- 1School of Earth Science and Resources, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China
- 2Key laboratory for Groundwater and Ecology in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Xi’an Center of Geological Survey, Chinese Geological Survey, Xi’an, China
- 3College of Oceanography and Ecological Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China
- 4College of Forestry, Xinyang Agriculture and Forestry University, Xinyang, China
Characterization of the spatiotemporal variability of stable isotopes (δ18O and δD) in the surface water of the Han River Basin (HRB) is critical for tracing basin-scale hydrological cycle processes, identifying moisture-source dynamics, and optimizing water resource management. Through systematic sampling and analysis of hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in the mainstream, tributary, groundwater, and rainwater of the HRB, we investigated the spatial and seasonal variation in the isotopic composition of water bodies in this area. The Local Meteoric Water Line (LMWL): δD = 7.72δ18O + 11.55 indicates that the study area is influenced by atmospheric precipitation and exhibits evaporative fractionation. The seasonal variation is closely related to the circulation effect and evaporative fractionation. The summer water isotope values (δ18O: −8.2‰, δD: −52.5‰) were significantly higher than those in spring (δ18O: −8.7‰, δD: −58.0‰) and autumn (δ18O: −8.6‰, δD: −56.6‰). This pattern can be attributed to two main factors: first, the moisture derived from the Western Pacific during summer exhibits inherently heavier isotopic composition (δ18O: −3.75‰, δD: −18.5‰); second, intensified evaporative fractionation further enriches heavy isotopes in surface waters. Across the Han River Basin, the spatial pattern of δ18O values follows an “increase-decrease-increase” trend from the Hanzhong Basin to the Qin-Ba Mountains, then to the middle and lower reaches. This trend is primarily controlled by the shifting dominance of three factors: groundwater discharge, tributary inputs, and direct precipitation. This study, for the first time, reveals that the seasonal variations of stable isotopes in surface water of the HRB are driven by circulation effect, providing a new isotopic tracing basis for hydrological analysis of watersheds in monsoon regions.
1 Introduction
Global climate change has become a major topic in Earth Science, with significant impacts on the water cycle (Huntington, 2006; Kundzewicz, 2008; Grover, 2014; Gosling and Arnell, 2016; Qiu et al., 2023). Rising temperatures and changing precipitation patterns are altering the spatial and temporal distribution of water resources, affecting surface and groundwater flow, recharge, and consumption (Alexander et al., 2013). Hydrogen and oxygen isotopes, as essential tracers in hydrological studies, have been widely used to examine various aspects of the water cycle, especially in the processes of evaporation, precipitation, and groundwater recharge (Gonfiantini, 1986; Gammons et al., 2006; Kendall and McDonnell, 2012; Yang and Han, 2020; Ren et al., 2024). It is also possible to effectively track the origin, flow path, and exchange processes of water, providing critical support for accurate watershed hydrological modeling and water resource management (Clark and Fritz, 1997; Risi et al., 2013; Nusbaumer et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2018).
Existing studies have well demonstrated the response of hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in water bodies to climate change, as well as their considerable potential for tracing hydrological cycle processes. Studies in regions such as the Colorado River Basin in the United States (Guay et al., 2006), the Sava River Basin between the Southern Alps, the Dinaric Mountains and the Pannonian Plain in Europe (Ogrinc et al., 2018), and the Indus River Basin (Sharma et al., 2017) have shown that isotopic signatures exhibit diverse characteristics across different climate zones. In China, particularly in major river basins like the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers (Ding et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015; Fan et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018; Peng et al., 2018; Shi et al., 2019; Li C. et al., 2020; Li Z. et al., 2020; Yan et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2022b; Chen et al., 2024), providing valuable data to quantify regional hydrological processes.
The Han River Basin (HRB), as the primary water source for the South-to-North Water Diversion Project, provides vital water supplies for surrounding regions, making it crucial for both economic and social development. Although isotope studies have been carried out in several sub-basins of the HRB, such as the Jinshui River Basin (Bu et al., 2018), Minjia River Basin (Ma et al., 2022), Guanshan River (Zhang Q. Z. et al., 2025), Hanbei Basin (Yan et al., 2022), and the middle-lower reaches (Li et al., 2016), these investigations have primarily focused on qualitative analyses of hydrological processes within individual small watersheds. Comprehensive quantitative research on regional hydrological processes is still lacking in this basin. Furthermore, due to the diverse climate, geography, and topography of the HRB, existing studies have not fully covered all key hydrological processes within the basin. For instance, the isotopic distribution and variation between different water bodies within the basin remain underexplored, indicating the need for further detailed investigations. Therefore, a more thorough study of hydrogen and oxygen isotopic characteristics in the HRB will not only contribute to a better understanding of local hydrological processes but also provide a scientific basis for water resource management and regulation in the South-to-North Water Diversion Project.
Based on this, the present study was conducted to collect precipitation, surface water, and groundwater samples in the basin in spring, summer, and autumn, and to analyze the composition of water stable isotopes. The aim is to systematically reveal the spatial and temporal evolution of isotopic composition of the water in the HRB, to quantify the recharge relationship between different water bodies, and to clarify the key factors influencing the isotope distribution, thus providing solid data support and scientific information for the in-depth understanding of the basin’s water cycle process in HRB and guaranteeing the sustainable use of water resources at the water source of the South-to-North Water Transfer Central Route Project.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study area
The Han River is the largest tributary of the Yangtze River (Figure 1), originating from the southern foot of the Qinling Mountains in Shaanxi Province. Its mainstream flows through Shaanxi and Hubei provinces and empties into the Yangtze River at Hankou. The river is 1,577 km long, with a total drainage area of 159,000 km2 (Li and Zhang, 2008; 2009; Xu et al., 2011). The upper reaches (above Danjiangkou, about 925 km long) are dominated by medium mountains and low mountains, with deep canyons as the main landform. The middle reaches (from Danjiangkou to Zhongxiang, 270 km) pass through hilly areas, with several intermountain basins distributed between them. The lower reaches (below Zhongxiang, 382 km long) gradually narrow due to artificial embankments. This longitudinal zonation of landforms has shaped the spatial heterogeneity of the hydrological environment in the basin and influenced the temporal and spatial distribution patterns of the hydrological cycle and water resources.
The Han River Basin (HRB) is located in the transitional zone of hydrological and climatic characteristics between northern and southern China, showing typical seasonal variations of the subtropical monsoon region (Chen et al., 2019). Meteorological observation data (1951–2020) indicate a significant temperature gradient across the basin, with monthly average temperatures ranging from −2 °C in the northwest source area to 27 °C in the southeast lowlands. The annual average precipitation in the basin is 873 mm, with a highly uneven distribution throughout the year. About 75% of precipitation occurs during the flood season (May to October) (Li et al., 2016; Yuan et al., 2019), as shown in Figure 2, often leading to summer and autumn floods. The discharge of the Han River is mainly replenished by precipitation, with abundant water volume. The intra-annual distribution of the discharge is highly consistent with precipitation, with 5–10 months accounting for 78% of the annual total (Wang et al., 2020).
Figure 2. Monthly variations in precipitation and temperature during the sampling year in the HRB. Data was acquired from https://rp5.ru/.
The lithologic distribution of the HRB is highly complex, with strata from all geological periods ranging from the Precambrian to the Quaternary almost all exposed. Paleozoic and older strata are mainly developed in the upper reaches of the basin, forming the main body of the Qinling Mountains and Daba Mountains (Zhang et al., 1996). The Qinling Mountains are dominated by granite and metamorphic rocks (Deng, 1981), whereas the Daba Mountains are mainly composed of limestone with intercalated metamorphic rocks (Zheng et al., 2013). The Cenozoic and Mesozoic strata are primarily distributed in intermountain basins, grabens, and low-lying areas, corresponding to the formation of medium- to low-relief mountain and hilly landforms (Deng, 1981). Structurally, the Han River Basin spans multiple first-order tectonic units, including the Qinling Fold Belt, the Yangtze Platform, and the Songpan-Ganzi Fold System. The tectonic movement is characterized by folding, block movement, and uplift (Deng, 1981; Wu et al., 2025). The Ankang Fault developed in the study area (Figure 1) is a regional fault located in the southern part of the South Qinling Tectonic Belt, with an overall strike of northwest and north-northwest, and serves as the boundary fault of the Daba Mountain Tectonic Belt (Xie et al., 2022).
2.2 Sampling and analysis
In this study, samples were collected continuously from downstream to upstream in 2023 during spring, summer, and autumn. Sampling points were deployed in the mainstreams, tributaries, groundwater, and rainwater, distributed across different geomorphological units as much as possible. The distribution of sampling points is shown in Figure 1. A total of 67 water samples were collected, including 29 from the mainstreams of the Han River, 18 from tributaries, 17 from groundwater, and 3 from rainwater. River water samples were generally collected below 10 cm of the water surface. Groundwater samples were collected after 10 min of pumping. Two rainwater samples were collected in summer and one in autumn, all of which were single precipitation samples. Rainwater was collected using high-density polyethylene bottles equipped with funnels, and a ping-pong ball was placed at the funnel opening to prevent evaporation. The bottles were immediately sealed with parafilm after precipitation ceased to avoid fractionation. All of the samples were filtered through a 0.22 μm cellulose membrane, and the filtered samples were transferred into dry, clean 50 mL centrifuge tubes.
δ18O and δD values of all samples were determined by the Liquid Water Isotope Analyzer (IWA-35EP) in the State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The precision of δ18O and δD measurements was better than ±0.1‰ and ±1.0‰, respectively. Results were reported as relative to the standard V-SMOW (Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water).
3 Results
3.1 The hydrogen and oxygen isotope composition of waters in the HRB
The δ18O and δD values for river water, groundwater and rainwater in the HRB are shown in Table 1. The δ18O value of river water of the whole basin varied from −9.8‰ to −5.3‰ with an average value of −8.7‰. The δD value for the whole basin ranged from −65.0‰ to −38.0‰, with an average of −58.0‰. These results are similar to those of previous studies in the basin: δ18O: −10.3 to −7.2‰, δD: −70.6 to −48.0‰ (Ding et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015; Deng et al., 2016; Li et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2016). The ranges of δ18O and δD for groundwater are relatively narrow (−8.4‰ to −6.2‰ and −55.4‰ to −40.9‰, respectively), with an average δ18O value of −7.2‰ and δD of −47.3‰. The hydrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions of rainwater showed that the δ18O values were −5.5‰ and −2.0‰, and the δD values were −30.2‰ and −6.8‰ in summer; while in autumn, the δ18O value was −6.6‰ and the δD value was −34.4‰.
The deuterium excess (d-excess) in precipitation is defined as the y-intercept when the slope = 8, expressed by d-excess = δD - 8 × δ18O (Dansgaard, 1964). This equation could reflect differences in humidity between the water vapor source and evaporation (Rozanski et al., 1993; Clark and Fritz, 1997). The d-excess values in river water ranged from 4.2‰ to 16.1‰ with a mean value of 12.2% (Figure 3).
3.2 Seasonal variations of δ18O and δD of waters in the HRB
As shown in Figure 4 and Table 1, the hydrogen and oxygen isotope compositions of samples collected across different seasons were highly variable. Most river water samples exhibited relatively higher δ18O and δD values in summer (−8.2‰ ± 0.7‰ and −52.5‰ ± 4.2‰, respectively) compared to spring (−8.7‰ ± 0.9‰ and −58.0‰ ± 6.0‰, respectively) and autumn (−8.6‰ ± 0.7‰ and −56.6‰ ± 4.2‰, respectively). Meanwhile, the stable isotope composition of tributaries showed a greater range of variation than that of the mainstream, most evident in spring, reaching 4.5‰ and 27.0‰, respectively. The stable isotopic composition of groundwater showed no significant seasonal variation (Table 1), with average δ18O and δD values of −7.2‰ ± 0.5‰ and −47.3‰ ± 3.7‰, respectively. The coefficient of variation (CV) for hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in the mainstream and groundwater of the HRB exhibits minimal seasonal fluctuations, maintaining within a narrow range of −9% to −5% throughout three seasons. The CV of tributaries in spring peaks at −16% for δ18O and −14% for δD, significantly higher than those in summer and autumn (−12% for δ18O and −11% for δD). This characteristic is highly consistent with the information presented in Figure 4. The outlier points in Figure 4 are distributed in the middle and lower reaches, where human activities are intensive. These human disturbances locally disrupt the isotopic signal of tributaries, resulting in abnormally high δ18O values (−7.1‰ to −5.8‰) and δD values (−47.4‰ to −38.3‰) and thus increasing the CV in this region.
Figure 4. Seasonal variations of δ18O (A) and δD (B) in mainstreams and tributaries. The circled outlier samples are all located in the middle and lower reaches, an area characterized by intense human activity.
3.3 Spatial variations of δ18O and δD of waters in the HRB
In general, from the source region to the river mouth, the δ18O and δD values exhibited evident spatial variation (Figure 5; Table 1). Topography and geomorphology directly regulate the spatial differentiation of river water isotopic compositions by altering the altitude effect of precipitation recharge and the retention and mixing processes of water bodies within the basin. Based on topographical features, the Han River Basin is divided into three zones: the Hanzhong Basin, the Qin-Ba Mountain, and the Middle and Lower reaches. We employed Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to validate the credibility of this spatial classification (Figure 6). The results confirm significant isotopic heterogeneity among the units (ρ < 0.001) and illustrate a clear evolutionary trajectory from the headwater basin through the mountainous transition zone to the downstream plains, providing a solid statistical foundation for the division. The δ18O and δD values of the mainstream exhibited similar trends in spring and autumn across the upper reach (Hanzhong basin and Qin-Ba Mountain) (Figures 5A,B). In the Hanzhong Basin, the values initially rose, then continuously declined in the Qin-Ba Mountain area until they reached the lowest point (at Ankang, spring: −9.7‰ for δ18O, −64.5‰ for δD and autumn: −9.5‰, −61.6‰), and then slowly rose again. The δ18O and δD values of the mainstream flowing through the Hanzhong Basin fluctuated in summer, remaining at a relatively high level. Upon reaching the Qin-Ba Mountain area, the values increased rapidly and then stabilized. Upon entering the middle and lower reaches of the Han River, the isotope values in all three seasons increased sharply at HJ9 (Xiangyang) (spring: −8.9‰, summer: −7.2‰, and autumn: −7.1‰). Subsequently, they remained stable in spring but showed a decreasing trend in summer and autumn. Tributaries in the Hanzhong basin exhibited a trend opposite to the mainstream, decreasing first and then increasing (Figures 5C,D). In the Qin-Ba Mountain area and the middle and lower reaches, they showed a continuous increasing trend. Similar to seasonal variations, the spatial CV for mainstream and groundwater is relatively low (−9% to −5%), indicating a uniform spatial distribution. The CV for tributaries is significantly higher (−16% to −11%), reflecting pronounced spatial differentiation and high dispersion among different tributaries.
