ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. For. Glob. Change

Sec. Forest Hydrology

Can we maximize snow storage through fire-resilient forest treatments? Insights from experimental forest treatments in the Eastern Cascades, WA, USA

  • 1. University of Alaska Southeast, Juneau, United States

  • 2. University of Washington, Seattle, United States

  • 3. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle, United States

Article metrics

View details

565

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Forest treatments such as prescribed burns, mastication, and thinning are widely implemented across the western USA to reduce fuels and enhance wildfire resilience. These practices also influence snow accumulation and melt, which in turn affect snow storage and duration. Since many regions depend on seasonal snow for water resources, it is essential that forest management practices preserve, or even enhance, snow storage as a buffer against the impacts of climate change. To test the hypothesis that thinning and canopy gap creation can maximize snow storage, particularly on north-facing slopes, experimental forest treatments representing a range of thinning intensities were implemented on Cle Elum Ridge in the headwaters of the Yakima River Basin, Washington, USA. Ground-based snow observations, combined with pre-treatment (2021) and post-treatment (2023) snow-on lidar, show that canopy thinning increased snow depth and storage by 30% on north-facing slopes and by 16% on south-facing slopes. Snow depth was positively related to canopy openness, as measured by sky view fraction and canopy edge metrics, with stronger effects on north-facing slopes. In contrast, there was no clear relationship between snow depth and degree of thinning as measured by forest basal area, a common forestry metric used to plan treatment prescriptions. Using canopy edge metrics and sky view fraction relationships, we estimated the hydrologic benefit of thinning during 2023 at 12.3 acre-ft of water storage per 100 acres of north-facing forest and 5.1 acre-ft on south-facing slopes. These findings highlight the potential to incorporate hydrologic resilience as a co-benefit when planning fuels reduction strategies.

Summary

Keywords

Forest, Snow, Wildfire, forest management, Water Resources

Received

17 September 2025

Accepted

03 December 2025

Copyright

© 2025 Lumbrazo, Howe, Dickerson-Lange, Pestana, Cramblitt, Dedinsky, Smith and Lundquist. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Cassie Lumbrazo

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics