ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Environ. Sci., 22 August 2022

Sec. Environmental Economics and Management

Volume 10 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.980648

Nexuses between international trade, renewable energy, and transport services: Leading toward practical implications and trade policies

  • 1. School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China

  • 2. Department of Business Administration, ILMA University, Karachi, Pakistan

  • 3. Department of Marketing, College of Business Administration, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • 4. College of Business Management, Institute of Business Management, Karachi, Pakistan

  • 5. Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • 6. Poznan University of Economics and Business, Poznan, Poland

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the connection between logistic indicators, trade, renewable energy, and ICT on transport services in the selected 33 developed European countries. The researchers used the panel data from the 33 developed European countries to test the hypothesis. Panel GMM is an optimal modeling choice in this study from data sets ranging from 2007 to 2020. The results revealed that transport services have a significant positive relationship with trade, renewable energy, ICT, and internet usage. Also, the logistic indicators have a significant positive connection with transport services. Furthermore, renewable energy and transport services have a significant positive association with transport services. ICT adoption positively affects road freight transport by enhancing operations’ safety, suitability, visibility, and accountability. The effectiveness of these indicators is considerably affected by transport flow predictions and resource allocation strategy. Moreover, the management of high-quality operations requires optimization, and using transport and logistic management systems for transportation services makes it feasible to get optimal outcomes.

Introduction

The economic environment developed over the last few years in developed economies, most significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic, has revealed certain behaviors and patterns among entities to boost their competitiveness. Due to the enforced modifications in the scope of activities and functions, entities and entire economies of the developed world have begun to concentrate on obtaining and sculpting information and communication technology from the environment. It also pertains to the transportation industry. In contrast, considerable volatility remains the primary link between individual market participants, sophisticated infrastructure, and logistic channels worldwide. These economies seek to maximize their cost-effectiveness through cutting-edge technology that enables the acquisition and processing of data to provide valuable logistic information. However, it is essential to evaluate strategies that may improve the quality of transportation services by lowering the cost of executing orders for existing clients or by increasing the efficiency of these processes by eliminating errors and leveraging the existing planning agility ().

The urgency to decarbonize the transportation industry has been emphasized in several kinds of research produced under the 2030 agenda for sustainable development goals.

Transport services are almost 95% oil-dependent and consume about 50% of the world’s oil. Transportation-related CO2 emissions are expected to continue their exponential growth, and energy-related CO2 emissions constitute 74% of total greenhouse emissions. Despite electricity and heat generation continue being the highest greenhouse gas-producing industries, accounting for 43% of total greenhouse emissions in 2017, transportation employed second with a 24% share of CO2 emissions in 2017 (; ; ). However, 86% of emission from the transport sector comprises the road transport. Furthermore, 95% of the energy used globally in transportation is derived from petroleum-based products, and it also has the lowest renewable energy dissemination ().

CO2 emissions are much heavier than they used to be at the start of the industrial revolution, with CO2 levels in the atmosphere reaching 409.8 ppm in 2019, the highest level in at least 800,000 years (). Developed countries have increased their efforts in recent years to gain consent for industrial sector reform and to achieve relatively speedy development in energy consumption for the creation of products and services (). Due to the recent alarming prevalence of carbon emissions, mitigation techniques must be developed to balance greenhouse gas concentrations. Unfortunately, there has been no worldwide agreement on strategies for reducing severe environmental damage. Significant advancements in renewable energy provide viable alternatives to conventional fossil fuel methods. Many renewable energy sources, unlike fossil fuels, are sustainable and emit low carbon, which justifies their growing prominence ().

The transportation sector is undergoing considerable development in digitization and computerization these days. The process of transport digitization entails adopting digital communication services that facilitate compliance with existing rules and the management of logistic processes (The, 2021; ). This has a considerable effect on the flow of information and may contribute to the growth of competitive advantage in the market (). Moreover, it strengthens the possibilities for sustainable transportation on all frontiers: environmental, physical, economic, and social sectors ().

Numerous research studies have already been conducted in recent years to determine the association between logistic indicators, renewable energy, trade, and the role of ICT on transport services (; ). Considering the uncertainties surrounding the current global pandemic, it is critical to examine the perspective and recommendations of transportation services from the relevant experts (). The significance of ICT integration in the transportation industry enables a quick and flexible link that assists enterprises in managing operations and control by assuring end-to-end, real-time visibility of each stage of the supply chain (E2E). In developed economies, the transport companies are competent carriers with extensive experience in offering freight delivery services through road transport. They provide comprehensive air and container transport services via vehicles.

