The feeding habits of the Amur whitefish Coregonus ussuriensis in the Amur River, China

Abstract

To study their feeding habits, Coregonus ussuriensis samples were collected seasonally in the Amur River, China. A total of 574 samples were collected, including 200 individuals with empty stomachs. The stomach contents of the remaining 374 samples were identified, counted, weighed, and analyzed. The results showed that the vacuity rate of Coregonus ussuriensis was 34.84% in total; the rates in summer and autumn were higher than in spring and winter. Prey items could be divided into three categories: fish, benthos, and mammals, with 62 taxonomic units. Of these, fish had the highest relative importance index (IRI), followed by benthos and mammals. Specifically, Exopalaemon modestus was the dominant species among the food species of Coregonus ussuriensis, and unidentified fish, Hydropsyche sp., Hemiculter leucisculus, Abbottina rivularis, and Saurogobio dabryi were important species. The average repletion index (RI, %) of Coregonus ussuriensis was highest in autumn (1.86), followed by winter (1.40), summer (1.26), and spring (1.02). The main food of Coregonus ussuriensis was benthos in spring and autumn, and fish in summer and winter. Cluster analysis showed that, according to the similarity level of the bait biological composition, the fork length group samples of Coregonus ussuriensis could be divided into three groups: 210–330 mm, 330–450 mm, and >450 mm. The highest IRI% of feed organisms in these three groups of samples were fish (73.67%), benthos (75.12%), and benthos (94.46%), respectively. It can be observed that with the growth of the fork length of Coregonus ussuriensis, the importance of benthos in its diet increases. The results of an RDA analysis on the relationship between main bait organisms and various factors indicated that season, river level, river width, and fish size have a significant impact on bait organisms and a positive or negative impact on the quality scores of some bait species. This study filled the gap in biological research on the feeding ecology of Coregonus ussuriensis and laid a research foundation for ecological research on this species and its resource protection and aquaculture.

Introduction

The Amur River in China is 4,440 km long, flows into the Okhotsk Strait in Russia, and has a main stem and tributaries (the Songhua River and the Ussuri River). It is located in the northeast region of China, with a latitude range of N 43.4–53.5°. It is a coldwater river, of which the ice cover period lasts for over 5 months, and is rich in fishery resources, among which Coregonus ussuriensis is an important species.

Coregonusussuriensis Berg, a salmonid Amur whitefish, is a coldwater species with a long life span, slow growth, high fecundity, and late maturity and is distributed in the waters of the Amur River and southern Sea of Okhotsk (Nikolskiy, 1960; Zhang, 1995; Li et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2022). Coregonus ussuriensis migrates to the cold-water tributaries or estuary of the Amur River in summer and to the main stream of the Amur River waters such as the Songhua River and the Ussuri River in winter (Nikolskiy, 1960; Wang et al., 2019a). The construction of the Dadingzishan Navigation Power Junction in the Songhua River blocked the migration channel of Coregonus ussuriensis, resulting in a loss of habitat in the upstream waters (Wang et al., 2019b). In addition, the impact of fishing and other human activities has jointly led to a decline in the resources of Coregonus ussuriensis, which was listed as a “vulnerable” species in the China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals (Pisces) (Yue and Chen, 1998). Only by fundamentally understanding the ecological needs of fish can scientific and effective protection measures be formulated (Sánchez and Cobo, 2012). Previous studies on Coregonus ussuriensis focused on life history, age, growth, fecundity, and genetic structure (Ma et al., 2003; Liang et al., 2004; Li et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2019b). Previous studies have shown that Coregonus ussuriensis is characterized by slow growth and late sexual maturity, which indicates that it will not easily recover from human interference. However, there is currently insufficient research on its biology; in particular, there has been a lack of systematic research on feeding ecology. Fish feeding ecology is an important aspect of fish ecology research. Fish obtain energy and nutrition through feeding activities, providing a material basis for individual survival, growth, development, and reproduction, as well as population reproduction. The feeding habits of fish have important practical significance for studying their ecological characteristics, protecting fish resources, and promoting fish growth and aquaculture. Owing to a series of impacts from human activities, issues such as the decline of fishery resources have emerged, and key issues in aquatic ecosystems, including feeding ecology, have also attracted widespread attention (Yan et al., 2011). The stomach content analysis is a traditional method for studying fish feeding, and it is also the most direct and effective. It can accurately determine specific types of diet and is widely used in studies of fish feeding ecology (Yan et al., 2011; Huo et al., 2014; Ma et al., 2014; Sui et al., 2021; Sarker et al., 2023).

