrology.
FIGURE 7

Kinematic interactions between eastward extrusion in east-southern Tibet and active construction of the Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis for mechanism driving diversity in surface topography in east-southern Tibet since Late Miocene (see context for more details). EST, East-southern Tibet; EHS, Eastern Himalayan Syntaxis; ISZ, Intracrustal shear zone; YGR, Yardong-Gulu Rift; TWC, Thermally weakened crust; NCL, Namco Lake.
Previous tomographic studies have identified the weakly coupled extension of southern Tibet (Tian et al., 2015) when southern Tibet possessed an unchanged altitude at 15 Ma (Spicer et al., 2003) (Figure 7A). The plateau-wide eastward extrusion took place at 13.5 Ma (
6 Conclusion
Southern Tibet has remained in a constant elevation since 15 Myr ago (Spicer et al., 2003), while rapid uplift of the Nyainqentanglha Mountain Range (NR) in east-southern Tibet (EST) occurred around 10–8 Ma (
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6480794.
Author contributions
BX: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing–original draft. XX: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing–review and editing. JY: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing–review and editing. XG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Writing–review and editing. YW: Data curation, Methodology, Writing–review and editing. CL: Data curation, Methodology, Writing–review and editing. JW: Data curation, Methodology, Writing–review and editing. XT: Data curation, Methodology, Writing–review and editing. XL: Data curation, Methodology, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No 42325402, 41874102, 42274120, 41974097) and the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) (2019QZKK0701).
Acknowledgments
We want to thank all reviewers and authors for their contributions to this Research Topic. We also thank the entire Frontiers in Earth Science team for their dedicated effort in guiding the revision and detailed editing of the papers on the Research Topic.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AmmonC. J. (1991). The isolation of receiver effects from teleseismic P waveforms. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.81 (6), 2504–2510. 10.1785/bssa0810062504
2
AnZ.KutzbachJ. E.PrellW. L.PorterS. C. (2001). Evolution of Asian monsoons and phased uplift of the Himalaya–Tibetan plateau since Late Miocene times. Nature411 (6833), 62–66. 10.1038/35075035
3
ArmijoR.TapponnierP.HanT. (1989). Late Cenozoic right‐lateral strike‐slip faulting in southern Tibet. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth94 (B3), 2787–2838. 10.1029/jb094ib03p02787
4
BeaumontC.JamiesonR. A.NguyenM. H.LeeB. (2001). Himalayan tectonics explained by extrusion of a low-viscosity crustal channel coupled to focused surface denudation. Nature414 (6865), 738–742. 10.1038/414738a
5
BlisniukP. M.HackerB. R.GlodnyJ.RatschbacherL.BiS.WuZ.et al (2001). Normal faulting in central Tibet since at least 13.5 Myr ago. Nature412 (6847), 628–632. 10.1038/35088045
6
ChenL.WenL.ZhengT. (2005). A wave equation migration method for receiver function imaging: 2. Application to the Japan subduction zone. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth110 (B11). 10.1029/2005jb003666
7
ChenY.LiW.YuanX.BadalJ.TengJ. (2015). Tearing of the Indian lithospheric slab beneath southern Tibet revealed by SKS-wave splitting measurements. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.413, 13–24. 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.12.041
8
ChevalierM. L.TapponnierP.van der WoerdJ.LeloupP.WangS.PanJ.et al (2020). Late quaternary extension rates across the northern half of the yadong‐Gulu Rift: implication for east‐west extension in southern Tibet. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth125 (7), e2019JB019106.