Literature review and hypothesis development

Dynamic interfaces have dominated global change for decades among individuals, corporations, and entities. Trade performance requires strong acquaintances between all stakeholders on land, sea, air routes, telecommunications, financial markets, and knowledge acquisition.

Trade and transport services

At the end of World War II, significant economic expansion on an international market resulted from all economic and social indicator transformations that subsidized the emergence of globalization (). The expansion of transport, on the one hand, provides the foundation for the economic development of competencies and the strengthening of their competitiveness. However, on the other hand, it leads to environmental degradation (). Certain transport companies incorporate this issue into their development priorities and outline targets and long-term initiatives that can be categorized as quality standards in the relevant discipline (; ). The literature revealed that the transport services’ effectiveness is triggered by a variety of factors, including ecological location, innovativeness of applied technical and organizational solutions, quality of infrastructure, level of technological advancement of transport means, and implementation of sustainability considerations in the pursuit of transportation systems (). As a new concept for attaining regional and international competitiveness, green transportation is the remedy to these constraints (; ).

This concept supports adopting innovative, eco-friendly technology and organizational alternatives in the transportation sector (; ; ). The concept of green transportation is necessary to maintain equilibrium among economic, social, and natural components (). It seems to have a considerable influence on the transport sector’s local and global functioning and development. It results in more significant international trade, the dissemination of information and innovation, and, perhaps, a better understanding of the need to balance economic and environmental goals. In Europe, the transport industry contributes to approximately 5 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) and directly engages more than 10 million people in 1.1 million transport firms (). Considering the importance of the transport sector on a regional and global scale, it is vital to conduct a theoretical and practical inquiry into the significant challenges and trends observed inside this sector of the economy (; ). Therefore, based on the past literature, the following hypothesis has been proposed:

H1Transportation services and trade have a positive relationship.

Renewable energy and transport services

revealed that persistent growth in global agility demand, paired with a long-standing dependence on fossil energy resources, poses a substantial obstacle to assuring the transport sector’s future sustainability. Transportation activity contributes to 23% of worldwide energy-related CO2 emissions. However, population, income, and trade expansion all contribute to a ramp-up in transportation energy demand, inadequate substitute fuels, notably in the heavy-duty component, coupled with lock-in effects in the fuel and transportation infrastructure, and have contributed to a slower rate of transformation to renewable energy than in other economic sectors. investigated the effects and efficiency of transportation policy measures in attaining integrated energy and transportation system emission reduction targets in Denmark. They argued that CO2 and fossil fuels tend to substantially reduce carbon emissions from the transportation sector, while fostering mobility service is the most cost-effective strategy investigated. studied the life cycle of CO2 emissions with hazel gasification methanation to create renewable biofuels to compare the RED recast’s heat and transport sustainability goals for 2026. They concluded that 97 percent of the greatest emissions associated were achieved by changing the arable land to transportation end-use.

Furthermore, considered that refrigerated transport is witnessing rapid growth in terms of growing demand for chilled and frozen foods. Vehicles require gasoline for mobility and to power the diesel-powered refrigeration unit that preserves the vehicle inside at the desired temperature. This tendency makes things difficult for sustainable development as transportation substantially contributes to energy consumption and associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally. Transport accounted for 31% of total final energy consumption in the E.U. in 2017 (). Moreover, 27% of total GHG is due to transportation, including road transport accounting for 74%; heavy-duty vehicles contributed to 19% of these emissions ().

Therefore, based on the past literature, the following hypothesis has been proposed:

H2Transportation services and renewable energy usage have a positive relationship.

Information and communication technology service and transport services

Information and communication technology has been recognized as a growth enabler in developing and developed countries. Several scholars have analyzed ICT use in various scenarios (; ). The acronym ICT has been used widely in the literature, encompassing cellphones, decision support applications, smart devices with applications, and technology gadgets. ) examined ICT adaptation in road freight transport in Africa. ICT adoption positively affects road freight transport by enhancing safety, suitability, visibility, and accountability in operations. Furthermore, studied that the expansion of ICT may also significantly affect alternative concentration to enhance transportation systems. The study by shows ICT technologies as a remedy for transportation issues and creates a cognitive comprehension of the domain’s and related fields’ prevailing arguments. They explored mechanisms for innovation and commercialization inside the market for intelligent transport systems, with a particular emphasis on collaborative activities. However, they mainly elaborated on assessments of existing ICT implementations across Europe.

studied that ICT enables new prospects to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger transport by reducing, transferring, or upgrading transportation. The research of seeks to examine the relationship between information and communication technology usage in passenger transportation and a sustainable environment using a panel dataset of 46 countries from 1998 to 2016. Internet and phone penetration are used to quantify ICTs, whereas environmental degradation is quantified using three separate metrics of carbon emissions from various sources. They concluded that a strong correlation between ICTs and the passenger transportation activity seems to have the potential to transform environmental sustainability by reducing carbon emissions.

Hence, based on the available literature, the following hypotheses have been proposed:

H3Transportation and information and communication technology services have a positive relationship.

H4Transport services and internet usage have a significant positive relationship.

Logistic indicators and transport services

Since 2007, the World Bank has been compiling a survey-based index called the logistic performance index (LPI), which is generally accepted globally (160 countries are included in the 2018 version). The LPI is an efficient mechanism for countries to measure and evaluate their logistic performance worldwide and perhaps to recognize logistical hurdles and opportunities (; ; ). LPI is acquiring recognition as a reliable technology rapidly used by governing bodies to design strategies. LPI has been employed by the European Commission in its Transport Evaluation Panel to review the performance assessment of the Customs Union. Therefore, the World Bank is accompanied by several international transport groups and agencies in developing and implementing LPI. Therefore, it is recognized that an increase in a country’s LPI score leads to growing trade volumes in a globalized economy. Many studies have discussed the significance of logistic indicators in transportation services. Observed that the business’s logistic chain develops a strategy regarding measures to be implemented inside transportation operations and then evaluates them competitively. argued that the mechanisms for regulating transportation services contribute in developing a transportation and logistic system. The effectiveness of these mechanisms is considerably influenced by the forecasting and planning of cargo flows and resource distribution. They further added that management of high-quality operations entails optimization. Implementing transport and logistic management systems for transportation services makes it possible to obtain a positive optimization outcome. exemplified the significance of specific logistical indicators in enhancing the quality of transportation services. The study also tested the application of dynamics, correlation, and regression analysis to specific logistic indicators that can be employed to forecast future actions to improve the quality of processes and services delivered. It further concluded that this insight could substantially impact the growth and competitiveness of transportation enterprises, specifically in quite an unpredictable market.

Therefore, based on the past literature, the following hypothesis has been proposed:

H5Transportation services and logistic indicators have a positive relationship.

Methodology and data source

The researchers in this study explored the nexus between transportation services, renewable energy, trade, ICT, and logistic indicators while addressing the panel data of 33 selected developed European countries. Renewable energy plays an integral part in an economy by subsidizing the framework for transportation services, which leads to substantial trade volume and logistic performance. However, the following econometric equation briefed hypothesis of this research study:where TNRS indicates transport services containing the percentage of services exports. Trade specifies with the percentage of GDP. However, RE is explained as the percentage of final consumption of renewable energy. ICT and INT are total exports of information communication technology services and internet usage by individuals, respectively. The logistic indicators have been explained as the ability of the consignment to track and trace efficiently (L1), the competitiveness of the logistic services (L2), the ability to place cost-effective shipment price (L3), efficient clearness process from the customs (L4), and frequency of the consignment received by consignee within the expected time (L5) and efficient transport infrastructure (L6). However, the index value ranging from 1 to 5 symbolizes low-to-high logistic performance, while α is constant, and ε designates an error correction in the model. The researcher used the panel data from 33 developed European countries to test the hypothesis. Hence, the following equation has been proposed to analyze the performance of transport services:

Typically, the researchers experienced the issue of serial correlation and heteroskedasticity while dealing with the panel data, which might mislead the accurate estimation of the model. Serial correlation is the term used to denote the disturbance phrase linked with any variable in the model that the disturbance could not influence in another variable of the proposed model (). FGLS permits heteroskedasticity and the absence of cross-sectional correlation in models. Due to the heterogeneity caused by the estimates, the asymptotic efficiency of FGLS may not hold on to small sample sizes. revealed that FGLS seems more appropriate and efficient than least squares for large sample sizes and that FGLS can resolve heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation constraints ().

Equation 2 elaborated country’s time effect and country’s fixed effect as the model observed the country-specific heterogeneity issues. This research study addressed this issue by transforming these specified equations using first difference estimators, namely, dynamic panel GMM estimators, that effectively mitigated serial correlation and heterogeneity. Generally, the panel data are confronted with serial correlation, heteroskedasticity, and heterogeneity, all of which could be resolved through panel GMMs (the generalized method of moments) (). Moreover, the GMM estimator is effective when the cross-sectional identities are large in number compared to the period identifiers (). A panel of 33 countries was selected for the study (Table. 1).

TABLE 1

AbbreviationVariableSource
TTrade (% of GDP)OECD National Accounts Database
TNRSTransport services (% of service exports, BoP)IMF
ICTICT service exports (% of service exports, BoP)IMF
INTIndividuals using the Internet (% of the population)International Telecommunication Union (ITU)
L1Logistic performance index: ability to track and trace consignments (1 = low to 5 = high)Turku School of Economics
L2Logistic performance index: competence and quality of logistic services (1 = low to 5 = high)Turku School of Economics
L3Logistic performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced shipments (1 = low to 5 = high)Turku School of Economics
L4Logistic performance index: efficiency of the customs clearance process (1 = low to 5 = high)Turku School of Economics
L5Logistic performance index: frequency with which shipments reach the consignee within scheduled or expected time (1 = low to 5 = high)Turku School of Economics
L6Logistic performance index: quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1 = low to 5 = high)Turku School of Economics
RERenewable energy consumption (% of total final energy consumption)International Energy Agency

Source of data (period of review 2007–2020).

Results and discussion

As exhibited in Table 1, all variables have a strong mean and standard deviation and a prominent spike in their dispersion, demonstrating the transport service’s robustness with the panel of 33 developed European countries with good economic growth. The performance of logistic indicators has been explained as the ability of the consignment to track and trace efficiently, competitiveness of the logistic services, ability to place cost-effective shipment price, efficient clearness process from the customs, and frequency of the consignment received by consignee within the expected time, and efficient transport infrastructure. However, the index value ranging from 1 to 5 symbolizes low-to-high logistic performance. However, all logistic indicators have a positive mean and standard deviation. Furthermore, renewable energy, ICT, and trade also have significant positive mean and standard deviation.

Table 2 demonstrates the correlation among variables in this study. The researcher found that only renewable energy positively correlates with transport services. As the usage of renewable energy increases, the transport services will be more efficient in the 33 targeted countries. However, trade, ICT, Internet usage, and all logistic indicators negatively correlate with transport services.

TABLE 2

VariableTNRSTREICTINTL1L2L3L4L5L6
TNRS1
T−0.31561
RE0.3790−0.22231
ICT−0.21490.08800.11031
INT−0.10650.27940.29680.27911
L1−0.2320−0.07320.13210.31970.51921
L2−0.2592−0.05730.11970.31580.55160.918251
L3−0.25270.02850.08720.32070.45810.83970.86571
L4−0.24840.05480.18540.31040.61630.877220.90890.83391
L5−0.1959−0.02130.08820.25850.45140.856560.85250.82190.82971
L6−0.2778−0.025540.09410.24740.599950.89640.93170.81630.92910.821671

Correlation matrix (developed E.U. countries).

Table 3 demonstrates the results of the static model while explaining the ordinary least square (OLS), fixed effect (F.E.), and random effect (RE). The results found that L2 has the ability to place cost-effective shipment price (L3), efficient clearness process from the customs (L4), and frequency of the consignment received by consignee within expected time and has a negative coefficient value with transport services on 1%, 5%, and 10% levels of confidence. In simple terminology, the competent logistic services, ease of competitive shipment prices, and efficient customs clearance process will significantly hurt the efficiency of the transport services. However, RE, ICT, INT, trade, and remaining logistic indices (L1, L5, and L6) significantly correlate with transport services. Renewable energy consumption will significantly improve the performance of transport services, and its less contribution to environmental degradation will help the country to achieve sustainable goals. Moreover, the efficient information and communication technology usage and usage of the Internet will significantly make the transport services efficient.

TABLE 3

VariableFEREOLS
Trade0.04787 (0.0732)0.0178 (0.06637)0.3814 (0.0635)***
ICT0.18450 (0.02236)***0.17883 (0.02235)***0.1139 (0.03353)***
Individuals using the Internet0.20162 (0.04432)***0.20309 (0.04477)***0.34450 (0.1501)**
Renewable energy consumption0.104237 (0.0178)***0.09392 (0.01783)***0.26241 (0.035094)***
L10.248988 (0.11211)**0.23880 (0.1136)**−0.1898 (0.4864)
L2−0.175411 (0.15516)−0.18546 (0.1570)−0.6727 (0.61617)
L3−0.15703 (0.1127)−0.15377 (0.11436)−0.0408 (0.43589)
L4−0.07505 (0.012275)−0.073477 (0.1244)−0.07369 (0.49559)
L50.0841 (0.109743)0.085131 (0.11129)1.0305 (0.48609)**
L60.09399 (0.13774)0.086188 (0.139575)1.16630 (0.52872)**
Hausman54.36 (0.001)***

Static model: the results of OLS, FE, and RE effects.

***, **, and * indicate 1%, 5%, and 10% levels of significance.

Table 4 demonstrates the panel estimation regression of GMM and FGLS. The results disclosed that transport services have a positive and significant relationship with trade, renewable energy, ICT, and internet usage at a 5% confidence level. The association between transport service and trade is directly proportional with a 0.0776 coefficient value. The significance of transport efficiency in trade cannot be denied. The economies can have a strong capacity to boost their trade balance by applying efficient transport services that drastically reduce cost and time.

TABLE 4

VariableOne-step difference GMMOne-step system GMMFGLS
Lag. Transport services0.62379 (0.22532)***0.92242 (0.07653)***
Trade0.059068 (0.07767)*0.02984 (0.03054)*0.38148 (0.062832)***
ICT service exports0.088861 (0.03874)**0.013166 (0.06215)**0.11390 (0.03313)***
Individuals using the Internet0.030061 (0.0812303)0.000391 (0.02394)0.344501 (0.14830)**
Renewable energy consumption0.01250 (0.045194)*0.024703 (0.023946)*0.26241 (0.346744)***
L10.1882539 (0.74049)*0.08437 (0.09905)**−0.189863 (0.480583)*
L2−0.163065 (0.112768)**0.196005 (0.010346)**−0.67279 (0.609339)***
L3−0.01132 (0.109761)0.05798** (0.091183)−0.04086 (0.48762)
L40.033726 (0.09187)*0.037149 (0.09169)**−0.073691 (0.489658)*
L50.036064 (0.104359)**0.15507 (0.11709)***1.03055 (0.480276)**
L60.019845 (0.118696)−0.106299 (0.120782)**1.16630 (0.522394)**
AR (2)0.38040.17125-
Hansen0.792360.89549-
Number of groups33
Number of instruments22

Dynamic model.

***, **, and * indicate 1%, 5%, and 10% levels of significance.

Information, communication, and technology have a significant positive connection with transport services having a coefficient value of 0.038. The results revealed that ICT adoption positively affects road freight transport by enhancing safety, suitability, visibility, and accountability in operations. However, the expansion of ICT may also significantly affect the alternative concentration to enhance transportation systems. ICT technology is a means of resolving transportation difficulties and developing a cognitive understanding of the domain and related fields’ dominant arguments. Moreover, strategies for innovation and commercialization within the intelligent transport systems’ domain focus on collaborative endeavors. However, the findings mostly focus on evaluating existing ICT deployments in developed countries in Europe. It suggested that a significant association between ICTs and passenger transportation operations has the potential to transform environmental sustainability by reducing carbon emissions.

The results found that renewable energy and transport services have a significant positive association with transport services with a 0.045 coefficient value. The transportation sector produces 23% of global energy-related CO2 emissions. The population, income, and trade-economic expansion all lead to a rise in transportation energy demand; however, insufficient substitute fuels, primarily in the heavy-duty component, and lock-in effects in the fuel and transportation infrastructure have resulted in a slower rate of transformation to renewable energy than in other economic sectors. In 2017, the E.U.’s total final energy consumption for transportation accounted for 31% approximately. Additionally, 27% of total GHG emissions with road transport accounting for the majority (74%) of these emissions; heavy-duty vehicles accounted for 19% of these emissions.

Furthermore, the result findings revealed that logistic indicators positively connected with transport services, even though to develop a strategy for measures to be implemented within transportation operations and to evaluate their competitiveness within the business’s logistic chain. The efficiency of these indicators is significantly influenced by cargo flow forecasts and resource allocation planning. In addition, the management of high-quality operations requires optimization. By applying transport and logistic management systems for transportation services, it is feasible to achieve optimal outcomes.

Conclusion

Under transport services, the significance of global logistics in expanding financial operations is examined rigorously and debated. This debate is enlarged to include environmentally friendly logistical operations associated with renewable energy to tackle environmental degradation issues related to the economic expansion of developed nations. The research used the GMM and FGLS approach to predict the link between logistic indicators, trade, renewable energy, and ICT on transport services in selected 33 developed European countries. The use of renewable energy sources will considerably improve the performance of transportation services, and their reduced contribution to environmental deterioration will assist the country in achieving its sustainable goals. In addition, the use of information and communication technologies and the Internet will considerably improve the efficiency of transport services. Transport services have a considerable positive link with trade, renewable energy, ICT, and internet usage with a 5% confidence data level. The correlation between transport services and trade is directly proportional. The importance of transport efficiency in trade cannot be denied. By implementing cost-effective and time transportation services, economies can significantly improve their trade balances. The adoption of ICT positively influences road freight transport by improving operational safety, integrity, visibility, and accountability. However, the growth of ICT may also substantially impact the accumulation of opportunities to improve transport networks. However, there is a strong correlation between logistic indicators and transport services, although to establish a strategy for measures to be implemented within transportation operations and then evaluate their effectiveness within the business’s logistical system.

The effectiveness of these indicators is considerably affected by transport flow predictions and the resource allocation strategy. Moreover, the management of high-quality operations requires optimization. Using transport and logistic management systems for transportation services makes it feasible to get optimal outcomes (Table 5).

TABLE 5

VariableMeanStd. Dev.MinMax
T4.65210.47823.83776.0146
RE2.84190.745890.18514.3969
ICT2.14210.65600.29343.9023
INT4.30540.245923.24494.6136
TNRS3.09880.604111.53234.1651
L11.50340.11111.15371.6822
L21.48940.10911.24121.6714
L31.46630.08461.23851.6553
L41.44800.084681.07841.65015
L51.58070.08611.35581.75711
L61.48050.12931.17241.6936

Summary statistics (developed E.U. countries).

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding

This research is supported by the Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Public Big Data (No. PBD 2022-17) and the Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Spatial Information Engineering (NO. 20210218). Furthermore, the authors of this article would like to thank Prince Sultan University for its financial and academic support.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The reviewer [A.S] declared a shared affiliation with the author [K.J] to the handling editor at the time of review.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    AditjandraP. T.ZunderT. H.IslamD. M. Z.PalacinR. (2016). “Green rail transportation: Improving rail freight to support green corridors,” in Green transportation logistics (Cham: Springer), 413454.

  • 2

    AhmedF.AliI.KousarS.AhmedS. (2022). The environmental impact of industrialization and foreign direct investment: Empirical evidence from asia-pacific region. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.29, 2977829792. 10.1007/s11356-021-17560-w

  • 3

    AliY.SocciC.PretaroliR.SeveriniF. (2018). Economic and environmental impact of transport sector on Europe economy. Asia-Pac. J. Reg. Sci.2 (2), 361397. 10.1007/s41685-017-0066-9

  • 4

    Alonso-BorregoC.ArellanoM. (1999). Symmetrically normalized instrumental-variable estimation using panel data. J. Bus. Econ. Statistics17 (1), 3649. 10.2307/1392237

  • 5

    AnH.RazzaqA.NawazA.NomanS. M.KhanS. A. R. (2021). Nexus between green logistic operations and triple bottom line: Evidence from infrastructure-led Chinese outward foreign direct investment in belt and road host countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.28 (37), 5102251045. 10.1007/s11356-021-12470-3

  • 6

    AshmarinaS. I.MantulenkoV. V.VochozkaM. (Editors) (2020). Engineering economics: Decisions and solutions from eurasian perspective (Springer Nature), 139.

  • 7

    BieserJ. C.HöjerM. (2021). “A framework for assessing impacts of information and communication technology on passenger transport and greenhouse gas emissions,” in Environmental informatics (Cham: Springer), 235253.

  • 8

    ChattiW.MajeedM. T. (2022). Investigating the links between ICTs, passenger transportation, and environmental sustainability. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.29 (18), 2656426574. 10.1007/s11356-021-17834-3

  • 9

    DinS.NazirM. S.SarfrazM. (2022). The climate change and stock market: Catastrophes of the Canadian weather. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.29, 4480644818. 10.1007/s11356-022-19059-4

  • 10

  • 11

    EzenwaA.WhiteingA.JohnsonD.OledinmaA. (2020). Factors influencing information and communication technology diffusion in Nigeria's transport logistics industry: An exploratory study. Int. J. Intelligent Enterp.13 (2/3), 252276. 10.1504/ijism.2020.107846

  • 12

    GogoneataB. (2008). An analysis of explanatory factors of logistics performance of a country. Amfiteatru Econ. J.10 (24), 143156.

