Abstract
Paper mills generate large quantities of wastewater and sludge waste depending on the type of paper making processes employed. This poses several problems regarding wastewater treatment, discharge, and sludge disposal. Whenever wastewater is generated, it should be treated in wastewater treatment plants prior to being released to the environment since it can be polluting and dangerous. A study was conducted at Star Paper Mills Ltd. Saharanpur, UP to demonstrate the existing and advanced technologies for wastewater treatment. The mill uses woody raw materials such as eucalyptus, poplar, and veener chips to manufacture a wide range of industrial and cultural grade papers, such as absorbent kraft, maplitho, azure lay, and copier. We observed that the most common excess back water is from paper machines, bleach plant effluent, floor cleaning, and other sources of wastewater. High chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and low biodegradability are all characteristics of pulp and paper wastewater. Approximately 85–90% of the fresh water utilized is wasted. We examined the wastewater collected and evaluated from the paper mill by Central Pulp and Paper Research Institute (CPPRI). The Effluent treatment plant (ETP) at Star Paper Mills Ltd. is sufficient to facilitate satisfactory removal of suspended matter in clarifiers and oxidation of biodegradable organic matter in aeration tank. As a matter of fact, if the ETP is operated under optimal conditions, the aeration capacity is sufficient to effectively treat even higher BOD loads than the existing load.
1 Introduction
1. The pulp and paper industry has long been regarded as one of the most significant consumers of natural resources, energy, and a major polluter of the environment. It generates a huge number of pollutants because of pulping and manufacturing paper goods, the composition of which varies depending on the manufacturing method. In terms of wastewater generation, the pulp and paper industry ranks third (; ; ). Water is produced throughout the manufacturing process because of numerous activities such as wood preparation, pulping, pulp washing, bleaching, and coating processes. Figure 1 depicts the pulp and paper industry’s production flow chart. These industries require a large number of lignocellulosic plant components and utilize chemicals during the manufacturing process, and they are often considered polluting industries due to the large amount of waste material that enters the environment. Increased economic concerns and tight environmental rules arose as a result of the growing demand for freshwater. This exercise emphasizes the use of water and appropriate wastewater treatment procedures in the pulp and paper sector (; ; Zhang et al., 2022; Khan et al., 2022; ; ). Only when wastewater is adequately treated, it can be successfully reused, reducing the amount of freshwater utilized. As a result, the amount of wastewater emitted into the atmosphere will be reduced (; ; ). Water recovery and reuse, on the other hand, can raise organic and inorganic concentrations, which can impact paper formation, increase the bacterial load, or cause corrosion and stink. As a result, an appropriate advanced wastewater treatment system must be adopted to solve this (; ; ).
FIGURE 1
For instance, the process of pulping involves the separation the fibers and creation of a fiber suspension in water. Mechanical, thermal, and chemical energy, in various amounts, can be used to achieve this separation (; ; ). The most significant sources of contamination from various stages of the process are: wood preparation, pulping, pulp washing, screening, bleaching, papermaking, and coating operations, depending on the method. The type of wood, the type of operation, the amount of water that the mill can circulate, the technology utilized, and the management techniques adopted all influence the properties of the waste liquid to be treated (; ; Shaikh et al., 2021; Tillaguango et al., 2022; ). Untreated waste fluids might have significant biological oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), suspended particles (primarily fibers), fatty acids, tannins, resin acids, lignin, and its derivatives, depending on the raw material and the procedure involved (). Some are naturally occurring contaminants, while others are xenobiotics created during the pulp and paper production process. Some compounds resist biological decomposition and are harmful to aquatic organisms (; ; ). It is reported that pulp and paper wastewater contains around 700 organic and inorganic chemicals, including adsorbable organic halogens (AOX), colour, and phenolic compounds (). Some bleaching methods produce bioaccumulative chemicals.
In a recent study, researchers have reported that bleaching effluents have high BOD and COD levels, as well as a lot of suspended particles, fatty acids, tannins, resin acids, and lignin and its derivatives (). These suspended solids, organic substances, chromophoric compounds, inorganic compounds, and salts are all characteristics of high yield pulping wastewaters (Yuan et al., 2022; Wen et al., 2022; Zakari et al., 2022; ). In addition to the foregoing, semi-chemical procedures use lignosulfonates. Solids dissolved organics, and chromophoric chemicals are all measured in the Kraft process wastewaters. If Kraft pulps are bleached with chlorine chemicals, organochlorine compounds may be present (). Table 1 shows examples of beginning COD for high yield pulping and Kraft pulping. Furthermore, there is a variation in the physiochemical characteristics among the size of paper mills i.e., small and large paper mills. Table 2 summarizes the physio-chemical characteristics of small and large paper mills (Murshed et al., 2021a; ; ).
TABLE 1
| Effluent | Process | COD [mg/L] |
|---|---|---|
| Pulp mills | TMP | 3,350; 3,450; 5,400; 7,120; 3,430 |
| BCTMP-TMP | 3,520; 7,310 | |
| TMP-CTMP | 4,800: 7,830 | |
| CTMP | 4,650; 7,290; 8,000–9,600: 12,000 | |
| Kraft bleaching | 400–800: 1,100–1,600: 1,200–1,250 | |
| NSSC | 2000–6,000 | |
| Paper mills | TMP | 1,050–4,000 |
| CTMP | 3,500–1,100; 9,500 | |
| NSSC | 5,600 | |
| Kraft | 2000; 2,400; 3,200; 4,110 |
COD of effluents from high yield and chemical pulping processes.
TABLE 2
| Characteristics | Small mills | Large mills |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemical oxygen demand (mg/L) | 680–1,250 | 155 |
| Chemical oxygen demand (mg/L) | 3,400–5,780 | 716 |
| COD/BOD ratio | 3.9–5 | 4.6 |
| pH | 8.2–8.5 | 8.5–9.5 |
| Total solids (mg/L) | – | 4,410 |
| Suspended solids (mg/L) | 900–2000 | 3,300 |
Physical and chemical characteristics.
Thus it has become a significant task to understand the physio-chemical characteristics of wastewater from the pulp and paper making process.
1.1 Characteristics of wastewater
1.1.1 Physical characteristics
Color, odour, temperature, and solids content are the most important physical features of wastewater ().
1.1.1.1 Color
Because of considerable bacterial breakdown, wastewater appears dark grey or black in colour, indicating that it is septic. Under anaerobic septic conditions, sulphides such as ferrous sulphide, hydrogen sulphide, and the creation of divalent metal irons increase the colour of the effluent.
1.1.1.2 Odour
Fresh wastewater has a pleasant odour, but when it is digested biologically under anaerobic conditions for 3–4 h, odorous chemicals are emitted. As a result, hydrogen sulphide and other sulphur compounds are released, increasing the odour.
1.1.1.3 Temperature
Temperature measurement is critical because most wastewater treatment plans contain temperature-sensitive biological processes. The temperature of wastewater varies depending on the season and geographic region. Temperatures in colder places will range from 7 to 18°C, while temperatures in warmer regions will range from 13 to 24°C.
1.1.1.4 Solid content
Insoluble or suspended solids, as well as soluble chemicals dissolved in water, make up total solids in wastewater. The suspended solids concentration is determined by drying and weighing the residue left after the sample has been filtered (; Tillaguango et al., 2021; Murshed et al., 2021b). Proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids make up the majority of organic matter.
