Abstract
Introduction:
Oxidative homeostasis plays a crucial role in physiology, as reactive oxygen species (ROS) regulate immunity and longevity, but also lead to damaging oxidative stress. ROS are therefore expected to influence host-parasite interactions. Previous studies have shown that supplementing mosquito diets with prooxidants (hydrogen peroxide) or antioxidants (ascorbic acid) disturbs their oxidative balance, particularly in uninfected individuals, which actively avoid these compounds when given a choice.
Methods:
Here, we evaluated how such diet-induced shifts in oxidative status influence infection outcomes with the microsporidian parasite Vavraia culicis in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Mosquitoes were fed a standard sugar solution or one supplemented with a prooxidant or an antioxidant either early or late in life. We then measured longevity, fecundity, and parasite load 13 days after emergence or at death.
Results:
Early prooxidant consumption increased longevity; this benefit was lower in infected mosquitoes. Antioxidant consumption increased fecundity irrespective of infection. Early intake of either supplement increased parasite load in 13-day old mosquitoes, while late intake promoted parasite growth later in life.
Discussion:
These findings reveal context-dependent effects of oxidative status on host traits and parasite dynamics, emphasizing the crucial role of timing in shaping oxidative interventions.
Introduction
Nutrition is a crucial factor shaping host-parasite interactions because it delivers energy, micronutrients and other compounds that affect both the host’s and the parasite’s fitness (; ; ; Ponton et al., 2011, 2013). One mechanism is that nutrition modulates constitutive and inducible immune responses (; Povey et al., 2009; , ; ; ; ; Ponton et al., 2020). However, since nutrition influences immunity through various other direct and indirect pathways, including the interactions with the host’s endogenous microbiota (Ponton et al., 2011; ; Simpson and Raubenheimer, 2012), many details of the mechanism are poorly understood (; Schmid-Hempel, 2021). Yet, a deeper understanding of the relationship between nutrition and immunity is important, for it has implications for morbidity and mortality (; Samartín and Chandra, 2001; ; Ritz and Gardner, 2006; Sorci and Faivre, 2008).
For many animals a large part of the nutrition is provided by flowering plants. Since these have coevolved with their pollinators and herbivores for millions of years (van der Kooi and Ollerton, 2020), they contain numerous volatile and non-volatile compounds () in their nectar, pollen, resin and oils (Palmer-Young et al., 2019; Parachnowitsch et al., 2019). These include macronutrients (proteins, fats and carbohydrates), which can shape host–parasite interactions both directly and through their interactions with one another (; ; ; ; ; Ponton et al., 2020). However, their effects on immune function and host survival are further complicated by many other plant-derived compounds, which may also modulate these interactions (Povey et al., 2009; ; ). Micronutrients – chemical substances like vitamins and minerals required in small quantities for normal growth, development, and immune function () – are one such class of compounds. In addition, several phytochemicals in nectar or pollen have antimicrobial properties, so they protect not only the plants from pathogens (; ; Mcart et al., 2014), but also the animals that feed on them (; Singer et al., 2009; ). Such properties may be particularly significant for pollinators and nectar-feeders, which are frequently exposed to the secondary metabolites.
As regular nectar-feeders (Ode, 2006) and vectors for parasites with major implications for human health, mosquitoes are particularly interesting for studying effects of secondary metabolites in nectar on host-parasite interactions. Indeed, nectar influences the outcome of mosquito infections by malaria parasites, likely due to a combination of toxic secondary metabolites and the nutritional profile of the nectar (). Many of the compounds in nectar possess oxidative or antioxidative properties, which impact the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the development of oxidative stress (OS) in mosquitoes (). Both ROS and OS play important roles in shaping mosquito life-history traits, such as aging and reproduction (; ; Metcalfe and Alonso-Alvarez, 2010) while also regulating their immune responses (Pham-Huy et al., 2008). Redox cycles induced by prooxidants like hydrogen peroxide and by antioxidants like ascorbic acid are a likely defence mechanism against many bacteria and fungi in nectar (; Schmitt et al., 2021). OS further acts as a physiological mediator linking environmental factors, including diet, to life-history trade-offs by modulating processes such as immune defence, reproduction, and aging (). Elevated ROS levels can both signal immune activation and cause cellular damage, requiring mosquitoes to maintain a finely balanced oxidative homeostasis that influences host survival and parasite resistance. Understanding how this balance is achieved may therefore provide valuable insights into the effects of mosquito nutrition on disease transmission. Furthermore, elucidating the roles of macro- and micronutrients in oxidative homeostasis and host-parasite interactions can clarify the behavioural ecology of self-medication in these insects (; ; ).
In a recent study, we found that Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes dynamically adjust their dietary preferences in response to an infection by the microsporidian parasite Vavraia culicis (Zeferino et al., 2024). Infected individuals initially prefer diets containing prooxidants but later shift towards antioxidants as the infection progressed. This dynamic strategy suggests a trade-off between resistance and tolerance over time. In contrast, uninfected mosquitoes consistently avoid both prooxidant and antioxidant diets. These dietary choices significantly influence oxidative homeostasis, particularly in uninfected individuals, supporting the hypothesis of self-medication and indicating possible effects on other life-history traits. Building on these findings, we sought with this study to investigate the broader impacts of dietary supplementation with a prooxidant or an antioxidant on mosquitoes’ health and their possible implications for disease transmission. We thus examined the effects of consuming a standard sugar source or one supplemented with a prooxidant or an antioxidant, administered early or late in life (Figure 1), on the longevity, fecundity, and resistance of An. gambiae to infection by V. culicis. Additionally, we assessed whether these supplements impose a cost on uninfected mosquitoes. Based on our previous results, we hypothesised that infected individuals would benefit from oxidative supplements, thereby justifying their selective intake, while uninfected individuals would experience fitness costs when consuming these diets, which may explain their active avoidance. These assumptions provide a framework to evaluate the adaptive value of diet-mediated modulation of oxidative balance in the context of infection.
