Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article

Front. Educ.

Sec. Higher Education

This article is part of the Research TopicReimagining Higher Education: Responding Proactively to 21st Century Global ShiftsView all 53 articles

Reframing Flipped Studio Learning for Transformative Pedagogy in Architecture and Built Environment Education

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Faculty of Architecture, Urban Design and Creative Arts, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham, Thailand
  • 2Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham, Thailand

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Flipped learning has been widely recognized for promoting active and self-directed learning across higher education, yet its theoretical grounding within architecture and built environment education remains fragmented and underdeveloped. This study employs a conceptual–analytical methodology, combining a narrative literature review and analytical mapping to studio pedagogy, to develop a discipline-specific conceptual–operational framework for Flipped Studio Learning. The framework identifies four adoption drivers—pedagogical design, technological readiness, learner engagement, and institutional support—which interact through the mediating construct of perceived effectiveness and are influenced by contextual factors such as discipline type, class size, and prior learning experience. The study yields three major theoretical outcomes: (1) a theoretically grounded model explaining how flipped learning aligns with studio-based education; (2) measurable constructs and operational indicators that translate the framework into testable variables; and (3) three conceptual propositions (P1–P3) that guide subsequent empirical validation through methods such as SEM, case studies, or longitudinal research. Theoretically, the study integrates constructivism, experiential learning, and reflective practice with the epistemology of studio pedagogy, repositioning flipped learning as a reflective pedagogical ecosystem rather than a delivery technique. Practically, it offers actionable pathways for curriculum renewal, studio orchestration, and institutional policy—advancing technology-enhanced, student-centered design education.

Keywords: architecture and built environment education, conceptual–operational framework, Design Pedagogy, flipped classroom, reflective practice, Studio-based learning, Technology-Enhanced Learning

Received: 17 Oct 2025; Accepted: 26 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Ruengtam. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Porntip Ruengtam

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.