1.1.1.5 Turbidity
Turbidity is the cloudiness or haziness of fluids with suspended solid matter, which is made up of particles of various sizes; it is caused by suspended and colloidal particles in wastewater. Due to the growth of algae, the anaerobic process, and gas production noted by Pavanelli and Bigi, it will rise (; ; ). A nephlometer with a light source and one or more photoelectric detectors read out mechanism at right angles to the stream of light can be used to measure it.
1.1.2 Chemical characteristics
1.1.2.1 Inorganic chemicals
For reusing treated wastewater, inorganic phosphorus, chloride, sulphate, pH, and alkalinity are being evaluated. The growth of aquatic plants is fueled by nitrogen and phosphorus. Heavy metals that are not consistently determined as trace elements must be considered for biological wastewater treatment. The growth of organisms in water requires trace elements such as cobalt, copper, iron, and zinc [; ; ; Işık et al., 2021]. However, if the number of heavy metals in the environment exceeds a certain level, it might be harmful. As a result, characterization of treated effluent and settling sludge is critical.
1.1.2.2 Organic chemicals
1.1.2.2.1 Biochemical oxygen demand and chemical oxygen demand
The biodegradability of the organic matter contained in the wastewater is measured by BOD. It is reflected by the microorganism’s consumption of oxygen to oxidize the waste present in the wastewater at a specific period (; Rehman et al., 2021; Murshed et al., 2021a; ; ). A high BOD level in wastewater indicates a considerable amount of degradable organic matter. The amount of oxygen required for the full breakdown of organic matter is also represented by COD. COD produces dissolved raw materials, chemicals to aid the pulping process, and substances generated during the pulping process, all of which have major environmental consequences. The COD value in pulp and paper mill effluent is determined by the paper making process (). The BOD/COD ratio is a critical statistic for determining the biodegradability of a contaminant in wastewater. When the ratio is larger than 0.5, the organic pollutant contained in the wastewater has a high biodegradability, while when it is less than 0.3, it has a low biodegradability.
1.1.2.2.2 Total organic carbon
The total quantity of carbon in organic compounds such as suspended particulate matter, colloidal particles, BOD, and COD is referred to as TOC. It is feasible to relate and identify the BOD and COD values using the TOC value to determine the typical wastewater.
2 Wastewater treatment
The alarming issue regarding the use of freshwater, vis-a-vis stringent environmental regulations calls for the need for water use and efficient wastewater treatment in the pulp-and-paper industry. Thus, the recycling and reuse of the generated wastewater after its proper treatment is the key to reducing freshwater use. This approach will in turn minimize effluent discharge to the environment and at the same time conserve the environment by reducing freshwater use. There are several wastewater treatment technologies whose major goal is to eliminate contaminants by combining physio-chemical, biological, and sophisticated treatment processes that encompass primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment.
2.1 Primary treatment
Primary treatment in the pulp and paper industry is accomplished through various unit operations such as screening, mixing, sedimentation, filtration, dissolved air floatation, and sedimentation, all of which remove a small amount of organic material in the form of suspended solids. At surface loading rates of up to 1.4 m3/m2 h, it removes around 80% of suspended particles from wastewater. Drying, incineration, freezing, dialysis, osmosis, and adsorption are all part of the process.
2.2 Secondary treatment
Aerated lagoons, aerobic reactors, and anaerobic reactors are used to treat pulp and paper mill effluent. The activated sludge technique is the most frequent biological treatment method (ASP). For the removal of COD, BOD, TSS, and AOX in pulp and paper mill effluent, it consists of an aeration tank with complete mixing followed by a secondary clarifier. The aerobic bacteria’ oxygen needs are met by distributed aerators or a shaft mechanical aeration system. According to Bajpai and Bajpai (), the removal of AOX ranges from 15 to 65%, while the elimination of specific chlorinated organics such as chlorinated phenols, catechols, guaiacols, and vanillins can range from 20 to 100%. The ASP that treats wastewater from paper mills appears to be particularly prone to thickening. It contributes to sludge’s low settleability, resulting in poor wastewater quality. Hydraulic variation, organic load variation, and filamentous bulking all have a negative impact on depollution operations in pulp and paper wastewater treatment plants (). It improves the removal of particles in the wastewater in the form of suspended dissolved solids (; ; ).
2.3 Tertiary treatment
Membrane processes, ultra-filtration, coagulation, metal salt precipitation, and advanced oxidation processes are some of the tertiary treatment methods used in the pulp and paper industry to remove residual COD, toxicity, total solids, and colour (Murshed et al., 2021a; ; Saroha et al., 2021; ; Khan et al., 2022b). In order to comply with stricter restrictions regarding the quality of wastewater entering bodies of water. In many sectors, tertiary treatment is an option. It is done based on the wastewater’s quality. The goal of tertiary treatment is to eliminate contaminants from wastewater and ensure that effluent is safely discharged into the environment. Pollution in water bodies is reduced by internal reuse, recycling, and recovery of by-products. Chemical coagulation-flocculation followed by sedimentation is a widely used procedure for SS removal that can be used as a tertiary treatment for pulp and paper effluents (; ).
2.4 Biological treatment methods
Microorganisms are used in biological treatment to break down the organic materials in wastewater. Adjusting pH in biological treatment of pulp mill wastewater utilising sequential batch reactors does not result in a substantial improvement in COD removal (). Based on their oxygen requirements, bacteria are classified as aerobic, anaerobic, or facultative. The bacteria make contact with the organics and use it as food for their growth in order to eliminate the trash from the wastewater. The secondary biological treatment coagulates and removes both organic and inorganic non-settling colloidal particles that could not be eliminated in the main treatment unit. Biological treatment is used to stabilize the dissolved organic matter that remains in the effluents after basic treatment.
2.4.1 Types of biological treatment
The removal of dissolved and fine colloidal organic materials necessitates biological wastewater treatment. The decomposition can be either slow or fast, depending on the type of dehydrogenation. Biological treatment can be categorized into the following types.
2.4.1.1 Aerobic treatment
The organic stuff is consumed by aerobic microorganisms. Bacteria, algae, fungus, protozoa, rotifers, and other organisms make up active biomass. In the presence of oxygen, these organisms convert biodegradable organic matter into non-biodegradable compounds such as CO2 and H2O. Contact beds, ASPs, and trickling filters are examples of aerobic treatment methods. Biodegradable organic matter, oxygen nutrients, the absence of hazardous matter, and favourable environmental variables such as pH, temperature, hydraulic retention durations, and solids retention times are all basic prerequisites for any aerobic biological treatment.
2.4.1.2 Anaerobic treatment
The designed methanogenic anaerobic breakdown of organic matter with diverse species of anaerobic bacteria is defined as the anaerobic treatment process. In the absence of dissolved oxygen, anaerobic microbes transform organic substrates into stable compounds such as carbon dioxide, methane, and water. Up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors, anaerobic sludge digestion, and rotating biological contractors are examples of anaerobic treatment technologies. Another study discovered that excessive viscosity is an issue in the anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mills for biogas production (). The advantage of the anaerobic treatment is that it produces biogas based on the substrate’s characteristics, but it requires more maintenance, has a longer startup time, and is difficult to manage biomass ().
