Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Environ. Sci.

Sec. Environmental Systems Engineering

Refuse-derived fuel gasification for energy production: A science mapping analysis and systematic literature review

Provisionally accepted
Isaac  MensahIsaac Mensah1*Satyanarayana  NarraSatyanarayana Narra1Julius  Cudjoe AhiekporJulius Cudjoe Ahiekpor2Nana  Yaw AsieduNana Yaw Asiedu3
  • 1University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
  • 2Kumasi Technical University, Kumasi, Ghana
  • 3Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Refuse-derived fuel (RDF) gasification presents a promising pathway for sustainable municipal solid waste (MSW) management and renewable energy generation, while aligning with the principles of the circular economy. Despite its growing relevance, structured reviews of RDF gasification remain limited. This study is novel in its integration of bibliometric science mapping with systematic literature review methodologies, providing both a quantitative mapping of research trends and a qualitative synthesis of thematic clusters—an approach not previously applied to RDF gasification. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA 2020) protocol, a bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer to examine citation patterns by documents and author keyword co-occurrence. A total of 257 peer-reviewed articles published from 1986 to 2025 were retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Next, the SLR then narrowed this to 195 articles published from 2015–2025 (10-year period). In addition, five relevant peer-reviewed articles were independently retrieved from Google Scholar and incorporated into the SLR dataset to enrich the qualitative analysis. The bibliometric analysis identified the most influential publications, authors, journals, and five thematic research clusters in RDF gasification. The systematic analysis revealed that RDF gasification is both economically viable and environmentally beneficial, though its commercial success depends on factors such as plant scale and consistent feedstock supply, among others. Key technical drivers include feedstock optimization, catalyst–temperature interactions, contaminants abatement, and process integration. Future research should prioritize multi-criteria optimization of RDF gasification systems, including the integration of techno-economic and life cycle assessments to inform policy and investment decisions. This review advances understanding of RDF gasification and supports progress toward the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), and 13 (Climate Action), offering a strategic foundation for guiding future research, policy, and investment in sustainable energy solutions.

Keywords: Bibliometric review, Electricity, Gasification, Hydrogen, Refuse-derived fuel (RDF), syngas, Systematic review

Received: 30 Nov 2025; Accepted: 26 Jan 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Mensah, Narra, Ahiekpor and Asiedu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Isaac Mensah

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.