Figure 1
Materials and methods
Experimental system
We used the Kisumu strain of An. gambiae s.s (Vulule et al., 1994), which had been maintained at our standard laboratory conditions (about 600 individuals per cage, constant access to 6% sucrose solution, 26 ± 1°C, 70 ± 5% relative humidity and 12 h light/dark) for many years before the experiments.
To infect mosquitoes, we used the microsporidian V. culicis floridensis, which had been provided by J.J Becnel (USDA, Gainesville, FL, USA). V. culicis is an obligate intracellular parasite of several mosquito genera, including Anopheles (; ; ). To maintain its status as a generalist parasite, we alternately infected Aedes aegypti and An. gambiae (Zeferino and Koella, 2024).
Mosquitoes become infected as larvae when they ingest spores. After several rounds of replication, the parasite produces infectious spores that spread to the gut and fat body cells. These spores are released into larval habitats when larvae die, when adults die on the water surface, or when eggs coated with spores are laid onto the water.
Mosquito rearing and maintenance
We conducted two experiments, one for longevity and one for fecundity, so that the two traits do not interfere with each other due to the life-history trade-off in An. gambiae (). The design of the two experiments was identical. Freshly hatched (0 to 3-hour-old) larvae were individually placed into 12-well culture plates, each containing 3 ml of deionised water. The larvae received Tetramin Baby® fish food every day according to their age (0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.16, 0.32 and 0.6 mg/larva, respectively, at ages 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 or older ()). Two-day-old larvae were exposed to either 0 or 10,000 spores of V. culicis. Pupae were transferred to individual 50 ml falcon tubes with approximately 10 ml of deionised water (). Upon emergence, females were maintained according to the experiment: for the longevity-experiment we kept females alone in 150 ml cups to prevent mating, whereas in the fecundity-experiment we kept mosquitoes in groups of 20 females and 20 males in 1.5 l jars to allow mating (see details below).
Longevity experiment
Adult females were individually moved to 150 ml cups (5.5 cm Ø x 10 cm) covered with a net immediately upon emergence (Figure 1A). The cups contained 50 ml deionised water covered by a petri dish (50 mm Ø) to prevent the mosquitoes from drowning. A 10 x 7 cm filter paper partly submerged in the water maintained humidity in the cup. The mosquitoes were provided with tightly compressed cotton balls (approx. 4 cm diameter) that were soaked with about 5–8 ml of the diet they were allocated to and placed onto the net of the cup. The cotton balls were replaced daily. The cups were surveyed daily, and dead individuals were collected and frozen at -20°C for later analysis.
Fecundity experiment
Females were moved to 1.5 l jars (15 cm Ø x 20 cm) in groups of 20 according to their treatment status immediately upon emergence. To enable mating, we also added 20 males. These were from our colony and were thus not infected, so that fecundity was not influenced by the infection of their mates. The mosquitoes were fed daily with cotton balls soaked in their respective diet. Nine days after emergence females were given the opportunity to blood-feed on TGZ’s arm for five minutes (Figure 1B). One day later females that were not fully engorged were excluded from the experiment. The next day the remaining females were transferred to individual cups containing 50 ml deionised water covered by a petri dish (50 mm Ø) to prevent the mosquitoes from drowning. The cup also contained a 94 mm Ø filter paper folded into the shape of a cone for egg laying. Four days after blood-feeding (so 13 days after emergence), the females were frozen at -20°C for later analysis and a picture was taken of each filter paper so that we could count the eggs.
Dietary treatments
We gave the mosquitoes one diet (referred to as early diet) from day 0 (the day of emergence) to day 4, and another diet (referred to as late diet) from day 5 up to the mosquitoes’ death (Figure 1). This categorization was based on our previous work (Zeferino et al., 2024) where we showed that infected mosquitoes exhibited a preference for different diets in early and late stages of life. At each of these stages, mosquitoes received either 10% sucrose (referred to as sugar diet), 10% sucrose supplemented with 8mM of hydrogen peroxide (prooxidant diet) or 10% sucrose supplemented with 1mg/mL of ascorbic acid (vitamin c; antioxidant diet). The diets were freshly prepared on the day they were given to the mosquitoes. The concentrations of hydrogen peroxide and ascorbic acid correspond to concentrations found in nectar (; ; Santos et al., 2017; ), and they had been tested before the experiment to ensure they did not kill the mosquitoes.
Measurements
The number of eggs was measured from the photos with the software ImageJ v1.54 (). The right wing of every mosquito was removed and its length was measured from the axillary incision to the wing’s tip (; Petersen et al., 2016) with ImageJ. The remainder of the mosquito was put into a 2 ml Eppendorf tube containing 0.1 ml of deionised water. A stainless-steel bead (Ø 5 mm) was added to each tube and the samples were homogenised with a Qiagen TissueLyser LT at a frequency of 30 Hz for two minutes. The number of spores in each sample was counted from 0.1 µl of the sample with a haemocytometer under a phase-contrast microscope (400x magnification).
Statistical analysis
All analyses were conducted with R (Team, 2017) version 4.4.2, using the packages glmmTMB () for model fitting, DHARMa () for model diagnostics, car () for ANOVA, and emmeans () and multcomp () for post hoc comparisons. We used generalized linear mixed-effects models (GLMMs) implemented in the glmmTMB package, selecting the distribution that best suited the biological nature of the data and provided the best model fit. Model assumptions, including overdispersion and residual structure, were checked using simulated residual diagnostics from the DHARMa package. Significance was assessed using the Anova function from the car package (), with Type III ANOVA used in the presence of significant interactions, and Type II otherwise. Post-hoc multiple comparisons were conducted using emmeans with Tukey adjustment for multiple testing.
Age at death was analysed with a linear model with a Gaussian distribution of errors, where the response variable was age at death and the explanatory variables were infection status, early diet, late diet, and their interactions. Wing length was included as a covariate.
The proportion of individuals laying eggs was analysed with a generalised linear model with a binomial distribution of errors, where the response variable was the proportion of individuals that laid eggs and the explanatory variables were the infection status, early diet, late diet, and their interactions. Wing length was included as a covariate.
The number of eggs was analysed with a linear model with a Gaussian distribution of errors, where the response variable was egg count and the explanatory variables were infection status, early diet, late diet, and their interactions. Wing length was included as a covariate. Individuals that did not lay eggs were excluded from this analysis.
The infection dynamics of V. culicis in An. gambiae have been previously characterized (e.g., Zeferino and Koella, 2024). At the time of adult emergence (day 0), spores are not yet detectable. About 4 days after emergence spores become detectable in all exposed individuals, and parasite load increases until around day 8. Parasite growth then slows and typically plateaus after day 12. Because we assessed spore load on day 13 – during this plateau phase – we expected, and indeed found, that all exposed mosquitoes had detectable levels of infection. Spore load was measured using a haemocytometer with 0.1 µl of sample (i.e., 1/1000 of the total homogenate volume), resulting in a detection threshold of approximately 1000 spores. Counts were analysed using a generalized linear model with a negative binomial distribution to account for overdispersion (Venables and Ripley, 2002), where the response variable was spore load and the explanatory variables were early diet, late diet, their interaction, and wing length as a covariate. Since the number of spores increases throughout the mosquitoes’ life, we analysed the spore load at death (from the longevity experiment) using a generalised linear model with a negative binomial distribution of errors, where the response variable was spore load at death and the explanatory variables were age at death, early diet, late diet, their interaction, and wing length as a covariate.
Results
Longevity
In the longevity experiment, mosquitoes were housed individually and received their assigned dietary treatment daily until death (see Figure 1A). Infection by V. culicis shortened the lifespan from an average of 29.4 days to 24.8 days (χ2 = 83.11, df = 1, p < 0.001) and feeding on sugar supplemented with the prooxidant increased the lifespan, whether the consumption was early (prooxidant: 29.9 days; antioxidant: 26.2 days; sugar: 25.1 days; χ2 = 65.75, df = 2, p < 0.001) or late (prooxidant: 28.1 days; antioxidant: 26.9 days; sugar: 26.2 days; χ2 = 8.94, df = 2, p = 0.011, Figure 2). However, the impact of late diet was small, and its impact was not seen within groups defined by early diet and infection status (multiple comparisons of Figure 2). The effects of the early and the late diet were independent of each other (early diet * late diet: χ2 = 2.69, df = 4, p = 0.611). However, the early diet had a stronger impact on uninfected individuals than infected ones, with both supplemented diets increasing longevity (prooxidants: 32.8 vs 26.1 days; antioxidants: 29.2 vs 24.4 days; sugar 26.3 vs. 23.6 days; interaction infection status * early diet: χ2 = 10.11, df = 2, p = 0.006, Figures 2A–C), while the impacts of the late diet (infection status * late diet: χ2 = 0.96, df = 2, p = 0.617) and of the combination of the two diets (infection status * early diet * late diet: χ2 = 1.62, df = 4, p = 0.805) on infected and uninfected individuals were similar.
Figure 2
Egg-laying likelihood
In the fecundity experiment, mosquitoes were transferred to individual egg-laying cups and allowed to oviposit over a two-day period. They continued to receive their assigned dietary treatment daily until they were frozen on day 13 (see Figure 1B). 59.5% of the mosquitoes laid at least one egg, independently of the their infection status (57.8% vs 61.0%, χ2 = 1.12, df = 1, p = 0.290), early diet (62.3% vs 56.9% vs 59.0%, χ2 = 2.13, df = 2, p = 0.345), late diet (61.2% vs 60.1% vs 57.0%, χ2 = 1.25, df = 2, p = 0.536) or any of their interactions (infection status * early diet: χ2 = 3.95, df = 2, p = 0.139; infection status * late diet: χ2 = 1.76, df = 2, p = 0.414; early diet * late diet: χ2 = 5.91, df = 4, p = 0.206; infection status * early diet * late diet: χ2 = 2.64, df = 4, p = 0.619; Figures 3A–C).
Figure 3
Fecundity output
In contrast, if the mosquitoes did lay eggs, infection by V. culicis reduced the number of eggs from an average of 87.5 eggs to 81.7 eggs (χ2 = 4.06, df = 1, p = 0.044) and consuming sugar supplemented with either a prooxidant or, in particular, an antioxidant increased the number of eggs, whether the supplement was given early (prooxidant: 85.9 eggs; antioxidant: 95.3 eggs; sugar: 73.6 eggs; χ2 = 23.91, df = 2, p < 0.001) or late (prooxidant: 89.4 eggs; antioxidant: 87.8 eggs; sugar: 76.9 eggs; χ2 = 13.06, df = 2, p = 0.001). These effects were independent of any combination of the treatments (infection status * early diet: χ2 = 3.66, df = 2, p = 0.160; infection status * late diet: χ2 = 2.55, df = 2, p = 0.280; early diet * late diet: χ2 = 4.42, df = 4, p = 0.352; infection status * early diet * late diet: χ2 = 5.62, df = 4, p = 0.229; Figures 4A–C).
Figure 4
Infection outcome
In both experiments, mosquitoes were collected on day 13 or at death for spore load assessment (see Figures 1A, B). The mosquitoes that were assayed 13 days after emergence harboured, on average, about 1.5x105 spores (Figures 5A, B), and early consumption of sugar supplemented with either a prooxidant or an antioxidant increased the spore load (prooxidant: 1.7x105 spores; antioxidant: 1.6x105 spores; sugar: 1.1x105 spores; χ2 = 8.35, df = 2, p = 0.015). However, although spore load was not influenced by the late diet (prooxidant: 1.4x105 spores; antioxidant: 1.6x105 spores; sugar: 1.3x105 spores; χ2 = 2.31, df = 2, p = 0.315), early consumption of prooxidants followed by late consumption of antioxidants led to the higher parasite load (early diet * late diet: χ2 = 12.15, df = 4, p = 0.016).