2.4.1.3 Attached growth and suspended growth process
Biological processes are categorized into suspended growth systems and attached growth systems based on the status of biomass in the reactor. The microorganisms in suspended growth systems are suspended in mid-air while treating wastes. Organic elimination, nitrification, and denitrification are all part of this process. Anaerobic digestion, anaerobic contact method based on the suspended growth process, ASP, aerated lagoons, Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR), ASP. Microorganisms linked to the media in the reactor treat the wastes during the wastewater treatment process. The wastes that are being treated pass through the media. This method is utilized for organics removal, nitrification, and denitrification. The associated growth process operates trickling filters, roughing filters, rotating biological contractors, packed bed anaerobic filter, and extended bed. Table 3 compares the advantages of these two processes for a better understanding of the process benefits ().
TABLE 3
| Category | Suspended growth process | Attached growth process |
|---|---|---|
| BOD removal | 85–90% | Above 95% |
| Lower limit of BOD | 15 ppm | 10 ppm |
| Capital cost | High | Moderate |
| Operational cost | Minimum | High |
| Land requirement | High | Low |
| Shock loads | Rapid recovery | Very slow |
| Foaming | None | Often |
| Odour | Yes | Minimal |
| Hydraulic washout | No | Yes |
| Plugging and drying of media | Yes | No |
| Output of sludge | Moderate | High |
Comparison of suspended growth process and attached growth process.
2.5 Advanced wastewater treatment methods
2.5.1 Dissolved solids removal
Both organic and inorganic dissolved solids are removed. A variety of strategies for removing inorganic components from wastewater have been researched. Ion exchange, electrodialysis, and reverse osmosis are three technologies that are widely used in advanced waste treatment. Adsorption on activated carbon is the most popular method for removing soluble organics from wastewater. Solvent extraction is also utilized to recover certain organic compounds from industrial waste fluids, such as phenol and amines.
2.5.1.1 Exchange of ions
Hardness, iron, and manganese salts have all been removed from drinking water supplies using this method. It is also been used to remove certain pollutants from industrial waste and recover important trace metals like chromium, nickel, copper, lead, and cadmium. The method takes advantage of certain natural and manufactured materials’ ability to exchange one of their ions. Ion exchange characteristics can be found in a variety of naturally occurring minerals. The aluminium silicate minerals known as zeolites are among the most remarkable. Sodium silicate and sodium aluminate solutions were used to make synthetic zeolites. Synthetic ion-exchange resins made of organic polymers with connected functional groups, such as—COO—3 –SO H + H+ (weakly acidic cation exchange resins), or—N+(CH3)3OH (strongly basic anion exchange resins) can also be employed. Hardness-producing components like calcium and magnesium are replaced by sodium ions during the water softening process (; Wei et al., 2022; Xiang et al., 2022). A sodium-based cation exchange resin is typically utilized. When sodium ions in the resin are exchanged for calcium ions in solution, cation exchange has the power to soften water. De-mineralization water is created by driving water through semipermeable membranes at high pressure in the reverse osmosis process. When a vessel is divided by a semipermeable membrane (one that is permeable to water but not to dissolved material) and one compartment is filled with water and the other with concentrated salt solution, water diffuses through the membrane towards the compartment containing salt solution until the difference in water levels on the two sides of the membrane creates enough pressure to counteract the original water flow (Khan et al., 2022; ; Tang et al., 2022). The osmotic pressure of the fluid is represented by the difference in levels.
2.5.1.2 Reverse osmosis
RO can be used to treat industrial wastewater. Some of the industries that employ the RO method are as follows:
1) Colorings-containing outflows are treated, with the possibility of their recovery.
2) Treatment of oily emulsions, latex, and electrophoretic paints in outflows.
3) Treatment of metal-finishing industrial effluents with the recovery of concentrated metal salt solutions and reuse of water for cleaning
4) Treatment of organic chemical wastewater in the organic chemical and pharmaceutical sectors
The use of RO for wastewater treatment differs greatly from the use of the technology for general process water purification (Figure 2). This is owing to the fact that wastewater typically contains larger amounts of pollutants and a wider variety of toxins. Furthermore, there is a lot of variation in industrial wastewaters. Wastewaters differ from one industry to the next, and they might alter from 1 h to the next at any one plant. The protection against organic fouling, mineral scaling, and chemical degradation is the most significant component in treating industrial wastewater with RO. Before considering RO, a full cation/anion balance is essential, as well as the identification of possible flocculants. Calcium, iron, aluminum, and other insoluble heavy metals are all potential inorganic foulants and sealants for RO membranes. Surfactants, colour bodies, flocculants, and bacteria are all examples of organic foulants. Membrane fouling can also be caused by high BOD and COD levels. Pretreatment methods come in a variety of shapes and sizes. Rinse-waters from fabrication operations are generally cleaned to remove heavy metals and subsequently released to the sewer, particularly in the metal finishing, printed circuit board, and microelectronics industries. Total dissolved solids in wastewater discharged to sewers typically range from 200 to 10,000 parts per million (ppm) (TDS). This wastewater can be treated and recycled with the right pretreatment technology and RO. The RO product water can be further polished with ion exchange treatment, making it ideal for all rinses. Because the pH, oxidizing potential, and concentration of soluble salts in wastewater effluents frequently exceed the working limitations of RO systems, it is vital to examine each unique application in order to build a successful and cost-effective system (Krishnan and Dagar, 2022; ; Xie et al., 2022; Weimin et al., 2022; ). After completing a thorough analysis of the wastewater, decide the optimal preconditioning chemical and choose the best pretreatment technology for the application. The reverse osmosis process produces a waste stream with a high TDS content. Feedwater will yield approximately 25–40% of waste rejects with high TDS concentrations. To concentrate and remove organic pollutants from this waste, it must be evaporated in forced evaporation systems.
FIGURE 2
2.6 Microorganisms for wastewater treatment
Microorganisms play a vital role in the degradation of pollutants present in the wastewater. The most important ones include bacteria, fungus, algae, protozoa and rotifers. Bacterial species of Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Achromobacter and fungal species of Fusarium, Phanero chaetechrysosporium, Corious versicolor, Ralstonia, Streptomyces are also proved to be efficient fungal groups that evidenced degradation pollutants (). These microorganisms treat the wastewater mainly by enzyme action and biosorption ().
2.7 Biokinetic studies
Biokinetics plays a vital role in the operation of aerobic wastewater treatment systems, based on the biochemistry and microbiology of the aerobic treatment. The process of biokinetics is essential for the rational design and operation, predicting system stability, effluent quality and waste stability. The performance of biological processes used for wastewater treatment depends on the dynamics of substrate utilization and microbial growth. Effective design and operation of such system require an understanding of the biological reactions occurring and an understanding of the basic principles governing the growth of microorganisms (). Jacques Monod proposed an equation to relate microbial growth rates in an aqueous environment to the concentration of a limiting nutrient. It is a mathematical model equation for the growth of microorganisms involved in the wastewater treatment (; Singh et al., 2021; Zakari et al., 2021; Shahzad et al., 2022). The empirical coefficient of the equation differs from species to species and based on the environmental conditions.
The Monod equationwhere μ is the specific growth rate.
μmax is the maximum specific growth rate.
S is the concentration substrate.
Ks is the half-velocity constant.
The proportionality constants obtained from the kinetics equations derived for the above rates are known as biokinetic constants or growth constants. The objectives of the biokinetics study are as follows.
1) To describe the development of microbes within the bioreactor.
2) To predict the effluent microbes and substrate concentrations by developing suitable mathematical models.