Figure 5. Variations of hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in mainstreams (A, B), and tributaries (C, D) along the flow path in the HRB. The filled circles and squares represent the δ18O and δD of the mainstream, respectively and the empty circles and squares represent the δ18O and δD of the tributary, respectively.
Figure 6. (A, B) Boxplot of original δ18O values and δD values for the three regions, with One-way ANOVA results indicating significant differences (p < 0.001). The boxes represent the 25th–75th percentiles, and the whiskers indicate the range. (C) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) biplot of the sampling sites based on standardized variables (elevation, river gradient, δ18O, and distance to the source). The three clusters correspond to the geomorphological divisions, illustrating the longitudinal evolution from the headwaters to the plains.
4 Discussion
Rivers are complex dynamic systems in which δ18O and δD values record key water cycle signals. These isotopic signatures are controlled by water mixing, recharge-discharge relationships, and evaporative fractionation. Analyzing their correlation with environmental factors enables quantification of different water sources and reveals the impact mechanisms of hydrological and meteorological processes (Hitchon and Krouse, 1972; Gat, 1996; Kendall and Coplen, 2001; Bershaw et al., 2012).
4.1 The relationship between the δ18O and δD values of the river water and meteoric water in the HRB
As the primary source of surface water, precipitation imparts a close relationship between the hydrogen and oxygen isotopic composition of river water and that of the precipitation within its catchment (Poage, 2001; Dutton et al., 2005; Reckerth et al., 2017). Based on the analysis of precipitation samples from around the world, Craig (1961) established the Global Meteoric Water Line (GMWL): δD = 8δ18O + 10. During the transport of water vapor sources in atmospheric precipitation across regions, environmental changes cause imbalances in gas-liquid isotope fractionation, resulting in the phenomenon of linear deviation of the Local Meteoric Water Line (LMWL) from the GMWL (Dansgaard, 1964; Clark and Fritz, 1997). Given the absence of systematic rainwater sampling and the lack of atmospheric precipitation isotope monitoring data covering the entire HRB in the present study, we conducted a systematic review of prior researches: specifically, studies targeting the upper reaches (Zhang, 1989; Bu et al., 2018) and those focusing on the middle-lower reaches (Wang, 2021) have each completed year-long (or longer) systematic analyses of atmospheric precipitation isotopes. By synthesizing these published datasets, the LMWL for the HRB was determined as δD = 7.72 δ18O + 11.55 (Figure 7). Compared with the GMWL, the LMWL of the HRB shows a slightly lower slope and a slightly higher intercept. This phenomenon indicates that isotopic nonequilibrium fractionation occurs during the precipitation process in the basin, which is induced by sub-cloud secondary evaporation, mixing of multiple water vapor sources, and the evaporative environment in certain regions (e.g., the middle and lower reaches of the basin).
Figure 7. δD vs. δ18O values for natural water in the HRB. The black line is the Local Meteoric Water Line (LMWL, δD = 7.72 δ18O + 11.55) (Zhang, 1989; Bu et al., 2018; Wang, 2021). The black dashed line is the Global Meteoric Water Line (GMWL, δD = 8δ18O + 10) (Craig, 1961). The green dashed line represents the River Water Level (RWL) in spring, the red dashed line represents the RWL in summer, and the blue dashed line represents the RWL in autumn.
Based on the results obtained in the surface water, the relationship between δD and δ18O of Han River water in different seasons is as follows:
The δD and δ18O values of water in the Han River are all distributed near the LMWL (Figure 7), indicating that the primary water source is atmospheric precipitation recharge. The slopes of the δD-δ18O relationship Equations 1–3 are all less than 8, suggesting that precipitation-recharged water has been subject to superimposed evaporative fractionation during its transport and retention.
4.2 Controlling factors of seasonal variation
4.2.1 Seasonal scale circulation effect
In this study, we observed that the δ18O and δD values of river water in the HRB were significantly higher in the summer compared to the spring and autumn (Figure 4). However, previous studies on the Yangtze River Basin (Chen et al., 2024; Li C. et al., 2020) and the Mekong River Basin (Noipow, 2015; Le Duy et al., 2018), which are also located in the monsoon region, have shown that summer precipitation is regulated by the “amount effect,” with its δ18O and δD values generally being negative. Since rivers are mainly recharged by precipitation, the stable isotope values of river water also exhibit the characteristic of being the lowest in summer, which is exactly contrary to the results of this study. Tan et al. (2016) reported in the eastern China monsoon region that δ18O variation in atmospheric precipitation is mainly controlled by circulation effect and shows no significant correlation with precipitation amount. When precipitation water vapor originates from the Western Pacific Ocean, the δ18O value of precipitation is relatively high, whereas if the water vapor comes from the Indian Ocean, the δ18O value of precipitation is low. The water vapor transport in the Han River Basin happens to have both of these two sources (Sun et al., 2011; Li et al., 2023). It can be concluded that the seasonal differentiation of hydrogen and oxygen isotope compositions of river water in the study area can be attributed to the differences in the sources of water vapor.
Notably, the southeastern moisture channel exhibits a significant enhancement exclusively during the summer months (Deng et al., 2024). The Western Pacific water vapor is typically enriched in heavier hydrogen isotopes, with δ18O values between −5.7‰ and −4.8‰ (Tao et al., 2021; Zhang J. et al., 2025). This is consistent with the higher δ18O isotope values (−5.5‰ to −2.0‰) observed in the rainwater samples collected during the summer. Therefore, the higher isotope values of river water in the summer in the HRB are likely related to the Western Pacific water vapor, which is transported to the basin through the southeast monsoon. In contrast to the Western Pacific water vapor in the summer, the water vapor in the spring and autumn is mainly sourced from the Indian Ocean (Deng et al., 2024). According to the studies by Tao et al. (2021) and Zhang J. et al. (2025), the δ18O values of Indian Ocean water vapor generally range from −6.4‰ to −5.1‰, which are lower than those of the water vapor in the Western Pacific. This isotopic distinction leads to a lower δ18O value (−6.6‰) in precipitation during autumn compared to summer, which is subsequently reflected in the river water, exhibiting correspondingly lower δ18O and δD values during these seasons.