9
ClarkM. K.RoydenL. H. (2000). Topographic ooze: building the eastern margin of Tibet by lower crustal flow. Geology28 (8), 703–706. 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)028<0703:tobtem>2.3.co;2
10
DingL.ZhongD.YinA.KappP.HarrisonT. M. (2001). Cenozoic structural and metamorphic evolution of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis (Namche Barwa). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.192 (3), 423–438. 10.1016/s0012-821x(01)00463-0
11
EnglandP.HousemanG. (1989). Extension during continental convergence, with application to the Tibetan Plateau. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth94 (12), 17561–17579. 10.1029/jb094ib12p17561
12
FarrellJ.WuS. M.WardK. M.LinF. C. (2018). Persistent noise signal in the FairfieldNodal three‐component 5‐hz geophones. Seismol. Res. Lett.89 (5), 1609–1617. 10.1785/0220180073
13
GanW.ZhangP.ShenZ. K.NiuZ.WangM.WanY.et al (2007). Present‐day crustal motion within the Tibetan Plateau inferred from GPS measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth112 (B8), B08416. 10.1029/2005jb004120
14
GuoX.GaoR.ZhaoJ.XuX.LuZ.KlempererS. L.et al (2018). Deep-seated lithospheric geometry in revealing collapse of the Tibetan Plateau. Earth-Science Rev.185, 751–762. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.07.013
15
GuoZ.WilsonM.ZhangM.ChengZ.ZhangL. (2015). Post-collisional ultrapotassic mafic magmatism in south Tibet: products of partial melting of pyroxenite in the mantle wedge induced by roll-back and delamination of the subducted Indian continental lithosphere slab. J. Petrology56 (7), 1365–1406. 10.1093/petrology/egv040
16
HaG.WuZ.LiuF. (2019). Late quaternary vertical slip rates along the southern yadong–gulu rift, southern Tibetan plateau. Tectonophysics755, 75–90. 10.1016/j.tecto.2019.02.014
17
HagerC. (2014). Integrated tectonic and quantitative thermochronometric investigation of the Xainza rift. Tibet Dissertation. University of Kansas.
18
HarrisonT. M.CopelandP.KiddW.LoveraO. M. (1995). Activation of the Nyainqentanghla shear zone: implications for uplift of the southern Tibetan plateau. Tectonics14 (3), 658–676. 10.1029/95TC00608
19
HouZ.ZhaoZ.GaoY.YangZ.JiangW. (2006). Tearing and dischronal subducting of the Indian continental slab: evidence from cenozoic gangdese volcano-magmatic rocks in south Tibet. Acta Petrol. Sin.22 (4), 761–774.
20
HuchonP.PichonX. L.RanginC. (1994). Indochina peninsula and the collision of India and Eurasia. Geology22 (1), 27–30. 10.1130/0091-7613(1994)022<0027:ipatco>2.3.co;2
21
KappJ. L. D. A. (2005). Nyainqentanglha Shan: A window into the tectonic, thermal, and geochemical evolution of the Lhasa block, southern Tibet. J. Geophys. Res.110 (B8), B08413. 10.1029/2004jb003330
22
KumarP.YuanX.KindR.NiJ. (2006). Imaging the colliding Indian and Asian lithospheric plates beneath Tibet. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth111 (B6). 10.1029/2005jb003930
23
LangstonC. A. (1979). Structure under Mount Rainier, Washington, inferred from teleseismic body waves. J. Geophys. Res.84 (B9), 4749. 10.1029/jb084ib09p04749
24
LaskowskiA. K.OrmeD. A.CaiF.DingL. (2019). The ancestral Lhasa river: A late cretaceous trans-arc river that drained the proto–Tibetan plateau. Geology47 (11), 1029–1033. 10.1130/g46823.1
25
LeahyG. M.SaltzerR. L.SchmedesJ. (2012). Imaging the shallow crust with teleseismic receiver functions. Geophys. J. Int.191 (2), 627–636. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05615.x
26
LeaseR. O.BurbankD. W.ClarkM. K.FarleyK. A.ZhengD.ZhangH. (2011). Middle Miocene reorganization of deformation along the northeastern Tibetan Plateau. Geology39 (4), 359–362. 10.1130/g31356.1
27
LiC.Van der HilstR. D.MeltzerA. S.EngdahlE. R. (2008). Subduction of the Indian lithosphere beneath the Tibetan Plateau and Burma. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.274 (1-2), 157–168. 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.016
28
LiangS.GanW.ShenC.XiaoG.LiuJ.ChenW.et al (2013). Three-dimensional velocity field of present-day crustal motion of the Tibetan Plateau derived from GPS measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth118 (10), 5722–5732. 10.1002/2013jb010503
29