This study analyzed the stomach contents of Coregonus ussuriensis individuals randomly collected in different seasons in China to systematically understand their feeding characteristics and fill the gap in ecological research. The objectives of this study were as follows: 1) analyze the feeding intensity and diet composition of Coregonus ussuriensis, 2) evaluate the effects of size and seasonal and environmental factors on the diet, and 3) determine the feeding strategy.

Materials and methods

Study area and sample collection

Coregonusussuriensis samples were collected from sites that were interconnected in the waters of the Amur River, including the Amur River, the Songhua River, the Ussuri River, and the Tangwang River, the latter of which is a tributary of the Songhua River (Figure 1). These waters are located in the northeast of China and have typical seasonal characteristics, with ice cover from late November to mid-April of the following year.

FIGURE 1

The fish were sampled using floating gill nets (mesh size 4, 8, and 10 cm) seasonally from July 2016 to June 2018. The samples were immediately transported to the laboratory in an icebox after fishing, where fork length (FL) and total length (TL) were measured to the nearest 1 mm, and body weight (BW) was weighed to the nearest 0.1 g. The fish body was then dissected so that the gonads could be observed and the contents of the stomach could be extracted. Sex was identified and the maturity stage was determined using a visual evaluation according to six scales (Wang et al., 2022). The stomach contents of each specimen were washed out into a Petri dish. Each prey item was sorted and identified to the lowest feasible taxon under a stereomicroscope, then counted and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg individually, after absorbing excess water with blotting paper. All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines and approval of the Animal Research and Ethics Committees of the Heilongjiang River Fisheries Research Institute.

Data analysis

To analyze the feeding intensity rhythm of Coregonus ussuriensis, the vacuity rate (V) and repletion index (RI, %) were computed (Morato et al., 2000; Figueiredo et al., 2005).

V=N_e/N_s×100%, where N_e is the number of empty stomachs and N_s is the total number of stomachs sampled.

, where W_P is the weight of the prey and W_F is the pure body weight of the corresponding fish. The contribution of each prey item was analyzed by the index of relative importance (IRI) and IRI% (Cortés, 1997).

Where F%, N%, and W% are the percentage of occurrence, number, and weight, respectively.

To study size-related diet variations, the samples were divided into nine groups by fork length from 215 mm to 588 mm with 30 mm intervals (210–240 mm, 240–270 mm, 270–300 mm, 300–330 mm, 330–360 mm, 360–390 mm, 390–420 mm, 420–450 mm, and >450 mm). Hierarchical cluster analysis based on the Bray–Curtis similarity index and the IRI% were used for the classification of size classes into groups (Clarke and Warwick, 2001). The RDA (redundancy analysis) was used to analyze the impacts of environmental factors (season, river width, sediment, river grade, longitude and latitude, water temperature, fish size, and fish sexual maturity ratio) on the W% of the prey items of Coregonus ussuriensis. Prey items with a low W% (<5%) were removed in the process of the analysis. River width was measured using range finder (Rasger S1500BE); river sediment was classified based on mud, sand, and stones of different particle sizes; river grade was divided by the main stem and tributary level of the river; fish size was reflected by fork length (FL); longitude and latitude were recorded by GPS (GARMIN 66S); water temperature was measured using a temperature recorder (HOBO U22-001); and the fish sexual maturity ratio is the proportion of mature fish individuals to the total number of individuals. Data and images were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and ArcGIS 10.5. All statistical analyses were performed using PRIMER 6.0 and Cannoco 5 software.