4.2.2 Evaporation effect
Evaporation plays a critical role in shaping the isotopic composition of river water, particularly during warmer months (Martinelli et al., 1996; Taniguchi et al., 2000; Hua et al., 2019; Ren et al., 2024). During evaporation, lighter isotopes (16O and 1H) are preferentially vaporized, leaving the heavier isotopes (18O and 2H) concentrated in the remaining water (Dansgaard, 1964; Simpson and Herczeg, 1991). In summer, the high temperatures increase the evaporation rate, which results in a higher concentration of heavier isotopes in the river water (Figure 8). In contrast, temperatures in spring and autumn are lower, and evaporation is less intense, leading to lower isotopic values in river water. But in spring and autumn, the δ18O values exhibited a more pronounced temperature effect. This is because precipitation is relatively scarce in spring and autumn (Cao et al., 2024), allowing temperature to play a more dominant role in controlling isotopic fractionation. In contrast, during summer, the correlation weakens due to the complex input of marine moisture. Similar findings are reported by Tang et al. (2015) and Lin et al. (2024), both of which indicate that the temperature effect dominates the variation in precipitation isotope values during the non-monsoon season. Table 2 summarizes the controlling factors of seasonal variations in the isotopic values of atmospheric precipitation in monsoon regions, and a growing body of research has confirmed that the “amount effect” is no longer the dominant factor governing such seasonal variations.
Figure 8. The relationship between water temperature (WT) and δ18O in river water. The gray line indicates a positive correlation between δ18O and WT.
Table 2. Summary of seasonal variations in precipitation isotopes in regions affected by circulation effect.
4.3 Controlling factors of spatial variation
In this study, the river water isotopes exhibited high spatial heterogeneity from the upper to lower reaches (Figure 5). As hydrogen and oxygen isotopes show a strong correlation (Figure 7) and exhibit identical spatial variation patterns (Figure 5), this indicates that both are governed by the same environmental factors and fractionation mechanisms. Therefore, we selected δ18O to describe this common trend.
4.3.1 Controlling factors in the Hanzhong Basin
In the Hanzhong Basin, the δ18O values in the mainstem exhibited a clear seasonal pattern: a consistent increase was observed during spring, elevated values with fluctuations were maintained in summer, and an initial rise followed by a subsequent decline occurred in autumn (Figure 9). These variations reflected shifts in dominant hydrological processes across seasons. The δ18O variation in spring and autumn was controlled mainly by changing mixing ratios between groundwater and tributary inputs. In summer, it was governed primarily by the combined effects of precipitation recharge and evaporative fractionation.
Figure 9. Spatial variations of δ18O values of the mainstream, tributary and groundwater in the HRB: (A) Spring, (B) Summer, and (C) Autumn.
Groundwater displayed higher and more stable isotopic values (Spring: −7.5‰; Summer: −7.4‰; Autumn: −7.3‰) due to its integrated nature from historical precipitation. During spring and autumn, reduced precipitation and lower tributary discharge - exemplified by the Xushui River’s spring flow being only 10% of its summer volume (Jia, 2021) - resulted in increased groundwater contribution as baseflow. This led to rising δ18O values in the mainstem. Similar groundwater influences on riverine isotopes have been documented in several major river systems, including the Tarim River (Zuo et al., 2025), Yarlung Tsangpo River (Yan et al., 2021), and Nenjiang River (Cui et al., 2022). The autumn decline in δ18O values resulted from enhanced tributary contributions. The Xushui and Youshui Rivers delivered substantially higher discharges in autumn (18 and 6 m3/s, respectively, Cjh.com.cn, 2025) compared to spring (8 and 2 m3/s), increasing the input of isotopically depleted water to the mainstem and consequently reducing δ18O values.
During summer, precipitation served as the main recharge source under the East Asian Summer Monsoon influence. Summer precipitation contained relatively enriched δ18O signatures (see Section 4.2.1), while high temperatures intensified evaporative fractionation from the mainstem. Although tributaries brought depleted waters, these dilution effects were counterbalanced by the dominant enriching processes, maintaining high and fluctuating δ18O values in the mainstem.
4.3.2 Controlling factors in the Qin-Ba Mountains
After the mainstream of the Han River flowed out of the Hanzhong Basin and entered the terrain dominated by the Qin-Ba Mountains, the δ18O values of the mainstream first decreased and then increased. As shown in Figure 9, during spring and autumn, this variation in the mainstream aligned with that of the tributaries, indicating that tributary inflows primarily drove the changes in isotopic composition in this segment. However, this correlation was almost absent in summer, suggesting the influence of other dominant factors.
The spatial variation in δ18O values of the tributaries cannot be explained by a single isotopic effect but rather results from the combined influence of moisture sources and topographic structure. Regional studies and observations indicate that during the rainy season, the Qin-Ba region receives monsoon moisture from different pathways, including the southwestern channel from the Indian Ocean/Bay of Bengal and the southeastern channel from the Western Pacific/South China Sea (Song et al., 2021). Differences in moisture sources and transport paths affect precipitation isotopes through Rayleigh distillation and rainout processes (Sun et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2022a). In this context, the Ankang Fault developed within this region can be regarded as a topographic/tectonic transition zone (Xie et al., 2022). To the west of the fault, the steep North Daba Mountain Thrust Belt experiences intense tectonic uplift, which strongly blocks moisture with depleted isotopic composition transported from the southwestern direction (Song et al., 2021). Additionally, the forced uplift of water vapor induces initial condensation here, resulting in relatively negative δ18O values in both precipitation and tributary runoff. To the east of the fault, precipitation and tributaries are primarily influenced by moisture derived from the southeastern direction (Song et al., 2021), which is characterized by relatively enriched isotopic values. Furthermore, the river channel gradually widens in this segment, leading to prolonged water exposure, increased retention and evaporation, all of which contribute to the relative enrichment of δ18O in the tributaries.
When these tributaries converged into the mainstream, they significantly influenced the δ18O values of the mainstream through conservative mixing process in spring and autumn. Combined with measured oxygen isotope values, the impact of tributary inflow on the isotopic composition of the mainstream was calculated using the mass conservation formula (Equation 4).
where x represents the contribution rate of tributaries. δ18Omix represents the δ18O values of the mainstream after tributary confluences, while δ18Ot and δ18Om represent the isotope values of the tributary and mainstream, respectively. As shown in Table 3, the average contribution rate of tributaries is 47%, with a maximum of up to 93%.
However, during summer, as the river flowed out of the Hanzhong Basin and entered the Shiquan area, it often received strong convective rainfall from the Qin-Ba Mountains, as well as surface runoff generated by short-duration intense mountain storms (Li et al., 2018; Xiao et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2025). Summer storm events were frequently accompanied by the “amount effect” – the input of large amounts of fresh precipitation often led to lighter isotopic values in runoff, causing a decrease in δ18O values of the mainstream (Li C. et al., 2020; Li Z. et al., 2020; Ma et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2024). Additionally, when the river flowed out of the basin into gorges or narrow channels, the current velocity could increase instantaneously, reducing evaporative enrichment, causing a short-distance decline in the mainstream’s δ18O values. However, on a larger spatial scale, the influx of isotopically heavier moisture from the Western Pacific, combined with high evaporation effect and significant water retention (e.g., valley widening and reservoir storage), collectively leads to the relative enrichment of heavier isotopes in this river segment (Ding et al., 2014; Li C. et al., 2020; Tao et al., 2021; Zhang J. et al., 2025). On the other hand, although tributaries are numerous, the increased volume of the mainstream during the high-flow period reduced the dilution effect of tributary inputs on the overall isotopic composition (i.e., decreased flow proportion), thereby diminishing the dominant role of tributaries on the mainstream’s δ18O (Chen et al., 2008; Gao et al., 2018).
