REVIEW article
Front. Environ. Sci.
Sec. Atmosphere and Climate
The Antarctic Peninsula under present day climate and future low, medium-high and very high emissions scenarios
Provisionally accepted- 1Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- 2Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, United Kingdom
- 3Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- 4The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
- 5British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- 6Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, United Kingdom
- 7World Wide Fund for Nature UK, Godalming, United Kingdom
- 8King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- 9Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom
- 10Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- 11Dartmouth College, Hanover, United States
- 12University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
- 13University College London, London, United Kingdom
- 14UK Government Foreign Commonwealth & Development Office, London, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The Antarctic Peninsula is warming rapidly, with more frequent extreme temperature and precipitation events, reduced sea ice, glacier retreat, ice shelf collapse, and ecological shifts. Here, we review its behaviour under present-day climate, and low (SSP 1-2.6), medium-high (SSP 3-7.0) and very high (SSP 5-8.5) future emissions scenarios, corresponding to global temperature increases of 1.8°C, 3.6°C and 4.4°C by 2100. Higher emissions will bring more days above 0°C, increased liquid precipitation, ocean warming, and more intense extreme weather events such as ocean heat waves and atmospheric rivers. Surface melt on ice shelves will increase, depleting firn air content and promoting meltwater ponding. Under the highest emission scenario, collapse of the Larsen C and Wilkins ice shelves is likely by 2100 CE, and loss of sea ice and ice shelves around the Peninsula will exacerbate the current trends of land-ice mass loss. Collapse of George VI Ice Shelf by 2300 under SSP 5-8.5 would substantially increase sea level contributions. Under this very high emissions scenario, sea level contributions from the Peninsula could reach 7.5 ± 14.1 mm by 2100 CE and 116.3 ± 66.9 mm by 2300 CE. Conversely, under the lower emissions scenarios, the Antarctic Peninsula's sea ice remains similar to present, and land ice is predicted to undergo only minor grounding line recession and thinning. Changes in sea surface temperatures and the change from snow to rain will impact marine and terrestrial biota, altering species richness and enhancing colonisation by nonnative species. Ranges of key species such as krill and salps are likely to contract to the south, impacting their marine vertebrate predators. These changing conditions will also influence Antarctic Peninsula research, fisheries, tourism, infrastructure and logistics. The future of the Peninsula depends on the choices made today. Limiting temperatures to below 2°C, and as close as possible to 1.5°C (by following the SSP 1-1.9 or 1-2.6 scenarios), combined with effective governance, will result in increased resilience and relatively modest changes. Any higher emissions scenarios will damage pristine systems, cause sustained, irreversible ice loss on human timescales, and spread to Antarctic regions beyond the Peninsula.
Keywords: Antarctic Peninsula, Climate Change, Ecology, Ice shelf, ocean, Operations & Maintenance, sea ice
Received: 22 Oct 2025; Accepted: 11 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Davies, Atkinson, Banwell, Brandon, Caton Harrison, Convey, De Rydt, Dodds, Downie, Edwards, Gilbert, Hubbard, Hughes, Marshall, Orr, Rogelj, Seroussi, Siegert, Stroeve and Rumble. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Bethan Joan Davies
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
