1 Introduction
As the public begins to pay attention to global warming and environmental issues, this awareness of environmental protection has also driven the trend of environmental protection in rich countries (). In particular, consumers have become aware of the impact of environmental degradation on the quality of life and have begun to shift their consumption behavior towards green values. Some companies have realized the trend of green products and started to transform the product manufacturing process to develop innovative green products, such as circular products (Yadav et al., 2022). Since the transformation of manufacturers requires a lot of resources and time, some manufacturers try to adopt the strategy of the green image but do not produce green products (), which is called greenwashing. In addition, to attract consumers to buy green products, manufacturers use excessively exquisite packaging for green products, which makes consumers feel greenwashed (Qayyum et al., 2022), which in turn creates negative attitudes towards circular products (such as product confusion).
Unlike previous surveys that only explored the positive drivers of purchase intentions for green products, this article explores the factors that hinder the willingness to accept circular products and uses signaling theory () to build a model of acceptance intentions for circular products. That said, this article explores the factors that hinder people’s willingness to accept circular products from the perspective of excessively exquisite packaging. This article uses signaling theory to explain why excessively exquisite packaging will cause consumers’ greenwashing perception, which will lead to green confusion, and ultimately reduce the willingness to accept circular products. Since a series of policies adopted by the government still cannot effectively curb global warming and environmental pollution, circular products have been verified as an effective strategy to alleviate this problem (Yadav et al., 2022).
This article validates the circular product purchase model (Figure 1) by collecting qualitative transcripts from three directors of circular product companies and three consumers in Taiwan and uses qualitative analysis to verify the green behavioral model of this article (please see Table 1).
FIGURE 1
TABLE 1
| Terms | Verification codings | |
|---|---|---|
| Proposition 1 | Excessive product packaging promotes greenwash perception | A1, B1, C1, D2, E1, and F1 |
| Proposition 2 | Greenwash perception promotes green confusion | A2, B2, C2, D4, E2, and F2 |
| Proposition 3 | Green confusion reduces the willingness to accept circular products | A3, B4, C3, D4, E3, and F3 |
Analysis result.
2 Literature reviewing
1) Signal theory
Signaling theory (
), developed in conditions of imperfect markets and asymmetric information, assumes that only the managers of the firm know the true quality of the product. That is, consumers do not have complete information to discern the true quality of the product. This article adopts signaling theory to describe the consumer mechanism of circular products. In the case of circular products, consumers can only judge circular products through a few external signals such as packaging, product description, or brand, which makes it more difficult for consumers to compare and distinguish the authenticity of circular products. Therefore, consumers will judge the attributes of circular products through obvious signals, such as excessively exquisite packaging. Since circular products are remanufactured from recycled resources, excessively exquisite packaging will make consumers doubt the authenticity of circular products. On the contrary, the signal of simple packaging will make consumers feel that it meets the attributes of circular products.
2) Excessively exquisite packaging and greenwash perception
In the purchase decision process, consumers do not know the actual attributes of circular products, so they will use more external information than internal information to evaluate circular products, which is called “signaling theory” (). To attract consumers to buy products, manufacturers usually use excessively exquisite packaging to distinguish competitors' products, thereby increasing consumers’ willingness to purchase (). According to signal theory, consumers may regard packaging as a kind of external information to evaluate products (), because product packaging is an easy-to-observe external signal. If manufacturers overpackage circular products to increase consumers’ willingness to purchase, it may damage the brand’s green image (). That is to say, the signal of excessively exquisite packaging will make consumers feel that the circular product attributes claimed by the manufacturer are invalid and unreliable, and then consumers will judge that the brand may falsify green information (greenwashing) because it violates the concept of energy saving and carbon reduction. Therefore, this article makes the first claim.
Proposition 1
Excessively exquisite packaging promotes greenwash perception.
3) Greenwash perception and green confusion.
Proposition 2
Greenwash perception promotes green confusion.
4) Green Confusion and Willingness to Accept Circular Products
Proposition 3Green confusion reduces willingness to accept circular products.
3 Methodology
This article verified the theoretical model (Figure 1) through qualitative coding analysis and collected qualitative transcripts from three supervisors of circular product companies and three consumers in Taiwan. This article adopts six samples because the past survey has proposed that more samples only can obtain similar information (). This article uses A, B, C, D, E, and F to represent the codings and analyze if these codings support the three propositions. The purpose of qualitative coding analysis was to code the responses of the six interviewees and to analyze whether these codes were propositions previously made. For example, A1 represents the first classification code of the content answered by the first interviewer. This code describes that interviewer A thinks excessive product packaging is very strange because it violates the definition of circular products. Interviewer A has a greenwashing perception of whether this circular product is fake.
Cohen’s kappa coefficient () is employed to calculate the coding reliability, and the triangulation method is used to confirm the reliability of the qualitative transcript.
4 Discussion
This article draws on signaling theory to build a circular product acceptance model and describes how consumers evaluate circular products through the mechanisms of excessively exquisite packaging, greenwashing perception, and green confusion. Previous surveys rarely pay attention to barriers to the willingness to accept circular products, so this article draws on signaling theory to open the black box of barriers to the willingness to accept circular products and provides a significant incremental contribution to circular products. In addition, this article focuses on circular products, because circular products can effectively reduce environmental pollution and climate warming, thereby achieving the goal of environmentally sustainable development.
Second, the qualitative analysis preliminarily supports the proposition of this paper. In other words, excessively exquisite packaging will reduce the willingness to accept circular products through the intermediary mechanism of greenwashing perception and green confusion. Although past investigation has examined the negative effects of excessively exquisite packaging (), they have not examined in detail the behavioral mechanism between excessively exquisite packaging and willingness to accept circular products.
In summary, this article discusses three strategies for marketing circular products. First of all, manufacturers of circular products should make product packaging as simple as possible to match the attributes of circular products. Consumers will be unable to judge the attributes of circular products because the packaging is too exquisite, resulting in inconsistent cognition, which ultimately causes negative cognitions (such as greenwashing and green confusion). In addition, past empirical investigations also found that simple packaging can enhance consumers’ green awareness of products (). Secondly, to alleviate consumers’ “greenwashing” concept, manufacturers of circular products should not only maintain their green image but also demonstrate more green business activities, such as obtaining green product certification, to increase consumers’ green concept. Finally, to reduce consumers’ green confusion, manufacturers of round products should not only use simple packaging but also introduce the manufacturing process of round products in the packaging instructions, such as adding a QR code to introduce the website, which can reduce consumers’ green confusion.
5 Future Research and Limitations
Although this paper employs excessively exquisite packaging as an antecedent of willingness to accept circular products, there may be other factors that may lead to similar behaviors, such as discounts and promotions (). Further research should examine the different factors. Second, this article addresses that excessively exquisite packaging, greenwash perception, and green confusion can form the willingness to accept circular products, but there may be other important mechanisms in different contexts that are ignored. Further study must explore and examine more possible mechanisms in different contexts to rich the literature on circular products. For example, death anxiety may be a possible variable to the willingness to accept circular products, because consumers want to reduce global warming issues. Third, this paper adopts the signal theory to construct the theoretical model of this paper. Further research should explore different theories in different backgrounds to verify the theoretical model of this paper. Finally, the propositions presented in the paper may be insufficient, so further research must collect more literature to supplement these propositions. In addition, a deeply qualitative interview or a quantitative survey must also be employed to validate these hypotheses.
Statements
Author contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
CaoQ.ZhouY.DuH.RenM.ZhenW. (2022). Carbon information disclosure quality, greenwashing behavior, and enterprise value. Front. Psychol.13, 892415. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892415
2
ChangT. W.HungC. Z. (2022). Sustainable consumption: Research on examining the influence of the psychological process of consumer green purchase intention by using a theoretical model of consumer affective events. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 1–21. 10.1007/s10668-022-02152-6
3
HermansonA. S. (2019). Green movements and their political development in the Nordic countries. The nordic environments. Routledge, 91–110.
4
MadueñoJ. H.JorgeM. L.ConesaI. M.Martínez-MartínezD. (2016). Relationship between corporate social responsibility and competitive performance in Spanish SMEs: Empirical evidence from a stakeholders’ perspective. BRQ Bus. Res. Q.19 (1), 55–72. 10.1016/j.brq.2015.06.002
5
NielsenJ. (2000). Why you only need to test with 5 users. available at https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/.
6
PolonskyM. J.GrauS. L.GarmaR. (2010). The new greenwash? Potential marketing problems with carbon offsets. Int. J. Bus. Stud.18 (1), 49–54.
7
RajendranR. P.ArunJ. (2021). The effect of consumer confusion proneness on intention to recommend the role of discrete emotions. Acad. Mark. Stud. J.25, 1–6.
8
RatnaV. V.OjhaR. K. (2022). Green brand management: Nexus between brand attachment, satisfaction and loyalty of green products. Int. J. Green Econ.16 (2), 1–129. 10.1504/ijge.2022.10052431
9
SpenceM. (1973). Job market signaling. Q. J. Econ.87 (3), 355–374. 10.2307/1882010
10
TarabiehS. M. Z. A. (2021). The impact of greenwash practices over green purchase intention: The mediating effects of green confusion, Green perceived risk, and green trust. Manag. Sci. Lett.11 (2), 451–464. 10.5267/j.msl.2020.9.022
11
WallenburgC. M.EinmahlL.LeeK. B.RaoS. (2021). On packaging and product returns in online retail—mailing boxes or sending signals?J. Bus. Logist.42 (2), 291–308. 10.1111/jbl.12273
12
WandiraR. K. (2020). Negative emotions in excessive product packaging: The effect of environmental concerns. Int. J. Innovation, Creativity Change10 (12), 543–553.
13
WarrensM. J. (2015). Five ways to look at Cohen's kappa. J. Psychol. Psychotherapy5 (4), 1.
14
ZhangS. (2022). Research on energy-saving packaging design based on artificial intelligence. Energy Rep.8, 480–489. 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.069
15
ZhaoH.YaoX.LiuZ.YangQ. (2021). Impact of pricing and product information on consumer buying behavior with customer satisfaction in a mediating role. Front. Psychol.12, 720151. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.720151
16
ZouJ.TangY.QingP.LiH.RazzaqA. (2021). Donation or discount: Effect of promotion mode on green consumption behavior. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health.18 (4), 1912. 10.3390/ijerph18041912
Summary
Keywords
excessively exquisite packaging, greenwashing perception, green confusion, willingness to accept circular products, sustainability
Citation
Wang C-H (2023) Why does excessively exquisite packaging hinder consumers to buy circular products? a perspective of signaling theory. Front. Environ. Sci. 11:1198788. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1198788
Received
02 April 2023
Accepted
09 June 2023
Published
30 June 2023
Volume
11 - 2023
Edited by
Anat Tchetchik, Bar-Ilan University, Israel
Reviewed by
Amar Razzaq, Huanggang Normal University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Wang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Chiang-Hui Wang, mandyw@mail.mcu.edu.tw
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.