Abstract
A major fraction of nitrogen (N) in boreal forest soils is found in organic forms associated with soil organic matter (SOM) and mineral particles. The capacity of ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungal symbionts to access this N is debated, considering that these fungi have lost many of the genes for decomposing organic matter that were present in their saprotrophic ancestors. To gain a molecular-level understanding of the N-mining processes in ECM fungi, we developed an experimental approach where the processes of decomposition were studied in parallel with the changes in the structure and properties of the organic matter. We showed that ECM fungi have significant capacities to assimilate organic N associated with SOM and mineral surfaces. The decomposition mechanisms differ between species, reflecting the lignocellulose decomposition mechanisms found in their saprotrophic ancestors. During N-mining, the ECM fungi processed the SOM to a material with increased adsorptive properties to iron oxide mineral particles. Two pathways contributed to these changes: Extracellular modifications of the SOM and secretion of mineral surface reactive metabolites. Some of these metabolites have iron(III)-reducing activities and can participate in extracellular Fenton reactions and redox reactions at iron oxide mineral surfaces. We conclude that the traditional framework for understanding organic N acquisition by ECM fungi from recalcitrant SOM must be extended to a framework that includes how those decomposition activities affect the stabilization and reactivity of mineral-associated SOM. The activity through these complex networks of reactions is decisive for the overall effect of ECM fungal decomposition on nutrients and C-cycling in forest ecosystems.
Introduction
Primary production in boreal forest ecosystems is commonly limited by nitrogen (N) availability (). A large fraction of the N in these soils is present in organic forms, primarily as proteinaceous compounds, but also as heterocyclic N molecules (; ), that result from the decomposition of plant, microbe, and animal tissues. This organic N is complexed with other organic molecules present in soil organic matter (SOM), including cellulose, hemicellulose, chitin, lignin, lipids, polyphenols, and other biomolecules (). The bioavailable fraction of organic N, i.e., compounds that can be taken up by plants and microbes, is considered to consist of water-soluble molecules of relatively small size. This fraction includes amino acids and small peptides, and plants have been shown to directly assimilate amino acids (). However, dissolved N compounds account for a small fraction of the organic N pool (). Although there is evidence that plants can increase the available N pool by secretion of proteases and subsequent proteolysis (; ; ), for trees in boreal forests, fungal root symbionts including ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi are thought to play a key role in this process (Smith and Read, 2008; ). To access the organic N compounds present in soil, ECM fungi must have the capacity to decompose at least partly the SOM complexes where N is embedded. ECM fungi have evolved several times from saprotrophic ancestors (; Tedersoo and Smith, 2017). The ancestral decomposition strategies likely resembled the enzymatic system for the decomposition of lignocellulose in white-rot (WR) wood-decaying fungi, the two-step mechanism involving hydroxyl radicals (⋅OH) generated by Fenton chemistry and hydrolytic enzymes in brown-rot (BR) wood-decaying fungi (), or enzymatic decomposition systems in litter decomposers, presumably similar to those of WR fungi (; ). The convergent loss of genes encoding plant cell wall-degrading enzymes (PCWDEs) in ECM fungi has been used as an argument against the view that ECM fungi have a significant capacity to decompose SOM (). However, some genes coding for PCWDEs have been conserved and these display very diverse types and numbers across ECM lineages (), which suggest that ECM fungi have retained and adapted some features of the decomposition mechanisms found in their saprotrophic ancestors. Moreover, ECM lineages have retained the genes involved in the decomposition of microbial cell walls (), which suggests that ECM fungi might selectively target compounds of microbial origin that can be rich in N, such as chitin and proteins.
Assuming that the main function of the decomposition activity of ECM fungi is to mobilize nutrients entrapped in organic matter, rather than obtaining metabolic carbon (C) (), an outstanding question then is if these decomposition activities render the remaining organic matter more or less suitable for further decomposition by saprotrophic microbes (). SOM can be stabilized against microbial decomposition via polymerization reactions that lead to the formation of recalcitrant humic substances (). The humification model for SOM stabilization has been increasingly questioned, and it has been proposed that SOM becomes protected from microbial decomposition by interacting with mineral particles or by being incorporated into molecular aggregates (). It follows that the processing of SOM accompanying the N-mining activities in ECM fungi may affect soil C stabilization via several different mechanisms.
