Abstract
Through the examination of calcite twins, this research outlines the tectonic development and paleo stress patterns of the Paleozoic Routshon complex situated in the southeastern segment of the Sanandaj–Sirjan zone, a hinterland region of the Zagros orogeny in southeastern Iran. The study of orogenic phase indicates that the deformation event affecting the southern sector of the Sanandaj-Sirjan zone aligns with the Cimmerian orogenic phase of the Late Triassic period. A variety of structural features at both map and outcrop scales highlight the importance of slip partitioning in the structural evolution of this region, driven by inclined transpression. Observations suggest that the deformation related to contractional components includes steeply to moderately plunging folds, dip-slip domain deformation primarily involving thrusts, and ongoing deformation by strike-slip component motion, which results in thrust-related ductile shear zones. The analysis of calcite c-axis fabrics from mylonite samples obtained from these shear zones indicates a low-temperature monoclinic pattern of non-coaxial deformation. This deformation type underscores the impact of the strike-slip component in the development of progressive simple shear within thrust-related shear zones in this segment of the Sanandaj-Sirjan zone. Dynamic analysis of c-axis fabric data reveals a NE-SW orientation for the principal compressive axes (σ1) in this area. This direction, corroborated by additional data such as fault surface, GPS, and earthquake focal mechanism data, confirms that the orientation of the compressive axes (σ1) has remained consistent from the Late Triassic to the present.
1 Introduction
Mechanical e-twinning of calcite represents the primary mechanism of crystal-plastic deformation in coarse-grained limestones and marbles subjected to temperatures below approximately 400°C (). Twins have been extensively utilized as markers of deformation history, providing valuable insights into the stress regimes that shaped geological formations (), who developed a dynamic technique to deduce stress axes from a population of e-lamellae in deformed calcite rocks (Figure 1). This technique has been subsequently modified and refined to ascertain the principal direction and/or magnitudes of paleo-stress and numerous studies have refined techniques to deduce principal stress directions and magnitudes from calcite twin data (; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Yamaji, 2015; ; ; ; Zheng and Shan, 2020).
FIGURE 1
The scientific issue in the study area revolves around the complex tectonic evolution and paleo stress patterns within the Routshon complex, part of the Sanandaj–Sirjan zone in southeastern Iran. This region, a hinterland of the Zagros orogeny, exhibits a multifaceted geological history influenced by the prolonged convergence between Eurasia and Gondwanaland fragments, as evidenced by ophiolite belts and current GPS vectors (
To address these issues, our research focuses on a detailed analysis of calcite twinning and c-axis fabrics from mylonite samples within thrust-related shear zones in the Routshon complex. Previous studies have identified key structural features and deformation phases in the Zagros region (
In this study, we performed a dynamic analysis of c-axis fabric data to map out the principal compressive axes (σ1) and their orientations. By examining calcite twins and their deformation patterns, we aimed to reconstruct the paleo stress fields and elucidate the tectonic history of the region. Our approach combines field observations, microstructural analysis, and stereographic projections to provide a nuanced understanding of the stress regimes that have influenced the geological evolution of the Routshon complex.
Our findings indicate that the deformation events in the southern Sanandaj–Sirjan zone align with the Cimmerian orogenic phase of the Late Triassic period, characterized by contractional components and strike-slip motions resulting in ductile shear zones. The NE-SW orientation of the principal compressive axes (σ1), corroborated by fault surface GPS and earthquake focal mechanism data, highlights the consistency of the stress regime from the Late Triassic to the present.
This paper aims to utilize the properties of calcite twins to investigate the paleo-stress patterns and structural evolution of the Paleozoic Routshon complex, which is exposed in the Bazar area (Figure 2) within the Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone (SSZ), southeastern Iran. The study seeks to provide insights into the tectonic evolution of the Zagros orogenic belt’s hinterland.
FIGURE 2

(A) Simplified tectonic map of Iran, showing the Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone (SSZ) between the Urumieh-Dokhtar Magmatic Assemblage (UDMA) and the Zagros Fold-Thrust Belt. (B) Satellite image of the Bazar area, highlighting major geological features. (C) Key structures within the region in map view and (D) in cross section view, providing a detailed view of fault lines and thrust systems critical to the area’s tectonic framework.
2 Geological setting
The Zagros orogeny is part of the Alpine–Himalayan belt system, formed due to the prolonged convergence between Eurasia and fragments derived from Gondwanaland, as evidenced by ophiolite belts and current GPS vectors (
The SSZ stretches approximately 1,500 km from the northwest (Sanandaj) to the southeast (Sirjan) with a width of 150–200 km, running parallel to the Zagros Fold Thrust belt. This zone contains the most intensely deformed rocks, exhibiting a NW-SE structural trend. The southern boundary of the SSZ is defined by the Zagros Main Thrust, which separates it from the Zagros region. Additionally, Central Iran is divided from the SSZ by a series of steep and straight faults, including the Tabriz and Nain-Baft Faults (
The Sanandaj–Sirjan zone’s polyphase deformation structures align with transpressional forces due to the angled collision between the African–Arabian continent and the Iranian microcontinent (
In the southern part of the Sanandaj-Sirjan Zone (SSZ), Paleozoic strata are divided into six syntectonic regional metamorphic complexes, each with varying metamorphic grades and ages. These complexes are overlain by non-metamorphosed Early Jurassic basal conglomerates, which contain metamorphic clasts, as well as volcanic-detrital rocks. The continuity of these complexes has been traced from Hajiabad in the southeast to Neyriz in the northwest (
Some researchers have suggested that these metamorphic complexes represent Precambrian basement rocks (
FIGURE 3

Outcrop view of rock units in the study area. Paleozoic units are identified as Dolomites (Pzd), Schists (Pzs), and White Marbles (Pzm). The transitional paleozoic-Triassic unit (PTdm) is characterized by Dolomitic marbles, illustrating the lithological diversity and stratigraphic relationships crucial to understanding the region’s geological history.
The Bazar area in the southeastern SSZ exhibits evidence of three distinct deformation events (D1, D2, and D3). Calcite twinning plays a significant role in understanding the deformation mechanisms and stress regimes associated with each phase.
2.1 D1 deformation
The D1 deformation phase is characterized by folding, manifested in a range from gently inclined to recumbent and spans mesoscopic to macroscopic scales, including axial planar schistosity (Figure 4A). These formations are prominently observed in the calcite and dolomite marbles (PTd) and white marble (Pm) units of the Routshon complex, as evidenced by detailed field observations and microstructural analysis. Specifically, axial planar schistosity is consistently observed to run parallel to the bedding planes in these units. This parallel alignment is indicative of intense compressive deformation, which is further supported by the presence of well-developed axial planar schistosity, confirmed through microscopic examination of thin sections from multiple samples. These samples exhibit clear evidence of recrystallization and deformation textures consistent with low-grade metamorphic conditions, corroborating the interpretation of the observed fabrics. Our analysis of the F1 folds in the Routshon complex reveals that their axial planes dip at angles of 10°–30° toward the NE, while the fold axes plunge gently to the W. These observations are consistent across multiple outcrops and are supported by detailed field measurements and structural mapping. The gentle plunge of the fold axes and the moderate dip of the axial planes suggest that these folds formed through a process of flexural flow, (
FIGURE 4

(A,B) View of an outcrop featuring an isoclinal fold, highlighting the characteristic features of the F1 folds in the calcite and dolomite marbles (PTd) and white marble (Pm) units of the Routshon complex. The F1 folds are marked by their gently inclined to recumbent geometry with axial planes dipping at angles of 10°–30° toward the NE and axes plunging gently to the W. These folds are indicative of flexural flow deformation. The symbols so and s1 correspond to bedding and schistosity, respectively. (C) Under the flexural flow folding mechanism some layers are thickened into axial zones (yellow lines) and thinned into limbs (blue lines) (D) Type III interference pattern in folding identified as a Hook type pattern, resulting from the coaxial refolding of F1 and F2 folds.
2.2 D2 deformation
This deformation event led to the formation of thrust faults (Figure 2). In the hinterlands of orogenic belts, thrusts typically result from differential flow within a ductile mass, which creates F1-folds. Subsequent shearing between the antiform and synform limbs produces these thrusts (
FIGURE 5

(A) Outcrop view of the T1 thrust, illustrating the truncation and duplication of Dolomites (Pzd). (B) Outcrop view of T2 thrust, where Dolomitic Marbles (Ptdm) were truncated and thrusted over schists (Pzs). (C) Dolomites (Pzd) overlying the white Marbles (Pzm) and Schists (Pzs) by T3 thrust. (F) Flexural-slip duplex structures in the Pzm (white Marbles) and Pzs (Schists) units associated with the T3 thrust, characterized by a sigmoidal configuration and suggesting a southwest thrust direction. (D,E) slickenside and striation of T2 thrust with its stereographic projection (equal area), indicating the direction of movement. (G,H) Typical outcrop of klippes, showing Dolomites (Pzd) over Schists (Pzs) by T4 thrust.
Shear zones, formed in the thrust sheets, are composed of calcite mylonites. The foliation patterns exhibit east-west orientations and dip northward. The elongation lineation within the calcite mylonites is delineated by the elongated axes of the calcite grains, which are ellipsoidal in shape. The mylonites present multiple shear sense indicators across various scales, all suggesting a right-lateral shear direction, as illustrated in Figures 6A–D.
FIGURE 6

(A) Outcrop view of mylonitic foliation within the T1 thrust shear zone. (B) C-type shear band featuring horizontal C-planes and S-planes trending from upper right to lower left. (C) δ (delta)- type mantled porphyroclasts. (D) σ(Sigma)-type of asymmetric mantled porphyroclats with backward rotation (Zhang and Fossen, 2020) in dolomite and calcite. Also, fractured porohyroclats with and antithetic microfaults evident in these shear zones.
2.3 D3 deformation
The last deformation phase was characterized by an extensional regime, leading to the formation of normal faults. The bookshelf or domino structures associated with a normal fault can be clearly seen in competence units such as dolomites and marbles (Figure 7). The normal faults show a NNE trend which has a high correlation with dyke orientations. The study area reveals the presence of diacritic dykes within the fault planes, as depicted in Figure 6. The emergence of normal faults is hypothesized to be associated with magmatic activity, a theory that requires more in-depth analysis for verification.
FIGURE 7

(A) Intrusion of dioritic dykes into Dolomites (Pzd unit), showing the interaction between magmatic activity and existing rock formations. (B) Intrusion of a dioritic dyke into Dolomitic Marbles (PTdm unit) demonstrating the penetration of magmatic material into carbonate units. (C,D) Rose diagrams illustrating a high correlation between the trends of normal faults and the orientation of dykes, highlighting the structural relationship between faulting and magmatism.
Calcite twinning plays a crucial role in deciphering the deformation history of the Routshon complex across the D1 to D3 phases. During the D1 deformation phase, calcite twins indicate low-temperature compressive conditions, with consistent NE-SW oriented stress axes corresponding to the flexural flow folds. In the D2 phase, the twinning patterns within the mylonitic shear zones of the thrust faults reveal progressive simple shear deformation, providing kinematic indicators of dextral shear. Finally, in the D3 extensional phase, the reorientation of calcite twins reflects the transition to an extensional stress regime, marking the shift from compressional to extensional tectonics. These twinning patterns serve as microstructural markers, offering valuable insights into the paleostress orientations and the dynamic tectonic evolution of the study area.
3 Sampling strategy and measurement
To delineate the stress and kinematic chronology of the Sanandaj–Sirjan zone, a sampling strategy was employed that involved collecting 15 oriented samples of calcite mylonites from thrust-related shear zones. These samples were aligned normal to the mylonitic foliation and parallel to its strike. Utilizing a U-stage, measurements were conducted to determine the c-axis and orientation of twin lamellae. Approximately 50 grains were examined per sample. The predominant form of calcite twin lamellae observed was type II twins; however, other twin types were also identified in these samples (as shown in Figure 8). The analysis indicated that 70% of the calcite grains exhibited two sets of twins, while the remaining 30% presented a single set of twins.
FIGURE 8

Microphotograph (plane-polarized light, PPL) of type I, II and III twins. Type II twins are the predominant twin type observed in mylonitic calcites from the Bazar area.
4 Discussion
4.1 Structural model of the bazar area
In the southern region of the SSZ, the Paleozoic rock formations underwent deformation and metamorphism as a result of the early Cimmerian orogenic events that occurred in the Late Triassic period. An unconformity between the deformed and metamorphosed Paleozoic complex and the Jurassic units (conglomerate and sandstones) in the Khabr area (east of the study area) and Faryab area (southeast of the study area) reveals the end of the Cimmerian phase (
FIGURE 9

Structural relationships in the Bazar area, illustrating direct correlations with contractional, dip-slip, and strike-slip components as outlined by the strain triangle in the inclined transpression model (
4.1.1 Contractional domain
Deformation related to the contractional component is observed in the calcite and dolomite marbles (PTdm) and white marble (Pzm) units, characterized by folds that range from steeply plunging to moderately inclined (Figures 4A, 9).
4.1.2 Dip-slip domain
In the dip-slip domain, deformation is primarily governed by thrusts dipping north with top-to-the-south movement and thrusts dipping east with top-to-the-west movement. These thrust faults are central to the complexity of the outcrop patterns, typically trending NW–SE or N–S with dips ranging from northeast to east (Figures 2D, 5).
4.1.3 Strike-slip domain
The ongoing deformation under strike-slip component motion is evident in the form of thrust-related ductile shear zones. These zones contain calcite mylonites and display multiple indicators of dextral shear sense (Figures 2D, 5E–H, 9).
4.2 Kinematic interpretation of calcite fabrics
FIGURE 10

Computer simulations of c-axis fabrics in calcite based on experimental data, classifying these fabrics into low-temperature (LT) and high-temperature (HT) types. HT fabrics feature simple shear, evolving from rotated pure shear fabrics with added monoclinic distortion. LT fabrics, displayed in the lower part of the figure, consist of both pure shear and simple shear components, as oriented with respect to the external frame (
Figure 11 presents plots of optic c-axis orientations from samples 1 to 18. These samples exhibit concentrations of c-axes with highly intense point maxima positioned anticlockwise from the normal to the shear plane, indicative of LT simple shear fabrics.
FIGURE 11

Presentation of calcite twinning data, showing orientations of c-axes, compression, and tension axes. Panels (A–C) illustrate c-axis fabrics displaying a low-temperature (LT) simple shear pattern, indicative of dextral shear sense in mylonitic shear zones. The data are plotted on lower hemisphere, equal-area stereographic projections with contour levels at 1%.
4.3 Paleostress orientations from calcite twins
Data were organized into distinct files for c-axes, e-twin lamellae, compression directions, and tension directions, formatted for immediate application in stereographic projection software. In instances where a calcite grain features two or three e-twin lamellae, the corresponding c-axis data for that grain is recorded multiple times in the dataset (
Figure 10 illustrates a monoclinic stress pattern derived from c-axes and twin planes data, where σ3 aligns with the tension axis maximum, and σ1 is close to the compression axis maximum. The compression axes (σ1) exhibit a NE–SW trend with shallow plunges ranging from 7°–19°, while the tension axes (σ3) display a NW–SE trend with moderate plunges of 12°–54°. Both stress axes, σ1 and σ3, are nearly horizontal, whereas the σ2 axis is predominantly vertical. These mean principal stress axes are mapped on a structural diagram, revealing a geometric alignment between compressional stress axes and thrusts, suggesting dextral movement in shear zones (Figures 5E–H).
The compressional stress indicated by calcite twinning in the Routshon complex is likely linked to the subduction of the Neotethys beneath the southern Sanandaj-Sirjan zone in central Iran during the Middle Triassic. Our findings suggest that a dextral inclined transpression regime was dominant in the metamorphic complexes within the hinterland of the Zagros orogen from the Middle Triassic to the Jurassic, associated with the oblique subduction of the Neotethys beneath central Iran. Notably, the Triassic-Early Jurassic σ1 trends observed in the Bazar area (this study) and the Faryab area (
FIGURE 12

(A) Topographic map of Iran using SRTM 30 data, showing the orientation of compressive stress (azimuth of σ1). Different arrow styles represent various methodologies used to determine stress orientations. Key to methodologies: 1: this study; 2: (
4.4 Strengths and limitations of the data
Our study leverages a detailed analysis of calcite twinning and c-axis fabrics to interpret the tectonic evolution and paleostress patterns within the Routshon complex of the Sanandaj-Sirjan zone. The following points highlight the strengths and limitations of our data:
4.4.1 Strengths
• Comprehensive Sampling and Analysis: The study is based on a dataset of 15 oriented samples of calcite mylonites from thrust-related shear zones. Each sample has been meticulously analyzed for c-axis orientations and twin lamellae using a U-stage, ensuring high accuracy and reliability of the data.
• Consistency with Experimental Findings: The observed low-temperature (LT) simple shear patterns in the c-axis fabrics align well with experimental studies, providing confidence in the interpretation of the shear sense and deformation mechanisms.
• Structural and Microstructural Correlations: Our interpretations are supported by detailed structural mapping and microstructural analysis, which reveal consistent geometries and kinematic indicators across multiple samples and outcrops.
4.4.2 Limitations
• Potential Rigid Body Behavior of Porphyroclasts: Under low-temperature conditions, porphyroclasts might behave as rigid bodies, potentially complicating the interpretation of ductile deformation. This aspect necessitates caution in interpreting the shear sense purely from calcite fabrics.
• Absence of EBSD Analysis: While Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) analysis could provide additional insights into the deformation mechanisms and validate our interpretations, it was not performed due to resource constraints. Future studies incorporating EBSD would help confirm our conclusions.
• Localized Data: The data and interpretations are derived from specific locations within the Routshon complex. While these findings provide valuable insights, they may not fully represent the broader regional deformation patterns and tectonic history.
5 Conclusion
The structural evolution observed in the study area is closely tied to slip partitioning, reflecting a comprehensive analysis within the domains of strike-slip, dip-slip, and contraction, as framed by the strain triangle model. The examination of optical c-axis orientations reveals pronounced point maxima, positioned anticlockwise from the normal to the shear plane, which indicates a low-temperature (LT) simple shear fabric. This LT fabric aligns with experimental findings, suggesting that twinning, is the predominant mechanism of deformation within the region. Further analysis identifies a dextral shear sense within mylonitic shear zones, characterized by a monoclinic stress pattern. This pattern is discernible through the orientation of c-axes and twin planes data, where σ3 aligns with the tension axes’ maximum and σ1 is proximal to the compression axes’ maximum. Notably, the compression axes (σ1) exhibit a NE–SW orientation with shallow plunges ranging between 7°–19°, while the tension axes (σ3) present a NW–SE trend with moderate plunges of 12°–54°. The orientations of σ1 and σ3 are predominantly sub-horizontal, while the σ2 axis being sub-vertical. The plotted orientations of the mean principal stress axes on a structural map reveal a geometric relationship between compressional stress axes and thrusts, indicating a dextral movement across shear zones. Conclusively, the findings of this research confirm the prevalence of a dextral inclined transpression regime during the Middle Triassic-Jurassic period within the metamorphic complexes of the Zagros orogen hinterland.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Author contributions
HD: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Software, Writing–original draft. SS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. SK: Data curation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing–review and editing. JO: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing–review and editing. AR: Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing–review and editing. MN: Conceptualization, Validation, Visualization, Writing–review and editing. RD: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbbaspourR.MousaviS. M.RashidiA.KhatibM. M.ShafieibaftiS. (2023). Tectonic paleostress field and its impact on the geodynamic evolution of Central Iran, case study: the Shotori Mountain. J. Mt. Sci.20, 3018–3034. 10.1007/s11629-023-8017-6
2
AgardP.OmraniJ.JolivetL.WhitechurchH.VrielynckB.SpakmanW.et al (2011). Zagros orogeny: a subduction-dominated process. Geol. Mag.148, 692–725. 10.1017/S001675681100046X
3
AghanabatiA. (2004). Geology of Iran. Tehran, Iran: Geological Survey of Iran Press.
4
AlaviM. (1994). Tectonics of the Zagros orogenic belt of Iran: new data and interpretations. Tectonophysics229, 211–238. 10.1016/0040-1951(94)90030-2
5
AlaviM. (2004). Regional stratigraphy of the Zagros fold-thrust belt of Iran and its proforeland evolution. Am. J. Sci.304, 1–20. 10.2475/ajs.304.1.1
6
AmirihanzaH.ShafieibaftiS.DerakhshaniR.KhojastehfarS. (2018). Controls on Cu mineralization in central part of the Kerman porphyry copper belt, SE Iran:constraints from structural and spatial pattern analysis. J. Struct. Geol.116, 159–177. 10.1016/j.jsg.2018.08.010
7
AuthemayouC.BellierO.ChardonD.MalekzadeZ.AbassiM. (2005). Role of the Kazerun fault system in active deformation of the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt (Iran). Comptes Rendus. Géoscience337, 539–545. 10.1016/j.crte.2004.12.007
8
AuthemayouC.ChardonD.BellierO.MalekzadehZ.ShabanianE.AbbassiM. R. (2006). Late Cenozoic partitioning of oblique plate convergence in the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt (Iran). Tectonics25, 1860. 10.1029/2005TC001860
9
BerberianM. (1972). Two important deformational and metamorphic phases in the belt northeast of the Zagros thrust line (Iran). Geological Survey of Iran. internal report (unpublished).
10
BerberianM. (1973). Two important deformational and metamorphic phases in the belt northeast of the Zagros thrust line (Iran); a brief structural review of the Sanandaj-Sirjan belt. Geol. Surv. Iran. Intern. Rep.21 (7), 829–843.
11
BerberianM. (1976). An explanatory note on the first seismotectonic map of Iran, a seismotectonic review of the country. Contribution to the seismotectonic of Iran (Part III). Geol. Surv. Iran.39, 7–141.
12
BerberianM.KingG. C. P. (1981). Towards a paleogeography and tectonic evolution of Iran. Can. J. Earth Sci.18, 210–265. 10.1139/e81-019
13
BerberianM.NogolM. (1974). Preliminary explanation text of the geology of Deh Sard and Khabr maps with some remarks on the metamorphic complexes and the tectonics of the area (two geological maps, 1/100000 from the Hajiabad quadrangle map). Tehran, Iran: Geological Survey of Iran. Geol Survey of Iran Int Rep, 1–60.
14
BurkhardM. (1993). Calcite twins, their geometry, appearance and significance as stress-strain markers and indicators of tectonic regime: a review. J. Struct. Geol.15, 351–368. 10.1016/0191-8141(93)90132-T
15
DerakhshaniR.EslamiS. S. (2011). A new viewpoint for seismotectonic zoning. Am. J. Environ. Sci.7, 212–218. 10.3844/ajessp.2011.212.218
16
DolatiA.BurgJ. P. (2013). Preliminary fault analysis and paleostress evolution in the makran fold-and-thrust belt in Iran. Front. Earth Sci.5, 261–277. 10.1007/978-3-642-30609-9_13
17
EbrahimiY.ShafieibaftiS.DerakhshaniR.EsmaeilianS. (2021). Slip partitioning and inclined transpression in the Bazargan fold and thrust belt, Central Iran Microcontinent, Kerman area, SE Iran. J. Struct. Geol.148, 104352. 10.1016/j.jsg.2021.104352
18
EvansM. A.GroshongR. H. (1994). A computer program for the calcite strain-gauge technique. J. Struct. Geol.16, 277–281. 10.1016/0191-8141(94)90110-4
19
EzatiM.RashidiA.GholamiE.MousaviS. M.NematiM.ShafieibaftiS.et al (2022). Paleostress analysis in the Northern Birjand, East of Iran: insights from inversion of fault-slip data. Minerals12, 1606. 10.3390/min12121606
20
FalconN. L. (1961). Major earth-flexuring in the Zagros mountains of south-west Iran. Q. J. Geol. Soc.117, 367–376. 10.1144/gsjgs.117.1.0367
21
FarbodY.BellierO.ShabanianE.AbbassiM. R. (2011). Geomorphic and structural variations along the doruneh fault system (central Iran). Tectonics30, 2889. 10.1029/2011TC002889
22
FattahpourV.MoosaviM. (2010). Stress inversion from the focal mechanism solution of Bam earthquake aftershocks (Iran, 2003). J. Geophys. Eng.7, 290–301. 10.1088/1742-2132/7/3/008
23
GhanbarianM. A.DerakhshaniR. (2022a). Systematic variations in the deformation intensity in the Zagros Hinterland Fold-and-Thrust Belt, Iran. Z. Dtsch. Ges. fur Geowiss.173, 193–210. 10.1127/zdgg/2021/0276
24
GhanbarianM. A.DerakhshaniR. (2022b). The folds and faults kinematic association in Zagros. Sci. Rep.12, 8350. 10.1038/s41598-022-12337-8
25
GhanbarianM. A.YassaghiA.DerakhshaniR. (2021). Detecting a sinistral transpressional deformation belt in the Zagros. Geosci. (Basel)11, 226. 10.3390/geosciences11060226
26
GhasemiA.TalbotC. J. (2006). A new tectonic scenario for the Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone (Iran). J. Asian Earth Sci.26, 683–693. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2005.01.003
27
GhaziJ. M.MoazzenM. (2015). Geodynamic evolution of the Sanandaj-Sirjan zone, Zagros orogen, Iran. Turkish J. Earth Sci.24, 513–528. 10.3906/yer-1404-12
28
GSI (1997a). Geological map of gol-e-gohar. Iran: Tehran.
29
GSI (1997b). Geological map of Khabr. Iran: Tehran.
30
GSI (2007). Geological map of bazar. Iran: Tehran.
31
HandinJ. W.GriggsD. (1951). Deformation of Yule marble: Part II—predicted fabric changes. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.62, 863–886. 10.1130/0016-7606(1951)62[863:doympi]2.0.co;2
32
HatcherR. D. (1995). Structural geology: principles, concepts, and problems. United States: Prentice Hall.
33
HatcherR. D.HooperR. J. (1992). “Evolution of crystalline thrust sheets in the internal parts of mountain chains,” in Thrust tectonics. Egham, Surrey, England: University of London. 10.1007/978-94-011-3066-0_20
34
HushmandzadehA.SabzehiM.BreberianM. (1972). A brief note on Early Kimmerian orogeny and high grade metamorphism in the Sanandaj-sirjan Belt (Sirjan-Esfandagheh). Tehran, Iran: Geological Survey of Iran. Internal Report, 30.
