ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Special Educational Needs
This article is part of the Research TopicCultural and Contextual Challenges in the Inclusion of Children with Developmental DisordersView all 13 articles
Effects of a Structured Multisensory Phonics-Based Intervention on Children Identified as showing risk signs for Dyslexia: A Longitudinal Study in Brazilian Public Schools
Provisionally accepted
- Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract Introduction: This study evaluated the effects of a structured intervention protocol, grounded in systematic and multisensory phonics instruction, on reading development in children identified as showing risk signs for dyslexia through a multifactorial protocol. Methods: Seventy-six preschool and early elementary students were classified into three risk levels (mild, moderate, significant) based on phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming (RAN), and short-term/working memory. The intervention consisted of four progressive cycles (28 sessions in total). Cycles I and II involved small-group preventive sessions targeting phonological awareness, oral language, and early literacy concepts, supported by phonics-based materials and multisensory activities. From Cycle III onward, students were divided into two support groups: Risk Level 1 (small-group prevention) and Risk Level 2 (individual intensive support). Literacy development was monitored at five timepoints (T1–T5). Analyses included chi-square tests (χ²), adjusted standardized residuals, Cramér’s V, and multinomial logistic regression. Results: The intervention significantly increased the number of children achieving initial and consolidated literacy stages, with a reduction in those remaining at the pre-literacy stage. By T5, no significant differences remained between risk groups and the comparison group, indicating effectiveness of the intervention in promoting similar developmental trajectories. A small subset of students showed persistent difficulties, underscoring the need for ongoing individualized support. Differentiated response patterns across risk levels confirmed the predictive validity of the early identification protocol, demonstrating its utility for selecting children most in need of preventive and intensive intervention. Conclusion: A structured multisensory and systematic phonics-based intervention applied to children identified through early risk identification effectively supported those at risk for dyslexia. Findings highlight the potential of preventive and intensive interventions to reduce literacy gaps and the importance of sustained individualized support for students with persistent challenges, offering practical implications for inclusive education policies in public schools.
Keywords: Brazilian education, multisensory phonics instruction, Preventive intervention, reading acquisition, Response to Intervention (RtI), risk signs for dyslexia
Received: 11 Sep 2025; Accepted: 21 Jan 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Vale De Oliveira and Guimarães. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Vivian Régia Vale De Oliveira
Sandra Regina Kirchner Guimarães
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.