A common focus among ecologists examining organic nitrogen acquisition in ECM fungi has been the enzymatic decomposition of SOM including the activity and expression of PCWDEs and proteolytic enzymes. Less attention has been paid to how decomposition by ECM fungi affects the stabilization of soil C. To cover both aspects, we have developed an experimental approach where the decomposition activity and organic N uptake by ECM fungi were examined in parallel with analyzing structural modifications and formation of mineral-stabilized SOM (Figure 1). Coupled with experimental manipulations, space and time-resolved experiments and modeling, our approach has made it possible to make connections between biology and chemistry, and to identify extracellular components and physiological conditions that control organic matter decomposition and N assimilation in ECM fungi. Below, we summarize and discuss some of the key findings from these experiments.
FIGURE 1
Soil organic matter decomposition—diverse mechanisms but similar function
Spectroscopic analyses together with transcriptome profiling have provided firm experimental evidence that ECM fungi decompose SOM with mechanisms resembling those seen in their saprotrophic ancestors (
Despite the similarity in the chemical transformation of the SOM extract, each species expressed a different set of transcripts encoding enzymes that are typically associated with oxidative degradation of plant cell wall compounds in wood-decaying fungi (
Links between organic matter decomposition and the release of organic N, and how these processes are regulated by nutritional cues, have been identified in studies of the ECM fungi Paxillus involutus and Laccaria bicolor, representing species with BR and litter decomposing ancestors, respectively (
Fenton reaction and organic N acquisition in Paxillus involutus
SOM decomposition by P. involutus is similar to the BR wood-decaying mechanism and involves a two-step process of ⋅OH oxidation and enzymatic hydrolysis (
Transformation of organic matter through anabolic and catabolic processes
During decomposition and assimilation of N, P. involutus processes DOM components toward smaller size molecules and molecules with increased polar group content. This increases the propensity of the processed organic matter for adsorption to mineral particles (Wang et al., 2017). These results agree with the conceptual model of SOM formation and stabilization proposed by
Moreover, decomposition of DOM by P. involutus generates a modified DOM that displays an increased iron-reducing capacity (
Nitrogen acquisition from mineral-associated proteins
Approximately 20–50% of the SOM in boreal forest soils is associated with reactive minerals (
Discussion
The recent research summarized above emphasizes the need to develop a framework for organic N acquisition in ECM fungi that includes the effect of SOM decomposition activities on the stabilization of organic matter in addition to the commonly considered enzymatic mechanisms and mobilization of N from recalcitrant SOM (Figure 2). We have identified two processes in ECM fungi that affect the adsorptive properties of SOM: Ex vivo modifications where extracellular enzymes and oxygen radicals attack and transform DOM into a material with enhanced propensity to associate with mineral particles; in vivo turnover pathway where the fungi synthesize and secrete mineral-surface reactive metabolites (
FIGURE 2

The traditional and emerging frameworks for organic nitrogen acquisition in ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi. (A) The traditional framework. In this framework, organic N molecules, including proteins, are considered to be embedded in soil organic matter (SOM) and are stabilized by selective preservation of recalcitrant plant biopolymers coupled with abiotic synthesis of complex, highly aromatic humic substances resistant to microbial decay (black, dotted arrow). SOM is decomposed by ECM fungi (black arrow) through the activity of extracellular enzymes to small, water-soluble molecules such as amino acids and peptides that can be assimilated by the fungi (blue arrow). (B) Emerging framework. In this framework, SOM is viewed as a range of organic fragments and microbial products that are continuously processed into smaller molecules by decomposing microorganisms. SOM is decomposed by ECM fungi (black arrow) through the activity of extracellular enzymes and oxygen radicals generated by Fenton chemistry to small, water-soluble molecules that can be assimilated by the fungi (blue arrow). Concomitantly, SOM is modified into a material with enhanced affinity to mineral particles. Moreover, SOM decomposition is accompanied with a substantial secretion of low-molecular-weight compounds (brown arrow). Some of them have Fe(III) reducing activity and can participate in the dissolution of iron oxide mineral particles and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by Fenton-like mechanisms. Others bind strongly to mineral surfaces and can facilitate the hydrolysis of mineral-associated organic N sources (i.e., proteins) by conditioning the mineral surface in a way that protects direct sorption and subsequent deactivation of fungal proteases. ECM fungal biomass, in turn, also contributes substantially to the formation of SOM through necromass that is left behind after cell death.