  • 13

    GrilichesZ.RaoP. (1969). Small-sample properties of several two-stage regression methods in the context of autocorrelated disturbances. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.64, 253272. 10.1080/01621459.1969.10500968

  • 14

    GudmundssonH.WyattA.GordonL. (2005). Benchmarking and sustainable transport policy: Learning from the BEST network. Transp. Rev.25 (6), 669690. 10.1080/01441640500414824

  • 15

    GunasekaranA.SubramanianN.PapadopoulosT. (2017). Information technology for competitive advantage within logistics and supply chains: A review. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev.99, 1433. 10.1016/j.tre.2016.12.008

  • 16

    HasegawaT. (2018). Toward the mobility-oriented heterogeneous transport system based on new ICT environments–Understanding from a viewpoint of the systems innovation theory. IATSS Res.42 (2), 4048. 10.1016/j.iatssr.2018.07.001

  • 17

    KhanS. A. R.ZhangY.AneesM.GolpîraH.LahmarA.QianliD. (2018). Green supply chain management, economic growth and environment: A GMM based evidence. J. Clean. Prod.185, 588599. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.226

  • 18

    KhanS. A. R.JianC.ZhangY.GolpîraH.KumarA.SharifA. (2019). Environmental, social and economic growth indicators spur logistics performance: From the perspective of south asian association for regional cooperation countries. J. Clean. Prod.214, 10111023. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.322

  • 19

    KhanS. A. R.GodilD. I.JabbourC. J. C.ShujaatS.RazzaqA.YuZ. (2021b). Green data analytics, blockchain technology for sustainable development, and sustainable supply chain practices: Evidence from small and medium enterprises. Ann. Oper. Res.. 10111023. 10.1007/s10479-021-04275-x

  • 20

    KhanS. A. R.GodilD. I.YuZ.AbbasF.ShamimM. A. (2021c). Adoption of renewable energy sources, low-carbon initiatives, and advanced logistical infrastructure—An step toward integrated global progress. Sustain. Dev.30, 275. Early View. 10.1002/sd.2243

  • 21

    KhanS. A. R.GodilD. I.QuddoosM. U.YuZ.AkhtarM. H.LiangZ. (2021d). Investigating the nexus between energy, economic growth, and environmental quality: A road map for the sustainable development. Sustain. Dev.29 (5), 835846. 10.1002/sd.2178

  • 22

    KhanS. A. R.YuZ.SharifA. (2021e). No silver bullet for de-carbonization: Preparing for tomorrow, today. Resour. Policy71, 101942. 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101942

  • 23

    KhanS. A. R.PipraniA. Z.YuZ. (2022b). Digital technology and circular economy practices: Future of supply chains. Oper. Manag. Res.. 588599. 10.1007/s12063-021-00247-3

  • 24

    KhanS. A. R.UmarM.AsadovA.TanveerM.YuZ. (2022c). Technological revolution and circular economy practices: A mechanism of green economy. Sustainability14 (8), 4524. 10.3390/su14084524

  • 25

    KulisicB.DimitriouI.Mola-YudegoB. (2021). From preferences to concerted policy on mandated share for renewable energy in transport. Energy Policy155, 112355. 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112355

  • 26

  • 27

    LongA.BoseA.O'SheaR.MonaghanR.MurphyJ. D. (2021). Implications of European Union recast Renewable Energy Directive sustainability criteria for renewable heat and transport: Case study of willow biomethane in Ireland. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.150, 111461. 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111461

  • 28

    MalkowskaA.MalkowskiA. (2021). International trade in transport services between Poland and the European union. Sustainability13 (1), 424. 10.3390/su13010424

  • 29

    McKinnonA.BrowneM.WhiteingA.PiecykM. (Editors) (2015). Green logistics: Improving the environmental sustainability of logistics (London: Kogan Page Publishers).

  • 30

    MeneghettiA.Dal MagroF.RomagnoliA. (2021). Renewable energy penetration in food delivery: Coupling photovoltaics with transport refrigerated units. Energy232, 120994. 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120994

  • 31

    MohsinM.KamranH. W.NawazM. A.HussainM. S.DahriA. S. (2021). Assessing the impact of transition from nonrenewable to renewable energy consumption on economic growth-environmental nexus from developing Asian economies. J. Environ. Manag.284, 111999. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111999

  • 32

    Rehman KhanS. A.HassanS.KhanM. A.KhanM. R.GodilD. I.TanveerM. (2022). Nexuses between energy efficiency, renewable energy consumption, foreign direct investment, energy consumption, global trade, logistics and manufacturing industries of emerging economies: In the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Environ. Sci.10, 880200. 10.3389/fenvs.2022.880200