4.3.3 Controlling factors in the middle and lower reaches
As the mainstream enters the middle and lower reaches of the Han River, the δ18O values exhibit an increasing trend, with a smaller increase in the spring and a more pronounced rise in the summer and autumn. The highest values are observed in Xiangyang (Figure 9). The isotopic values of tributary and groundwater (−6.6‰ and −7.0‰, respectively) also showed an increasing trend and were significantly higher than those of the mainstream (−8.5‰), suggesting that tributary and groundwater in this section were not the primary factors causing the isotopic value changes in the mainstream. In Wang’s (2021) study, the multi-year average δ18O value for precipitation (−9.0‰) within this region aligns with those of mainstream (−8.5‰), indicating a dominant influence from atmospheric precipitation.
In the middle and lower reaches, the terrain is relatively flat, allowing water vapor from the western Pacific to penetrate far inland. Ingraham and Taylor (1991) conducted an analysis of isotopes in precipitation in coastal regions and found that during the transport of water vapor, heavy isotopes are continuously removed by precipitation along the pathway, leading to progressive depletion of heavy isotopes in the remaining vapor. Accompanied by the continental effect (Dansgaard, 1964; Rozanski et al., 1993), the δ18O of river water becomes progressively lighter from the estuary toward upstream areas. Furthermore, as rivers enter the plains, the channel slope decreases, flow velocity slows, and water residence time increases, which enhances evaporation (Deng et al., 2016; Hua et al., 2019; Ren et al., 2024). This process preferentially removes lighter isotopes from the water, concentrating heavier isotopes and further driving an increase in δ18O values. Seasonal variations in precipitation also play a critical role in controlling isotopic changes in the mainstream. Precipitation in summer and autumn is generally larger and typically exhibits lighter isotopic characteristics (lower δ18O values). However, enhanced evaporation preferentially removes the lighter isotopes, causing δ18O values to rise, which accounts for the difference in isotopic increase between spring and summer–autumn seasons.
At the specific confluences where the Tangbai River joins the Han River, the higher δ18O values (−6.6‰ in spring and −6.0‰ in autumn) of the tributary cause a localized anomaly, leading to a sharp increase in the δ18O of the mainstream, with a contribution rate reaching 36% (Table 3). However, this change is confined to a small area and does not significantly affect the overall spatial trend of the isotope composition. According to end-member mixing analysis theory, recharge source only exerts a notable influence on the isotope composition of the mainstream when its flow constitutes a substantial proportion of the mainstream’s flow (Hewlett and Hibbert, 1967; Liu and Kao, 2007; Ma et al., 2022). Given that tributaries in the middle and lower reaches contribute little to the mainstream (Table 3, average 18%), they primarily disrupt isotopic signals at the local scale rather than acting as dominant factors. The variation in δ18O of the mainstream, with its larger flow, is predominantly controlled by precipitation and evaporation.
5 Conclusion
In this study, we investigated the stable isotope characteristics of water bodies in the HRB. The results indicated that the hydrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions of water bodies in this watershed exhibited distinct spatial and seasonal variation patterns. Overall, stable isotope variations in the HRB were influenced by precipitation and underwent evaporative fractionation. Seasonally, influenced by atmospheric precipitation circulation effects and evaporation, the δ18O and δD values are higher in summer than in spring and autumn. Spatially, hydrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions in the mainstream are higher in the Hanzhong Basin, primarily controlled by shifts in the mixing ratio of groundwater and tributaries. However, since our study did not obtain groundwater flow data, we cannot quantify the contribution ratio between the two sources. Future research may consider incorporating hydrological models (such as SWAT) to conduct quantitative studies on this controlling factor. The Qin-Ba Mountains, the δ18O and δD values in mainstream first increase and then decrease. This trend is controlled by tributary inflow during spring and autumn, while in summer the stable isotope values rise due to heavy rainfall and intense evaporation. Entering the middle and lower reaches, the δ18O and δD values generally show an increasing trend, primarily influenced by precipitation and following the continental effect. By clarifying the recharge distribution patterns across different periods and the recharge types in distinct sub-regions, the spatiotemporal variations in the isotopic compositions of river water within the Han River Basin can furnish a core scientific underpinning for cross-seasonal water regulation, inter-regional water allocation, and long-term sustainable water resource planning.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
NW: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. Y-NY: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. J-WZ: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. M-LH: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. DZ: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. Y-CF: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. G-SZ: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. Z-QZ: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42373058, 42573054), Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges, Chang’an University (No. 300102274203), and the Henan Province Science and Technology Research Project (No. 252102320220).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Xue Tian, Chen Hao, and Gao Zhenpeng for helping in the field work.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The reviewer DM declared a shared affiliation with the authors NW, J-WZ, M-LH, G-SZ, Z-QZ to the handling editor at time of review.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Alexander, L., Allen, S., Bindoff, N., Breon, F., Church, J., Cubasch, U., et al. (2013). Climate change 2013: the physical science basis, in contribution of working group I (WGI) to the fifth assessment report (AR5) of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC).
Bershaw, J., Penny, S. M., and Garzione, C. N. (2012). Stable isotopes of modern water across the Himalaya and eastern Tibetan Plateau: implications for estimates of paleoelevation and paleoclimate. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 117 (D2), 2011JD016132. doi:10.1029/2011JD016132
Bu, H., Song, X., and Xia, J. (2018). The hydrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions of precipitation in a forested watershed of the South Qinling Mts. China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 25 (7), 6720–6728. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-0996-9
Cao, Y., Zhang, D., Wu, N., He, M., Zhang, J., and Zhao, Z. (2024). Transportation of dissolved inorganic carbon and the controlling factors. Bull. Mineralogy, Petrology Geochem. 44, 1–10. doi:10.3724/j.issn.1007-2802.20240122
Chen, H., Yan, B., Guo, S., and Zhang, H. (2008). Temporal and spatial trends analysis of the runoff in Hanjiang Basin. South-To-North Water Transfers Water Sci. and Technol. 6 (3), 49–53. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1683.2008.03.015
Chen, T., Xia, J., and Zou, L. (2019). The response of the upstream hydrological cycle process to climate change in the upper Hanjiang River Basin. China Rural Water Hydropower (9), 1–7. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-2284.2019.09.001
Chen, H., Li, J., Zhao, C., Wang, C., Hao, W., Meng, L., et al. (2024). Seasonal and spatial variations of water recharging in the Yangtze River using hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes. J. Hydrol. 639, 131563. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131563
Chiang, J. C. H., Herman, M. J., Yoshimura, K., and Fung, I. Y. (2020). Enriched East Asian oxygen isotope of precipitation indicates reduced summer seasonality in regional climate and westerlies. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117 (26), 14745–14750. doi:10.1073/pnas.1922602117
Cjh.com.cn (2025). HanRiver hydrological network [online]. Available online at: http://hj.cjh.com.cn/ (Accessed December 9, 2025).
Clark, I. D., and Fritz, P. (1997). Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology. Dublin: National Ground Water Association.
Craig, H. (1961). Isotopic variations in meteoric waters. Science 133 (3465), 1702–1703. doi:10.1126/science.133.3465.1702
Cui, G., Liu, Y., and Tong, S. (2022). Hydrogeochemical processes controlling the salinity of surface water and groundwater in an inland saline-alkali wetland in western Jilin, China. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10, 993849. doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.993849
Dansgaard, W. (1964). Stable isotopes in precipitation. Tellus 16 (4), 436–468. doi:10.3402/tellusa.v16i4.8993
Deng, Z. R. (1981). Hydrology and geography of the Han River. (04), 113–121. doi:10.19603/j.cnki.1000-1190.1981.04.017
Deng, K., Yang, S., Lian, E., Li, C., Yang, C., and Wei, H. (2016). Three Gorges Dam alters the Changjiang (Yangtze) river water cycle in the dry seasons: evidence from H-O isotopes. Sci. Total Environ. 562, 89–97. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.213
Deng, H., Wang, Q., Zhao, Y., Zhai, J., Zhu, Y., Gui, Y., et al. (2024). Effect of water vapor transport and budget on precipitation in the Yangtze-Huang-Huai-Hai River Basin. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 53, 101787. doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101787
Ding, T., Gao, J., Tian, S., Shi, G., Chen, F., Wang, C., et al. (2014). Chemical and isotopic characteristics of the water and suspended particulate materials in the Yangtze River and their geological and environmental implications. Acta Geol. Sin. Engl. Ed. 88 (01), 276–360. doi:10.1111/1755-6724.12197
Dutton, A., Wilkinson, B. H., Welker, J. M., Bowen, G. J., and Lohmann, K. C. (2005). Spatial distribution and seasonal variation in18O/16O of modern precipitation and river water across the conterminous USA. Hydrol. Process. 19 (20), 4121–4146. doi:10.1002/hyp.5876
Fan, B., Zhang, D., Tao, Z., and Zhao, Z. (2017). Compositions of hydrogen and oxygen isotope values of Yellow River water and the response to climate change. China Environ. Sci. 37 (05), 1906–1914.
Gammons, C. H., Poulson, S. R., Pellicori, D. A., Reed, P. J., Roesler, A. J., and Petrescu, E. M. (2006). The hydrogen and oxygen isotopic composition of precipitation, evaporated mine water, and river water in Montana, USA. J. Hydrol. 328 (1-2), 319–330. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.12.005
Gao, B., Li, J., and Wang, X. (2018). Analyzing changes in the flow regime of the Yangtze River using the eco-flow metrics and IHA metrics. Water-Sui 10 (11), 1552. doi:10.3390/w10111552
Gat, J. R. (1996). Oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in the hydrologic cycle. Annu. Rev. Earth Pl. S. C. 24 (1), 225–262. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.24.1.225
Gonfiantini, R. (1986). “Environmental isotopes in lake studies,” in Handbook of environmental isotope geochemistry. Editors P. Fritz, and J. C. Fontes (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 113–168.
Gosling, S. N., and Arnell, N. W. (2016). A global assessment of the impact of climate change on water scarcity. Clim. Change 134 (3), 371–385. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0853-x
Grover, V. I. (2014). “Impact of climate change on the water cycle,” in Managing water resources under climate uncertainty. Editors S. Shrestha, A. K. Anal, P. A. Salam, and M. van der Valk (Springer), 3–30.
Guay, B. E., Eastoe, C. J., Bassett, R., and Long, A. (2006). Identifying sources of groundwater in the lower Colorado River valley, USA, with δ18O, δD, and 3H: implications for river water accounting. Hydrogeol. J. 14 (1-2), 146–158. doi:10.1007/s10040-004-0334-4
Hewlett, J. D., and Hibbert, A. R. (1967). Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas. For. Hydrol. 1, 275–290.
Hitchon, B., and Krouse, H. R. (1972). Hydrogeochemistry of the surface waters of the Mackenzie River drainage basin, Canada—III. Stable isotopes of oxygen, carbon and sulphur. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac. 36 (12), 1337–1357. doi:10.1016/0016-7037(72)90066-X
Hu, J., Emile Geay, J., Nusbaumer, J., and Noone, D. (2018). Impact of convective activity on precipitation δ18O in isotope-enabled general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123 (23). doi:10.1029/2018JD029187
Hua, M., Zhang, X., Yao, T., Luo, Z., Zhou, H., Rao, Z., et al. (2019). Dual effects of precipitation and evaporation on lake water stable isotope composition in the monsoon region. Hydrol. Process. 33 (16), 2192–2205. doi:10.1002/hyp.13462
Huntington, T. G. (2006). Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: review and synthesis. J. Hydrol. 319 (1-4), 83–95. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.003
Ingraham, N. L., and Taylor, B. E. (1991). Light stable isotope systematics of large-scale hydrologic regimes in California and Nevada. Water Resour. Res. 27 (1), 77–90. doi:10.1029/90WR01708
Jia, Z. (2021). Study on ecological flow of cascade hydropower station in Xushui River Basin. (thesis). Northwest A&F University, Xi’an, China.
Kendall, C., and Coplen, T. B. (2001). Distribution of oxygen-18 and deuterium in river waters across the United States. Hydrol. Process. 15 (7), 1363–1393. doi:10.1002/hyp.217
Kundzewicz, Z. W. (2008). Climate change impacts on the hydrological cycle. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 8 (2-4), 195–203. doi:10.2478/v10104-009-0015-y
Le Duy, N., Heidbüchel, I., Meyer, H., Merz, B., and Apel, H. (2018). What controls the stable isotope composition of precipitation in the Mekong Delta? A model-based statistical approach. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc. 22 (2), 1239–1262. doi:10.5194/hess-22-1239-2018
Li, S., and Zhang, Q. (2008). Geochemistry of the upper Han River basin, China, 1: spatial distribution of major ion compositions and their controlling factors. Appl. Geochem. 23 (12), 3535–3544. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.08.012
Li, S., and Zhang, Q. (2009). Geochemistry of the upper Han River basin, China. 2: seasonal variations in major ion compositions and contribution of precipitation chemistry to the dissolved load. J. Hazard. Mater. 170 (2-3), 605–611. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.022
Li, S., Yue, F., Liu, C., Ding, H., Zhao, Z., and Li, X. (2015). The O and H isotope characteristics of water from major rivers in China. Chin. J. Geochem. 34 (1), 28–37. doi:10.1007/s11631-014-0015-5
Li, X., Tang, C., Han, Z., and Cao, Y. (2016). Hydrochemical characteristic and interaction process of surface and groundwater in mid-lower reach of HanJiang River, China. Environ. Earth Sci. 75 (5), 418. doi:10.1007/s12665-015-5175-z
Li, P., Wang, N., Dai, C., Wang, J., and Cheng, X. (2018). Modeling topographic effects on a heavy rainfall event on the Southern slopes of the qinling-daba Mountains. J. Shaanxi Meteorol. (1), 1–9. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4354.2018.01.001
Li, C., Lian, E., Yang, C., Deng, K., Qian, P., Xiao, S., et al. (2020). Seasonal variability of stable isotopes in the Changjiang (Yangtze) river water and its implications for natural climate and anthropogenic impacts. Environ. Sci. Eur. 32 (1), 84. doi:10.1186/s12302-020-00359-w
Li, Z. J., Li, Z. X., Song, L. L., and Ma, J. Z. (2020). Characteristic and factors of stable isotope in precipitation in the source region of the Yangtze River. Agr. For. Meteorol. 281, 107825. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107825
Li, Y., Liu, X., Xie, X., Cauquoin, A., and Werner, M. (2023). Interannual modulation of the East and South Asian summer precipitation δ18O by the Indian and western North Pacific summer monsoon strength. Glob. Planet. Change 227, 104187. doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2023.104187
Lin, F., Zhang, Q., Sinha, A., Wang, Z., Axelsson, J., Chen, L., et al. (2024). Seasonal to decadal variations of precipitation oxygen isotopes in northern China linked to the moisture source. Npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 7 (1), 14. doi:10.1038/s41612-024-00564-x
Liu, K., and Kao, S. (2007). A three end-member mixing model based on isotopic composition and elemental ratio. Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. 18 (5), 067. doi:10.3319/TAO.2007.18.5.1067(Oc
Ma, T., Xu, G., Zhao, C., Mao, J., Xu, M., Xiong, H., et al. (2022). Water source analysis of runoff in qinling forest small watershed, China based on H-O stable isotope tracing. J. Earch Sci. Environ. 44 (3), 545–557. doi:10.19814/j.jese.2022.02023
Martinelli, L. A., Victoria, R. L., Silveira Lobo Sternberg, L., Ribeiro, A., and Zacharias Moreira, M. (1996). Using stable isotopes to determine sources of evaporated water to the atmosphere in the amazon basin. J. Hydrol. 183 (3), 191–204. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(95)02974-5
Noipow, N. (2015). “Seasonal variation of the stable isotope fingerprints in Mekong River and the implication on hydrological study of Thailand and Lao PDR,” in The 3rd Lao-Thai Technical Conference.
Nusbaumer, J., Wong, T. E., Bardeen, C., and Noone, D. (2017). Evaluating hydrological processes in the community atmosphere model version 5 (CAM5) using stable isotope ratios of water. J. Adv. Model Earth Sy 9 (2), 949–977. doi:10.1002/2016MS000839
Ogrinc, N., Kocman, D., Miljević, N., Vreča, P., Vrzel, J., and Povinec, P. (2018). Distribution of H and O stable isotopes in the surface waters of the Sava River, the major tributary of the Danube River. J. Hydrol. 565, 365–373. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.024
Peng, Y., Wan, C., Jin, H., Luo, D., Yang, Y., Wang, Q., et al. (2018). Hydrological insights from hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in source area of the Yellow River, east-northern part of Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Ch. 317 (1), 131–144. doi:10.1007/s10967-018-5864-7
Poage, M. A. (2001). Empirical relationships between elevation and the stable isotope composition of precipitation and surface waters: considerations for studies of paleoelevation change. Am. J. Sci. 301 (1), 1–15. doi:10.2475/ajs.301.1.1
Qiu, J., Shen, Z., and Xie, H. (2023). Drought impacts on hydrology and water quality under climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 858, 159854. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159854
Reckerth, A., Stichler, W., Schmidt, A., and Stumpp, C. (2017). Long-term data set analysis of stable isotopic composition in German rivers. J. Hydrol. 552, 718–731. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.022
Ren, X., Li, P., He, X., and Zhang, Q. (2024). Tracing the sources and evaporation fate of surface water and groundwater using stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen. Sci. Total Environ. 931, 172708. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172708
Risi, C., Noone, D., Frankenberg, C., and Worden, J. (2013). Role of continental recycling in intraseasonal variations of continental moisture as deduced from model simulations and water vapor isotopic measurements. Water Resour. Res. 49 (7), 4136–4156. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20312
Rozanski, K., Araguás Araguás, L., and Gonfiantini, R. (1993). Isotopic patterns in modern global precipitation. Clim. Change Cont. Isotopic Rec. 78, 1–36. doi:10.1029/GM078p0001
Sharma, A., Kumar, K., Laskar, A., Singh, S. K., and Mehta, P. (2017). Oxygen, deuterium, and strontium isotope characteristics of the Indus River water system. Geomorphology 284, 5–16. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.12.014
Shi, M., Wang, S., Argiriou, A. A., Zhang, M., Guo, R., Jiao, R., et al. (2019). Stable isotope composition in surface water in the upper yellow River in Northwest China. Water-Sui 11 (5), 967. doi:10.3390/w11050967
Simpson, H. J., and Herczeg, A. L. (1991). Stable isotopes as an indicator of evaporation in the River murray, Australia. Water Resour. Res. 27 (8), 1925–1935. doi:10.1029/91WR00941
Song, L., Hao, C., and He, S. (2021). Study on spatial differentiation of precipitation between north and south of qinling Mountains. Earth Environ. 49 (6), 615–622. doi:10.14050/j.cnki.1672-9250.2021.49.049
Sun, B., Zhu, Y., and Wang, H. (2011). The recent interdecadal and interannual variation of water vapor transport over eastern China. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 28 (5), 1039–1048. doi:10.1007/s00376-010-0093-1
Sun, C., Tian, L., Shanahan, T. M., Partin, J. W., Gao, Y., Piatrunia, N., et al. (2022). Isotopic variability in tropical cyclone precipitation is controlled by Rayleigh distillation and cloud microphysics. Commun. Earth Environ. 3 (1), 50. doi:10.1038/s43247-022-00381-1
Tan, M. (2014). Circulation effect: response of precipitation δ18O to the ENSO cycle in monsoon regions of China. Clim. Dynam. 42 (3-4), 1067–1077. doi:10.1007/s00382-013-1732-x
Tan, M., Nan, S. L., and Duan, W. H. (2016). Seasonal scale circulation effect of stable isotope in atmospheric precipitation in the monsoon regions of China. Quat. Sci. 36 (3), 575–580. doi:10.11928/j.issn.1001-7410.2016.03.07
Tang, Y., Pang, H., Zhang, W., Li, Y., Wu, S., and Hou, S. (2015). Effects of changes in moisture source and the upstream rainout on stable isotopes in precipitation – a case study in Nanjing, eastern China. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc. 19 (10), 4293–4306. doi:10.5194/hess-19-4293-2015
Taniguchi, M., Nakayama, T., Tase, N., and Shimada, J. (2000). Stable isotope studies of precipitation and river water in the Lake Biwa basin, Japan. Hydrol. Process. 14 (3), 539–556. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(20000228)14:3<539::AID-HYP953>3.0.CO;2-L
Tao, S., Zhang, X., Pan, G., Xu, J., and Zeng, Z. (2021). Moisture source identification based on the seasonal isotope variation of precipitation in the Poyang Lake Wetland, China. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 37, 100892. doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100892
Wang, Y. (2021). Temporal and spatial evolution of precipitation stable isotopes in western Hubei: implications for palaeoclimate and paleoaltimetry reconstruction. (thesis). China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China.
Wang, D., Wu, D., Xie, X., and Li, X. (2020). Study on spatio-temporal variation of runoff in flood season in Hanjiang River Basin. Pearl River 41 (4), 30–39. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-9235.2020.04.005
Wang, B., Yang, Y., Clift, P., Xing, L., Zhang, Y., Tang, H., et al. (2025). Influence of Qinba Mountains on summer precipitation in the North-South transition zone based on WRF simulation. Environ. Res. Commun. 7 (6), 65013. doi:10.1088/2515-7620/addbab
Wu, H., Li, J., Song, F., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, C., et al. (2018). Spatial and temporal patterns of stable water isotopes along the Yangtze River during two drought years. Hydrol. Process. 32 (1), 4–16. doi:10.1002/hyp.11382
Wu, H., Fu, C., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Wei, Z., and Zhang, X. (2022a). Temporal variations of stable isotopes in precipitation from Yungui Plateau: insights from moisture source and rainout effect. J. Hydrometeorol. 23 (1), 39–51. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-21-0098.1
Wu, H., Song, F., Li, J., Zhou, Y., Zhang, J., and Fu, C. (2022b). Surface water isoscapes (δ18O and δ2H) reveal dual effects of damming and drought on the Yangtze River water cycles. J. Hydrol. 610, 127847. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127847
Wu, N., Zhang, J., He, M., Zhang, D., Fu, Y., Zhang, G., et al. (2025). Characteristics of spatial–temporal variations and controlling factors of chemical weathering in the Han River Basin. Water-Sui 17 (17), 2624. doi:10.3390/w17172624
Xiao, Y., Liu, R., Ma, Y., Zhang, X., Lou, P., and Gao, M. (2024). Comparative analysis of different heavy rainstorm periods lasting for two consecutive days in the Qinba Region under the influence of the Southwest vortex. Atmosphere-Basel 15 (3), 260. doi:10.3390/atmos15030260
Xie, W., Wang, X., Zhang, H., Liu, Q., Wang, S., and Lu, H. (2022). Drainage evolution in intermontane basins at the Qinling-Daba Mountains. Sci. Sin. Earth Sci. 52 (3), 497–516.
Xu, Z., Shi, C., Tang, Y., and Han, H. (2011). Chemical and strontium isotopic compositions of the Hanjiang Basin Rivers in China: anthropogenic impacts and chemical weathering. Aquat. Geochem. 17 (3), 243–264. doi:10.1007/s10498-011-9132-5
Yan, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, W., Zhang, G., Guo, J., Zhang, D., et al. (2021). Spatiotemporal variation of hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes in the Yarlung Tsangpo River Basin, Southern Tibetan Plateau. Front. Earth. Sci. 9, 757094. doi:10.3389/feart.2021.757094
Yan, S., Liu, Y., and Liu, Y. (2022). Research on the water cycle in Hanbei Basin based on water environmental isotopes. China Rural Water Hydropower (10), 87–90. doi:10.12396/znsd.220053
Yang, K., and Han, G. (2020). Controls over hydrogen and oxygen isotopes of surface water and groundwater in the Mun River catchment, northeast Thailand: implications for the water cycle. Hydrogeol. J. 28 (3), 1021–1036. doi:10.1007/s10040-019-02106-9
Yuan, J., Zhao, B., and Zhang, Q. (2019). Transformation and source identification of N in the upper reaches of the Han River basin, China: evaluated by a stable isotope approach. Environ. Monit. Assess. 191 (7), 475. doi:10.1007/s10661-019-7603-0
Zhang, S. (1989). Characteristics of hydrogen-oxygen isotope compositions of contemporarily atomspheric sedimentation in Shaanxi Province. Geol. Shaanxi (02), 57–66.
Zhang, G. W., Meng, Q. R., Yu, Z. P., Sun, Y., and Zhou, D. W. (1996). Orogenic processes and dynamic characteristics of the qinling orogenic Belt, 193–200.03
Zhang, Y. N., Gan, Y. Q., Li, X. Q., Liu, Y. D., Yu, K., and Zhang, B. (2016). Water chemical characteristics and controlling factors of the Yangtze River in the wet season, 2013. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 25 (4), 645–654. doi:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201604015
Zhang, L., Yuan, R., Song, X., and Xia, J. (2018). Spatial variation of stable isotopic composition in surface waters of the Huai River basin, China and the regional hydrological implication. Hydrol. Res. 49 (5), 1452–1466. doi:10.2166/nh.2017.027
Zhang, A., Zhao, X., He, J., Huang, X., Zhao, X., and Zhao, Y. (2023). Characteristics of hydrogen and oxygen isotope composition in precipitation, Rivers, and Lakes in Wuhan and the ecological environmental effects of Lakes. Water-Sui 15 (16), 2996. doi:10.3390/w15162996
Zhang, J., Yu, W., Thompson, L. G., Lewis, S., Cauquoin, A., Werner, M., et al. (2025). Shifting influences of Indian Ocean Dipole and western Pacific subtropical high on annual precipitation δ18O in southern East Asia. Npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 8 (1), 107. doi:10.1038/s41612-025-01000-4
Zhang, Q. Z., Jin, K., Wu, Y. H., Luo, Y., and Lu, Y. (2025). Composition and influencing factors of hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes in Guanshan River of the South-to-North water diversion middle route Project. J. Yangtze River Sci. Res. Inst. 42 (2), 179–187. doi:10.11988/ckyyb.20240475
Zheng, Y., Xiao, W., and Zhao, G. (2013). Introduction to tectonics of China. Gondwana Res. 23 (4), 1189–1206. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2012.10.001
Keywords: Han River Basin, stable isotopes, circulation effect, evaporative fractionation, water mixing, hydrological implication
Citation: Wu N, Yan Y-N, Zhang J-W, He M-L, Zhang D, Fu Y-C, Zhang G-S and Zhao Z-Q (2026) Spatiotemporal variability of hydrogen and oxygen stable isotopes in the Han River Basin and the regional hydrological implication. Front. Earth Sci. 13:1740170. doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1740170
Received: 05 November 2025; Accepted: 23 December 2025;
Published: 09 January 2026.
Edited by:
Tianming Huang, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), ChinaReviewed by:
Ruth Esther Villanueva Estrada, National Autonomous University of Mexico, MexicoRamanathan Alagappan, Independent Researcher, Tiruchirapalli, India
Dawei Mu, Chang’an University, China
Copyright © 2026 Wu, Yan, Zhang, He, Zhang, Fu, Zhang and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ya-Ni Yan, eWFueWFuaTE5OTBAMTYzLmNvbQ==
Mei-Li He1