Figure 5
The spore load at death increased with age at death (χ2 = 25.40, df = 1, p < 0.001) and was higher in mosquitoes consuming either supplemented diet provided early (χ2 = 25.30, df = 2, p < 0.001, Figure 5C), with an average spore load of 5.9x105 per day in mosquitoes feeding on the prooxidant and antioxidant diet, and 4.1x105 spores on the sugar diet. Notably, while the late diet had a modest effect on spore load (χ2 = 9.10, df = 2, p = 0.010), it also changed the relationship between spore load and age, with supplemented diets increasing spore load with age at death (age * late diet: χ2 = 9.36, df = 2, p = 0.009, Figure 5C).
Discussion
Supplementing the sugar meals of mosquitoes with prooxidants or antioxidants had significant effects on their longevity, fecundity and parasite growth, likely increasing their reproductive success. These effects depended on the timing of the supplementation, with early-life diets having a particularly strong influence. However, some of the observed outcomes – especially those related to longevity and fecundity – deviated from our initial expectations, particularly in uninfected individuals. Rather than experiencing strong costs from consuming these supplemented diets, uninfected mosquitoes sometimes showed neutral or even unexpectedly beneficial responses. In the following sections, we explore possible explanations for these patterns, discuss how they relate to oxidative homeostasis and previously observed dietary preferences (Zeferino et al., 2024), and reflect on their broader ecological and epidemiological implications.
Consuming a prooxidant or an antioxidant together with sugar, particularly early in life, significantly extended both the longevity (Figure 2) and the fecundity (Figure 4) of uninfected mosquitoes. These results were unexpected, as uninfected individuals actively avoided these diets when given a choice (Zeferino and Koella, 2024). However, the beneficial effect of antioxidants aligns with findings from other studies. For instance, antioxidants enhance longevity in mealworm beetles by suppressing immune activity and reducing immunopathology (). Similarly, feeding crickets with vitamin C reduces several aspects of oxidative damage, including damaged DNA in haemocytes (). In contrast, the positive effect of prooxidants observed in our study differs from previous findings in An. arabiensis, where hydrogen peroxide reduced lifespan. This discrepancy may be explained by the low, naturally occurring concentration of hydrogen peroxide used in our experiment. At such levels, dietary ROS may have hormetic effects – where mild oxidative stress induces beneficial cellular responses – enhancing physiological function and extending lifespan (Ristow, 2014; ). These effects may involve the upregulation of cellular defence mechanisms, enhanced viral resistance (Pan et al., 2012) or modulation of insulin-signalling pathway to extend longevity (Zhang et al., 2017).
The effects of dietary supplementation were also observed in infected mosquitoes, though to a lesser extent. Two main explanations may account for this difference. First, parasites may reduce the beneficial impacts of the supplements. For antioxidants, this could occur because parasitic infections stimulate the immune system, leading to oxidative damage. Although antioxidant intake typically reduces oxidative stress and limits cellular damage (Sternberg et al., 2012; ), infection-induced immune activation might counteract these benefits. For prooxidants, the combined ROS increase from the diet and parasite-induced immune stimulation may push OS beyond manageable levels, disrupting oxidative homeostasis and leading to oxidative damage. Second, these dietary supplements may reduce the pathological effects of infection on longevity and fecundity, although increasing parasite load (Figure 5). This increase, observed both at day 13 and at death, suggests that the diets help hosts to better cope with the physiological costs of infection, enabling them to live despite a more efficiently parasite proliferation. This aligns with a form of tolerance where the host is not reducing the parasite’s growth (as in resistance) but is instead managing the infection’s impact on its own survival (longevity-tolerance (Strauss and Agrawal, 1999; Stowe et al., 2000; ; )), fecundity (fecundity-tolerance (; Råberg et al., 2007, 2008; ; )) and potentially other life-history traits. These results also highlight a potential dual effect of these diets: they increased resistance early in life (i.e., reduced parasite load on day 8 (Zeferino et al., 2024)) while promoting tolerance later in life (i.e., increased parasite load by day 13 without apparent costs).
Although both diets disrupt the mosquito’s oxidative homeostasis (Zeferino et al., 2024), their effects diverged. Prooxidants may boost immune function, perhaps by raising ROS levels, which helps to combat infections (; Schneeberger et al., 2013), and increases longevity (Figure 2). In contrast, antioxidants appeared to suppress immune responses by decreasing ROS (; ; Marva et al., 1989; ; ). While this boosted fecundity (Figure 4), it had no effect on longevity and appeared to compromise the ability to contain infections, highlighting the immuno-suppressant effects of antioxidants diets. While these dietary items did not clear the infection, as is often the case in the wild (; Richardson et al., 2015), they significantly improved the overall fitness of the host, as reflected in increased longevity and fecundity (; Singer and Bernays, 2009; Singer et al., 2009; ). Notably, the timing of supplementation played a critical role, with early diet interventions showing stronger effects than late supplementation. This temporal difference aligns with the infection dynamics of V. culicis, which undergoes exponential growth around day four before slowing and reaching a plateau after day twelve (Zeferino and Koella, 2024).
