ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Ecol. Evol.
Sec. Biogeography and Macroecology
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fevo.2025.1589794
Evidence for marine-driven, cyclical fluctuations in burrow-nesting seabird habitat on the Oregon Coast
Provisionally accepted- 1Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, United States
- 2United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Newport, United States
- 3U.S. Geological Survey, Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Corvallis, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Seabirds are among the most threatened birds globally, with the loss or deterioration of coastal breeding habitats posing a severe threat. Natural and anthropogenic disturbances substantially influence coastal ecosystems through erosion and vegetation loss, altering habitat for the wildlife species that depend on them. In addition to these disturbances, oceanographic processes may play an important role in shaping the vegetation at breeding habitats; however, there is limited information on how vegetative conditions for burrow nesting seabirds have changed over time, and whether these changes are related to specific oceanographic or climatic factors. The Oregon Coast National Wildlife Refuge Complex, USA (NWRC) is home to a diverse suite of 1.3 million nesting seabirds from 14 species, which provide valuable ecological, economic, and cultural services, including nutrient transfer to terrestrial habitats and ecotourism for local communities. Over the last 30 years, populations of several burrow nesting seabird species including tufted puffin (Fratercula cirrhata) and rhinoceros auklet (Cerorhinca monocerata), which breed on offshore islands, have sharply declined along the Oregon Coast. To better understand the potential factors driving these declines, we conducted a spatiotemporal analysis of an aspect of burrow nesting seabird habitat, vegetation cover, within the Oregon Coast NWRC. Specifically, we quantified vegetative cover on 16 islands from 1992 to 2022 using a combination of empirical data, historical aerial photography (1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005), and aerial photography from the National Agriculture Imagery Program (2005Program ( -2022)). Results showed cyclical fluctuations in vegetation cover coast-wide, which were closely related to large scale oceanographic oscillations. Specifically, vegetation cover was negatively correlated with the winter Pacific Decadal Oscillation and positively correlated with the spring El Nino Southern Oscillation. We did not directly compare seabird population trends to vegetation trends; however, quantifying these long-term changes in vegetation at breeding habitats can contribute to our comprehensive understanding of the myriad factors influencing seabird population dynamics and conservation.
Keywords: random forest, time series analysis, habitat classification, seabirds, Coastal ecosystems, vegetation cover Disclaimer
Received: 08 Mar 2025; Accepted: 18 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kusaka, Stephensen, Peterson and Davis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Carina M. Kusaka, Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Corvallis, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.