- 1U.S. Geological Survey, Geology, Energy and Minerals Science Center, Reston, VA, United States
- 2Finsterle GeoConsulting, LLC, Kensington, CA, United States
by Plampin MR, Anderson ST, Finsterle S and Wiens AM (2025). Front. Earth Sci. 13:1639952. doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1639952
There was a mistake in Figure 2 as published. The State of Iowa was mis-labeled as the State of Wisconsin in the image of the map of the study area in the figure. The corrected Figure 2 appears below.
Figure 2. Outlines of the shallower injection units investigated in this study (colored lines) are superimposed on the shaded area, which represents the extent of the Mount Simon Sandstone Storage Assessment Unit from the USGS CO2 storage resource assessment (U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Carbon Dioxide Storage Resources Assessment Team, 2013). “Mt. Simon” refers to the Mount Simon Sandstone, “Potosi” refers to the Potosi Dolomite, and “St. Peter” refers to the St. Peter Sandstone. Within the Mt. Simon, the outline of a potential CO2 storage “sweet spot”, as defined by Anderson and Jahediesfanjani (2019), is also displayed. Dots represent modeled injection-well locations with a uniform 25 km × 25 km well-spacing (from Plampin et al., 2023).
The original article has been updated.
Generative AI statement
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: geologic carbon sequestration, injectivity, pressure buildup, optimization, Illinois basin
Citation: Plampin MR, Anderson ST, Finsterle S and Wiens AM (2025) Correction: Estimation of dynamic geologic CO2 storage resources in the Illinois basin, including effects of brine extraction, anisotropy, and hydrogeologic heterogeneity. Front. Earth Sci. 13:1761777. doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.1761777
Received: 05 December 2025; Accepted: 08 December 2025;
Published: 15 December 2025.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2025 Plampin, Anderson, Finsterle and Wiens. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Steven T. Anderson, c2FuZGVyc29uQHVzZ3MuZ292
Ashton M. Wiens1