Results

Coregonus ussuriensis samples

A total of 574 fish samples were included in the feeding analysis of Coregonus ussuriensis in this study, including those with 200 empty stomachs and 374 stomachs with prey. The numbers of stomach samples with food collected in spring, summer, autumn, and winter were 46, 28, 172, and 128, respectively. Except for the summer samples collected only from the Tangwang River, samples were collected from several of the above stations for other seasons (Figure 1; Table 1). The fork length range of the samples was 215–588 mm and the age range was two to nine.

Diet composition of Coregonus ussuriensis

In general, the vacuity rate of Coregonus ussuriensis was 34.8%. Prey items were divided into three categories: fish, benthos, and mammals, with a total of 62 taxonomic units identified (Table 2). Among them, there were 30 taxonomic units for fish (including unidentified fish), 31 taxonomic units for benthos (including unidentified species), and 1 mammal species. In terms of quantity, benthos are the most abundant, accounting for 74.36% of the total, followed by fish (25.61%) and mammals (0.03%). In terms of weight, fish were the most abundant, accounting for 70.91%, followed by benthos (28.88%) and mammals (0.21%). In terms of the relative importance of IRI, fish and benthos were the dominant species, with higher levels, whereas mammals were the lowest and were occasional species.

Specifically, from the perspective of food quantity, Hydropsyche sp. Accounts for 31.25% at most, followed by Exopalaemon modestus (17.95%), Ephemera shengmi (6.44%), Siphlonuridae sp. (5.13%), Abbottina rivularis (3.78%), unidentified fish (3.25%), etc. In terms of weight, Exopalaemon modestus is the largest, accounting for 21.11%, followed by unidentified fish (12.06%), Hemiculter leucisculus (10.06%), Abbottina rivularis (5.56%), Paraleucogobio strigatus (5.47%), Acheilognathus macropterus (4.98%), and Saurogobio dabryi (4.62%). According to the analysis results of IRI, Exopalaemon modestus was the dominant species among the food species of Coregonus ussuriensis, and unidentified fish, Hydropsyche sp., Hemiculter leucisculus, Hemiculter leucisculus, Abbottina rivularis Abbottina rivularis, and Saurogobio dabryi are important species.

Seasonal feeding characteristics

As shown in Figure 2, the vacuity rates of Coregonus ussuriensis in spring, summer, autumn, and winter were 23.33%, 45.10%, 42.09%, and 22.89% respectively, which showed that the rates in summer and autumn are significantly higher than in spring and winter. The repletion index of Coregonus ussuriensis was highest in autumn (1.86), followed by winter (1.40), summer (1.26), and spring (1.02).

FIGURE 2

Figure 3 shows the relative importance index percentage (IRI%) of food species of Coregonus ussuriensis. In general, fish was the highest, accounting for 56.87%, followed by benthos (43.13%) and mammals (0.01%). The prey of Coregonus ussuriensis in spring contained benthos and fish, with IRI% of 74.54% and 25.46%, respectively. Among them, Hydropsyche sp. was the dominant species in spring, with the highest IRI value, and Siphlonuridae sp., Exopalaemon modestus, and unidentified fish were important species. The food items in summer could be divided into three categories: fish, benthos, and mammals, with IRI% of 92.21%, 7.67%, and 0.1%, respectively. Among them, Abbottina rivularis and unidentified fish were the dominant species, and Exopalaemon modestus was an important species. In autumn, the food items consisted of benthos and fish, with IRI% of 53.23% and 46.77%, respectively. Among them, Exopalaemon modestus was the absolute advantage species, and unidentified fish, Paraleucogobio strigatus, Saurogobio dabryi, Gobio gobio cymocephalus, and Pseudorasbora parva were important species. The food items in winter contained fish and benthos, with IRI% of 84.01% and 15.99%, respectively. Among them, unidentified fish was the dominant species, and Hemiculter leucisculus, Hydropsyche sp., Acheilognathus macropterus, Saurogobio dabryi, Abbottina rivularis, Protosalanx hyalocranius, and Rhodeus sericeus were important species.

FIGURE 3

Size-related feeding characteristics

To analyze the difference in the food item composition of different sizes of Coregonus ussuriensis, cluster analysis was conducted on individual samples of different fork length groups according to the relative importance index percentage (IRI%) of stomach contents. Figure 4 shows that at a level of 58% similarity of food composition, the samples can be divided into three groups: 210–330 mm, 330–450 mm, and >450 mm. Among them, the IRI% of bait organisms in the 210–330 mm body fork length group was highest in fish, accounting for 73.67%, followed by benthos (26.32%) and mammals (0.01%). In the 330–450 mm fork length group, the IRI% of benthos was the largest (75.12%), followed by fish (24.87%) and mammals (0.01%). The prey of the >450 mm fork length group was composed of benthos and fish, of which benthos had the highest IRI% of 94.46% (fish only accounted for 5.54%). It can be observed that with the growth in the fork length of Coregonus ussuriensis, the importance of benthos in its diet increases.

FIGURE 4

The relationship between main bait organisms and environmental factors

RDA analysis was conducted on the mass fraction (>5%) of the main food of Coregonus ussuriensis in different factors, such as season, river width, sediment, river grade, longitude and latitude, water temperature, fish body size, and fish sexual maturity ratio (Figure 5). The results showed that season, river grade, river width, and fish body size had a greater impact on bait organisms. Of these, season, fish size, and sexual maturity ratio had a positive effect on the total mass fraction of bait organisms, such as Xenocypris argentea, Leuciscus waleckii, Paraleucogobio strigatus, Pseudorasbora parva, and Acheilognathus macropterus, but had a negative effect on Hydropsyche sp., Opsariichthys bidens, and Siphlonuridae sp. The level and width of rivers had a positive effect on Hemiculter leucisculus and Gobio cymocephalus but a negative effect on Ctenogbius cliffordpopei, Exopalaemon modestus, and Rhodeus sericeus. The sediment and water temperature of rivers had a significant impact on Opsariichthys bidens, Siphlonuridae sp., Gobio gobio cymocephalus, and Rhodeus sericeus.

FIGURE 5

Discussion

The diets of fish were closely related to the environmental characteristics of their habitat, which often varies with spatiotemporal changes (Saikia, 2015). The seasonal changes in fish feeding can be found in most fish species (La et al., 2007; Ma et al., 2014; 2020). Compared with spring and winter, summer and autumn have higher water temperatures, faster digestion of prey items, and a shorter retention time of food in the stomach, resulting in higher vacuity rates in summer and autumn. Some studies have shown that the vacuity rate of fish increases during the spawning season, and the feeding intensity decreases (Hovde et al., 2002; Šantić et al., 2009). However, this study showed that the feeding intensity of Coregonus ussuriensis in spawning season (autumn and winter) has not been reduced, which is similar to the research results of Ma et al. (2020) and Yan et al. (2011). On the contrary, Coregonus ussuriensis has the highest RI in autumn, which may be due to it accumulating more energy for reproduction.

It can be observed that seasonal environmental conditions are the key factors affecting the feeding habits of Coregonus ussuriensis. Coregonus ussuriensis has migratory characteristics, which results in the habitat environment changing with migration seasonally. Habitat environment factors such as width, flow velocity, and sediment will affect the composition and distribution of prey items. Coregonus ussuriensis will make predation choices based on the abundance and availability of food. In summer and autumn, Coregonus ussuriensis generally lives in cold water tributaries, such as the Tangwang River. Fish and benthos are more active in summer and were easily preyed on by Coregonus ussuriensis, which prefers to prey on fish because of the higher energy. In autumn, the acquisition of fish and benthos is not as easy as in summer; therefore, the preference for food decreases, resulting in the similarity in the IRI% of fish and benthos. In winter and spring, Coregonus ussuriensis lives in the main stems of large rivers where its bait fish concentrate for winter, and the predation becomes easier and therefore Coregonus ussuriensis shows a preference for fish. In spring, the bait fish begin to disperse and forage due to the availability of food; therefore, benthos become the main food source.

During individual fish development, changes occur in its food intake and digestive organs (Wootton, 1998). Many studies have shown that as fish grow and develop, their feeding habits are generally transformed (Graeb et al., 2005; Yan et al., 2011; Huo et al., 2014; Su et al., 2015; Sarker et al., 2023). Different sizes of fish have different food preferences (different prey types and sizes), which are related to the strategy of predation (Graeb et al., 2005). Size-related diet variation was also found in this study, in which individuals in the 210–330 mm FL group, considered immature individuals (Wang et al., 2022), consumed more fish, whereas individuals in the 330–450 mm and >450 mm groups (mature individuals) preferred benthos. The relative importance index of benthos also increases with the increase of body fork length, mainly because benthos have higher accessibility and choose this food to meet their energy needs. Among benthos, the larvae of Hydropsyche sp., the protective shell of which has been removed in the stomach contents of Coregonus ussuriensis, are the main dominant species. This is related to its feeding strategy and mouth characteristics. Coregonus ussuriensis feeding on benthos with protective shells requires spitting them out, and the proficiency of this feeding technique may be related to its size. Large individual fish do not have significant restrictions on prey items, which is mainly related to the abundance of fish and benthos, whereas small individual fish seem to have some preferences, preferring to feed on fish more rather than undertaking the complex actions needed to prey on benthos. Different types of food with different sizes of fish may also be a strategy to reduce food competition (Schoener, 1974; Werner, 1979). With the growth of organisms, changes in diet may have evolved into a strategy to reduce intraspecific competition for food between the young and adults (Werner, 1979; Amundsen et al., 1996).

In this study, Hydropsyche sp. is the most abundant in the food of Coregonus ussuriensis but it is not the dominant species of benthos in the Amur River (Huo et al., 2013). Previous studies have shown that fish do not always consume the most abundant prey in their environment but rather have different preferences (Kati et al., 2015; Ma et al., 2020). According to the optimal foraging theory, fish should choose those prey taxa that maximize the net energetic gain in relation to the energetic cost of their capture, ingestion, and digestion (Gerking, 1994). In this study, the proportion of Hydropsyche sp. in foods is the highest, which is closely related to their easy capture and digestion. The weight proportion of Exopalaemon modestus in prey is the highest, which is not only related to its resource quantity but also the ease of catching benthos. Additionally, fish are the dominant species in food, which is mainly related to the high quality and energy of individual units. These findings are broadly in accordance with those of Huo et al. (2014) and Ma et al. (2020). This study showed the prey taxa and feeding intensity are various in seasons and it may be the opportunistic feeder which has the characteristics of seasonal and size-related variations in diet composition. These changes in diet indicated the adaptability of predators and the diversity of their diets (Zander, 1996).

In addition, this study provided a scientific basis for the further study of coldwater fish and their conservation in waters at high latitude. In this study, the smallest individual of Coregonus ussuriensis was 215 mm (2 years old) and there was little difference between its morphological characteristics and those of adults. Additionally, it could feed on fish and benthos. Smaller individuals (0⁺) were not captured, and their feeding habits could not be monitored. To further investigate its feeding ecology, small individual samples should be added for analysis in the future.

Conclusion

A total of 574 fish samples were included in the feeding analysis of Coregonus ussuriensis in this study, including individuals with 200 empty stomachs and 374 stomachs with prey. The vacuity rates of Coregonus ussuriensis in spring, summer, autumn, and winter were 23.33%, 45.10%, 42.09%, and 22.89% respectively, which showed that summer and autumn had significantly higher rates than spring and winter. The repletion index of Coregonus ussuriensis was highest in autumn. Prey items of Coregonus ussuriensis were divided into three categories, fish, benthos, and mammals, with a total of 62 taxonomic units identified. Among them, there were 30 taxonomic units for fish (including unidentified fish), 31 taxonomic units for benthos (including unidentified species), and 1 mammal species. Fish and benthos were the dominant species, whereas mammals were occasional species. With the growth of Coregonus ussuriensis, the importance of benthos in its diet increases. This study showed that prey taxa are various and there are seasonal trends in feeding intensity, and it may be the opportunistic feeder that has seasonal and size-related variations in diet composition. RDA analysis showed that season, river grade, river width, and fish body size had the greatest impact on the food items of Coregonus ussuriensis.

References

• 1

  AmundsenP. A.GablerH. M.StaldvikF. J. (1996). A new approach to graphical analysis of feeding strategy from stomach contents data-modification of the Costello (1990) method. J. Fish. Biol.48, 607–614. 10.1006/jfbi.1996.0060

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 2

  ClarkeK. R.WarwickR. M. (2001). Change in marine communities: anapproach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth: 2ndedn. PRIMER-E.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 3

  CortésE. (1997). A critical review of methods of studying fish feeding based on analysis of stomach contents: application to elasmobranch fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.54, 726–738. 10.1139/f96-316

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 4

  FigueiredoM.MoratoT.BarreirosJ. P.AfonsoP.SantosR. S. (2005). Feeding ecology of the white seabream, Diplodus sargus, and the ballan wrasse, Labrus bergylta, in the Azores. Fish. Res.75, 107–119. 10.1016/j.fishres.2005.04.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 5

  GerkingS. D. (1994). Feeding ecology of fish. San Diego: Academic Press.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 6

  GraebB. D. S.GalarowiczT.WahlD. H.DttmersJ. M.SimpsonM. J. (2005). Foraging behavior, morphology, and life history variation determine the ontogeny of piscivory in two closely related predators. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Scis62, 2010–2020. 10.1139/f05-112

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 7

  HovdeS. C.AlbertO. T.NilssenE. M. (2002). Spatial, seasonal and ontogenetic variation in diet of Northeast Arctic Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides). ICES J. Mar. Sci.59, 421–437. 10.1006/jmsc.2002.1171

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 8

  HuoB.XieC. X.MadenjianC. P.MaB. S.YangX. F.HuangH. P. (2014). Feeding habits of an endemic fish, oxygymnocypris stewartii, in the yarlung zangbo River in tibet, China. Environ. Biol. Fish.97, 1279–1293. 10.1007/s10641-013-0213-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 9

  HuoT. B.LiZ.JiangZ. F.MaB.YuH. X. (2013). Macrozoobenthos community structure and water quality bioassessment in the mid-reaches of the Heilongjiang River. J. Fish. Sci. China20 (1), 177–188. 10.3724/sp.j.1118.2013.00177

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 10

  KatiS.MozsárA.ÁrvaD.CozmaN. J.CzeglédiI.AntalL.et al (2015). Feeding ecology of the invasive Amur sleeper (Perccottus glenii dybowski, 1877) in central europe. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol.100, 116–128. 10.1002/iroh.201401784

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 11

  LaM. G.LaM. M.TomassettiP. (2007). Feeding habits of the Madeira rockfish Scorpaena maderensis from central Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Biol.150, 1313–1320. 10.1007/s00227-006-0414-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 12

  LiP. L.LiuW.WangJ. L.ZhanP. R.WangC. (2015). Fecundity of Coregonus ussurinsis in the Heilongjiang River, China. J. Fish. Sci. China22 (6), 1234–1242. 10.3724/SP.J.1118.2015.14488

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 13

  LiangL. Q.ChangY. M.DongC. Z. (2004). Analysis of genetic diversity for Coregonus ussuriensis Berg in Heilongjiang River. J. Fish. Sci. China11 (6), 501–505.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 14

  MaB.ShiL. Y.DongC. Z. (2003). Biochemical genetic structure in Coregonus ussuriensis Berg. J. Fish. Sci. China10 (3), 195–200.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 15

  MaB. S.XieC. X.HuoB.YangX. F. (2014). Feeding habits of Schizothorax oconnori lloyd, 1908 in the yarlung zangbo river, tibet. J. Appl. Ichthyol.30, 286–293. 10.1111/jai.12283

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 16

  MaB. S.XuB.WeiK. J.ZhuX. Y.XuJ.LuJ. C.et al (2020). Feeding habits of the cyprinid gymnocypris firmispinatus in the anning river, China. Fish. Sci.86, 749–758. 10.1007/s12562-020-01445-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 17

  MoratoT.SantosR. S.AndradeJ. P. (2000). Feeding habits, seasonal and ontogenetic diet shift of blacktail comber, Serranus atricauda (Pisces: serranidae), from the Azores, north-eastern Atlantic. Fish. Res.49 (1), 51–59. 10.1016/s0165-7836(00)00189-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 18

  NikolskiyG. V. (1960). Fishes in Amur River basin. Beijing: Science Press, 58–66.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 19

  SaikiaS. K. (2015). Food and feeding of fishes. What do we need to know?Transylv. Rev. Syst. Ecol. Res.17, 71–84. 10.1515/trser-2015-0049

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 20

  SánchezH. J.CoboF. (2012). Ontogenetic dietary shifts and food selection of endemic Squalius carolitertii (Actinopterygii: cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in River Tormes, central Spain, in summer. Acta Ichthyol. Piscat.42, 101–111. 10.3750/aip2011.42.2.03

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 21

  ŠantićM.PodvinskiM.PallaoroA.JardasI.KirincicM. (2009). Feeding habits of megrim, lepidorhombus whiffiagonis (walbaum, 1792), from the central adriatic Sea. J. Appl. Ichthyol.25, 417–422. 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01257.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 22

  SarkerM. J.SarkerP. K.CahoonL. B.DiptyA. K.BasharM. A.HasanM. M.et al (2023). Seasonal variation in the epibenthic feeding habits of hilsa shad (tenualosa ilisha) in the upper meghna river estuary, Bangladesh. Fishes8, 335. 10.3390/fishes8070335

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 23

  SchoenerT. W. (1974). Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Sci185, 27–39. 10.1126/science.185.4145.27

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 24

  SuX.LiY. D.HeX. B.LuH. S.YanY. R. (2015). Feeding habits and ontogenetic diet shifts of mackerel tuna (euthynnus affinis) in the beibu gulf, south China Sea. Prog. Fish. Sci.36 (4), 65–72. 10.11758/yykxjz.20150409

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 25

  SuiH. Z.XueY.LiY. K.XuB. D.ZhangC. L.RenY. P. (2021). Feeding ecology of Japanese Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus niphonius) along the eastern coastal waters of China. Acta Oceanol. Sin.40 (8), 98–107. 10.1007/s13131-021-1796-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 26

  WangJ. L.LiuW.LiP. L.TangF. J.LuW. Q. (2022). Estimation of Coregonus ussuriensis age, growth, and maturation in China’s Amur River. PeerJ.12817. 10.7717/peerj.12817

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 27

  WangJ. L.LiuW.LuW. Q.LiP. L.TangF. J. (2019b). Assessment of the population resources of Coregonus ussuriensis in the middle reaches of Amur River. Chin. J. Ecol.38 (6), 1824–1829.

  • Google Scholar

• 28

  WangJ. L.LiuW.WangC.LiP. L.TangF. J.JiangT.et al (2019a). Microchemistry analysis of Coregonus ussuriensis otoliths from the Heilong Rvier basin. Acta Hydrobiol. Sin.43 (4), 825–831. 10.7541/2019.097

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  WernerE. E. (1979). “Niche partitioning by food size in fish communi-ties,” in Predator–prey systems in fisheries management. Editors StroudR. H.ClepperH. (Washington, DC: Sport Fishing Institute), 311–322.

  • Google Scholar

• 30

  WoottonR. J. (1998). Ecology of teleosts fishes. New York: Chapman and Hall.

  • Google Scholar

• 31

  YanY. R.YangH. H.LuH. S.LiR. W. (2011). Feeding ecology of dorab wolf-herring, Chirocentrus dorab from the Beibu Gulf. Acta Ecol. Sin.31 (3), 654–665.

  • Google Scholar

• 32

  YueP. Q.ChenY. Y. (1998). China red data Book of endangered animals (pisces)[M]. Beijing:Science Press.

  • Google Scholar

• 33

  ZanderC. D. (1996). “The distribution and feeding ecology of small-size epibenthic fish in the coastal Mediterranean Sea,” in Biologyand ecology of shallow coastal waters. Editors EleftheriouAA. A.SmithCJ (Fredensborg: Olsen and Olsen), 369–376.

  • Google Scholar

• 34

  ZhangJ. M. (1995). Ichthyology of Heilongjiang province. Harbin: Heilongjiang Science and Technology Press.

  • Google Scholar