LiangX.ChenY.TianX.ChenY. J.NiJ.GallegosA.et al (2016). 3D imaging of subducting and fragmenting Indian continental lithosphere beneath southern and central Tibet using body-wave finite-frequency tomography. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.443, 162–175. 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.03.029
30
LiuG.PersaudP.ClaytonR. W. (2018). Structure of the northern Los Angeles basins revealed in teleseismic receiver functions from short‐term nodal seismic arrays. Seismol. Res. Lett.89 (5), 1680–1689. 10.1785/0220180071
31
LiuZ.-C.WuF.-Y.JiW.-Q.WangJ.-G.LiuC.-Z. (2014). Petrogenesis of the Ramba leucogranite in the Tethyan Himalaya and constraints on the channel flow model. Lithos208-209, 118–136. 10.1016/j.lithos.2014.08.022
32
LiuZ.TianX.GaoR.WangG.WuZ.ZhouB.et al (2017). New images of the crustal structure beneath eastern Tibet from a high-density seismic array. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.480, 33–41. 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.09.048
33
MaheoG.LeloupP.ValliF.LacassinR.ArnaudN.PaquetteJ.et al (2007). Post 4 Ma initiation of normal faulting in southern Tibet. Constraints from the Kung Co half graben. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.256 (1-2), 233–243. 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.01.029
34
PanY.KiddW. (1992). Nyainqentanglha shear zone: A late Miocene extensional detachment in the southern Tibetan plateau. Geology20 (9), 775–778. 10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0775:nszalm>2.3.co;2
35
PubellierM.MorleyC. (2014). The basins of sundaland (SE Asia): evolution and boundary conditions. Mar. Petroleum Geol.58, 555–578. 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.11.019
36
ReplumazA.GuillotS.VillaseñorA.NegredoA. M. (2013). Amount of Asian lithospheric mantle subducted during the India/Asia collision. Gondwana Res.24 (3-4), 936–945. 10.1016/j.gr.2012.07.019
37
RinglerA. T.AnthonyR. E.KarplusM. S.HollandA. A.WilsonD. C. (2018). Laboratory tests of three Z‐land Fairfield nodal 5‐hz, three‐component sensors. Seismol. Res. Lett.89 (5), 1601–1608. 10.1785/0220170236
38
RoydenL. H.BurchfielB. C.KingR. W.WangE.ChenZ.ShenF.et al (1997). Surface deformation and lower crustal flow in eastern Tibet. Science276 (5313), 788–790. 10.1126/science.276.5313.788
39
SaikiaS.ChopraS.BaruahS.SinghU. (2017). Shallow sedimentary structure of the brahmaputra valley constraint from receiver functions analysis. Pure Appl. Geophys.174, 229–247. 10.1007/s00024-016-1371-3
40
SchellartW.ChenZ.StrakV.DuarteJ.RosasF. (2019). Pacific subduction control on Asian continental deformation including Tibetan extension and eastward extrusion tectonics. Nat. Commun.10 (1), 4480. 10.1038/s41467-019-12337-9
41
SchulzeN. (2021). The sedimentary and tectonic evolution of the nam Co basin, Tibetan plateau, since the middle pleistocene [dissertation. Bremen: University of Bremen.
42
ShapiroN. M.RitzwollerM. H.MolnarP.LevinV. (2004). Thinning and flow of Tibetan crust constrained by seismic anisotropy. Science305 (5681), 233–236. 10.1126/science.1098276
43
ShiD.WuZ.KlempererS. L.ZhaoW.XueG.SuH. (2015). Receiver function imaging of crustal suture, steep subduction, and mantle wedge in the eastern India–Tibet continental collision zone. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.414, 6–15. 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.12.055
44
SpicerR. A.HarrisN. B.WiddowsonM.HermanA. B.GuoS.ValdesP. J.et al (2003). Constant elevation of southern Tibet over the past 15 million years. Nature421 (6923), 622–624. 10.1038/nature01356
45
SweetJ. R.AndersonK. R.BilekS.BrudzinskiM.ChenX.DeshonH.et al (2018). A community experiment to record the full seismic wavefield in Oklahoma. Seismol. Res. Lett.89 (5), 1923–1930. 10.1785/0220180079
46
TapponnierP.ZhiqinX.RogerF.MeyerB.ArnaudN.WittlingerG.et al (2001). Oblique stepwise rise and growth of the Tibet Plateau. Science294 (5547), 1671–1677. 10.1126/science.105978
47
TianX.ChenY.TsengT.-L.KlempererS. L.ThyboH.LiuZ.et al (2015). Weakly coupled lithospheric extension in southern Tibet. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.430, 171–177. 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.08.025
48
TianX.BaiZ.KlempererS. L.LiangX.LiuZ.WangX.et al (2021). Crustal-scale wedge tectonics at the narrow boundary between the Tibetan Plateau and Ordos block. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.554, 116700. 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116700
49
TodraniA.SperanzaF.D’AgostinoN.ZhangB. (2022). Post‐50 Ma evolution of India‐Asia collision zone from paleomagnetic and GPS data: greater India indentation to eastward Tibet flow. Geophys. Res. Lett.49 (1), e2021GL096623. 10.1029/2021gl096623
50
WangG.WeiW.YeG.JinS.JingJ.ZhangL.et al (2017). 3-D electrical structure across the yadong-gulu rift revealed by magnetotelluric data: new insights on the extension of the upper crust and the geometry of the underthrusting Indian lithospheric slab in southern Tibet. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.474, 172–179. 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.06.027
51
WardK. M.LinF. C. (2017). On the viability of using autonomous three‐component nodal geophones to calculate TeleseismicPsReceiver functions with an application to old faithful, yellowstone. Seismol. Res. Lett.88 (5), 1268–1278. 10.1785/0220170051
52
WardK. M.LinF.SchmandtB. (2018). High‐resolution receiver function imaging across the cascadia subduction zone using a dense nodal array. Geophys. Res. Lett.45 (22), 218–212. 10.1029/2018gl079903
53
WuS. M.WardK. M.FarrellJ.LinF. C.KarplusM.SmithR. B. (2017). Anatomy of old faithful from subsurface seismic imaging of the yellowstone upper geyser basin. Geophys. Res. Lett.44 (20), 10,240–10,247. 10.1002/2017gl075255
54
XuZ.JiS.CaiZ.ZengL.GengQ.CaoH. (2012). Kinematics and dynamics of the Namche barwa syntaxis, eastern himalaya: constraints from deformation, fabrics and geochronology. Gondwana Res.21 (1), 19–36. 10.1016/j.gr.2011.06.010
55
ZhangL.LiangS.YangX.GanW.DaiC. (2021). Geometric and kinematic evolution of the Jiali fault, eastern Himalayan Syntaxis. J. Asian Earth Sci.212, 104722. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2021.104722
56
ZhangZ.ChenY.YuanX.TianX.KlempererS. L.XuT.et al (2013). Normal faulting from simple shear rifting in South Tibet, using evidence from passive seismic profiling across the Yadong-Gulu Rift. Tectonophysics606, 178–186. 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.03.019
57
ZhaoJ.YuanX.LiuH.KumarP.PeiS.KindR.et al (2010). The boundary between the Indian and Asian tectonic plates below Tibet. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.107 (25), 11229–11233. 10.1073/pnas.1001921107
58
ZhuD.-C.ZhaoZ.-D.NiuY.MoX.-X.ChungS.-L.HouZ.-Q.et al (2011). The Lhasa terrane: record of a microcontinent and its histories of drift and growth. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.301 (1-2), 241–255. 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.11.005
59
ZhuL. (2000a). Crustal structure across the San Andreas Fault, southern California from teleseismic converted waves. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.179 (1), 183–190. 10.1016/S0012-821x(00)00101-1
60
ZuoJ.WuZ.HaG.HuM.ZhouC.GaiH. (2021). Spatial variation of nearly NS-trending normal faulting in the southern yadong-gulu rift, Tibet: new constraints from the chongba yumtso fault, duoqing Co graben. J. Struct. Geol.144, 104256. 10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104256
Summary
Keywords
receiver function, Yardong-Gulu rift, dense seismic array, decoupled crust, east-southern Tibet
Citation
Xiang B, Xu X, Yu J, Guo X, Wu Y, Li C, Wu J, Tong X and Luo X (2023) Late Miocene landform construction in east-southern Tibet: seismic evidence and a synthetic review. Front. Earth Sci. 11:1258022. doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1258022
Received
13 July 2023
Accepted
29 August 2023
Published
08 September 2023
Volume
11 - 2023
Edited by
Zhanwu Lu, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, China
Reviewed by
Yun Chen, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China
Qiang Xu, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China
Zhen Liu, Chengdu University of Technology, China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2023 Xiang, Xu, Yu, Guo, Wu, Li, Wu, Tong and Luo.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xiao Xu, xuxiao8@mail.sysu.edu.cn; Jiahao Yu, Yuyujh23@mail2.sysu.edu.cn
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.