3) To study the effect of biokinetics on the process design, performance and stability of treatment process
3 Literature review
Several types of research have been conducted to assess and analyze the characteristics of effluents and their composition in wastewater. A study showed that the chemical oxygen demand (COD) levels of greater than 10,000 mg/L and total suspended solids as the primary contaminants in PPW (TSS) (). Some researchers demonstrated that the pulp and paper industry is infamous for consuming large amounts of fresh water and producing harmful effluents (). Another study showed high chemical oxygen demand (COD), large biological oxygen demand (BOD), and low biodegradability (reported as BOD/COD ratio) in pulp and paper wastewater (). A study on Bleaching effluents having high BOD and COD levels, as well as a lot of suspended particles (primarily fibres), fatty acids, tannins, resin acids, and lignin and its derivatives is also reported (). Some researchers from the USA demonstrated that the direct reaction (promoted by ozone itself) and the indirect response of OH radicals produced during ozonation treatment are both involved in ozone application (). In another research work, a group of researchers from China and New Zealand studied on the pulp and paper black liquor treatment, ozonation alone and combination UV/ozonation, process efficiency analysis utilizing various operating parameters, and data regression (). Two Indian researchers demonstrated that lignin, hemicelluloses, benzoic acid, phenylacetic acid, hexadecenoic acid, octadecanoic acid, phenol, p-cresol, benzophenone, diethyl phtanlate, and alkyl halides are all components of PPW pollutants, and they are resistant to degradation and removal (). It is learnt that the physicochemical mechanisms for PPW pollutant removal are very well understood, however there are fewer information on biological pollutant elimination pathways (). Furthermore, a study showed that the pulp and paper wastewater (PPW) make for 42% of the three billion tons of industrial wastewater produced worldwide (). It is aloso reported that ozonation is useful for eliminating color and oxidizing refractory organics, especially in industrial wastewater treatment, but also in effluent disinfection ().
Keeping the above discussion in view, the objective of our study is set.
4 Objective of the study
In our study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of existing ETPs for treating wastewater generated by the pulp and paper making process in a selected paper mill in India. The study is based on Central Pulp and Paper Research Institute (CPPRI)’s pollutant load assessment and information provided by the paper mill regarding its current maximum working capacity.
5 Methodology
5.1 Selection of a paper mill
Duncan Goenka Group’s flagship company, Star Paper Mills Ltd., is an integrated pulp and paper plant in Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh (Figure 3). The mill uses woody raw materials such as eucalyptus, poplar, and veener chips to manufacture a wide range of industrial and cultural grade papers, such as absorbent kraft, maplitho, azure lay, and copier. The mill has four paper machines with a 300 tpd installed capacity. Even though the mill uses traditional chlorine bleaching technology, it also uses an oxidative extraction stage that involves oxygen and peroxide. CEOPHH is the actual bleaching sequence. Furthermore, the mill has implemented Oxygen Delignification prior to bleaching to reduce the consumption of bleach chemical requirements in following pulp bleaching through bleaching sequence and overall pollution load reduction.
FIGURE 3
5.2 Fresh water consumption by the mill
Water is used extensively in the papermaking process. The amount of freshwater consumed is determined by the raw material utilized, the procedure performed, and the quality of the final product. Freshwater (groundwater) is first abstracted at Star Paper Mills Ltd. via borewell. The total number of borewells is ten, but only five are operational at any given time. The remaining five borewells are maintained on standby and gathered in a reservoir before being transferred to different areas of the mill as needed (Figure 4). A flow meter is installed in the borewell. The usage of freshwater by section is shown in Table 4. It is observed that paper machine and stock preparation consumes the highest (3,500 m3/day) amount of water compared to other processes which is followed by the pulping process i.e. 2850 m3/day.
FIGURE 4
TABLE 4
| S.N. | Process | Freshwater consumption, m3/daya |
|---|---|---|
| @ 230 tpd paper production | ||
| i. | Raw material Preparation (Including Chemical Preparation and Hydrant) | 316 |
| ii. | Pulp Mill (Pulping, Pulp Washing and Bleaching) | 2,850 |
| iii. | Paper Machine and Stock Preparation | 3,500 |
| iv. | Boiler (Recovery and Utility) | 1,600 |
| v. | Domestic | 1,100 |
| vi. | Miscellaneous | 1824 |
| vii | Total | 11,190 (52.3 m3/t finished paper)b |
Fresh water consumption in star paper mills Ltd, saharanpur, UP.
Figures provided by the Mill.
Finished production: 214 tpd.
5.3 Effluent treatment plant
The layout of the existing ETP at the paper mill is shown in Figure 5. The current ETP is based on the traditional activated sludge process and comprises mostly of a primary clarifier, an aeration tank, and a secondary clarifier. A belt press is also installed at the mill for dewatering primary and secondary sludge. After screening through a bar screen, the mill effluent is fed into a primary clarifier to remove suspended solids (Figure 6). To reduce pollution load, the primary clarifier overflow is pumped into the aeration tank for biological treatment (Figure 7). The aeration tank is equipped with 12 surface aerators (each with 50 HP) and a 50 HP blower to provide distributed aeration to maintain the dissolved oxygen level essential for appropriate microbial metabolic activity. The vital nutrient is introduced to the aeration tank to aid in the growth of microorganisms. Using a sludge filter press, the primary clarifier’s underflow is further dewatered to around 30% consistency (Figure 8). Sludge that has been dewatered is sold to board mills. The secondary clarifier’s (Figure 9) underflow is recycled back into the aeration tank to maintain the MLSS level (3,000 mg/L), and the rest is dewatered using the Volute Press (Figure 10). The treated wastewater is released into the Hindon River at a distance of roughly 3 km via a concrete underground drain. The mill has placed an OCEMS at the final output to monitor the quality of treated effluent 24 h a day, 7 days a week (Figure 11).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 9
FIGURE 10
FIGURE 11
5.4 Wastewater generation and its characteristics
Excess backwater from paper machines, bleach plant effluent, floor cleaning, and other sources of wastewater are the most common. Approximately 85–90% of the freshwater utilized is wasted. Table 5 shows the average parameters of wastewater collected following composite sampling and evaluated at CPPRI.
TABLE 5
| Particulars | ETP inlet (inlet to PC) | PC outlet (inlet to at) |
|---|---|---|
| pH | 7.39 | 7.82 |
| TDS, mg/l | 2,967 | 2,889 |
| TSS, mg/l | 1911 (15,900 kg/d) | 130 (1,082 kg/d) |
| COD, mg/l | 1,465 (12,189 kg/d) | 936 (7,788 kg/d) |
| BOD, mg/l | 653 (5,433 kg/d) | 494 (4,110 kg/d) |
Average characteristics of wastewater collected and pollution load generated at star paper mills Ltd.
[Present Paper Production Capacity 230 tpd; Effluent Volume, 8,320 m3/day (347 m3/h)].
5.5 Adequacy assessment of existing ETP
The adequacy of the various units of the existing ETP at Star Paper Mills Ltd. was assessed based on influent retention time in each unit, surface overflow rate in primary and secondary clarifiers, volumetric loading rate, and estimation of oxygenation capacity of existing aerators in the aeration tank for oxidation/degradation of BOD load available. Table 6 summarizes the assessment of ETP adequacy.
