1 Introduction
As the fashion industry booms, more and more environmental impacts are coming to the fore. In particular, the fashion industry is the second largest source of pollution after the petrochemical industry (), so contemporary fashion companies must adopt a green technology innovation strategy to alleviate the environmental impacts of products. Indeed, green technology innovation strategy has been confirmed as a key source of sustainability (). Therefore, it is urgent to explore how to drive fashion companies to adopt green technology innovation strategy.
However, previous investigations have paid limited attention to how to facilitate the adoption of green technology innovation strategy by fashion companies, as little is known about the drivers of green technology innovation strategy adoption. Previous research on exploring antecedents of green technology innovation strategy almost pays attention to the institutional perspective (e.g., ), but the institutional perspective cannot assure that companies adopt environmental innovation instead of making a show. This article upgrades the literature on environmental innovation to define green technology innovation strategy as an innovation strategy for green activities and green technology systems (). Finally, this article, thus, introduces a novel adoption model of green technology innovation strategy that describes the impact of how environmental social responsibility policy influences green technology innovation strategy adoption through the mediating role of green identity and moderation of external pressures based on cognitive consistency theory () and upper echelons theory (; ; ).
This article uses the qualitative method to interview three top management teams of Taiwan’s fashion companies to verify the proposed proposition and theoretical framework (Figure 1). The qualitative coding analysis is used to analyze the script of an interview, and the result confirms all propositions in this article.
FIGURE 1
2 Literature reviewing
2.1 Corporate governance
Corporate governance refers to how to deal with the relationship between different rights and stakeholders of the company. The important mean of corporate governance is to reasonably allocate the rights and obligations of all stakeholders, such as employees, customers, suppliers, shareholders/investors, government, community/non-government/non-profit organizations, external rating agencies, and media, etc. (; ; ). To achieve good corporate governance, companies should develop strategies to meet the rights and expectations of stakeholders (), such as corporate social responsibility (). This paper proposes that fashion companies should adopt environmental social responsibility to meet stakeholder expectations. In particular, the fashion industry is the second largest source of pollution, so these environmentally friendly fashion companies should have a higher willingness to undertake environmental social responsibilities to meet the requirements of environmental-related stakeholders.
2.2 Environmental social responsibility and green identity
Past investigations confirm that individuals will identify with their companies because these individual desires their work values can mirror their companies’ values based on cognitive consistency theory (; ). Cognitive consistency theory believes that individuals will expect their own perceived values to be consistent with their exhibited behavior. For example, when individuals’ values are biased toward environmental values due to the influence of company values, they will also begin to have behaviors that identify with the environment (green identity). That said, when members of senior management teams perceive high levels of environmental social responsibility policy within their companies, they will revise their original work values to meet the companies’ environmental values (environmental social responsibility policy), which form a green identity. For new hires, past research also confirms that the socially responsible can attract employees of similar value (; ; ). Therefore, if these members of senior management teams do not identify environmental social responsibility policy within their companies, they will leave their original companies or original senior management teams (). This article addresses Proposition 1 as follows:
Proposition 1:Environmental social responsibility policy positively causes green identity.
2.3 Green identity and green technology innovation strategy
This article defines green technology innovation strategy as an innovation strategy for green activities and green technology systems (; ; ). Based on upper echelons theory (; ; ), senior managers’ values (e.g., green identity) or features (e.g., age) will drive companies to adopt a strategy that meets their values or features, because these senior managers can allocate companies’ resources and manpower towards their preferred business activities (; ). For example, senior managers who have high levels of green identity will like environmental activities, so they will allocate companies’ resources and manpower towards environmental activities, which will drive companies to adopt green technology innovation strategy. This article addresses Proposition 2 as follows:
Proposition 2:Green identity positively causes green technology innovation strategy.
2.4 The moderating role of external pressures
External pressures (; ) represent the degree to which companies confront market pressures (e.g., an industry environment tendency), regulatory pressures (e.g., a government’s environmental regulation), and competitive pressures (e.g., a competitor’s environmental strategy), and these pressures will reinforce the intention of adopting response strategies. That said, companies who confront higher external pressures will have a higher intention to adopt green technology innovation strategy caused by senior managers’ green identity, because green technology innovation strategy is one kind of response strategy to external pressures. For example, when companies who confront higher external pressures will show a higher adoption intention of green technology innovation strategy since green technology innovation strategy can meet the government’s expectations and fight competitors. By contrast, when companies who confront lower external pressures will show a lower adoption intention of green technology innovation strategy since they have no urgent need to meet the government expectations and fight competitors. This article addresses Proposition 3 as follows:
Proposition 3:External pressures positively moderate the relationship between green identity and green technology innovation strategy.