Microbial processing of organic matter may also contribute to the formation of stabilized SOM by producing compounds with an increased propensity to become incorporated into molecular aggregates (
The significance of metabolites in decomposition processes has been questioned by soil scientists considering that soil microorganisms do not have the energy and nutrient resources needed for synthesizing metabolites in quantities required for their actions (
A recent discovery is the large capacity of ECM fungi with diverse evolutionary origins to reductively dissolve iron minerals (Wang et al., 2020, 2021). The mechanisms of these electron-transfer reactions are not known, but in agreement with mechanisms identified in iron-reducing bacteria (
Reductive dissolution of mineral particles also facilitates the mobilization of other nutrient sources than N; in particular phosphorus (P). In soils, a major fraction of P is associated with Fe(III) minerals (
It should be noted that organic N mining and stabilization of soil C by ECM fungi in boreal forests soils include several processes and mechanisms that have not been examined in our experiments. For example, the production of fungal necromass might have a profound effect on soil C stabilization (
To conclude, laboratory-scale experiments with single ECM fungal species and multimethod analytical approaches have increased our current understanding of the complex mechanisms underlying soil organic N acquisition in ECM fungi, including their impacts on SOM stabilization. The activity of these pathways is likely to be strongly dependent on the soil geochemistry, the presence of other microorganisms, and the allocation of host photosynthate to the ECM mutualists (
- -
Is SOM decomposition by ECM fungi the result of partial retention of ancestral mechanisms or development of novel mechanisms?
- -
How is SOM decomposition by ECM fungi regulated by the host C supply and the nutrient conditions in the soil environment?
- -
How do ECM physiology and growth strategy affect SOM decomposition and N transfer to the host plant?
- -
Are specific SOM molecules targeted by the decomposition activities of ECM fungi, and what are the chemical characteristics of ECM-decomposed SOM?
- -
Are nutrients present in the colloidal fraction of DOM available to ECM fungi and does DOM decomposition change the colloidal properties of DOM?
- -
How prevalent is the ECM capacity to reductively dissolve iron-oxide minerals and what are the consequences for Fenton-based oxidation of organic matter in boreal forest soils? (SOM chemistry).
- -
How can mechanisms and reaction pathways from laboratory-scale experiments accurately describing SOM decomposition by ECM fungi be incorporated into models that predict soil carbon budgets?
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
AT wrote the first draft of the manuscript. DF, MO, TW, and PP wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The work was supported by grants from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (2013.00073) and the Swedish Research Council (621-2012-03890 and 2017-04261).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AdamczykB. (2021). How do boreal forest soils store carbon?BioEssays2021:10. 10.1002/bies.202100010
2
AdamczykB.GodlewskyM.ZimnyJ.ZimnyA. (2008). Wheat (Triticum aestivum) seedlings secrete proteases from the roots and, after protein addition, grow well on medium without inorganic nitrogen.Plant Biol.10718–724. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00079.x
3
AgererR. (2001). Exploration types of ectomycorrhizae. A proposal to classify ectomycorrhizal systems according to their patterns of differentiation and putative ecological importance.Mycorrhiza11107–114. 10.1007/s005720100108
4
AraiY.SparksD. L. (2007). Phosphate reaction dynamics in soils and soil components: a multiscale approach.Adv. Agron.94135–179. 10.1016/S0065-2113(06)94003-6
5
BolanN. S.AdrianoD. C.KunhikrishnanA.JamesT.McDowellR.SenesiN. (2011). Dissolved organic matter: biogeochemistry, dynamics, and environmental significance in soils.Adv. Agron.1103–75. 10.1016/B978-0-12-385531-2.00001-3
6
ClarholmM.SkyllbergU.RoslingA. (2015). Organic acid induced release of nutrients from metal-stabilized soil organic matter–the unbutton model.Soil Biol. Biochem.84168–176. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.019
7
ClemmensenK. E.BahrA.OvaskainenO.DahlbergA.EkbladA.WallanderH.et al (2013). Roots and associated fungi drive long-term carbon sequestration in boreal forest.Science3391615–1618. 10.1126/science.1231923
8
EkbladA.WallanderH.GodboldD. L.CruzC.JohnsonD.BaldrianP.et al (2013). The production and turnover of extramatrical mycelium of ectomycorrhizal fungi in forest soils: role in carbon cycling.Plant Soil3661–27. 10.1007/s11104-013-1630-3
9
FernandezC. W.KennedyP. G. (2016). Revisiting the ‘Gadgil effect’: do interguild fungal interactions control carbon cycling in forest soils?New Phytol.2091382–1394. 10.1111/nph.13648
10
FernandezC. W.LangleyJ. A.ChapmanS.McCormackM. L.KoideR. T. (2016). The decomposition of ectomycorrhizal fungal necromass.Soil Biol. Biochem.9338–49. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.10.017
11
FloudasD.BentzerJ.AhrénD.JohanssonT.PerssonP.TunlidA. (2020). Uncovering the hidden genomic diversity of litter-decomposition mechanisms in mushroom-forming fungi.ISME J.142046–2059. 10.1038/s41396-020-0667-6
12
FreyD. S. (2019). Mycorrhizal fungi as mediators of soil organic matter dynamics.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.50237–259. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00948.x
13
Garrido-RamirezE. G.ThengB. K. G.MoraM. L. (2010). Clays and oxide minerals as catalysts and nanocatalysts in Fenton-like reactions — A review.Appl. Clay Sci.47182–192. 10.1016/j.clay.2009.11.044
14
GlasserN. R.SaundersS.NewmannD. K. (2017). The colourful world of extracellular electron shuttles.Annu. Rev. Microbiol.71731–751. 10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093913
15
GodboldD. L.HoosbeekM. R.LukacM.CotrufoM. F.JanssensI. A.CuelemansR.et al (2006). Mycorrhizal hyphal turnover as a dominant process for carbon input into soil organic matter.Plant Soil28115–24. 10.1007/s11104-005-3701-6
16
GodlewskiM.AdamczyckB. (2007). The ability of plants to secrete proteases by roots.Plant Physiol. Biochem.45657–664. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.06.001
17
HatakkaA.HammelK. E. (2010). “Fungal biodegradation of lignocellulose,” in The Mycota Vol. X, Industrial applications, ed.HofrichterM. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 319–340. 10.1007/978-3-642-11458-8_15
18
HögbergM. N.HögbergP. (2002). Extramatrical ectomycorrhizal mycelium contributes one-third of microbial biomass and produces, together with associated roots, half the dissolved organic carbon in a forest soil.New Phytol.154791–795. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00417.x
19
HögbergP.NäsholmT.FranklinO.HögbergM. N. (2017). Tamm Review: On the nature of the nitrogen limitation to plant growth in Fennoscandian boreal forests.Forest Ecol. Manag.403161–185. 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.04.045
20
JillingA.KeiluweitM.ContostaA. R.FreyS.SchimelJ.SchneckerJ.et al (2018). Minerals in the rhizosphere: overlooked mediators of soil nitrogen availability to plants and microbes.Biogeochemistry139103–122. 10.1007/s10533-018-0459-5
21
JonesD. L.DennisP. G.OwenA. G.van HeesP. A. W. (2003). Organic acid behavior in soils - misconceptions and knowledge gaps.Plant Soil.24831–41. 10.1023/A:1022304332313
22
JonesM. E.LaCroixR. E.ZeiglerJ.YingS. C.NicoP. S.KeiluweitM. (2020). Enzymes, manganese, or iron? Drivers of oxidative organic matter decomposition in soils.Env. Sci. Technol.5414114–14123. 10.1021/acs.est.0c04212
23
JonesD. L.ShannonD.MurphyD. V.FarrarJ. (2004). Role of dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) in soil N cycling in grassland soils.Soil Biol. Biochem.36749–756. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.01.003
24
KeiluweitM.BougoureJ. J.ZeglinL. H.MyroldD. O.WeberP. K.Pett-RidgeJ.et al (2012). Nano-scale investigation of the association of microbial nitrogen residues with iron (hydro)oxides in a forest soil O-horizon.Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta95213–226. 10.1016/j.gca.2012.07.001
25
KeiluweitM.BougoureJ. J.NicoP. S.Pett-RidgeJ.WeberP. K.KleberM. (2015). Mineral protection of soil carbon counteracted by root exudates.Nat. Clim. Change5588–595. 10.1038/nclimate2580
26
KleberM.SollinsP.SuttonR. (2007). A conceptual model of organo-mineral interactions in soils: self-assembly of organic molecular fragments into zonal structures on mineral surfaces.Biogeochemistry859–24. 10.1007/s10533-007-9103-5
27
KohlerA.KuoA.NagyL. G.MorinE.BarryK. W.BuscotF.et al (2015). Convergent losses of decay mechanisms and rapid turnover of symbiosis genes in mycorrhizal mutualists.Nat. Genet.47410–415. 10.1038/ng.3223
28
KranabetterJ. M.PhilpottT. J.DunnD. E. (2021). Manganese limitations and the enhanced soil carbon sequestration of temperate rainforests.Biogeochemistry156195–209. 10.1007/s10533-021-00840-5
29
KramerM. G.ChadwickO. A. (2018). Climate-driven thresholds in reactive mineral retention of soil carbon at the global scale.Nat. Clim. Change81104–1108. 10.1038/s41558-018-0341-4
30
KruminaL.OpDe BeeckM.MekleshV.TunlidA.PerssonP. (2022). Ectomycorrhizal fungal transformation of dissolved organic matter: consequences for reductive iron oxide dissolution and Fenton-based oxidation of mineral-associated organic matter.Front. Earth Sci.2022:763695. 10.3389/feart.2022.763695
31
LandeweertR.HofflandE.FinlayR. D.KuyperT. W.van BreemenN. (2001). Linking plants to rocks: ectomycorrhizal fungi mobilize nutrients from minerals.Trends Ecol. Evol.16248–254. 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02122-x
32
LapeyrieF.ChilversG. A.BhemC. A. (1987). Oxalic acid synthesis by the mycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus (Batsch. ex Fr.) Fr.New Phytol.106139–146. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb04797.x
33
LehmannJ.KleberM. (2015). The contentious nature of soil organic matter.Nature52860–68. 10.1038/nature16069
34
LeinweberP.KruseJ.BaumC.ArcandM.KnightJ. D.FarrellR.et al (2013). Advances in understanding organic nitrogen chemistry in soils using state-of-the-art analytical techniques.Adv. Agron.11983–151. 10.1016/B978-0-12-407247-3.00002-0
35
LevasseurA.DrulaE.LombardV.CoutinhoP. M.HenrissatB. (2013). Expansion of the enzymatic repertoire of the CAZy database to integrate auxiliary redox enzymes.Biotechnol. Biofuels61–14. 10.1186/1754-6834-6-41
36
LiangC.SchimelJ. P.JastrowJ. D. (2017). The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nat.Microbiol.2:nmicrobiol2017105. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.105
37
LindahlB. D.IhrmarkK.BobergJ.TrumboreS. E.HogbergP.StenlidJ.et al (2007). Spatial separation of litter decomposition and mycorrhizal nitrogen uptake in a boreal forest.New Phytol.173611–620. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01936.x
38
LindahlB.TunlidA. (2015). Ectomycorrhizal fungi – potential organic matter decomposers, yet not saprophytes. Tansley insight review.New Phytol.2051443–1447. 10.1111/nph.13201
39
McRoseD. L.NewmanD. K. (2021). Redox-active antibiotics enhance phosphorus bioavailability.Science371033–1037. 10.1126/science.abd1515
40
MekleshM.GentileL.AnderssonE.BhattacharyaA.de FariasM. A.CardosoM. B.et al (2022). Characterization of the colloidal properties of dissolved organic matter from forest soils.Front. Soil Sci.2022:832706. 10.3389/fsoil.2022.832706
41
MikuttaR.MikuttaC.KalbitzK.ScheelT.KaiserK.JahnR. (2007). Biodegradation of forest floor organic matter bound to minerals via different binding mechanisms.Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac.712569–2590. 10.1016/j.gca.2007.03.002
42
MiyauchiS.KissE.KuoA.DrulaE.KohlerA.Sánchez-GarcíaM.et al (2020). Large-scale genome sequencing of mycorrhizal fungi provides insights into the early evolution of symbiotic traits.Nat. Commun.2020:18795. 10.1038/s41467-020-18795-w
43
NannipieriP.PaulE. (2009). The chemical and functional characterization of soil N and its biotic components.Soil Biol. Biochem.412357–2369. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.07.013
44
NäsholmT.KiellndK.GanetegU. (2009). Uptake of organic nitrogen by plants.New Phytol.18231–48. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02751.x
45
NicolásC.Martin-BertelsenT.FloudasD.BentzerJ.SmitsM.JohanssonT.et al (2019). The soil organic matter decomposition mechanisms in ectomycorrhizal fungi are tuned for liberating soil organic nitrogen.ISME J.13977–988. 10.1038/s41396-018-0331-6
46
Op De BeeckM.TroeinC.PetersonC.PerssonP.TunlidA. (2018). Fenton reaction facilitates organic nitrogen acquisition by an ectomycorrhizal fungus.New Phytol.218335–343. 10.1111/nph.14971
47
Op De BeeckM.TroeinC.SiregarS.GentileL.AbbondanzaG.PetersonC.et al (2020). Regulation of fungal decomposition at single-cell level.ISME J.14896–905. 10.1038/s41396-019-0583-9
48
Op De BeeckM.PerssonP.TunlidA. (2021). Fungal extracellular polymeric matrices – highly specialized microenvironments that allow fungi to control soil organic matter reactions.Soil Biol. Biochem.159:108304. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108304
49
Paungfoo-LonhienneC.LonhienneT. G.RentschD.RobinsonN.ChristieM.WebbR. I.et al (2008). Plants can use protein as a nitrogen source without assistance from other organisms.P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA1054524–4529. 10.1073/pnas.0712078105
50
PellitierP. T.ZakD. R. (2018). Ectomycorrhizal fungi and the enzymatic liberation of nitrogen from soil organic matter: why evolutionary history matters.New Phytol.21768–73. 10.1111/nph.14598
51
PhillipsR. P.MeierI. C.BernhardtE. S.GrandyA. S.WickingsK.FinziA. C. (2012). Roots and fungi accelerate carbon and nitrogen cycling in forest exposed to elevated CO2.Ecol. Lett.151042–1049. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01827.x
52
RineauF.RothD.ShahF.SmitsM.JohanssonT.CanbackB.et al (2012). The ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus converts organic matter in plant litter using a trimmed brown-rot mechanism involving Fenton chemistry.Env. Microbiol.141477–1487. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02736.x
53
RoslingA. (2009). Trees, mycorrhiza and minerals—field relevance of in vitro experiments.Geomicrobiol. J.26389–401. 10.1080/01490450902929324
54
Ruiz-DueñasF. J.BarrasaJ. M.Sánchez-GarciaM.CamareroS.MiyauchiS.SerranoA.et al (2020). Genomic analysis enlightens Agaricales lifestyle evolution and increasing peroxidase diversity.Mol. Biol. Evol.381428–1446. 10.1093/molbev/msaa301
55
SchnitzerM.MonrealC. M. (2011). Quo vadis soil organic matter research? A biological link to the chemistry of humification.Adv. Agron.113139–213.
56
ShahF.NicolásC.BentzerJ.EllströmM.SmitsM.RineauF.et al (2016). Ectomycorrhizal fungi decompose soil organic matter using oxidative mechanisms adapted from saprotrophic ancestors.New Phytol.2091705–1719. 10.1111/nph.13722
57
ShahF.GresslerM.NehzatiS.OpDe BeeckM.GentileL.et al (2021). Secretion of iron(III)-reducing metabolites during protein acquisition by the ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus.Microorganisms9:35. 10.3390/microorganisms9010035
58
SimpsonA. J.SongG.SmithE.LamB.NovotnyE. H.HayesM. H. (2007). Unraveling the structural components of soil humin by use of solution-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.Environ. Sci. Technol.41876–883. 10.1021/es061576c
59
SmithS. E.ReadJ. R. (2008). Mycorrhizal Symbiosis.London: Academic Press.
60
StendahlJ.BergB.LindahlB. D. (2017). Manganese availability is negatively associated with carbon storage in northern coniferous forest humus layers.Sci. Rep.71–6. 10.1038/s41598-017-15801-y
61
TedersooL.SmithM. E. (2017). “Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Lineages: Detection of Four New Groups and Notes on Consistent Recognition of Ectomycorrhizal Taxa in High-Throughput Sequencing Studies,” in Biogeography of Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, ed.TedersooL. (New York, NY: Springer), 125–142.
62
WallanderH.WickmanT.JacksG. (1997). Apatite as a P source in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal Pinus sylvestris seedlings.Plant Soil196123–131.
63
WangT.TianZ.TunlidA.PerssonP. (2020). Nitrogen acquisition from mineral-associated proteins by an ectomycorrhizal fungus.New Phytol.228697–711.
64
WangT.TianZ.BengtsonP.TunlidA.PerssonP. (2017). Mineral surface-reactive metabolites secreted during fungal decomposition contribute to the formation of soil organic matter.Environ. Microbiol.195117–5129. 10.1111/1462-2920.13990
65
WangT.PerssonP.TunlidA. (2021). A widespread mechanism in ectomycorrhizal fungi to access nitrogen from mineral-associated proteins.Environ. Microbiol.195117–5129. 10.1111/1462-2920.15539
66
ZakD. R.PellitierP. T.ArgiroffW. A.CastilloB.JamesT. Y.NaveL. E.et al (2019). Exploring the role of ectomycorrhizal fungi in soil carbon dynamics.New Phytol.22333–39. 10.1111/nph.15679
Summary
Keywords
ectomycorrhizal fungi, decomposition, soil C stabilization, iron oxide minerals, nitrogen acquisition, metabolites
Citation
Tunlid A, Floudas D, Op De Beeck M, Wang T and Persson P (2022) Decomposition of soil organic matter by ectomycorrhizal fungi: Mechanisms and consequences for organic nitrogen uptake and soil carbon stabilization. Front. For. Glob. Change 5:934409. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2022.934409
Received
02 May 2022
Accepted
01 July 2022
Published
22 July 2022
Volume
5 - 2022
Edited by
Huajun Yin, Chengdu Institute of Biology (CAS), China
Reviewed by
Marty Kranabetter, Ministry of Forests and Range, Canada; Bartosz Adamczyk, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Finland
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2022 Tunlid, Floudas, Op De Beeck, Wang and Persson.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Anders Tunlid, anders.tunlid@biol.lu.se
This article was submitted to Forest Soils, a section of the journal Frontiers in Forests and Global Change
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.