Our findings suggest that our dietary treatments are most effective when administered before day five, during the early, rapid replication phase of the parasite. Prooxidant intake during this period likely increases oxidative stress, which, while causing some cellular damage (Råberg et al., 2008; ; Schmid-Hempel, 2021), may also inhibit V. culicis replication, thus extending host longevity (Sternberg et al., 2012; ). In contrast, antioxidant intake reduces oxidative stress, mitigating cellular damage but potentially facilitating V. culicis replication. This could explain the observed trade-off between increased fecundity and shorter lifespan in mosquitoes consuming antioxidants (Sternberg et al., 2012; ). These results emphasize the importance of the interaction between dietary timing and the physiological dynamics of both the host and the parasite. Our findings also underscore the complex interplay between prooxidants and antioxidants in mosquito physiology, challenging the traditional notion of oxidative stress as solely damaging. Instead, oxidative stress appears to play a dual role, where its benefits and costs are carefully balanced by the mosquitoes, influencing their survival and reproduction. This nuanced perspective highlights the adaptive strategies mosquitoes employ to regulate oxidative stress in response to dietary factors, emphasizing the importance of oxidative balance in their biology.
Understanding this complexity provides valuable insights into mosquito ecology and physiology, offering potential avenues for innovative vector control strategies. However, our results also raise important considerations for the use of V. culicis as a biological control agent. Infected mosquitoes showed an ability to mitigate the fitness costs of parasitism, potentially reducing the effectiveness of microsporidians. These findings emphasise the need to account for host-parasite dynamics and dietary influences when designing biological control programs.
A key limitation of this study is that we did not directly measure oxidative stress or immune parameters alongside the life-history traits we examined. Such measurements would have strengthened our interpretation of how dietary treatments modulate mosquito physiology, particularly in relation to switching diets mid-life. Capturing oxidative stress at multiple time points—rather than a single snapshot—would have allowed us to trace the temporal dynamics of oxidative balance and better understand the progression of physiological responses. Including additional oxidative damage markers or broader immune indicators would also have provided a more complete mechanistic picture, but these were beyond the logistical scope of this study. Finally, examining the potential transgenerational costs of these diets, especially in uninfected individuals, could reveal important hidden trade-offs. We believe these are promising directions for future research to deepen our understanding of the interplay between diet, immunity, and infection in mosquitoes.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
The manuscript presents research on animals that do not require ethical approval for their study.
Author contributions
TZ: Project administration, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Investigation. AM: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Methodology. JK: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Supervision, Methodology.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. TGZ, ARM and the project were supported by SNF grant 310030_192786.
Acknowledgments
We thank Luís M. Silva for his advice and technical support.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2025.1628611/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AbbottJ. (2014). Self-medication in insects: Current evidence and future perspectives. Ecol. Entomol39, 273–280. doi: 10.1111/een.12110
2
AbràmoffM. D.MagalhãesP. J.RamS. J. (2004). Image processing with imageJ. Biophotonics Int.11, 36–42.
3
AdamoS. A.RobertsJ. L.EasyR. H.RossN. W. (2008). Competition between immune function and lipid transport for the protein apolipophorin III leads to stress-induced immunosuppression in crickets. J. Exp. Biol.211, 531–538. doi: 10.1242/JEB.013136
4
AndreadisT. G. (2007). Microsporidian parasites of mosquitoes. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc.23, 3–29. doi: 10.2987/8756-971X(2007)23[3:MPOM]2.0.CO;2
5
AwodeleO.EmekaP. M.AkintonwaA.AinaO. O. (2007). Antagonistic effect of vitamin E on the efficacy of artesunate against Plasmodium berghei infection in mice. Afr. J. Biomed. Res.10, 51–57. doi: 10.4314/ajbr.v10i1.48971
6
BaracchiD.BrownM. J. F.ChittkaL. (2015). Behavioural evidence for self-medication in bumblebees? F1000Res4, 1–20. doi: 10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.6262.3
7
BartlettL. J.Martinez-MejiaC.DelaplaneK. S. (2022). Honey bees (Apis mellifera Hymenoptera: Apidae) preferentially avoid sugar solutions supplemented with field-relevant concentrations of hydrogen peroxide despite high tolerance limits. J. Insect Sci.22, 1–6. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieab102
8
BerryR.López-MartínezG. (2020). A dose of experimental hormesis: When mild stress protects and improves animal performance. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol.242, 110658. doi: 10.1016/J.CBPA.2020.110658
9
BrooksM. E.KristensenK.van BenthemK. J.MagnussonA.BergC. W.NielsenA.et al. (2017). glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J.9. doi: 10.32614/rj-2017-066
10
BrunnerF. S.Schmid-HempelP.BarribeauS. M. (2014). Protein-poor diet reduces host-specific immune gene expression in Bombus terrestris. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.281, 1–11. doi: 10.1098/RSPB.2014.0128
11
CalderP. C.JacksonA. A. (2000). Undernutrition, infection and immune function. Nutr. Res. Rev.13, 3–29. doi: 10.1079/095442200108728981
12
CarterC.ThornburgR. W. (2004). Is the nectar redox cycle a floral defense against microbial attack? Trends Plant Sci.9, 320–324. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.05.008
13
ChambersM. C.SchneiderD. S. (2012). Pioneering immunology: insect style. Curr. Opin. Immunol.24, 10–14. doi: 10.1016/J.COI.2011.11.003
14
CheonH. M.SangW. S.BianG.ParkJ. H.RaikhelA. S. (2006). Regulation of lipid metabolism genes, lipid carrier protein lipophorin, and its receptor during immune challenge in the mosquito Aedes aEgypti. J. Biol. Chem.281, 8426–8435. doi: 10.1074/JBC.M510957200/ASSET/21B18318-D046-4B08-BEF8-AC5CE6637E03/MAIN.ASSETS/GR7.JPG
15
ClaytonD. H.WolfeN. D. (1993). The adaptive significance of self-medication. Trends Ecol. Evol.8, 60–63. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(93)90160-Q
16
Corby-HarrisV.HabelK. E.AliF. G.PromislowD. E. L. (2007). Alternative measures of response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol.20, 526–533. doi: 10.1111/J.1420-9101.2006.01267.X
17
CostantiniD. (2019). Understanding diversity in oxidative status and oxidative stress: The opportunities and challenges ahead. J. Exp. Biol.222. doi: 10.1242/JEB.194688/2696
18
CostantiniC.AyalaD.GuelbeogoW. M.PombiM.SomeC. Y.BassoleI. H. N.et al. (2009). Living at the edge: biogeographic patterns of habitat segregation conform to speciation by niche expansion in Anopheles Gambiae. BMC Ecol.9, 1–27. doi: 10.1186/1472-6785-9-16
19
CotterS. C.ReaveyC. E.TummalaY.RandallJ. L.HoldbrookR.PontonF.et al. (2019). Diet modulates the relationship between immune gene expression and functional immune responses. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.109, 128–141. doi: 10.1016/J.IBMB.2019.04.009
20
CotterS. C.SimpsonS. J.RaubenheimerD.WilsonK. (2011). Macronutrient balance mediates trade-offs between immune function and life history traits. Funct. Ecol.25, 186–198. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2435.2010.01766.X
21
Cunningham-RundlesS.McNeeleyD. F.MoonA. (2005). Mechanisms of nutrient modulation of the immune response. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.115, 1119–1128. doi: 10.1016/J.JACI.2005.04.036
22
DaoA.KassogueY.AdamouA.DialloM.YaroA. S.TraoreS. F.et al. (2010). Reproduction-longevity trade-off in Anopheles Gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol47, 769–777. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/47.5.769
23
de RoodeJ. C.HunterM. D. (2019). Self-medication in insects: when altered behaviors of infected insects are a defense instead of a parasite manipulation. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci.33, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2018.12.001
24
de RoodeJ. C.LefèvreT.HunterM. D. (2013). Self-medication in animals. Sci. (1979)340, 150–151. doi: 10.1126/science.1235824
25
DhinautJ.BalourdetA.TeixeiraM.ChogneM.MoretY. (2017). A dietary carotenoid reduces immunopathology and enhances longevity through an immune depressive effect in an insect model. Sci. Rep.7, 1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12769-7
26
DowlingD. K.SimmonsL. W. (2009). Reactive oxygen species as universal constraints in life-history evolution. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.276, 1737–1745. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1791
27
FlaszB.DziewięckaM.KędziorskiA.TarnawskaM.AugustyniakJ.AugustyniakM. (2021). Multigenerational selection towards longevity changes the protective role of vitamin C against graphene oxide-induced oxidative stress in house crickets. Environ. pollut.290, 117996. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2021.117996
28
ForresterS. J.KikuchiD. S.HernandesM. S.XuQ.GriendlingK. K. (2018). Reactive oxygen species in metabolic and inflammatory signaling. Circ. Res.122, 877–902. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311401
29
FoxJ.WeisbergS. (2020). Using car and effects Functions in Other Functions. 1–5.
30
FukudaT.WillisO. R.BarnardD. R. (1997). Parasites of the Asian tiger mosquito and other container-inhabiting mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in northcentral Florida. J. Med. Entomol34, 226–233. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/34.2.226
31
GalenzaA.HutchinsonJ.CampbellS. D.HazesB.FoleyE. (2016). Glucose modulates Drosophila longevity and immunity independent of the microbiota. Biol. Open5, 165–173. doi: 10.1242/BIO.015016
32
GodfreyD. G. (1957). Antiparasitio Action of Dietary God Liver Oil upon Plasmodium berghei and its Reversal by Vitamin” E. Exp. Parasitol.6, 555–565. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(57)90038-3
33
GrahamA. L.ShukerD. M.PollittL. C.AuldS. K. J. R.WilsonA. J.LittleT. J. (2011). Fitness consequences of immune responses: strengthening the empirical framework for ecoimmunology. Funct. Ecol.25, 5–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01777.x
34
HarmanD. (1992). Role of free radicals in aging and disease. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci.673, 126–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb27444.x
35
HartigF. (2022).DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (Multi-level/mixed) regression models. Available online at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa (Accessed June 10, 2023).
36
HaydonD. T.MatthewsL.TimmsR.ColegraveN. (2003). Topndash;down or bottom–up regulation of intra–host blood–stage malaria: do malaria parasites most resemble the dynamics of prey or predator? Proc. R Soc. Lond B Biol. Sci.270, 289–298. doi: 10.1098/RSPB.2002.2203
37
HerbertE. W.ShimanukiJ. H. (1978). “Chemical composition and nutritive value of bee collected and bee-stored pollen,” in Apidologie (Italy: Springer Science+Business Media), 9 (1), 33–40.
38
HerbertE. W.VandersliceJ. T.HiggsD. J. (1985). Vitamin C enhancement of brood rearing by caged honeybees fed a chemically defined diet. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2 (1), 29–37. doi: 10.1002/arch.940020104
39
HienD. F.d.S.DabiréK. R.RocheB.DiabatéA.YerbangaR. S.et al. (2016). Plant-mediated effects on mosquito capacity to transmit human malaria. PloS Pathog.12. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005773
40
HothornT.BretzF.WestfallP. (2008). Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J.50, 346–363. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200810425
41
HowickV. M.LazzaroB. P. (2014). Genotype and diet shape resistance and tolerance across distinct phases of bacterial infection. BMC Evol. Biol.14, 1–13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-56/FIGURES/5
42
HuangM.Sanchez-MoreirasA. M.AbelC.SohrabiR.LeeS.GershenzonJ.et al. (2012). The major volatile organic compound emitted from Arabidopsis thaliana flowers, the sesquiterpene (E)-β-caryophyllene, is a defense against a bacterial pathogen. New Phytol.193, 997–1008. doi: 10.1111/J.1469-8137.2011.04001.X
43
IsahM. B.IbrahimM. A. (2014). The role of antioxidants treatment on the pathogenesis of malarial infections: a review. Parasitol. Res.113, 801–809. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-3804-1
44
JacksonJ. A.HallA. J.FribergI. M.RalliC.LoweA.ZawadzkaM.et al. (2014). An immunological marker of tolerance to infection in wild rodents. PloS Biol.12, e1001901. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.1001901
45
JunkerR. R.ThollD. (2013). Volatile organic compound mediated interactions at the plant-microbe interface. J. Chem. Ecol.39, 810–825. doi: 10.1007/S10886-013-0325-9
46
KarbanR.English-LoebG. (1997). Tachinid parasitoids affect host plant choice by caterpillars to increase caterpillars to increase caterpillar survival. Ecology78, 603–611. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078
47
KayA. D.BruningA. J.van AlstA.AbrahamsonT. T.HughesW. O. H.KaspariM. (2014). A carbohydrate-rich diet increases social immunity in ants. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.281. doi: 10.1098/RSPB.2013.2374
48
KelleyD. S.BendichA. (1996). Essential nutrients and immunologic functions. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.63, 994S–996S. doi: 10.1093/AJCN/63.6.994
49
KellyJ. F.AnthonyD. W.DillardC. R. (1981). A laboratory evaluation of the microsporidian Vavraia culicis as an agent for mosquito control. J. Invertebr Pathol.37, 117–122. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(81)90064-1
50
KoellaJ. C.LyimoE. O. (1996). Variability in the relationship between weight and wing length of Anopheles Gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol33, 261–264. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/33.2.261
51
KrungkraiS. R.YuthavongY. (1987). The antimalarial action on Plasmodium falciparum of qinghaosu and artesunate in combination with agents which modulate oxidant stress. Trans. R Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg81, 710–714. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(87)90003-4
52
KulmaK.SaddlerA.KoellaJ. C. (2013). Effects of age and larval nutrition on phenotypic expression of insecticide-resistance in Anopheles mosquitoes. PloS One8, e58322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058322
53
KutzerM. A. M.ArmitageS. A. O. (2016). The effect of diet and time after bacterial infection on fecundity, resistance, and tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster. Ecol. Evol.6, 4229–4242. doi: 10.1002/ECE3.2185
54
LazzaroB. P.LittleT. J. (2008). Immunity in a variable world. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.364, 15–26. doi: 10.1098/RSTB.2008.0141
55
LenthR. V. (2023).emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. Available online at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (Accessed June 10, 2023).
56
LeonhardtS. D.ChuiS. X.KubaK. (2024). The role of non-volatile chemicals of floral rewards in plant-pollinator interactions. Basic Appl. Ecol.75, 31–43. doi: 10.1016/J.BAAE.2024.01.002
57
MarvaE.CohenA.SaltmanP.ChevionM.GolenserJ. (1989). Deleterious synergistic effects of ascorbate and copper on the development of Plasmodium falciparum: an in vitro study in normal and in G6PD-deficient erythrocytes. Int. J. Parasitol.19, 779–785. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(89)90066-0
58
McartS. H.KochH.IrwinR. E.AdlerL. S. (2014). Arranging the bouquet of disease: floral traits and the transmission of plant and animal pathogens. Ecol. Lett.17, 624–636. doi: 10.1111/ELE.12257
59
MetcalfeN. B.Alonso-AlvarezC. (2010). Oxidative stress as a life-history constraint: the role of reactive oxygen species in shaping phenotypes from conception to death. Funct. Ecol.24, 984–996. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01750.x
60
OdeP. J. (2006). Plant chemistry and natural enemy fitness: Effects on herbivore and natural enemy interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol51, 163–185. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151110
61
Palmer-YoungE. C.FarrellI. W.AdlerL. S.MilanoN. J.EganP. A.JunkerR. R.et al. (2019). Chemistry of floral rewards: intra- and interspecific variability of nectar and pollen secondary metabolites across taxa. Ecol. Monogr.89, e01335. doi: 10.1002/ECM.1335
62
PanX.ZhouG.WuJ.BianG.LuP.RaikhelA. S.et al. (2012). Wolbachia induces reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent activation of the Toll pathway to control dengue virus in the mosquito Aedes aEgypti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.109, E23–E31. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.1116932108/SUPPL_FILE/ST09.DOCX
63
ParachnowitschA. L.MansonJ. S.SletvoldN. (2019). Evolutionary ecology of nectar. Ann. Bot.123, 247–261. doi: 10.1093/AOB/MCY132
64
PetersenV.MarchiM. J.NatalD.MarrelliM. T.BarbosaA. C.SuesdekL. (2016). Assessment of the correlation between wing size and body weight in captive Culex quinquefasciatus. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop.49, 508–511. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0039-2016
65
Pham-HuyL. A.HeH.Pham-HuyC. (2008). Free radicals, antioxidants in disease and health. Int. J. BioMed. Sci.4, 89–96. doi: 10.59566/IJBS.2008.4089
66
PontonF.MorimotoJ.RobinsonK.KumarS. S.CotterS. C.WilsonK.et al. (2020). Macronutrients modulate survival to infection and immunity in Drosophila. J. Anim. Ecol.89, 460–470. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13126