TABLE 6
| S. No. | Unit | Design specifications | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Primary clarifier | Capacity: 10087 m3 | Adequate to handle even excess effluent volume up to 30,000 m3/day |
| Effluent flowa, m3/hr: 347 | Surface Area, m2: 2,522 | ||
| Retention time, hr.: 29 | |||
| SOR, m3/m2/day: 3.3 | |||
| 2 | Aeration tank | Capacity: 18,720 m3 | Adequate in terms of handling capacity |
| Effluent flow after recirculationb, m3/hr.: 434 | Retention Time:43 h | Aeration is adequate to treat even excess BOD load up to 6,500 kg/day i.e., more than the present BOD load | |
| BOD load after primary clarifierC, kg/day: 4,110 | VLR, kg BOD/m3/day: 0.22 | ||
| kg/hr: 171 | F/m ratio: 0.11 | ||
| No of Aerators:12 | |||
| Total HP: 630 | |||
| O2required: 342 kg/h | |||
| Available O2: 528 kg/h | |||
| 3 | Secondary Clarifier | Capacity, m3: 6,005 | Adequate |
| Effluent flow. M3/hr: 434 | Surface Area, m2: 1,645 | ||
| Retention time, hr: 13.8 | |||
| SOR, m3/m2/day: 6.33 | |||
| 4 | Sludge Filter Press | Capacity: 10 tonne dry solids/day | Adequate to handle ETP sludge |
| Vollute Press | Capacity: 4.8 tonne dry solids/day |
Adequacy assessment of ETP at star paper mills Ltd.
Design Specifications provided by the mill.
Increased 25% wastewater volume due to recirculation of secondary sludge.
24% reduction in BOD, after Primary Clarifier.
5.6 Operation and maintenance
To achieve the designed performance from ETP, it is necessary to operate it under optimum conditions to meet the environmental discharge standards. Following are the suggested measures, the mill should adopt for proper and optimum operation of ETP:
1) Ensure proper and optimum conditions as per the designed specification and manufacturer’s instruction.
2) Ensure proper addition of nutrients in aeration tank as per thumb rule BOD: N: P - 100:5:1 to facilitate the growth of microbes and maintain an adequate level of MLSS.
3) Maintain the required level of MLSS concentration (2,500–3,000 mg/L) in the aeration tank by ensuring proper microbial growth.
4) Maintain desired level of DO in the aeration tank (1–2 mg/L).
5) Ensure periodic and timely withdrawal of sludge from the clarifiers.
6) Proper maintenance of electric motors and pumps etc.
7) Use of coagulant and effective settling of suspended solids in the primary clarifier.
8) In addition to the above, routine testing of major pollution parameters viz pH, TSS, COD, BOD is essential on daily basis to maintain the desired performance of ETP. The parameters of concern and the frequency of their analyses advised are as under.
6 Results and observations
The information on pH, TSS, TDS, COD, BOD, and color were recorded by CPPRI for the month of September 2021 (
Table 7). Based on the studies conducted to assess the adequacy of the Effluent Treatment plant (ETP) at Star Paper Mills Ltd., Saharanpur, CPPRI has the following observations to make:
1) The retention time available in the primary clarifier, aeration tank and secondary clarifier are sufficient to facilitate satisfactory removal of suspended matter in clarifiers and oxidation of biodegradable organic matter in the aeration tank. More than 50% of TDS is removed from the primary clarifier outlet to the secondary clarifier outlet As per the information received (September 2021), the secondary clarifier was able to significantly reduce the TSS from 123 mg/L to 53 mg/L.
2) The number of surface aerators provided in ETP i.e., 11 × 50 HP = 550 HP, 1 × 30 HP = 30 HP and 1 × 50 HP air blower are adequate to provide sufficient oxygen for oxidation of biodegradable organic matter. In fact, the aeration capacity is adequate to treat an even higher BOD load than the existing BOD load provided the ETP is operated under optimum conditions. BOD is lowered from 356 mg/L at the outlet of primary clarifier to a sufficiently lower amount of 26 mg/L. Likewise, COD reduced from 894 mg/L to 252 mg/L.
3) The mill has significantly reduced its water consumption with the adoption of modern fiber line technologies like oxygen delignification, new pulp washers as well as optimization of process operations and water requirement process-wise, good housekeeping practices.
TABLE 7
| Parameter | Primary clarifier outlet | Wood | Secondary clarifier outlet | Wood |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Months | September 2021 | March 2021 | September 2021 | March 2021 |
| pH | 7.23 | 7.2 | 6.5–8.5 | 7.7 |
| TSS | 123 | 38.62 | 53 | 8 |
| TDS | 1,882 | 3,355 | 1,851 | 2,142 |
| COD | 894 | 862 | 252 | 173 |
| BOD | 356 | 580 | 26 | 17 |
| Colour | — | — | 582 | 240 |
Wastewater treatment of paper and pulp industry.
7 Conclusion
The most important step in developing a successful wastewater treatment technology is site characterization, which aids in determining the most appropriate and feasible method. Various technologies, such as ion-exchange methods to remove dissolved materials, are used in the process to assist in clean wastewater. Nonetheless, they can be employed in a regulated manner to remediate a wide spectrum of contaminants. Despite significant technological improvements and achievements, wastewater treatment remains a critical issue internationally.
In this paper, we studied the WWTP in Star Paper Mills Ltd. Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. The paper mill comprises of an ETP which is based on the conventional activated sludge process. The ETP have a primary clarifier, an aeration tank, and a secondary clarifier. The following conclusions result from our study.
1) Primary clarifier, and secondary clarifier reduces all suspended matter in clarifiers
2) The aeration tank not only oxidises the biodegradable organic matter but also is capable to treat significantly higher BOD than rated value.
3) Adoption of technologies such as oxygen delignification and pulp washers helped the mill reduce water consumption
Due to its flexible design, operation, and cost-effectiveness, ETP appears to be the most frequent technology for removing heavy metals in wastewater among many wastewater treatment procedures. To make wastewater usable for other purposes, to eliminate pollutants and toxicants, to preserve the water quality of natural water resources, and to make wastewater useable for other reasons, advanced WWTP techniques in paper mills is required.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
SD Experiment and writing, SS supervision, MK proofreading.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbdullahA. L.IdrisA.AhmadunF. R.BaharinB. S.EmbyF.NoorM. M. M.et al (2005). A kinetic study of a membrane anaerobic reactor (MAR) for treatment of sewage sludge. Desalination183 (1-3), 439–445. 10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.044
2
AchokaJ. D. (2002). The efficiency of oxidation ponds at the Kraft pulp and paper mill at Webuye in Kenya. Water Res.36 (5), 1203–1212. 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00325-6
3
AhmadM.AkhtarN.JabeenG.IrfanM.Khalid AnserM.WuH.et al (2021). Intention-based critical factors affecting willingness to adopt Novel Coronavirus prevention in Pakistan: Implications for future pandemics. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health18 (11), 6167. 10.3390/ijerph18116167
4
AliS.YanQ.HussainM. S.IrfanM.AhmadM.RazzaqA.et al (2021). Evaluating green technology strategies for the sustainable development of solar power projects: Evidence from Pakistan. Sustainability (Switzerland)13 (23), 12997–29. 10.3390/su132312997
5
AlvaradoR.TillaguangoB.CuestaL.PinzonS.Alvarado-LopezM. R.IşıkC.et al (2022). Biocapacity convergence clubs in latin america: An analysis of their determining factors using quantile regressions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 1–17. 10.1007/s11356-022-20567-6
6
AlvaradoR.TillaguangoB.DagarV.AhmadM.IşıkC.MéndezP.et al (2021). Ecological footprint, economic complexity and natural resources rents in Latin America: Empirical evidence using quantile regressions. Journal of Cleaner Production318, 128585. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128585
7
AmmaryB. Y. (2004). Nutrients requirements in biological industrial wastewater treatment. Afr. J. Biotechnol.3 (4), 236–238. 10.5897/ajb2004.000-2042
8
AshrafiO.YerushalmiL.HaghighatF. (2015). Wastewater treatment in the pulp-and-paper industry: A review of treatment processes and the associated greenhouse gas emission. J. Environ. Manag.158, 146–157. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.010
9
BaiB.RaoD.ChangT.GuoZ. (2019). A nonlinear attachment-detachment model with adsorption hysteresis for suspension-colloidal transport in porous media. J. Hydrol. (Amsterdam)578, 124080. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124080
10
BajpaiP.BajpaiP. K. (1994). Biological colour removal of pulp and paper mill wastewaters. J. Biotechnol.33 (3), 211–220. 10.1016/0168-1656(94)90069-8
11
BasantwaniL. V.SharmaS.DagarV.KharintaK. (2021). Impact of national income and public expenditure on employment and its public-private sector composition in indian economy. International Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences17 (1), 213–222.