3 Research method
This article used a qualitative interview to produce the transcripts and then used qualitative coding analysis to verify Proposition 1, Proposition 2 and Proposition 3 based on the content of the transcript. This article contacted several fashion industry associations in Taiwan to collect interviewees. The three senior managers of fashion companies in Taiwan agreed to join this qualitative interview of this article, and they are all male with at least a master’s degree. The qualitative coding analysis supports Proposition 1, Proposition 2 and Proposition 3 in this article. In addition, this article also interviewed followers of three fashion company executives to confirm the correctness of the content, which meets the triangulation method.
Supporting codlings for Proposition 1 from the three senior managers: Environmental social responsibility has become more and more common in the fashion industry (Senior Managers 1, 2 and 3) because the environmental issues of the fashion industry have been valued by everyone (Senior Managers 1 and 2). If a company adopts an environmental social responsibility policy, all senior managers will abide by it (Senior Manager 3), and in the end, everyone identifies environmental issues (Senior Managers 1 and 3). Moreover, companies that adopt environmental social responsibility will also attract more outstanding talents to apply, and eventually, all employees of the company will agree with the value of the environment (Senior Managers 1 and 2).
Supporting codlings for Proposition 2 from the three senior managers: Senior managers’ identity of the environment will indeed affect the company’s adoption of green technology innovation strategies (Senior Managers 1, 2 and 3) because the company’s strategy is decided by senior managers (Senior Manager 1, 2 and 3). Senior executives can also use their power to influence the company’s adoption of strategies (Senior Managers 1 and 3), and most of the company’s resources are controlled by senior managers (Senior Managers 1 and 3).
Supporting codlings for Proposition 3 from the three senior managers: To survive, companies must care about market trends, government regulations, and competitors’ strategies (Senior Managers 1, 2 and 3). Although the company’s senior management’s recognition of the environment can affect the company’s adoption of environmental strategies (Senior Manager 1, 2 and 3), if these external stakeholders are biased towards environmental protection, the company will definitely be more willing to adopt environmental innovation strategies in response to these stakeholders (Senior Manager 1, 2 and 3).
4 Discussion
4.1 Theoretical implications
This article adopts cognitive-consistency theory and upper echelons theory to address a novel adoption model of green technology innovation strategy in the context of the fashion industry and discusses its antecedents and moderator. Previous surveys have paid limited attention to how to drive companies to adopt green technology innovation strategies, so this article has a significant incremental contribution to the fashion industry and sustainable literature. Indeed, there is limited research that adopts a similar framework to this article to put forward the drivers of green technology innovation strategy.
Second, this article addresses a connection between environmental social responsibility, green identity, green technology innovation strategy, and external pressures to detect a novel moderated mediation model, and it can describe the mechanism of green technology innovation strategy adoption in detail. The mechanism is crucial as fashion companies can make a strategy to drive green technology innovation strategy adoption. The green technology innovation strategy adoption is an important source of green competitive advantage.
In practice, to introduce environmental social responsibility policy into fashion companies, this article suggests fashion companies can not only run more environmental social responsibility activities but also encourage environmental social responsibility education and training courses. These fashion companies can gradually integrate the value of environmental social responsibility policy into their company culture and then implement environmental social responsibility policy, which is a key antecedent of green technology innovation strategy.
5 Conclusion
This article pays attention to the fashion industry by addressing a novel adoption model of green technology innovation strategy based on cognitive-consistency theory and upper echelons theory. The adoption model is unique and continues to help the fashion industry advance environmental protection issues. Indeed, past investigations rarely examine the drivers of green technology innovation strategy so there are no ideas about how to promote the adoption of green technology innovation strategy. Through the adoption of cognitive consistency theory and upper echelons theory, this article detects the black box of green technology innovation strategy adoption in the fashion industry setting.
Statements
Author contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AhnS. Y.ParkD. J. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and corporate longevity: The mediating role of social capital and moral legitimacy in korea. J. Bus. Ethics150, 117–134. 10.1007/s10551-016-3161-3
2
AliS.JiangJ.RehmanR.KhanM. K. (2022). Tournament incentives and environmental performance: The role of green innovation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.30, 17670–17680. 10.1007/s11356-022-23406-w
3
AliS.ZhangJ.UsmanM.KhanF. U.IkramA.AnwarB. (2019). Sub-national institutional contingencies and corporate social responsibility performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability11 (19), 5478. 10.3390/su11195478
4
BooneC.LokshinB.GuenterH.BelderbosR. (2019). Top management team nationality, corporate entrepreneurship, and innovation in multinational firms. Strategic Manag. J.40 (2), 277–302. 10.1002/smj.2976
5
ChenB.RenM.ChenL. (2021). Impact analysis of large-scale environmental spot inspection policy on green innovation: Evidence from China. Front. Environ. Sci.9, 676413. 10.3389/fenvs.2021.676413
6
CrifoP.Escrig-OlmedoE.MottisN. (2019). Corporate governance as a key driver of corporate sustainability in France: The role of board members and investor relations. J. Bus. Ethics159, 1127–1146. 10.1007/s10551-018-3866-6
7
DobrevS. D.KimT. (2019). Bringing the firms (and forms) back in: Organizational form identity and individual turnover. Acad. Manag. J.62 (4), 1028–1051. 10.5465/amj.2017.0497
8
DuM.ZhouQ.ZhangY.LiF. (2022). Towards sustainable development in China: How do green technology innovation and resource misallocation affect carbon emission performance?Front. Psychol.13, 929125. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.929125
9
FeilsD.RahmanM.ŞabacF. (2018). Corporate governance systems diversity: A coasian perspective on stakeholder rights. J. Bus. Ethics150, 451–466. 10.1007/s10551-016-3188-5
10
FeldmanS. (2013). Cognitive consistency motivational antecedents and behavioral consequents. New York: Academic Press.
11
HambrickD. C. (2016). 0Upper echelons theory. Palgrave Encycl. Strateg. Manag.32, 1–5.
12
HeW.ShenR. (2019). ISO 14001 certification and corporate technological innovation: Evidence from Chinese firms. J. Bus. Ethics158, 97–117. 10.1007/s10551-017-3712-2
13
HuangJ. W.LiY. H. (2017). Green innovation and performance: The view of organizational capability and social reciprocity. J. Bus. Ethics145, 309–324. 10.1007/s10551-015-2903-y
14
KrauseR.RohJ.WhitlerK. A. (2022). The top management team: Conceptualization, operationalization, and a roadmap for scholarship. J. Manag.48 (6), 1548–1601. 10.1177/01492063211072459
15
LiJ.TangY. I. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Acad. Manag. J.53 (1), 45–68. 10.5465/amj.2010.48036912
16
LiS.LuJ. W. (2020). A dual-agency model of firm CSR in response to institutional pressure: Evidence from Chinese publicly listed firms. Manag. J.63 (6), 2004–2032. 10.5465/amj.2018.0557
17
MunyedeP. (2021). Capping the tenure of CEOs as a good corporate governance strategy: Prospects and challenges. J. Contemp. Gov. Public Policy2 (1), 67–78. 10.46507/jcgpp.v2i1.29
18
NawazT. (2019). Exploring the nexus between human capital, corporate governance and performance: Evidence from islamic banks. J. Bus. Ethics157, 567–587. 10.1007/s10551-017-3694-0
19
NeelyB. H.LovelaceJ. B.CowenA. P.HillerN. J. (2020). Metacritiques of upper echelons theory: Verdicts and recommendations for future research. J. Manag.46 (6), 1029–1062. 10.1177/0149206320908640
20
OstermannC. M.NascimentoL. S.ZenA. C. (2021). Business model innovation for circular economy in fashion industry: A startups' perspective. Front. Sustain.2, 766614. 10.3389/frsus.2021.766614
21
PasrichaP.SinghB.VermaP. (2018). Erratum to: Ethical leadership, organic organizational cultures and corporate social responsibility: An empirical study in social enterprises. J. Bus. Ethics151, 959. 10.1007/s10551-017-3606-3
22
TourignyL.HanJ.BabaV. V.PanP. (2019). Ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility in China: A multilevel study of their effects on trust and organizational citizenship behavior. J. Bus. Ethics158, 427–440. 10.1007/s10551-017-3745-6
23
UchidaD. (2023). The wheel comes full circle? An integrated view of organizational responses to institutional pressures. J. Manag.49 (2), 771–807. 10.1177/01492063211057845
24
WuG.XuQ.NiuX.TaoL. (2022). How does government policy improve green technology innovation: An empirical study in China. Front. Environ. Sci.9, 799794. 10.3389/fenvs.2021.799794
25
YanA.GuoH.ZhouZ. E. (2022). How moral identity inhibits employee silence behavior: The roles of felt obligation and corporate social responsibility perception. J. Bus. Ethics. 10.1007/s10551-022-05263-2
Summary
Keywords
green technology innovation strategy, external pressures, sustainable development, environmental social responsibility, green identity
Citation
Wang C-H (2023) Why fashion companies adopt green technology innovation strategy: A perspective of environmental social responsibility. Front. Environ. Sci. 11:1152805. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1152805
Received
28 January 2023
Accepted
13 February 2023
Published
22 February 2023
Volume
11 - 2023
Edited by
Kittisak Jermsittiparsert, University of City Island, Cyprus
Reviewed by
Naveed R. Khan, UCSI University, Malaysia
Ahmad Harakan, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Indonesia
Rita Yi Man Li, Hong Kong Shue Yan University, Hong Kong SAR, China
Srirath Gohwong, Kasetsart University, Thailand
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Wang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Chiang-Hui Wang, mandyw@mail.mcu.edu.tw
This article was submitted to Environmental Economics and Management, a section of the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.