67
PontonF.WilsonK.CotterS. C.RaubenheimerD.SimpsonS. J. (2011). Nutritional immunology: A multi-dimensional approach. PloS Pathog.7, e1002223. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PPAT.1002223
68
PontonF.WilsonK.HolmesA. J.CotterS. C.RaubenheimerD.SimpsonS. J. (2013). Integrating nutrition and immunology: A new frontier. J. Insect Physiol.59, 130–137. doi: 10.1016/J.JINSPHYS.2012.10.011
69
PoveyS.CotterS. C.SimpsonS. J.LeeK. P.WilsonK. (2009). Can the protein costs of bacterial resistance be offset by altered feeding behaviour? J. Anim. Ecol.78, 437–446. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2656.2008.01499.X
70
RåbergL.GrahamA. L.ReadA. F. (2008). Decomposing health: tolerance and resistance to parasites in animals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.364, 37–49. doi: 10.1098/RSTB.2008.0184
71
RåbergL.SimD.ReadA. F. (2007). Disentangling genetic variation for resistance and tolerance to infectious diseases in animals. Science318, 812–814. doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.1148526
72
RichardsonL. L.AdlerL. S.LeonardA. S.AndicoecheaJ.ReganK. H.AnthonyW. E.et al. (2015). Secondary metabolites in floral nectar reduce parasite infections in bumblebees. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.282. doi: 10.1098/RSPB.2014.2471
73
RistowM. (2014). Unraveling the truth about antioxidants: Mitohormesis explains ROS-induced health benefits. Nat. Med.20, 709–711. doi: 10.1038/NM.3624;SUBJMETA=2366,631,80,86;KWRD=STRESS+SIGNALLING
74
RitzB. W.GardnerE. M. (2006). Malnutrition and energy restriction differentially affect viral immunity. J. Nutr.136, 1141–1144. doi: 10.1093/JN/136.5.1141
75
SamartínS.ChandraR. K. (2001). Obesity, overnutrition and the immune system. Nutr. Res.21, 243–262. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5317(00)00255-4
76
SantosV. H. M.MinatelI. O.RecoP. C.GarciaA.LimaG. P. P.SilvaR. M. G. (2017). Peptide composition, oxidative and insecticidal activities of nectar from flowers of Spathodea campanulata P. Beauv. Ind. Crops Prod97, 211–217. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.12.025
77
Schmid-HempelP. (2021). Evolutionary parasitology: the integrated study of infections, immunology, ecology, and genetics (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).
78
SchmittA.RoyR.CarterC. J. (2021). Nectar antimicrobial compounds and their potential effects on pollinators. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci.44, 55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2021.03.004
79
SchneebergerK.CzirjákG.Á.VoigtC. C. (2013). Inflammatory challenge increases measures of oxidative stress in a free-ranging, long-lived mammal. J. Exp. Biol.216, 4514–4519. doi: 10.1242/jeb.090837
80
SimpsonS. J.RaubenheimerD. (2012). The nature of nutrition. Princeton University Press. doi: 10.1515/9781400842803/HTML
81
SingerM. S.BernaysE. A. (2009). “Specialized generalists: behavioral and evolutionary ecology of polyphagous woolly bear caterpillars,” in Tiger moths and woolly bears: behavior, ecology, and evolution of the Arctiidae (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 103–114.
82
SingerM. S.MaceK. C.BernaysE. A. (2009). Self-medication as adaptive plasticity: increased ingestion of plant toxins by parasitized caterpillars. PloS One4, e4796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004796
83
SorciG.FaivreB. (2008). Inflammation and oxidative stress in vertebrate host–parasite systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.364, 71–83. doi: 10.1098/RSTB.2008.0151
84
SternbergE. D.LefèvreT.LiJ.de CastillejoC. L. F.LiH.HunterM. D.et al. (2012). Food plant derived disease tolerance and resistance in a natural butterfly-plant-parasite interaction. Evol. (N Y)66, 3367–3376. doi: 10.1111/J.1558-5646.2012.01693.X
85
StoweK. A.MarquisR. J.HochwenderC. G.SimmsE. L. (2000). The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.31, 565–595. doi: 10.1146/ANNUREV.ECOLSYS.31.1.565/CITE/REFWORKS
86
StraussS. Y.AgrawalA. A. (1999). The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol.14, 179–185. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01576-6
87
Team, R. C (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical com-puting.
88
van der KooiC. J.OllertonJ. (2020). The origins of flowering plants and pollinators. Sci. (1979)368, 1306–1308. doi: 10.1126/SCIENCE.AAY3662/ASSET/D58F6410-481C-4AC3-8529-9F758E59C4B7/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/368_1306_F2.JPEG
89
VenablesW. N.RipleyB. D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S (New York, NY: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
90
VululeJ. M.BeachR. F.AtieliF. K.RobertsJ. M.MountD. L.MwangiR. W. (1994). Reduced susceptibility of Anopheles Gambiae to permethrin associated with the use of permethrin-impregnated bednets and curtains in Kenya. Med. Vet. Entomol8, 71–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1994.tb00389.x
91
ZeferinoT. G.KoellaJ. C. (2024). Host-specific effects of a generalist parasite of mosquitoes. Sci. Rep.14, 18365. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69475-4
92
ZeferinoT. G.MoraA. R.VallatA.KoellaJ. C. (2024). Mosquitoes self-medicate according to the dynamics of a microsporidian infection. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.12.628192
93
ZhangX. S.WangT.LinX. W.DenlingerD. L.XuW. H. (2017). Reactive oxygen species extend insect life span using components of the insulin-signaling pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.114, E7832–E7840. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.1711042114/SUPPL_FILE/PNAS.1711042114.SAPP.PDF
Summary
Keywords
oxidative stress, life-history trade-offs, parasite tolerance, host-parasite interactions, Anopheles mosquitoes, self-medication, infection resistance, oxidative ecology
Citation
Zeferino TG, Mora AR and Koella JC (2025) Timing of prooxidant and antioxidant intake shapes life-history and parasite tolerance in Anopheles mosquitoes. Front. Ecol. Evol. 13:1628611. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2025.1628611
Received
14 May 2025
Accepted
18 July 2025
Published
04 August 2025
Volume
13 - 2025
Edited by
Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Spain
Reviewed by
Marko D. Prokic, University of Belgrade, Serbia
Pepijn Luijckx, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Zeferino, Mora and Koella.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Tiago G. Zeferino, tiago.goncalves@unine.ch
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.