12
BhardwajA.DagarV.KhanM. O.AggarwalA.AlvaradoR.KumarM.et al (2022). Smart IoT and machine learning-based framework for water quality assessment and device component monitoring. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.29, 46018–46036. 10.1007/s11356-022-19014-3
13
BhardwajM.KumarP.KumarS.DagarV.KumarA. (2022). A district-level analysis for measuring the effects of climate change on production of agricultural crops, i.e., wheat and paddy: Evidence from india. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.29 (21), 31861–31885. 10.1007/s11356-021-17994-2
14
CaoH.KhanM. K.RehmanA.DagarV.OryaniB.TanveerA. (2022). Impact of globalization, institutional quality, economic growth, electricity and renewable energy consumption on carbon dioxide emission in OECD countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.29 (16), 24191–24202. 10.1007/s11356-021-17076-3
15
ChauhanS.BanerjeeR.DagarV. (2021). Analysis of impulse buying behaviour of consumer during COVID-19: An empirical study. Millennial Asia, 097639962110412. 10.1177/09763996211041215
16
ChenF.AqeelM.MaqsoodM. F.KhalidN.IrshadM. K.IbrahimM.et al (2022). Mitigation of lead toxicity in vigna radiata genotypes by silver nanoparticles. Environ. Pollut.308, 119606. 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119606
17
ChiavolaA.FarabegoliG.AntonettiF. (2014). Biological treatment of olive mill wastewater in a sequencing batch reactor. Biochem. Eng. J.85, 71–78. 10.1016/j.bej.2014.02.004
18
ClaussF.BalavoineC.HélaineD.MartinG. (1999). Controlling the settling of activated sludge in pulp and paper wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci. Technol.40 (11-12), 223–229. 10.2166/wst.1999.0716
19
DagarV.AhmedF.WaheedF.BojnecŠ.KhanM. K.ShaikhS. (2022). Testing the pollution haven hypothesis with the role of foreign direct investments and total energy consumption. Energies15 (11), 4046. 10.3390/en15114046
20
DagarV.BansalE.MurshedM.MishraV.AlvaradoR.KumarA.et al (2020). Stochastic frontier analysis to measure technical efficiency: Evidence from skilled and unskilled agricultural labour in india. Inter. J. Agricul. Stat. Sci.16 (2), 647–657.
21
DagarV.BhattacharjeeM.AhmadF.CharanA.JitP. (2020). A comparative stochastic frontier analysis for technical efficiency of irrigation in Haryana. Inter. J. Agricul. Stat. Sci.16 (1), 199–209. 10.6084/m9.figshare.12949706.v1
22
DagarV.JitP.BhattacharjeeM.AhmadF.PawariyaV. (2020). Stochastic frontier analysis for measuring technical efficiency of neem coated urea : Evidence from north India. Int. J. Agricult. Stat. Sci.16 (1), 361–371.
23
DagarV.KhanM. K.AlvaradoR.RehmanA.IrfanM.AdekoyaO. B.et al (2021). Impact of renewable energy consumption, financial development and natural resources on environmental degradation in OECD countries with dynamic panel data. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.29, 18202–18212. 10.1007/s11356-021-16861-4
24
DagarV.KhanM. K.AlvaradoR.UsmanM.ZakariA.RehmanA.MurshedM.et al (2021). Variations in technical efficiency of farmers with distinct land size across agro-climatic zones: Evidence from India. J. Cleaner Prod.315 (June), 128109. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128109
25
DagarV.TiwariA. K.MishraS.MahajanV.SinghS.JitP.et al (2021). Covid 19 - risk management and technical efficiency of farmers post migration of agricultural labour in India. nt. J. Agricult. Stat. Sci16, 965–977.
26
DaiL.WangZ.GuoT.HuL.ChenY.ChenC.et al (2022). Pollution characteristics and source analysis of microplastics in the Qiantang River in southeastern China. Chemosphere Oxf.293, 133576. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133576
27
DubeskiC. V.BranionR. M.LoK. V. (2001). Biological treatment of pulp mill wastewater using sequencing batch reactors. J. Environ. Sci. Health A36 (7), 1245–1255. 10.1081/ese-100104875
28
FahadS.BaiD.LiuL.DagarV. (2022). Comprehending the environmental regulation, biased policies and OFDI reverse technology spillover effects: A contingent and dynamic perspective. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.29 (22), 33167–33179. 10.1007/s11356-021-17450-1
29
FangX.WangQ.WangJ.XiangY.WuY.ZhangY. (2021). Employing extreme value theory to establish nutrient criteria in bay waters: A case study of xiangshan bay. J. Hydrol.603, 127146. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127146
30
GeD.WuW.LiG.WangY.LiG.DongY.et al (2022). Application of CaO2-enhanced peroxone process to adjust waste activated sludge characteristics for dewaterability amelioration: Molecular transformation of dissolved organic matters and realized mechanism of deep-dewatering. Chem. Eng. J.437, 135306. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135306
31
GeD.YuanH.XiaoJ.ZhuN. (2019). Insight into the enhanced sludge dewaterability by tannic acid conditioning and pH regulation. Sci. Total Environ.679, 298–306. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.060
32
GuanQ.ZengG.SongJ.LiuC.WangZ.WuS. (2021). Ultrasonic power combined with seed materials for recovery of phosphorus from swine wastewater via struvite crystallization process. J. Environ. Manag.293, 112961. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112961
33
IrfanM.Sultan SalemM. A.Acevedo-DuqueÁ.AbbasiK. R.AhmadF.RazzaqA.et al (2021). Interventions for the current COVID-19 pandemic: Frontline workers' intention to use personal protective equipment. Front. Public Health9, 793642. 10.3389/fpubh.2021.793642
34
IrfanM.ElavarasanR. M.AhmadM.MohsinM.DagarV.HaoY. (2022). Prioritizing and overcoming biomass energy barriers: Application of AHP and G-TOPSIS approaches. Technol. Forecasting Social Change177, 121524. 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121524
35
IşıkC.AhmadM.OnganS.OzdemirD.IrfanM.AlvaradoR.et al (2021a). Convergence analysis of the ecological footprint: Theory and empirical evidence from the USMCA countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.28 (25), 32648–32659. 10.1007/s11356-021-12993-9
36
IşıkC.OnganS.BulutU.KarakayaS.IrfanM.AlvaradoR.et al (2022). Reinvestigating the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis by a composite model constructed on the Armey curve hypothesis with government spending for the US States. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.29 (11), 16472–16483. 10.1007/s11356-021-16720-2
37
IşıkC.OnganS.OzdemirD.AhmadM.IrfanM.AlvaradoR.et al (2021b). The increases and decreases of the environment Kuznets curve (EKC) for 8 OECD countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.28 (22), 28535–28543. 10.1007/s11356-021-12637-y
38
IşıkC.Sirakaya-TurkE.OnganS. (2020). Testing the efficacy of the economic policy uncertainty index on tourism demand in USMCA: Theory and evidence. Tour. Econ.26 (8), 1344–1357. 10.1177/1354816619888346
39
IşıkC. (2013). The importance of creating a competitive advantage and investing in information technology for modern economies: An ARDL test approach from Turkey. J. Knowl. Econ.4 (4), 387–405. 10.1007/s13132-011-0075-2
40
IslamM. M.AliM. I.CehB.SinghS.KhanM. K.DagarV. (2022). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption driven sustainable development in ASEAN countries: Do financial development and institutional quality matter?. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.29 (23), 34231–34247. 10.1007/s11356-021-18488-x
41
IslamM. M.KhanM. K.TarequeM.JehanN.DagarV. (2021). Impact of globalization, foreign direct investment, and energy consumption on CO2 emissions in Bangladesh: Does institutional quality matter?. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.28 (35), 48851–48871. 10.1007/s11356-021-13441-4
42
JavedH.IrfanM.ShehzadM.Abdul MuqeetH.AkhterJ.DagarV.et al (2022). Recent trends, challenges, and future aspects of P2P energy trading platforms in electrical-based networks considering blockchain technology: A roadmap toward environmental sustainability. Front. Energy Res.10. 10.3389/fenrg.2022.810395
43
KamaliM.KhodaparastZ. (2015). Review on recent developments on pulp and paper mill wastewater treatment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.114, 326–342. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.05.005
44
KarraschB.ParraO.CidH.MehrensM.PachecoP.UrrutiaR.et al (2006). Effects of pulp and paper mill effluents on the microplankton and microbial self-purification capabilities of the Biobio River, Chile. Sci. Total Environ.359 (1-3), 194–208. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.03.029
45
KhanI.ZakariA.ZhangJ.DagarV.SinghS. (2022). A study of trilemma energy balance, clean energy transitions, and economic expansion in the midst of environmental sustainability: New insights from three trilemma leadership. Energy248, 123619. 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123619
46
KhanI.ZakariA.DagarV.SinghS. (2022). World energy trilemma and transformative energy developments as determinants of economic growth amid environmental sustainability. Ener. Econ.108, 105884. 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105884
47
KhanM. K.BabarS. F.OryaniB.DagarV.RehmanA.ZakariA.et al (2022). Role of financial development, environmental-related technologies, research and development, energy intensity, natural resource depletion, and temperature in sustainable environment in canada. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.29 (1), 622–638. 10.1007/s11356-021-15421-0
48
KrishnanD.DagarV. (2022). Exchange rate and stock markets during trade conflicts in the USA, China, and India. Glob. J. Emerg. Mark. Econ.14 (2), 185–203. 10.1177/09749101221082724
49
LaceyC.BashaS.MorrisseyA.TobinJ. M. (2012). Occurrence of pharmaceutical compounds in wastewater process streams in Dublin, Ireland. Environ. Monit. Assess.184 (2), 1049–1062. 10.1007/s10661-011-2020-z
50
LazarovaV.AsanoT. (2013). Milestones in water reuse. IWA publishing.
51
LiB.BoiarkinaI.YuW.HuangH. M.MunirT.WangG. Q.et al (2019). Phosphorous recovery through struvite crystallization: Challenges for future design. Sci. Total Environ.648, 1244–1256. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.166
52
LiangJ.MaiW.WangJ.LiX.SuM.DuJ.et al (2021). Performance and microbial communities of a novel integrated industrial-scale pulp and paper wastewater treatment plant. J. Clean. Prod.278, 123896. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123896
53
LinX.LuK.HardisonA. K.LiuZ.XuX.GaoD.et al (2021). Membrane inlet mass spectrometry method (REOX/MIMS) to measure 15N-nitrate in isotope-enrichment experiments. Ecol. Indic.126, 107639. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107639
54
LiuW.HuangF.LiaoY.ZhangJ.RenG.ZhuangZ.et al (2008). Treatment of CrVI-containing Mg(OH)2 nanowaste. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.47 (30), 5619–5622. 10.1002/anie.200800172
55
LiuW.HuangF.WangY.ZouT.ZhengJ.LinZ. (2011). Recycling Mg(OH)2 nanoadsorbent during treating the low concentration of CrVI. Environ. Sci. Technol.45 (5), 1955–1961. 10.1021/es1035199
56
LiuW.LiJ.ZhengJ.SongY.ShiZ.LinZ.et al (2020). Different pathways for Cr(III) oxidation: Implications for Cr(VI) reoccurrence in reduced chromite ore processing residue. Environ. Sci. Technol.54 (19), 11971–11979. 10.1021/acs.est.0c01855
57
MahatS. B.OmarR.ManH. C.IdrisA. M.KamalS. M.AbdullahL. C.et al (2021). Dynamic anaerobic membrane bioreactor (DAnMBR) with phase separation for food processing wastewater treatment at mesophilic temperature: Characterization of cake layer. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.9 (4), 105718. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105718
58
MainardisM.ButtazzoniM.De BortoliN.MionM.GoiD. (2020). Evaluation of ozonation applicability to pulp and paper streams for a sustainable wastewater treatment. J. Clean. Prod.258, 120781. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120781
59
MurshedM.AhmedZ.AlamM. S.MahmoodH.RehmanA.DagarV. (2021). Reinvigorating the role of clean energy transition for achieving a low-carbon economy: Evidence from Bangladesh. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.28, 67689–67710. 10.1007/s11356-021-15352-w
60
MurshedM.RahmanM. A.AlamM. S.AhmadP.DagarV. (2021a). The nexus between environmental regulations, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: linking environmental patents to ecological footprint reduction in South Asia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.28 (36), 49967–49988. 10.1007/s11356-021-13381-z
61
MurshedM.RahmanM. A.AlamM. S.AhmadP.DagarV. (2021b). The nexus between environmental regulations, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: linking environmental patents to ecological footprint reduction in South Asia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.28 (36), 49967–49988. 10.1007/s11356-021-13381-z
62
MurshedM.RashidS.UlucakR.DagarV.RehmanA.AlvaradoR.et al (2022). Mitigating energy production-based carbon dioxide emissions in argentina: The roles of renewable energy and economic globalization. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.29 (12), 16939–16958. 10.1007/s11356-021-16867-y
63
McBrideE. M.MachP. M.DhummakuptE. S.DowlingS.CarmanyD. O.DemondP. S.et al (2019). Paper spray ionization: Applications and perspectives. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.118, 722–730. 10.1016/j.trac.2019.06.028
64
MohamedN.Al-JaroodiJ.Lazarova-MolnarS. (2019). Leveraging the capabilities of industry 4.0 for improving energy efficiency in smart factories. IEEE Access7, 18008–18020. 10.1109/access.2019.2897045
65
Morgan-SagastumeF.ValentinoF.HjortM.CirneD.KarabegovicL.GerardinF.et al (2014). Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production from sludge and municipal wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol.69 (1), 177–184. 10.2166/wst.2013.643
66
OthmanI.AnuarA. N.UjangZ.RosmanN. H.HarunH.ChelliapanS.et al (2013). Livestock wastewater treatment using aerobic granular sludge. Bioresour. Technol.133, 630–634. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.149
67
PavanelliD.BigiA. (2005). Indirect methods to estimate suspended sediment concentration: Reliability and relationship of turbidity and settleable solids. Biosyst. Eng.90 (1), 75–83. 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.09.001
68
PokhrelD.ViraraghavanT. (2004). Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater—A review. Sci. total Environ.333 (1-3), 37–58. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.05.017
69
RazaliM. A. A.AhmadZ.AriffinA. (2012). Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater with various molecular weight of PolyDADMAC induced flocculation with polyacrylamide in the hybrid system. Adv. Chem. Eng. Sci.2 (04), 490–503. 10.4236/aces.2012.24060
70
RehmanA.RadulescuM.MaH.DagarV.HussainI.KhanM. K. (2021). The impact of globalization, energy use, and trade on ecological footprint in Pakistan: Does environmental sustainability exist?. Energies14 (17), 5234. 10.3390/en14175234
71
SarohaK.DagarV.JitP.AlvaradoR.MishraV.PahwaN.et al (2021). COVID-19: Trend analysis for market arrival of green gram in India. Inter. J. Agricul. Stat. Sci.16, 1017–1031.