35
JamisonW. R.SpangJ. H. (1976). Use of calcite twin lamellae to infer differential stress. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.87, 868. 10.1130/0016-7606(1976)87<868:UOCTLT>2.0.CO;2
36
JavadiH. R.Esterabi AshtianiM.GuestB.YassaghiA.GhassemiM. R.ShahpasandzadehM.et al (2015). Tectonic reversal of the western doruneh fault system: implications for Central Asian tectonics. Tectonics34, 2034–2051. 10.1002/2015TC003931
37
JavadiH. R.GhassemiM. R.ShahpasandzadehM.GuestB.AshtianiM. E.YassaghiA. L. I.et al (2013). History of faulting on the doruneh fault system: implications for the kinematic changes of the central Iranian microplate. Geol. Mag.150, 651–672. 10.1017/S0016756812000751
38
JavidfakhrB.BellierO.ShabanianE.AhmadianS.SaidiA. (2011a). Plio-Quaternary tectonic regime changes in the transition zone between Alborz and Kopeh Dagh mountain ranges (NE Iran). Tectonophysics506, 86–108. 10.1016/j.tecto.2011.04.013
39
JavidfakhrB.BellierO.ShabanianE.SiameL.LéanniL.BourlèsD.et al (2011b). Fault kinematics and active tectonics at the southeastern boundary of the eastern Alborz (Abr and Khij fault zones): geodynamic implications for NNE Iran. J. Geodyn.52, 290–303. 10.1016/j.jog.2011.02.005
40
JayaA.NishikawaO. (2013). Paleostress reconstruction from calcite twin and fault-slip data using the multiple inverse method in the East Walanae fault zone: implications for the Neogene contraction in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. J. Struct. Geol.55, 34–49. 10.1016/j.jsg.2013.07.006
41
JentzerM.FournierM.AgardP.OmraniJ.KhatibM. M.WhitechurchH. (2017). Neogene to Present paleostress field in Eastern Iran (Sistan belt) and implications for regional geodynamics. Tectonics36, 321–339. 10.1002/2016TC004275
42
JonesS. J. (2004). Tectonic controls on drainage evolution and development of terminal alluvial fans, southern Pyrenees, Spain. Terra Nova.16, 121–127. 10.1111/j.1365-3121.2004.00539.x
43
KamaliZ.NazariH.RashidiA.HeyhatM. R.KhatibM. M.DerakhshaniR. (2023). Seismotectonics, geomorphology and paleoseismology of the doroud fault, a source of seismic hazard in Zagros. Appl. Sci.13, 3747. 10.3390/app13063747
44
KaragianniI.PapazachosC. B.ScordilisE. M.KarakaisisG. F. (2015). Reviewing the active stress field in Central Asia by using a modified stress tensor approach. J. Seismol.19, 541–565. 10.1007/s10950-015-9481-4
45
KargaranbafghiF.NeubauerF.GenserJ. (2011). Cenozoic kinematic evolution of southwestern Central Iran: strain partitioning and accommodation of Arabia-Eurasia convergence. Tectonophysics502, 221–243. 10.1016/j.tecto.2010.02.004
46
KermaniA. F.DerakhshaniR.ShafieibaftiS. (2017). Data on morphotectonic indices of Dashtekhak district, Iran. Data Brief.14, 782–788. 10.1016/j.dib.2017.08.052
47
LacombeO. (2001). Paleostress magnitudes associated with development of mountain belts: insights from tectonic analyses of calcite twins in the Taiwan foothills. Tectonics20, 834–849. 10.1029/2001TC900019
48
LacombeO. (2007). Comparison of paleostress magnitudes from calcite twins with contemporary stress magnitudes and frictional sliding criteria in the continental crust: mechanical implications. J. Struct. Geol.29, 86–99. 10.1016/j.jsg.2006.08.009
49
LacombeO.BellahsenN.MouthereauF. (2011). Fracture patterns in the Zagros Simply Folded Belt (Fars, Iran): constraints on early collisional tectonic history and role of basement faults. Geol. Mag.148, 940–963. 10.1017/S001675681100029X
50
LacombeO.LaurentP. (1992). Determination of principal stress magnitudes using calcite twins and rock mechanics data. Tectonophysics202, 83–93. 10.1016/0040-1951(92)90456-G
51
LacombeO.LaurentP. (1996). Determination of deviatoric stress tensors based on inversion of calcite twin data from experimentally deformed monophase samples: preliminary results. Tectonophysics255, 189–202. 10.1016/0040-1951(95)00136-0
52
LacombeO.MouthereauF.KargarS.MeyerB. (2006). Late Cenozoic and modern stress fields in the western Fars (Iran): implications for the tectonic and kinematic evolution of central Zagros. Tectonics25, 1831. 10.1029/2005TC001831
53
LafranceB.WhiteJ. C.WilliamsP. F. (1994). Natural calcite c-axis fabrics: an alternate interpretation. Tectonophysics229, 1–18. 10.1016/0040-1951(94)90002-7
54
MajidiB. (1972). Preliminary report of the hadjiabad quadrangle. Tehran: Geol. Surv. Iran. Int. Rep.
55
MajidiB. (1974). Metamorphic problems of south Iran. Memoirs Fac. Eng., 120–145.
56
MalekzadeZ.BellierO.AbbassiM. R.ShabanianE.AuthemayouC. (2016). The effects of plate margin inhomogeneity on the deformation pattern within west-Central Zagros Fold-and-Thrust Belt. Tectonophysics693, 304–326. 10.1016/j.tecto.2016.01.030
57
MansouriS. M.KeshavarzS.ShahpasandzadehM.FaghihA. (2021). Strain and vorticity analyses using rotated porphyroclasts in the Tanbour metamorphic rocks: evidence of transpressional deformation along the Sanandaj-Sirjan metamorphic belt, SW Iran. J. Struct. Geol.148, 104358. 10.1016/J.JSG.2021.104358
58
MobasherK.BabaieH. A. (2008). Kinematic significance of fold- and fault-related fracture systems in the Zagros mountains, southern Iran. Tectonophysics451, 156–169. 10.1016/j.tecto.2007.11.060
59
MohajjelM.FergussonC. L. (2000). Dextral transpression in Late Cretaceous continental collision, Sanandaj–Sirjan zone, western Iran. J. Struct. Geol.22, 1125–1139. 10.1016/S0191-8141(00)00023-7
60
MohajjelM.FergussonC. L.SahandiM. R. (2003). Cretaceous–Tertiary convergence and continental collision, Sanandaj–Sirjan zone, western Iran. J. Asian Earth Sci.21, 397–412. 10.1016/S1367-9120(02)00035-4
61
MohammadiNiaA.RashidiA.ShafieibaftiS.MousaviS. M.NematiM.KianimehrH.et al (2024). Unraveling the role of dextral faults in the formation of pull-apart basin structures and their implications on the genesis of ophiolites and pluto-volcanics. Front. Earth Sci. (Lausanne)12, 1399447. 10.3389/feart.2024.1399447
62
NavabpourP.AngelierJ.BarrierE. (2007). Cenozoic post-collisional brittle tectonic history and stress reorientation in the High Zagros Belt (Iran, Fars Province). Tectonophysics432, 101–131. 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.12.007
63
NavabpourP.AngelierJ.BarrierE. (2008). Stress state reconstruction of oblique collision and evolution of deformation partitioning in W-Zagros (Iran, Kermanshah). Geophys J. Int.175, 755–782. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03916.x
64
NavabpourP.BarrierE. (2012). Stress states in the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt from passive margin to collisional tectonic setting. Tectonophysics581, 76–83. 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.01.011
65
ParsonsT.ThompsonG. A. (1993). Does magmatism influence low-angle normal faulting?Geology21, 247–250. 10.1130/0091-7613(1993)021<0247:dmilan>2.3.co;2
66
PfiffnerO.-A.BurkhardM. (1987). Determination of paleostress axis orientations from fault, twin and earthquake data, Annales tectonicae, 1, 48–57.
67
QiuL.KongR.YanD. P.MuH. X.SunW.SunS.et al (2022). Paleo–Pacific plate subduction on the eastern Asian margin: insights from the Jurassic foreland system of the overriding plate. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am.134, 2305–2320. 10.1130/B36118.1
68
QiuL.YanD. P.TangS. L.WangQ.YangW. X.TangX.et al (2016). Mesozoic geology of southwestern China: Indosinian foreland overthrusting and subsequent deformation. J. Asian Earth Sci.122, 91–105. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.03.006
69
RahbarR.ShafieibaftiS.DerakhshaniR. (2017). Investigation of the tectonic activity of Bazargan Mountain in Iran. Sustain. Dev. Mt. Territ. 99, 380–386. 10.21177/1998-4502-2017-9-4-380-386
70
RamsayJ. G.HuberM. I. (1987). The techniques of modern structural geology: folds and fractures. 1st Edn.London, United Kingdom: Academic Press.
71
RashidiA.DerakhshaniR. (2022). Strain and moment rates from GPS and seismological data in northern Iran: implications for an evaluation of stress trajectories and probabilistic fault rupture hazard. Remote Sens. (Basel)14, 2219. 10.3390/rs14092219
72
RashidiA.KianimehrH.ShafieibaftiS.MehrabiA.DerakhshaniR. (2021). Active faults in the west of the lut block (Central Iran). Геофизические исследования22, 70–84. 10.21455/gr2021.3-5
73
RashidiA.KianimehrH.Yamini-FardF.TatarM.ZafaraniH. (2022). Present stress map and deformation distribution in the NE lut block, eastern Iran: insights from seismic and geodetic strain and moment rates. Pure Appl. Geophys179, 1887–1917. 10.1007/s00024-022-03015-x
74
RashidiA.NematiM.ShafieibaftiS.PourbeyranvandS.DerakhshaniR.BraitenbergC. (2023). Structure and kinematics of active faulting in the northern domain of Western and Central Alborz, Iran and interpretation in terms of tectonic evolution of the region. J. Asian Earth Sci.255, 105760. 10.1016/J.JSEAES.2023.105760
75
SabzeheiM.BerberianM. (1972). “Preliminary note on the structural and metamorphic history of the area between Dowlatabad and Esfandagheh, south-east Central Iran,” in Geol. Surv. Iran, internal report, first Iranian geological symposium. Tehran: Iranian petroleum institute.
76
SabzeheiM. S. (1974). Les melange ophiolitiques de la region d’Esfandagheh. France: These d’etate, Universite scientifique et medicale de Grenoble.
77
SarkarinejadK.AziziA. (2008). Slip partitioning and inclined dextral transpression along the Zagros Thrust System, Iran. J. Struct. Geol.30, 116–136. 10.1016/j.jsg.2007.10.001
78
SarkarinejadK.FaghihA.GrasemannB. (2008). Transpressional deformations within the Sanandaj–Sirjan metamorphic belt (Zagros mountains, Iran). J. Struct. Geol.30, 818–826. 10.1016/j.jsg.2008.03.003
79
ŞengörA. M. C.KiddW. S. F. (1979). Post-collisional tectonics of the Turkish-Iranian plateau and a comparison with Tibet. Tectonophysics55, 361–376. 10.1016/0040-1951(79)90184-7
80
ShabanianE.BellierO.AbbassiM. R.SiameL.FarbodY. (2010). Plio-quaternary stress states in NE Iran: Kopeh Dagh and Allah Dagh-Binalud mountain ranges. Tectonophysics480, 280–304. 10.1016/j.tecto.2009.10.022
81
ShafieibaftiS. (2007). Structural analysis of metamorphic rocks in the Faryab area (South of Esfandagheh). SE IranTehran, Iran: University of Shahid Beheshti, 129. Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis.
82
ShafieibaftiS.AlaviS. A.MohajjelM. (2011). Calcite twinning constraints on paleostress patterns and tectonic evolution of the Zagros hinterland: the Sargaz complex, Sanandaj–Sirjan zone, SE Iran. Arabian J. Geosciences4, 1189–1205. 10.1007/s12517-010-0140-3
83
ShafieibaftiS.MohajjelM. (2015). Structural evidence for slip partitioning and inclined dextral transpression along the SE Sanandaj–Sirjan zone, Iran. Int. J. earth Sci.104, 587–601. 10.1007/s00531-014-1106-6
84
ShanY.ZhengJ.LiangX. (2019). Synthetic slip plane, the combination of a pair of twinned and untwinned e-planes in a single calcite crystal: application in dynamic analysis. J. Struct. Geol.119, 81–92. 10.1016/j.jsg.2018.12.003
85
SheikholeslamiM. R.PiqueA.MobayenP.SabzeheiM.BellonH.EmamiM. H. (2008). Tectono-metamorphic evolution of the Neyriz metamorphic complex, quri-kor-e-sefid area (Sanandaj-Sirjan zone, SW Iran). J. Asian Earth Sci.31, 504–521. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2007.07.004
86
ShelleyD. (1989). CALCSTRESS: a program that calculates compression and tension directions from calcite u-stage data. Comput. Geosci.15, 269–273. 10.1016/0098-3004(89)90040-X
87
ShelleyD. (1993). Igneous and metamorphic rocks under the microscope: classification, textures, microstructures, and mineral preferred-orientations. London, Chapman and Hall, United Kingdom.
88
StocklinJ. (1968). Structural history and tectonics of Iran: a review. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull.52, 1229–1258. 10.1306/5D25C4A5-16C1-11D7-8645000102C1865D
89
TurnerF. J. (1953). Nature and dynamic interpretation of deformation lamellae in calcite of three marbles. Am. J. Sci.251, 276–298. 10.2475/ajs.251.4.276
90
TurnerF. J.WeissL. E. (1963). Structural analysis of metamorphic tectonites. New York: McGraw-Hill.
91
TwissR. J.MooresE. M. (1992). Structural geology. New York, United States: Macmillan.
92
WattersW. A.SabzeheiM. (1970). Preliminary report, geology and topography of the metamorphic and igneous complex of the central part of the Neyriz Quadrangle. Geol. Surv. Iran. Int. Rep., 253–269.
93
WeissL. E. (1954). A study of tectonic style: structural investigation of a marble quartzite complex in southern California, 30. United States: University of California Publications in Geological Science, 1–102.
94
WenkH. R.TakeshitaT.BechlerE.ErskineB. G.MatthiesS. (1987). Pure shear and simple shear calcite textures. Comparison of experimental, theoretical and natural data. J. Struct. Geol.9, 731–745. 10.1016/0191-8141(87)90156-8
95
XiaoC. H.ChenZ.L.YaoX. F.LiuX. C.LiuJ. M. (2023). The control of deformation partitioning on gold mineralization in the Qingchengzi district, Liaodong Peninsula, northeastern China. J. Asian Earth Sci.242, 105517. 10.1016/j.jseaes.2022.105517
96
YamajiA. (2015). How tightly does calcite e-twin constrain stress?J. Struct. Geol.72, 83–95. 10.1016/j.jsg.2015.01.008
97
YazdiS. H. M.PourkermaniM.ArianM.KarkheiranA. (2012). Determination of stress orientation in sabzevar ophiolite zone in (khorasan razavi province, Iran). Indian J. Sci. Technol.5, 1–6. 10.17485/ijst/2012/v5i10.6
98
ZamaniB.AngelierJ.ZamaniA. (2008). State of stress induced by plate convergence and stress partitioning in northeastern Iran, as indicated by focal mechanisms of earthquakes. J. Geodyn.45, 120–132. 10.1016/j.jog.2007.07.003
99
ZanchiA.BerraF.MatteiM.GhassemiM. R.SabouriJ. (2006). Inversion tectonics in central Alborz, Iran. J. Struct. Geol.28, 2023–2037. 10.1016/j.jsg.2006.06.020
100
ZarifiZ.NilfouroushanF.RaeesiM. (2014). Crustal stress map of Iran: insight from seismic and geodetic computations. Pure Appl. Geophys171, 1219–1236. 10.1007/s00024-013-0711-9
101
ZhangQ.FossenH. (2020). The dilemma of asymmetric porphyroclast systems and sense of shear. J. Struct. Geol.130, 103893. 10.1016/j.jsg.2019.103893
102
ZhengJ.ShanY. (2020). Inversion of polyphase calcite-twin data for deviatoric stress tensors: 2. Application to the Huangling Dome, northern South China. J. Struct. Geol.138, 104089. 10.1016/j.jsg.2020.104089
Summary
Keywords
calcite twinning, mylonite fabric, Sanandaj-Sirjan zone, structural geology, tectonics
Citation
Dorzadeh H, Shafieibafti S, Keshavarz S, Omrani J, Rashidi A, Nemati M and Derakhshani R (2024) Calcite e-twins as a tectonic indicator, paleo stress pattern and structural evolution of the Zagros hinterland, SE Iran. Front. Earth Sci. 12:1445918. doi: 10.3389/feart.2024.1445918
Received
08 June 2024
Accepted
01 July 2024
Published
31 July 2024
Volume
12 - 2024
Edited by
Fan Yang, Lanzhou University, China
Reviewed by
Chang-Hao Xiao, Institute of Geomechanics Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, China
Liang Qiu, China University of Geosciences, China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2024 Dorzadeh, Shafieibafti, Keshavarz, Omrani, Rashidi, Nemati and Derakhshani.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shahram Shafieibafti, shafiei_shahram@uk.ac.ir; Reza Derakhshani, r.derakhshani@uu.nl
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.