ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Earth Sci.

Sec. Hydrosphere

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1543497

Causes of Watershed Drought Analyzed Using Explainable Deep Learning: A Case Study in Fenhe River Basin

Provisionally accepted
Zixuan  ChenZixuan Chen1Xikun  WeiXikun Wei2*Guojie  WangGuojie Wang3Yifan  HuYifan Hu3Haonan  LiuHaonan Liu3Jinman  ZhangJinman Zhang1Shuang  ZhouShuang Zhou1Zengbao  ZhaoZengbao Zhao1Yushan  LiuYushan Liu1
  • 1Key Laboratory of Meteorology and Ecological Environment of Hebei Province, Meteorological Institute of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, China
  • 2Collaborative Innovation Center for Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 3School of Remote Sensing & Geomatics Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The study predicted daily-scale drought for the Fenhe River (FHR) basin and applied the explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) method to the model's prediction results. Daily-scale drought prediction can provide more timely and detailed drought information, while deep learning interpretable methods can help to understand the impact of different predictors on drought and improve the credibility of the model. The Standardized Antecedent Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SAPEI) was selected as an index for evaluating drought conditions. Five classical deep learning prediction models including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Networks (biLSTM), Transformer (TFR), Informer (IFR) were applied in the experiment, and the performance of each model was comprehensively evaluated. The results of the test set show that all models make effective predictions of drought in the FHR basin with pearson correlation coefficient (R) higher than 0.75. BiLSTM performs better in short-term prediction, while TFR and IFR are better at long-term prediction. The results of the deep learning interpretable model show that putting aside the strong influence of SAPEI itself in the prediction process, mean temperature (TM) has the greatest influence among the auxiliary predictors, followed by precipitation (PRE) and relative humidity (RHU), with potential evapotranspiration (PET) being the weakest. Our work emphasizes the importance of timely warnings of drought and the importance of XAI for the development of artificial intelligence.

Keywords: drought, prediction, daily-scale, deep learning, Explainable

Received: 11 Dec 2024; Accepted: 28 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Chen, Wei, Wang, Hu, Liu, Zhang, Zhou, Zhao and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Xikun Wei, Collaborative Innovation Center for Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, Jiangsu Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.