72
ShahzadU.MadalenoM.DagarV.GhoshS.DoğanB. (2022). Exploring the role of export product quality and economic complexity for economic progress of developed economies: Does institutional quality matter?. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics62, 40–51. 10.1016/j.strueco.2022.04.003
73
ShaikhE.MishraV.AhmedF.KrishnanD.DagarV. (2021). Exchange rate, stock price and trade volume in US-China trade war during COVID-19: An empirical study. Stud. Appl. Econ.39 (8). 10.25115/eea.v39i8.5327
74
SinghA. K.ChandraR. (2019). Pollutants released from the pulp paper industry: Aquatic toxicity and their health hazards. Aquat. Toxicol.211, 202–216. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2019.04.007
75
SinghG.KaurS.KhatriM.AryaS. K. (2019). Biobleaching for pulp and paper industry in India: Emerging enzyme technology. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol.17, 558–565. 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.01.019
76
SinghS.KumarS.DagarV.SaxenaM.RashidS. (2021). India’s agricultural food processing and industry specific trade pattern with EU and ASEAN. International Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences17 (1), 39–51.
77
TangC.IrfanM.RazzaqA.DagarV. (2022). Natural resources and financial development: Role of business regulations in testing the resource-curse hypothesis in ASEAN countries. Res. Pol.76, 102612. 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102612
78
TillaguangoB.AlvaradoR.DagarV.MurshedM.PinzónY.MéndezP. (2021). Convergence of the ecological footprint in Latin America: the role of the productive structure. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.28, 59771–59783. 10.1007/s11356-021-14745-1
79
ThompsonA.GriffinP.StuetzR.CartmellE. (2005). The fate and removal of triclosan during wastewater treatment. Water Environ. Res.77 (1), 63–67. 10.2175/106143005x41636
80
Toczyłowska-MamińskaR. (2017). Limits and perspectives of pulp and paper industry wastewater treatment–A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.78, 764–772. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.021
81
WeiR.AyubB.DagarV. (2022). Environmental benefits from carbon tax in the Chinese carbon market: A roadmap to energy efficiency in the Post-COVID-19 Era. Front. Ener. Res.10, 1–11. 10.3389/fenrg.2022.832578
82
WeiminZ.Sibt-e-AliM.TariqM.DagarV.KhanM. K. (2022). Globalization toward environmental sustainability and electricity consumption to environmental degradation: does EKC inverted U-shaped hypothesis exist between squared economic growth and CO2 emissions in top globalized economies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.. 10.1007/s11356-022-20192-3
83
WenC.AkramR.IrfanM.IqbalW.DagarV.Acevedo-DuquedÁ.et al (2022). The asymmetric nexus between air pollution and COVID-19: Evidence from a non-linear panel autoregressive distributed lag model. Environ. Res.209, 112848. 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112848
84
WilksR.ScholesE. (2018). DNA sequencing of pulp and paper wastewater treatment systems to inform process analysis. Appita Technol. Innov. Manuf. Environ.71 (2), 157–164. 10.3316/informit.645420249448252
85
XiangH.ChauK. Y.IqbalW.IrfanM.DagarV. (2022). Determinants of social commerce usage and online impulse purchase: Implications for business and digital revolution. Front. Psychol.13, 837042–13. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837042
86
XieM.IrfanM.RazzaqA.DagarV. (2022). Forest and mineral volatility and economic performance: Evidence from frequency domain causality approach for global data. Resour. Pol.76, 102685. 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102685
87
YuanB.LeilingW.SaydalievH. B.DagarV.Acevedo-DuqueÁ. (2022). Testing the impact of fiscal policies for economic recovery: does monetary policy act as catalytic tool for economic Survival. Econ. Chan. Restruct., 0123456789. 10.1007/s10644-022-09383-7
88
XuD.LiuJ.MaT.ZhaoX.MaH.LiJ. (2022). Coupling of sponge fillers and two-zone clarifiers for granular sludge in an integrated oxidation ditch. Environ. Technol. Innovation26, 102264. 10.1016/j.eti.2021.102264
89
YadavS.ChandraR. (2018). Detection and assessment of the phytotoxicity of residual organic pollutants in sediment contaminated with pulp and paper mill effluent. Environ. Monit. Assess.190 (10), 581. 10.1007/s10661-018-6947-1
90
ZakariA.KhanI.TanD.AlvaradoR.DagarV. (2022). Energy efficiency and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Energy239, 122365. 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122365
91
ZakariA.ToplakJ.IbtissemM.DagarV.KhanM. K. (2021). Impact of Nigeria’s industrial sector on level of inefficiency for energy consumption: Fisher ideal index decomposition analysis. Heliyon7 (5), e06952. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06952
92
ZhangC.KhanI.DagarV.SaeedA.ZafarM. W. (2022). Environmental impact of information and communication technology: Unveiling the role of education in developing countries. Technol. Forecast. Social Chan.178, 121570. 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121570
93
ZhangL.WangL.ZhangY.WangD.GuoJ.ZhangM.et al (2022). The performance of electrode ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor in treating cosmetics wastewater and its anti-fouling properties. Environ. Res.206, 112629. 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112629
Summary
Keywords
wastewater treatment plant, chemical oxygen demand, biochemical oxygen demand, adsorbable organic halogens, suspended solids, effluent treatment plant
Citation
Dagar S, Singh SK and Gupta MK (2022) Economics of advanced technologies for wastewater treatment: Evidence from pulp and paper industry. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:960639. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.960639
Received
06 June 2022
Accepted
27 June 2022
Published
10 August 2022
Volume
10 - 2022
Edited by
Cem Işık, Anadolu University, Turkey
Reviewed by
Rafael Alvarado, National University of Loja, Ecuador
Muhammad Kamran Khan, Bahria University, Pakistan
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Dagar, Singh and Gupta.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sumit Dagar, dagarsumit95@gmail.com
This article was submitted to Water and Wastewater Management, a section of the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.