Ratna Chrismiari Purwestri
Betha Lusiana- 1Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czechia
- 2The Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF), Bogor, West Java, Indonesia
Editorial on the Research Topic
Socioeconomic implications of forests and forestry in a changing climate and governance
Forests are widely recognized for their vital and diverse contributions to human wellbeing. Beyond wood production, they offer a wide range of ecosystem services—provisioning, regulating, and cultural—that sustain livelihoods, support biodiversity, and buffer communities against the impacts of climate change (Haines-Young and Potschin, 2018; Hernández-Blanco et al., 2022). While wood products remain the most documented economic benefit of forests (FAO, 2022), there is growing recognition of the value of non-wood forest products and services. These include recreation and the gathering of wild foods such as mushrooms and berries, which contribute to cultural identity, health, and local economies (Sievänen et al., 2008; Sheppard et al., 2020; Vacik et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021). In the face of intensifying climate-related disturbances, the regulating functions of forests—such as carbon sequestration and the control of floods and erosion—are becoming even more critical. This underlines the importance of supporting forests as multifunctional landscapes, essential to both environmental stability and socioeconomic development.
This special topic features research that underscores the intertwined nature of environment, social governance, and forest use. One study reported by Eshetu examines household-level use of fuelwood and associated carbon emissions in Ethiopia, drawing on the concept of “carbon neutrality” (FAO, 1997). This highlights the need to evaluate forests not only through an economic or social lens, but also for their environmental significance including the potential of negative contributions.
Governance structure, such as forest policies, legal frameworks, and social norm, play a critical role in shaping forest utilization and management practices worldwide, by promoting the active participation of all stakeholders and safeguarding their rights (Sarfo-Adu, 2021; Sotirov et al., 2020; Tole, 2010). In Malaysia, for example, indigenous engagement in forest-related climate action remains a challenge. Guglyuvatyy calls for carbon credit mechanisms that recognize indigenous peoples as key actors in achieving net-zero targets. The study further advocates for regulatory reforms to strengthen indigenous land rights and prevent the economic undervaluation and subsequent conversion of forested areas.
Sustainable management and monitoring practices also shape the health and productivity of forests (Siry et al., 2005; Prins et al., 2023). Ground-level monitoring is not only essential for tracking forest condition, but also for sustaining the availability of important food resources, such as sago in Papua, Indonesia. Fetriyuna et al. utilized remote sensing data to assess changes in sago forests over three decades. Their findings show that while in a more developed region (Merauke), exhibited degradation, it also produces sago with higher nutrient content, potentially due to the maturity of harvested sago. These insights highlight the complex interplay between forest conditions, land use change, and food security.
Societal preferences and views also shape how societies interact with and appraise forest ecosystem services. Understanding societal views on non-wood ecosystem services is essential for promoting local economy and ensuring sustainable production and consumption practices. For instance, in Turkey, Demirkaya et al. examines how young children and their parents perceived forest pollution and cleanness. Personal and parental attributes significantly influence awareness and knowledge about clean forests, highlighting the role of early education and family engagement in fostering environmental stewardship and sustainable tourism practices. Meanwhile, in the Czech Republic, studies have explored the economic and nutritional potential of forest mushrooms and berries as alternative sources of income beyond timber, based on national surveys of public preferences and collection practices related to non-wood forest commodities (Šišák et al., 2016; Purwestri et al., 2023).
While this Research Topic emphasizes the social, cultural, and governance-related dimensions of forest use and management in the context of climate change, it does not seek to extensively address the economic valuation of forest ecosystem services. This editorial choice reflects the substantial body of existing literature that has already explored the economic aspects in depth. Rather than duplicating those efforts, we aim to broaden the discourse by highlighting complementary themes that are equally vital for advancing sustainable forest governance.
Readers interested in the economic valuation of forests are encouraged to explore relevant research published in Frontiers journals. For instance, a global meta-regression analysis by Pisani et al. (2022) investigate key variables driving the economic value of forest ecosystem services, highlighting the influence of socio-economic factors and ecosystem service quality conditions. Regional studies, such as the review by Osewe et al. (2024), assess how contextual factors and global trends impact the valuation of ecosystem services in East Africa, offering insights into preferred valuation methods and approaches in that region. Additionally, Raihan (2023) provides a comprehensive review of integrative approaches combining monetary and non-monetary valuation methods for forest ecosystem services, emphasizing the need for holistic assessment frameworks. These studies collectively highlight the importance of incorporating economic valuation into forest management and policymaking to ensure sustainable use and conservation of forest resources.
Author contributions
RCP: Formal analysis, Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. BL: Formal analysis, Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
FAO (1997). Implications of Woodfuel Use for Greenhouse Gas Emissions, in: Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study: Regional Study on Wood Energy Today and Tomorrow in Asia, Working Papers Series. Field Document No. 50. Regional Wood Energy Development Programme in Asia, Bangkok, Thailand, 174.
Haines-Young, R., and Potschin, M. (2018). “Common international classification of ecosystem services (CICES) V5.1,” in Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure (Fabis Consulting Ltd.: Nottingham, UK). doi: 10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108
Hernández-Blanco, M., Costanza, R., Chen, H., deGroot, D., Jarvis, D., Kubiszewski, I., et al. (2022). Ecosystem health, ecosystem services, and the well-being of humans and the rest of nature. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 5027–5040. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16281
Osewe, E. O., Popa, B., Vacik, H., Osewe, I., and Abrudan, I. V. (2024). Review of forest ecosystem services evaluation studies in East Africa. Front. Ecol. Evol. 12:1385351. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1385351
Pisani, D., De Lucia, C., and Pazienza, P. (2022). On the investigation of an economic value for forest ecosystem services in the past 30 years: Lessons learnt and future insights from a North–South perspective. Front. For. Glob. Change 5:798976. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2022.798976
Prins, K., Köhl, M., and Linser, S. (2023). Is the concept of sustainable forest management still fit for purpose? For. Policy Econ. 157:103072. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103072
Purwestri, R. C., Hochmalová, M., Hájek, M., Palátová, P., Jarský, V., Huertas-Bernal, D. C., et al. (2023). From recreational to income-generating opportunities: assessment of public preferences for non-wood forest products in the Czech Republic. Front. Nutr. 10:1193203. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1193203
Raihan, A. (2023). A review on the integrative approach for economic valuation of forest ecosystem services. J. Environ. Sci. Econ. 2, 1–18. doi: 10.56556/jescae.v2i3.554
Sarfo-Adu, G. K. (2021). Role of forest related policies and laws on sustainable forest management practice: a critical overview. J. Resour. Dev. Manag. 73, 46–55. doi: 10.7176/JRDM/73-06
Sheppard, J. P., Chamberlain, J., Agúndez, D., Bhattacharya, P., Chirwa, P. W., Gontcharov, A., et al. (2020). Sustainable forest management beyond the timber-oriented status quo: transitioning to co-production of timber and non-wood forest products—a global perspective. Curr. Forestry Rep. 6, 26–40. doi: 10.1007/s40725-019-00107-1
Sievänen, T., Arnberger, A., Dehez, J., Grant, N., Jensen, F., Skov-Petersen, H., et al. (2008). Forest Recreation Monitoring - A European Perspective. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki, Finland.
Siry, J. P., Cubbage, F. W., and Ahmed, M. R. (2005). Sustainable forest management: global trends and opportunities. For. Policy Econ. 7, 551–561. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2003.09.003
Šišák, L., Riedl, M., and Dudik, R. (2016). Non-market non-timber forest products in the Czech Republic-their socio-economic effects and trends in forest land use. Land Use Policy 50, 390–398. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.10.006
Sotirov, M., Pokorny, B., Kleinschmit, D., and Kanowski, P. (2020). International forest governance and policy: institutional architecture and pathways of influence in global sustainability. Sustainability 12:7010. doi: 10.3390/su12177010
Tole, L. (2010). Reforms from the ground up: a review of community-based forest management in tropical developing countries. Environ. Manage. 45, 1312–1331. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9489-z
Vacik, H., Hale, M., Spieker, H., Pettenella, D., and Tomé, M. (2020). Non-Wood forest Products in Europe: Ecology and Management of Mushrooms, Tree Products, Understory Plants and Animal Products. Norderstedt: BoD - Books on Demand.
Keywords: socioeconomic, social governance, forest management, carbon emissions, societal preferences
Citation: Purwestri RC and Lusiana B (2025) Editorial: Socioeconomic implications of forests and forestry in a changing climate and governance. Front. For. Glob. Change 8:1620331. doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2025.1620331
Received: 29 April 2025; Accepted: 26 May 2025;
Published: 05 June 2025.
Edited and reviewed by: Astrid Moser-Reischl, Technical University of Munich, Germany
Copyright © 2025 Purwestri and Lusiana. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ratna Chrismiari Purwestri, cHVyd2VzdHJpQGZsZC5jenUuY3o=