  • 33

    RezagholizadehaMahdiehAghaeiMajidDehghanOmid (2020). Foreign direct investment, stock market development, and renewable energy consumption: Case study of Iran. J. Renew. Energy Environ.7, 818. 10.30501/JREE.2020.105913

  • 34

    SałekR. (2021). The importance of telematic information and logistics indicators for the management of the quality of transport services. Prod. Eng. Arch.27 (3), 176183. 10.30657/pea.2021.27.23

  • 35

    SarfrazM.IvascuL.AbdullahM. I.OzturkI.TariqJ. (2022). Exploring a pathway to sustainable performance in manufacturing firms: The interplay between innovation capabilities, green process, product innovations and digital leadership. Sustainability14 (10), 5945. 10.3390/su14105945

  • 36

    SarfrazM.MohsinM.NaseemS.KumarA. (2021). Modeling the relationship between carbon emissions and environmental sustainability during COVID-19: A new evidence from asymmetric ARDL cointegration approach. Environ. Dev. Sustain.23, 1620816226. 10.1007/s10668-021-01324-0

  • 37

    SarkisJ.KouhizadehM.ZhuQ. S. (2020). Digitalization and the greening of supply chains. Industrial Manag. Data Syst.121 (1), 6585. 10.1108/IMDS-08-2020-0450

  • 38

    SirinaN.ZubkovV. (2021). Transport services management on transport and logistic methods. Transp. Res. Procedia54, 263273. 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.02.072

  • 39

    ThomopoulosN.GivoniM. (Editors) (2015). ICT for transport: Opportunities and threats (London: Edward Elgar Publishing).

  • 40

    TsakalidisA.van BalenM.GkoumasK.PekarF. (2020). Catalyzing sustainable transport innovation through policy support and monitoring: The case of TRIMIS and the European green deal. Sustainability12 (8), 3171. 10.3390/su12083171

  • 41

    van Veen-GrootD. B.NijkampP. (1999). Globalisation, transport and the environment: New perspectives for ecological economics. Ecol. Econ.31 (3), 331346. 10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00099-3

  • 42

    VenturiniG.KarlssonK.MünsterM. (2019). Impact and effectiveness of transport policy measures for a renewable-based energy system. Energy Policy133, 110900. 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110900

  • 43

    VenturiniG. (2019). Transition to sustainable transport systems: Perspectives on alternative fuels, collaborative development of coherent scenarios and policy analysis for the case of the Danish energy system. Denmark: Technical University of Denmark.

  • 44

    YuZ.RidwanI. L.IrshadA. U. R.TanveerM.KhanS. A. R. (2022a). Investigating the nexuses between transportation Infrastructure, renewable energy Sources, and economic Growth: Striving towards sustainable development. Ain Shams Eng. J., 101843. 10.1016/j.asej.2022.101843

  • 45

    YuZ.UmarM.RehmanS. A. (2022b). Adoption of technological innovation and recycling practices in automobile sector: Under the covid-19 pandemic. Oper. Manag. Res.. 835846. 10.1007/s12063-022-00263-x

  • 46

    ZhangJ.HayashiY.FrankL. D. (2021). COVID-19 and transport: Findings from a worldwide expert survey. Transp. Policy103 (01), 6885. 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.011

  • 47

    ZiyadinS.SousaR. D.MalayevK.YergobekD.NurlanovaA. (2020). The influence of logistics innovations on management of freight-transportation processes. Pol. J. Manag. Stud.21 (1), 432446. 10.17512/pjms.2020.21.1.32

Summary

Keywords

logistic indicators, transport services, trade, renewable energy, information communication technology

Citation

Yu Z, Khan AR, Thomas G, Jameel K, Tanveer M and Janjua L (2022) Nexuses between international trade, renewable energy, and transport services: Leading toward practical implications and trade policies. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:980648. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.980648

Received

28 June 2022

Accepted

18 July 2022

Published

22 August 2022

Volume

10 - 2022

Edited by

Jean Vasile Andrei, Universitatea Petrol Si Gaze Ploiesti, Romania

Reviewed by

Asif Basit, University of Malaya, Malaysia

Adeel Shah, College of Business Management, Pakistan

Muddassar Sarfraz, Putra Malaysia University, Malaysia

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Zhang Yu,

This article was submitted to Environmental Economics and Management, a section of the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics