- 1College of Literature and Journalism Communication, Jishou University, Jishou, China
- 2Department of Communication and Culture, Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC, Canada
- 3Office of the Party and Administration, Hebei Academy of Fine Arts, Shijiazhuang, China
- 4School of Journalism and Communication, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- 5China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, Beijing, China
Background: The accidental consumption of wild poisonous mushrooms has emerged as a primary source of poisoning incidents globally. It is imperative to comprehend the dietary habits of individuals consuming wild mushrooms to address this issue effectively.
Methods: In this investigation, an extended version of the theory of reasoned action was employed, incorporating perceived benefit and food-related self-efficacy as novel predictive variables.
Results: A total of 793 Chinese residents participated in the study, which revealed that subjective norms (β = 0. 219, t = 5.314), attitudes (β = 0.426, t = 8.237), self-efficacy (β = 0.144, t = 5.905), and perceived benefit (β = 0.177, t = 4.586) significantly influenced the participants' intentions.
Conclusion: The extended theory of reasoned action framework has proven to be a valuable instrument for understanding individuals' inclinations toward selecting food-related risks. These factors should be considered in governmental initiatives aimed at enhancing food safety.
1 Introduction
The consumption of wild mushrooms is deeply popular in China, having long been regarded as a mountain delicacy by residents of many regions. It is estimated that over 1,000 species of poisonous mushrooms exist globally, with China alone accounting for at least 500 species (1). However, accidental ingestion of poisonous wild mushrooms has become the primary cause of poisoning incidents worldwide (2, 3). In some Asian countries, mushroom poisoning poses a severe public health threat, with China reporting the highest mortality rates (4). Poisonous mushroom poisoning in China is characterized by a high case fatality rate and substantial regional prevalence, far exceeding the global average (5). Among food-borne poisoning cases in China, mushroom poisoning incidents are the most frequent, accounting for 44.35% of total cases in 2022—a staggering increase of 88.35% compared to the previous year (6). Studies in multiple regions of China have identified poisonous mushroom poisoning as the primary cause of localized food-borne disease outbreaks and fatalities (7–9). Effective governmental management and control measures are urgently needed to mitigate the risks associated with wild mushroom consumption (10).
Due to the continuous increase in cases of accidental ingestion of poisonous wild mushrooms, many countries have implemented measures to address this issue. For example, numerous European countries have established legal frameworks to ensure the safe trade of wild mushrooms (11). The American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPC) requires individuals to submit their wild mushroom specimens to local experts and provides telephone support for pharmacists, doctors, and nurses through poison centers (12). In China, high-risk regions such as Yunnan, Hubei, Jiangsu, Hunan, Sichuan, and Anhui have activated early warning systems during peak seasons. These systems employ a variety of communication channels, including radio broadcasts, bulletin boards, posters, distribution of educational materials, and public meetings. In remote mountainous areas, risk prevention efforts are further enhanced through radio broadcasts, permanent displays of warning posters, and community gatherings. Radio broadcasts leverage their accessibility and immediacy to rapidly disseminate risk warnings and identification knowledge during peak seasons or in specific regions, thereby raising public vigilance. Bulletin boards and posters use text-and-image combinations to provide long-term educational displays in densely populated areas, reinforcing awareness of food safety. Public meetings facilitate direct interaction between government agencies and health departments, enabling precise transmission of risk-related information and addressing public concerns, thereby fostering a sense of responsibility and engagement among participants. These measures integrate the strengths of diverse media channels to comprehensively elevate public awareness and promote the adoption of the “Four No's” principle: not picking, not eating, not selling, and not purchasing wild mushrooms (13, 14). Despite localized successes in reducing poisoning incidents, the overall risk of wild mushroom consumption remains inadequately managed (10). Poisonous mushroom poisoning has thus become a major cause of poisoning globally (15).
The striking similarity in macroscopic characteristics between edible and poisonous mushrooms makes them easily confused in mixed wild habitats (16). According to the latest annual report from the American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC), 1,119 mushroom exposure cases were reported in 2022, with only 63.37% successfully identified (17). Furthermore, mushroom identification requires specialized expertise, which often exceeds the capacity of healthcare professionals (18). Folk verbal descriptions of mushrooms are subjective as their morphology varies with seasons, growth stages, local habitats, and environmental conditions (19). The incidence of mushroom poisoning varies significantly worldwide due to local traditions, lifestyles, nutritional factors, climate, and the presence of wild mushrooms (4). For untrained individuals, relying on methods such as Internet searches to distinguish mushrooms is insufficient, and misidentification could potentially compromise patient care (20). In addition, the vast majority of mushroom poisoning cases lack antidotes (21). Consequently, the only definitive way to prevent poisoning is to refrain from picking, consuming, selling, or purchasing wild mushrooms.
Herbert Simon proposed that decision-makers in risk behaviors are social individuals with bounded rationality, as their choices are constrained by environmental factors and limited cognitive capacities, often leading to behaviors that are less than fully rational or even irrational (22). Therefore, understanding the influencing factors of risky behaviors, such as the consumption of wild mushrooms, is essential to address cognitive biases and risk preferences in individuals, thereby promoting health-protective behaviors. This understanding also serves as a prerequisite for government-led interventions. However, research aimed at improving food safety behavior theories remains limited, and the lack of theoretical guidance continues to hinder advancements in food safety education (23, 24), resulting in ineffective intervention programs (3, 25).
This study addresses the dual challenges of theoretical and practical limitations by exploring key factors influencing the willingness to eat wild mushrooms. The theoretical framework and model integrate the theory of reasoned action (TRA) and a risk-benefit perspective. The TRA was selected because it has been successfully applied in numerous studies on consumer food choice behaviors (26, 27). However, the traditional TRA model has two critical limitations: first, its “attitude” variable implicitly encompasses a comprehensive evaluation of behavioral outcomes but fails to distinguish the independent roles of “risk” and “benefit.” Second, the TRA does not account for individuals' confidence in their ability to manage risks, which self-efficacy theory can explain—specifically, why individuals with high self-efficacy may overlook warnings due to overconfidence.
Given that perceived benefit and food self-efficacy are critical predictors in food safety research (28, 29), and prior studies have not integrated the TRA with these constructs, this research integrates the TRA, perceived benefit, and self-efficacy into a unified model. This integration provides empirical evidence to explain consumers' willingness to eat wild mushrooms. The study aims to validate this extended theoretical framework using structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), clarifying the predictive pathways of subjective norms, attitude, perceived benefit, and self-efficacy on consumption intentions. The findings will offer empirical evidence for public health policies, enabling the design of targeted intervention strategies. This research holds significant public health value for reducing global mushroom poisoning incidents.
2 Literature review and research hypotheses
2.1 Theory of reasoned action
Many studies have utilized behavioral science theories and models to better understand food handlers' behaviors (30–32). Among these, the theory of reasoned action (TRA) is the most widely applied, having been used to study food-handling practices among consumers in Australia, Malaysia, the United States, and China (33). Proposed by Ajzen and Fishbein, TRA primarily analyzes how and why attitudes influence behavior, explaining the causal relationships between attitudes, subjective norms, and behavioral intentions (34). Existing literature demonstrates that TRA is highly effective in predicting and explaining food safety behaviors. For instance, Hosseini et al. (35) and Janani and Annapoorni (36) separately demonstrated the effectiveness of TRA-based interventions in promoting breakfast consumption and intentions to purchase organic foods. In addition, Xiaopeng et al. constructed an extended TRA model to investigate consumers' willingness to purchase green agricultural products (37).
The theory of reasoned action (TRA) directly predicts individual behavior through behavioral intention, which is jointly influenced by two primary factors: attitude and subjective norms (38). Attitude refers to an individual or organization's emotional evaluation of a behavior, encompassing both positive and negative orientations toward it. For instance, Harris et al. (39) found that customers' attitudes significantly influence their willingness to patronize restaurants with reported foodborne illness cases. Rodrigues et al. (40) revealed that food handlers' intentions to implement food safety behaviors are directly shaped by their attitudes toward such practices. Rezaei et al. (41) noted that positive attitudes toward food safety behaviors enhance Iranian farmers' willingness to engage in on-farm food safety practices. Petrovici and Paliwoda (42) further demonstrated that attitudes and habits significantly impact food consumption behaviors.
In China, the consumption of wild mushrooms is deeply rooted in cultural traditions. Wild mushrooms are revered as “mountain delicacies” and celebrated as “pure natural foods” (43). In many regions, they are not only a staple of daily diets but also play a central role in festivals and social gatherings (44). Their perceived high nutritional value has made wild mushrooms a cherished food choice among consumers (45). In addition, Chinese culinary culture surrounding wild mushrooms is profoundly influenced by regional traditions and generationally accumulated knowledge. Rural residents, in particular, have developed unique systems of mushroom identification and consumption through familial and communal knowledge transmission (46). This cultural legacy fosters a positive attitude toward wild mushrooms among Chinese consumers, positioning them as a food of high value. Consequently, in China's cultural context, attitude plays a critical role in understanding the decision-making processes of consumers regarding wild mushroom consumption.
Subjective norms refer to the perceived social pressure individuals or organizations feel when deciding whether to engage in a specific behavior (47). Long considered a powerful determinant of behavior, subjective norms have been extensively studied in behavioral research (48). In dietary choices, scholars have noted that individuals may conform to others' food-related norms to guide their eating behaviors (49). For instance, studies show that participants consume less of food if they perceive it as the standard of an unpopular social group (50, 51). Such social-environmental pressures can make it harder for people to maintain healthy diets, as they may lack the motivation to deviate from the choices of their social circles, even if those choices involve unhealthy but palatable options (52). Unhealthy social norms can provide reasons for behavioral change, potentially encouraging even health-conscious individuals to adopt less healthy eating habits to align with the majority (48). Notably, this influence often operates unconsciously as consumers may not recognize the impact of subjective norms (53). Recent research further highlights the significant role of subjective norms in shaping sustainable food choices (54). However, scholars have also noted that subjective norms are not always decisive in influencing behavior (55).
China emphasizes collective, where profound societal influence on individual decision-making, where family, community, and broader social norms exert deeply ingrained impacts (56). In the context of wild mushroom consumption, an individual's attitude is shaped not only by personal preferences but also by the opinions of family members and the community. For instance, individuals are more likely to exhibit a higher willingness to consume wild mushrooms if their family members or peers hold positive attitudes toward them (33). This powerful social influence aligns closely with the subjective norms construct in the theory of reasoned action (TRA), suggesting that subjective norms may be a critical predictor of behavioral intentions in China's cultural context.
Based on the above discussion, this study proposes the following hypotheses:
H1: Attitude positively affects the willingness to eat wild mushrooms.
H2: Subjective norms positively affect the willingness to eat wild mushrooms.
2.2 Perceived benefit, self-efficacy
Consumer perceptions of a food's benefits are often emotionally driven (57). Emotion can be defined as the complex physiological and psychological experience an individual undergoes when exposed to stimuli such as food (58). The most significant benefits of food typically stem from emotional factors tied to product intrinsic attributes, including sensory characteristics and preferences (59). When benefits are associated with risks, people tend to perceive these benefits as attributes that offset potential negative consequences. Wild mushrooms are cherished for their delicious taste and celebrated as “purely natural foods,” earning widespread popularity among Chinese consumers (9). In Central and Eastern European countries, wild mushrooms are valued for their unique texture, distinct flavor, and nutritional profile as a protein source. Nutritionists even promote them as meat substitutes, making them a long-standing favorite (44). When food benefits align with sensory appeal, environmental factors, or emotional associations, these perceptions often arise from individual product experiences (57, 60). When asked about the most important attributes influencing food choices, consumers most frequently cite taste (59). Consuming wild mushrooms offers the sensory pleasure of their unique flavor but also carries the risk of accidental poisoning. Food choices are primarily driven by preferences and situational context—what is most enjoyable and suitable for a given occasion—rather than risk assessment, which is often deprioritized by consumers (61).
In Chinese culture, wild mushrooms are not only prized for their distinctive flavor but also revered as “mountain delicacies” symbolizing high nutritional value (44). This cultural perception amplifies consumers' perceived benefit of wild mushrooms, elevating their prominence in food choices. Consumers also exhibit a preference for “pure natural” foods, associating them with minimal processing, traditional production methods, and desirable sensory qualities while expecting greater health benefits (59). Such perceived benefit directly influences individual consumption intentions.
Self-efficacy, a core concept proposed by American psychologist Albert Bandura in his social cognitive theory during the 1970s (62), refers to an individual's belief in their capability to execute tasks successfully. According to social cognitive theory, individuals with higher self-efficacy are more likely to believe they possess the ability to accomplish challenging tasks (63). Self-efficacy involves an assessment of one's capacity to perform tasks and represents a perceived capability. In the context of food safety, individuals with higher self-efficacy perceive themselves as having sufficient knowledge and confidence to avoid risks (28). Higher levels of self-efficacy are associated with lower perceived susceptibility to health risks such as avian influenza infection, thereby reducing the likelihood of taking preventive actions (64).
A study revealed that in some rural areas of Changsha, a city of China, residents have long maintained the dietary practice of foraging and consuming wild mushrooms. Older individuals, in particular, frequently disregard warnings from staff and continue harvesting and eating wild mushrooms as they strongly believe in their ability to identify toxic species based on personal experience (65). In regions of China where wild mushroom consumption is deeply rooted in cultural traditions, long-term consumption of specific species has fostered confidence in risk assessment. This confidence stems not only from personal experience but is also reinforced through inter-generational and community-based knowledge transmission (11). Such cultural and familial transmission of expertise strengthens consumers' self-efficacy, making them more inclined to consume wild mushrooms despite poisoning risks. Thus, in the Chinese cultural context, self-efficacy reflects not only individual capability but also the collective experience and knowledge inherited through family and community traditions.
Based on the above discussion, this study proposes the following hypotheses:
H3: Perceived benefit positively affects the willingness to eat wild mushrooms.
H4: Self-efficacy positively affects the willingness to eat wild mushrooms.
2.3 Demographic control variable
The propaganda degree of poisonous mushrooms varies from province to province, and the number of people who eat wild mushrooms and the poisoning rate will be different (66). In terms of gender differences, Zhitao et al. (67) found that the risk of male wild mushroom poisoning is higher than that of females, because men spend more time outdoors, prefer to collect wild mushrooms, and eat more wild mushrooms at the same time. In terms of occupational differences, Kalashnikov et al. found that in Ukraine, the occupations with a higher risk of mushroom poisoning are workers, unemployed people, and school students (68). In terms of age difference, Xun et al. (69) found that among patients with wild mushroom poisoning, the age group of 20–59 years old had the largest number of cases. The highest mortality rate is in the age group of 1–6 years old, followed by the age group over 60 years old. In addition, Rahayu et al. (70) found that a higher educational level may reduce the risk of poisoning by wild poisonous mushrooms. To sum up, our research takes province, gender, age, occupation, and education level as control variables.
Dietary behavior originates from a reasonable decision-making process and is influenced by many factors. Although the theory of reasoned action (TRA) primarily focuses on the two core factors of attitude and subjective norms, this study further extends the model by incorporating two additional dimensions: perceived benefit and self-efficacy, to more comprehensively understand consumers' willingness to eat wild mushrooms, as illustrated in Figure 1.
3 Methodology
3.1 Collection of research data
This study was designed and organized by researchers cooperating with China National Food Safety Risk Assessment Center, and data were collected in Guizhou, Hunan, Jiangxi, Yunnan, and Chongqing of China from 20 May 2021 to January 2022. In these areas, wild mushroom poisoning has been reported as the leading cause of death of food-borne diseases in the past few decades. Research data were collected through a combined approach of online surveys and in-person household surveys. The questionnaire design employed a five-point Likert scale (1: Strongly Disagree to 5: Strongly Agree). In the first section of the questionnaire, questions on age, gender, education, and income status were included to gather demographic variables (92). The second section addressed variables related to self-efficacy, perceived benefit, and constructs from the theory of reasoned action (TRA)—specifically, attitude, subjective norms, and intention to consume wild mushrooms. This study adopted a cross-sectional research design, characterized by collecting data from a population or specific group at a single point in time. The cross-sectional approach was chosen because it allows for a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon under study while effectively assessing variations and relationships within the target population. After filling in the missing data by the mean interpolation method, 793 valid observations were finally included. Kline recommends a minimum sample size of 200 participants for structural equation modeling (SEM) (71). The study's sample size of 793 participants meets the required threshold for conducting structural equation analysis.
3.2 Research population and sample
As can be seen from Table 1, among the samples studied, Guizhou Province accounted for 16.3%, Hunan Province accounted for 12.4%, Jiangxi Province accounted for 16.9%, Yunnan Province accounted for 30.3%, and Chongqing City accounted for 24.2%. Most of them are young and middle-aged, accounting for 23.6% at the age of 18–40, 60.4% at the age of 41–60, 15% at the age of 61–80, and 1% over 81. In terms of gender distribution, women account for 46.2% and men account for 53.8%; in terms of educational background, 38.3% graduated from primary school, 34% from middle school, 15.8% from high school, 7.2% from university, and 4.6% from postgraduate. As far as occupations are concerned, 0.9% are students, 16.9% are homeworkers, 3.3% are unemployed, 4.8% are retired, 1.5% are government workers, 10.2% are technicians, 3.5% are office staff and related personnel, 8.2% are business workers, 39.3% are agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and sideline fishing, and 1.3% are farmers.
3.3 Conceptual model and scale development
The conceptual model comprises five constructs, each measured through validated scales adapted from existing literature: attitude: adopted from Dean et al. (72), this scale consists of four items measuring an individual's emotional evaluation of consuming wild mushrooms. Subjective Norms: adapted from Menozzi et al. (73), this construct includes two items to assess perceived social pressure influencing behavior. Perceived benefit: adapted from Loh and Hassan (74), this scale includes three items evaluating the perceived advantages of consuming wild mushrooms. Self-Efficacy: derived from de Menezes et al. (75), this construct comprises two items reflecting confidence in one's ability to safely eat wild mushrooms. Behavioral Intention (Dependent Variable): willingness to eat wild mushrooms, the study's outcome variable, is measured by one item. The design of the conceptual model is illustrated in Figure 1, integrating these constructs to examine their hypothesized relationships and predictive pathways.
3.4 Data analysis
The study employed partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0 to analyze the data. The choice of the PLS method was driven by its dual strengths in supporting both exploratory and confirmatory research (76), effectively handling complex interactions among multiple predictor variables (e.g., perceived benefit, self-efficacy, and other newly introduced constructs) while being suitable for moderate sample sizes (n = 793) (77).
First, the measurement model was validated through composite reliability (CR), Cronbach's α, and average variance extracted (AVE) to ensure internal consistency and convergent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was further conducted to evaluate discriminant validity among constructs. Subsequently, regression analysis was applied to examine the hypothesized path relationships between variables. Overall model fit indices (e.g., R2, effect size, and predictive relevance Q2) were used to assess the model's explanatory and predictive capabilities. This methodological approach balances the exploratory nature of extending the theory of reasoned action (TRA) with the rigor required for hypothesis validation, ensuring both theoretical innovation and empirical robustness.
4 Result
4.1 Measurement model results
With the SmartPLS 3.0 software, the measurement values of the model were obtained. The main statistical indicators showed satisfactory values exceeding reference benchmarks. Hair et al. (78) pointed out that when the number of measurement indicators for a variable is < 6, a Cronbach's α coefficient >0.6 indicates that the scale is reliable. The minimum Cronbach's α value was 0.683, exceeding the 0.6 threshold, indicating the reliability of the scale; convergent validity reflects the degree of aggregation of latent variables corresponding to observed variables. Convergent validity is primarily measured through factor loadings, composite reliability (CR), and average variance extracted (AVE) (79). Among these, factor loadings must be >0.60, composite reliability must exceed 0.80, and average variance extracted must be >0.50 (80). For all latent variables, the minimum factor loading value was 0.811, all exceeding 0.6, with CR above 0.859 and AVE values above 0.721, indicating that the scale's internal consistency and fit are sufficient (Table 2).
The discriminant validity of our model was measured using two well-known methods, such as the Fornell–Larcker criterion and the heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio (81). The Fornell–Larcker criterion measures discriminant validity by taking the square root of the AVE values for all constructs (82, 83). Table 3 presents the Fornell–Larcker values constructed in this study. According to the threshold, all upper values in the table's columns should exceed the lower values. The results of this study meet the threshold specified by Fornell–Larcker because the upper values in Table 3, displayed in bold, exceed the values below them. Therefore, discriminant validity is confirmed in this study's model. In addition, according to the standard, the HTMT values for all constructs should ideally be < 0.85 and must be < 0.9 (81). As shown in Table 4, the HTMT values in our model are < 0.9. Therefore, the HTMT discriminant validity of this study's model is also achieved. In summary, the questionnaire is considered to have good discriminant validity.
4.2 Structural modeling
The R2 values of the latent constructs explain the strength of the model, with values >0.5 indicating substantial strength. Our model's R2 is 0.601, demonstrating a large explanatory power. A Q2 value greater than zero is considered suitable for the model. The Q2 value of the latent constructs in this study's model is 0.591, exceeding zero, indicating that the tested model has predictive relevance. In addition, Table 5 also shows the variance inflation factor (VIF) values for all constructs in this study's model. VIF was examined to identify collinearity issues in the model. According to the standard, values below 5 are considered appropriate as they indicate no collinearity. Among the constructs in this study's model, the “attitude” construct exhibited the highest VIF value (3.396) compared to other items. Therefore, the results indicate that no collinearity issues exist in this study's model. Thus, all numerical values in this study meet the established criteria, confirming the meaningfulness of the model (81).
Furthermore, among the control variables (province, gender, age, occupation, and education level), only education level had a significant impact on the willingness to eat wild mushrooms. Education level has a negative effect on residents' willingness to eat wild mushrooms; the lower the education level, the higher the willingness to eat wild mushrooms (Figure 2).
To ensure that these positive relationships were truly statistically significant, we applied a bootstrapping technique (2,000 subsamples). Here, we find that all such values were significant, as shown in Table 6.
5 Discussion
The primary objective of this study is to investigate the impact of behavioral predictors on consumers' willingness to eat wild mushrooms, proposing an extended theory of reasoned action (TRA) model that incorporates two additional variables: perceived benefits and self-efficacy. In addition, the study considers the collectivist historical and cultural traditions within the Chinese sociocultural context, emphasizing the cultural and psychological characteristics underlying the behavior of consuming wild mushrooms.
First, the study results indicate that attitude has a positive effect on the behavioral intention to eat wild mushrooms, consistent with previous findings (84). Attitude is believed to influence individual behavior; individuals who believe a behavior will lead to positive outcomes are likely to have a positive behavioral intention, while negative attitudes may lead to unfavorable behaviors (93). Wild mushrooms are part of traditional dietary habits in some regions, and local residents often hold positive and affirmative attitudes toward them. Consumers' attitudes toward consuming wild mushrooms depend on their knowledge of mushrooms and awareness of poisoning risks. Currently, residents in regions with abundant wild mushrooms often lack adequate knowledge to identify toxic species, and their foraging practices are largely unregulated by authorities (85). Consumers may overestimate their food safety knowledge and fail to recognize that their understanding may not reflect actual risks (86). In future, wild mushroom safety education, marketing, and government agencies could emphasize the negative consequences of unsafe food practices through media campaigns to enhance consumers' awareness of the risks associated with toxic mushrooms, particularly discouraging the consumption of mushrooms they cannot confidently identify. Evans et al. (87) found that as awareness of food-borne illnesses deepens, risk-taking behaviors gradually decrease.
Second, this study further validated the direct influence of subjective norms on dietary behavior in societies that emphasize collective, a finding consistent with research by Soon et al. (88) and Kurniawan et al. (89) in Indonesia and Malaysia, which can be explained by the interdependent cultural values of these nations. China is a society that emphasizes collective where individuals belong to strong and cohesive groups or extended families, and other's opinions may hold greater weight. Normative expectations and responsibilities shape individual attitudes in societies. The Greek term for food, “oikos,” means “family” and originally referred to “a group that eats together” (90). In China, “the process of social cohesion is always inseparable from dining” (86). What to eat, where to eat, and other food-related decisions have become critical criteria for the reorganization of groups and social stratification. Thaivalappil et al. (91) proposed that others' expectations regarding how food is handled at home and the social responsibilities of being a cook may benefit educational initiatives. Ruby et al. (33) found that consumers are more likely to consider and follow the advice of those closest to them.
Third, this study found that perceived benefit has a positive effect on the consumption of wild mushrooms, consistent with previous findings (44). Specifically, participants who more strongly recognize the benefits of consuming wild mushrooms (such as nutritional value, taste experience, or local cultural significance) are more likely to exhibit higher consumption willingness. This finding underscores the importance of perceived benefit in influencing individuals' behavioral decision-making processes (94). These results suggest that educational campaigns and promotional materials should highlight the potential risks of wild mushrooms (e.g., poisoning risks) while emphasizing the importance of proper identification and handling. This approach encourages consumers to consider both the benefits and risks when deciding to eat wild mushrooms.
Finally, this study found that food self-efficacy has a positive effect on the consumption of wild mushrooms, consistent with previous literature. JM Abbot et al. found that younger individuals exhibit higher self-efficacy regarding food safety, believing they possess sufficient knowledge to avoid risks. In the context of consuming wild mushrooms, individuals who perceive themselves as capable of identifying, foraging, and cooking wild mushrooms, or who believe their access to wild mushrooms is safe and reliable, are more likely to develop consumption intentions. This is because self-efficacy influences individuals' confidence in performing a behavior; when individuals believe they can successfully execute a behavior, they are more likely to engage in it.
Rural residents, compared to urban residents, have greater exposure to and use of wild mushrooms. However, due to lower educational attainment among rural residents and the morphological similarity between some edible and toxic mushrooms, rural areas experience significantly more wild mushroom poisoning incidents than urban areas (85). This study also found that groups with lower educational levels are more likely to exhibit a willingness to eat wild mushrooms. These individuals often lack knowledge about preventing toxic mushroom poisoning. Recommendations include reorganizing scientific information to address high-risk audiences' misconceptions (e.g., “I have sufficient identification ability; since I was not poisoned before, I will not be poisoned in the future”), specifically highlighting locally confusing toxic mushroom species to challenge audiences' overconfidence in their identification skills and correct such misconceptions.
These research findings provide critical entry points for public health policies. In cultures that emphasize collective, individual behavior is more driven by social norms, i.e., the influence of “group pressure” (e.g., expectations from family and friends), on behavioral intentions is stronger. Policy design can draw inspiration from Indonesia's “Family Food Safety Ambassadors” program (88), recruiting rural doctors or community leaders to conduct regular home visits to train residents to analyze the information of poisonous mushrooms and share poisoning case videos via social media groups, thereby embedding risk education into daily social interactions. Additionally, it is necessary to further standardize the wild mushroom trading through the identification of technical specifications, such as the policy practice of wild mushroom trading in Italy through molecular identification (10), thereby reducing risks at the source of the supply chain.
6 Conclusion
This study examines risk behaviors by emphasizing a very unique cultural background, in which people eat wild mushrooms as part of cultural habits, and in the past few decades, wild mushroom poisoning has been identified as a high mortality rate in some areas of China. To understand the predictive factors of willingness to take risks, we verified several important factors, such as perceived benefit and food self-efficacy, and we also tested the influence of subjective norms and attitudes on behavioral willingness. Our research contributes to the current understanding of risk cognition and related behaviors and extends to the discussion of social and cultural background characteristics and collective cultural values. We call for further research to test the risk perception and communication paradigm, transcend the cultural tradition centered on the Western paradigm, and develop a cross-cultural perspective that emphasizes the uniqueness of the local cultural background.
7 Limitations and future research
This study has several limitations. First, the sample's over-representation of rural participants from high-incidence southwestern China may have overestimated population-level risk preferences, necessitating future inclusion of urban-eastern populations to enhance generalizability. Second, self-reported data may have been influenced by social desirability bias, warranting validation through behavioral records or experimental methods. Third, unmeasured environmental and economic factors (e.g., foraging accessibility and household income) could moderate outcomes, requiring inclusion in future models. Finally, the theoretical framework's focus on collectivist cultural contexts limits its applicability to individualistic societies, which remains to be tested.
Future studies can deepen the following directions: first, conduct cross-cultural comparisons to validate the model's applicability in individualistic societies, particularly focusing on differences in the role of subjective norms and exploring how cultural dimensions (e.g., uncertainty avoidance) moderate risk decision-making mechanisms. Second, adopt a mixed-methods design: use longitudinal tracking to reveal seasonal variations in risk perception between rainy and dry seasons, and design randomized controlled experiments (e.g., comparing the effects of household advocate training vs. community poster interventions) to quantify the efficacy of policy interventions. Third, integrate social media big data to capture unconscious consumer reactions to risk information and analyze patterns of public opinion dissemination. Fourth, expand the theoretical framework by integrating the health belief model (HBM) and theory of reasoned action (TRA), incorporating moderating variables such as economic dependency, to construct a multidimensional predictive model. Finally, focus on high-risk groups (e.g., older foragers and migrant workers) through participatory research to develop customized intervention tools, and establish a dynamic policy evaluation system to achieve targeted resource allocation.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment (Record number: [2021]028). All interviewees had informed consent and voluntarily participated in the survey.
Author contributions
FG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JZ: Formal analysis, Investigation, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. ZL: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. YJ: Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. JD: Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. XH: Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing. SC: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for there search and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72464013) and Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2024JJ7391).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Chengye S, Lijing X. Further strengthen the control of toxic plants and mushroom poisoning in China. Adverse Drug React J. (2013) 1:2–3.
2. Marinov P, Bonchev G, Ivanov D, Zlateva S, Dimitrova T, Georgiev K, et al. Mushrooms intoxications. J IMAB. (2018) 24:1887–90. doi: 10.5272/jimab.2018241.1887
3. Abdelhakim AS, Jones E, Redmond E, Hewedi M, Seaman P. Cabin crew food safety training: a qualitative study. Food Control. (2019) 96:151–7. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.09.003
4. Govorushko S, Rezaee R, Dumanov J, Tsatsakis A. Poisoning associated with the use of mushrooms: a review of the global pattern and main characteristics. Food Chem Toxicol. (2019) 128:267–79. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.04.016
5. Qian H, Lijing X, Peibin M, Chengye S. Analysis of current situation of poisoning caused by poisonous animals, poisinous plants, and poisonous mushrooms in China. Adverse Drug React J. (2013) 5:6–10.
6. Penghui F, Honggiu L, Chuzunhua, Zhitao L, Hua G, Li L, et al. Analysis of foodborne diseases outbreak surveillance in China's Mainland 2023. Chin J Food Hygiene. (2024) 36:1199–208.
7. Yingying O, chenrui G, shiyu D, Qin Z, Jingjing L, Chi Z, et al. Analysis of epidemiological characteristics of poisonous mushroompoisoning in Hubei Province from 2021 to 2023. Chinese J Food Hygiene. (2024) 36:951–4.
8. Shu Z, Yajuan Z, Yafang W, Jigui T, lin L, Lili Z, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of toadstool poisoning in Guizhou Province from 2011 to 2021. Chin J Food Hygiene. (2023) 35:946–9.
9. Mengmeng S, Yuli P, Yuyan J. Analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of mushroom poisoning events in Guangxi from 2015 to 2020. Chin J Food Hyg. (2022) 34:611–3.
10. Giusti A, Ricci E, Gasperetti L, Galgani M, Polidori L, Verdigi F, et al. Molecular identification of mushroom species in Italy: an ongoing project aimed at reinforcing the control measures of an increasingly appreciated sustainable food. Sustainability. (2020) 13:238. doi: 10.3390/su13010238
11. Peintner U, Schwarz S, Mešić A, Moreau P-A, Moreno G, Saviuc P. Mycophilic or mycophobic? Legislation and guidelines on wild mushroom commerce reveal different consumption behaviour in European Countries. PloS one. (2013) 8:e63926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063926
12. Gold JA, Kiernan E, Yeh M, Jackson BR, Benedict K. Health care utilization and outcomes associated with accidental poisonous mushroom ingestions—United States, 2016–2018. MMWR Morbidity Mortal Wkly Rep. (2021) 70:337–341. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7010a1
13. Xiangwei S, Yun W, Shuran Y, Zixin P. Analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of toadstool poisonincevents and prevention strategies in Enshi Tujia & Miao Autonomousprefecture, Hubei Province from 2015 to 2021. Chin J Food Hyg. (2022) 34:1095–9.
14. Weiwei S, Jikai L, Jian W, Jijun L, Junhua L, Yue D, et al. Analysis of rural banquet foodborne disease outbreaks in China from 2010 to 2020. Chin J Food Hyg. (2023) 35:915–21.
15. Vişneci EF, Acar D, Özdamar EN, Güven M, Patat M. Mushroom poisoning cases from an emergency department in central anatolia: comparison and evaluation of wild and cultivated mushroom poisoning. Eurasian J Emerg Med. (2019) 18:28–33. doi: 10.4274/eajem.galenos.2018.35220
16. Linjing L, Gaoyang L, Qiutao X. Research progress on poisonous mushroom toxins classification and recognition. Chin J Food Hyg. (2013) 25:383–7.
17. Gummin DD, Mowry JB, Beuhler MC, Spyker DA, Rivers LJ, Feldman R, et al. 2022 Annual Report of the National Poison Data System®(Npds) from America' s Poison Centers®: 40th Annual Report. Clin Toxicol. (2023) 61:717–939. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2023.2268981
18. Zhongqiu L, Guangliang H, Chengye S, Xiaorong C, Haijiao L, Xuezhong Y. Chinese clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of mushroompoisoning. Chinese Journal of Food Hygiene. (2019) 20:583–98.
19. Nordt SP, Manoguerra A, Clark RF. 5-Year analysis of mushroom exposures in California. West J Med. (2000) 173:314. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.173.5.314
20. Cassidy N, Duggan E, Tracey JA. Mushroom poisoning in Ireland: the collaboration between the national poisons information centre and expert mycologists. Clin Toxicol. (2011) 49:171–6. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2011.560854
21. Gawlikowski T, Romek M, Satora L. Edible mushroom-related poisoning: a study on circumstances of mushroom collection, transport, and storage. Human Exp Toxicol. (2015) 34:718–24. doi: 10.1177/0960327114557901
23. Green LR, Radke V, Mason R, Bushnell L, Reimann DW, Mack JC, et al. Factors related to food worker hand hygiene practices. J Food Prot. (2007) 70:661–6. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-70.3.661
24. York VK, Brannon LA, Shanklin CW, Roberts KR, Barrett BB, Howells AD. Intervention improves restaurant employees' food safety compliance rates. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. (2009) 21:459–78. doi: 10.1108/09596110910955703
25. Zanin LM, da Cunha DT, de Rosso VV, Capriles VD, Stedefeldt E. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of food handlers in food safety: an integrative review. Food Res Int. (2017) 100:53–62. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.042
26. Briliana V, Keni K. Memprediksi Niat Wisatawan Memilih street food Menggunakan theory of reasoned action. J Manaj Dan Kewirausahaan. (2022) 6:685–90. doi: 10.24912/jmbk.v6i6.20778
27. Roseman MG, Hoon Kim Y, Zhang Y. A study of consumers' intention to purchase ethnic food when eating at restaurants. J Foodserv Bus Res. (2013) 16:298–312. doi: 10.1080/15378020.2013.810529
28. Wang G-Y, Yueh H-P. Optimistic bias, food safety cognition, and consumer behavior of college students in Taiwan and Mainland China. Foods. (2020) 9:1588. doi: 10.3390/foods9111588
29. Membré JM, Farakos SS, Nauta M. Risk-benefit analysis in food safety and nutrition. Curr Opin Food Sci. (2021) 39:76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2020.12.009
30. Mari S, Tiozzo B, Capozza D, Ravarotto L. Are you cooking your meat enough? The efficacy of the theory of planned behavior in predicting a best practice to prevent salmonellosis. Food Res Int. (2012) 45:1175–83. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.06.028
31. Bai L, Tang J, Yang Y, Gong S. Hygienic food handling intention. an application of the theory of planned behavior in the Chinese cultural context. Food control. (2014) 42:172–80. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.02.008
32. Mullan B, Allom V, Sainsbury K, Monds LA. Examining the predictive utility of an extended theory of planned behaviour model in the context of specific individual safe food-handling. Appetite. (2015) 90:91–8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.033
33. Ruby GE, Abidin UFUZ, Lihan S, Jambari NN, Radu S. Predicting intention on safe food handling among adult consumers: a cross sectional study in Sibu District, Malaysia. Food Control. (2019) 106:106696. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.06.022
34. Ajzen I. Understanding attitudes and predictiing social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (1980).
35. Hosseini Z, Gharghani ZG, Mansoori A, Aghamolaei T, Nasrabadi MM. Application of the theory of reasoned action to promoting breakfast consumption. Med J Islam Repub Iran. (2015) 29:289.
36. Janani V, Annapoorni M. Impact of theory of reasoned action on purchase intention towards organic foods. Quing Int J Commer Manag. (2023) 3:218–26. doi: 10.54368/qijcm.3.2.0017
37. Xiaopeng X, Ying L. Formation mechanism of the purchase intention of green agriculturaproducts from the perspective of consumers' perception:based on theexpanded model of reasoned action theory. J Chin Agri Univ. (2024) 29:214–27.
38. Yan-qiang L, Gang L. Analysis of user continuity knowledge sharing behavior in network environment: the ratio of Tra, Trb and continuous use theory. Lib Theory and Pract. (2019) 50-55.
39. Harris KJ, Ali F, Ryu K. Foodborne illness outbreaks in restaurants and Patrons' propensity to return. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. (2018) 30:1273–92. doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-12-2016-0672
40. Rodrigues KL, Eves A, das Neves CP, Souto BK, Dos Anjos SJG. The role of optimistic bias in safe food handling behaviours in the food service sector. Food Res Int. (2020) 130:108732. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108732
41. Rezaei R, Mianaji S, Ganjloo A. Factors affecting farmers' intention to engage in on-farm food safety practices in Iran: extending the theory of planned behavior. J Rural Stud. (2018) 60:152–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.04.005
42. Petrovici DA, Paliwoda S. Reasoned action and food choice in a transitional economy. J East-West Bus. (2008) 14:249–70. doi: 10.1080/10669860802530384
43. Boa E. Wild Edible Fungi: a Global Overview of Their Use and Importance to People. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2007).
44. Gurbuz IB. Nongreen revolution: a case study of wild-grown edible mushroom. Environ Sci Pollut Res. (2019) 26:7954–9. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04292-1
45. Racz L, Papp L, Prokai B, Kovacs Z. Trace element determination in cultivated mushrooms: an investigation of manganese, nickel, and cadmium intake in cultivated mushrooms using icp atomic emission. Microchem J. (1996) 54:444–51. doi: 10.1006/mchj.1996.0121
46. Jin-biao L, Tian-yue G. Study on cultural adaptation of livelihood choice among wulingmountain area migrant groups-taking the creative transformation ofindigenous knowledge of mushroom industry in tongren area as an example. Guizhou Ethn Stud. (2024) 45:177–83.
47. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav. (1991) 50:179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
48. Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychol Sci. (2007) 18:429–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
49. Robinson E, Thomas J, Aveyard P, Higgs S. What everyone else is eating: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of informational eating norms on eating behavior. J Acad Nutr Diet. (2014) 114:414–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2013.11.009
50. Berger J, Heath C. Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. J Pers Soc Psychol. (2008) 95:593. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.593
51. Berger J, Rand L. Shifting signals to help health: using identity signaling to reduce risky health behaviors. J Consum Res. (2008) 35:509–18. doi: 10.1086/587632
52. Mollen S, Rimal RN, Ruiter RA, Kok G. Healthy and unhealthy social norms and food selection. Findings from a field-experiment. Appetite. (2013) 65:83–9. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.01.020
53. Christie CD, Chen FS. Vegetarian or meat? Food choice modeling of main dishes occurs outside of awareness. Appetite. (2018) 121:50–4. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.10.036
54. Cialdini RB, Jacobson RP. Influences of social norms on climate change-related behaviors. Curr Opin Behav Sci. (2021) 42:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.01.005
55. Chung ACA, Rimal RNRRN. Social norms: a review. Rev Commun Res. (2016) 4:01–28. doi: 10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.008
56. Hofstede G. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Washington DC: Sage (1984).
57. Fischer AR, Frewer LJ. Consumer familiarity with foods and the perception of risks and benefits. Food Qual Prefer. (2009) 20:576–85. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.06.008
58. Averill JR. A constructivist view of emotion. Theories of Emotion. Amsterdam: Elsevier (1980). p. 305-39. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50018-1
59. Ueland Ø, Gunnlaugsdottir H, Holm F, Kalogeras N, Leino O, Luteijn J, et al. State of the art in benefit–risk analysis: consumer perception. Food Chem Toxicol. (2012) 50:67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.06.006
60. Cardello A. Consumer concerns and expectations about novel food processing technologies: effects on product liking. Appetite. (2003) 40:217–33.
61. Grunert KG. Current issues in the understanding of consumer food choice Trends Food Sci Tech. (2002) 13:275–85. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2244(02)00137-1
62. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Adv Behav Res Therapy. (1978) 1:139–61.
63. Torkzadeh G, Van Dyke TP. Development and validation of an internet self-efficacy scale. Behav Inform Tech. (2001) 20:275–80. doi: 10.1080/01449290110050293
64. Wei R, Lo V-H, Lu H-Y. Reconsidering the relationship between the third-person perception and optimistic bias. Communic Res. (2007) 34:665–84. doi: 10.1177/0093650207307903
65. Dihui M, Ko-ke T, Jinfu Z, Xijian L, Yan C. Epidemiological analysis of mushroom poisoning incidents in Changsha City from 2016 to 2020. Chin J Food Hyg. (2022) 34:5.
66. Hui L, Jinghuan R, Yating W, Xiaoye W, Rui W. Epidemic characteristics analysis for food poisoning events in China, 2018. Chin J Food Hyg. (2022) 34:147–53.
67. Zhitao L, Weiwei S, Jiang Z, Qiang Z, Juanjuan L, Haiyan D, et al. The disease burden of wild mushroom poisoning in Yunnan Province from 2017 to 2021. Chinese Journal of Food Hygiene. (2022) 34:1059–62.
68. Kalashnikov A, Kurdil N, Lutsenko OH, Voytenko H, Bogomol A. Hygienic and toxicological aspects of wild-growing mushroom poisoning (review of literature data and the results of own research). One Health Nutr Probl Ukr. (2019) 51:49–59. doi: 10.33273/2663-9726-2019-51-2-49-59
69. Xun L, Liangsong D, Xiping Y, Wenyan T, Bin L, Hui T. Analysis on the epidemiological characteristics of mushroom poisoning incidents in Chenzhou City from 2016 to 2020. Chin J Food Hyg. (2022) 34:163–7.
70. Rahayu Y, Riyanto A, Wibowo A. Relationship of magic mushroom literation as a drug with abuse it's use as a hallucination. Int J Adv Sci Educ Relig. (2019) 2:27–34. doi: 10.33648/ijoaser.v2i1.25
71. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Publications (2023).
72. Dean M, Lampila P, Shepherd R, Arvola A, Saba A, Vassallo M, et al. Perceived relevance and foods with health-related claims. Food Qual Prefer. (2012) 24:129–35.
73. Menozzi D, Sogari G, Mora C. Explaining vegetable consumption among young adults: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Nutrients. (2015) 7:7633–50. doi: 10.3390/nu7095357
74. Loh Z, Hassan SH. Consumers' attitudes, perceived risks and perceived benefits towards repurchase intention of food truck products. Brit Food J. (2022) 124:1314–32.
75. de Menezes MC, Roux AVD, Lopes ACS. fruit and vegetable intake: influence of perceived food environment and self-efficacy. Appetite. (2018) 127:249–56. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.05.011
76. Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Henseler J, Hair JF. On the emancipation of Pls-Sem: a commentary on rigdon (2012). Long Range Plann. (2014) 47:154–60. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2014.02.007
77. Hair JF Jr, Matthews LM, Matthews RL, Sarstedt M. Pls-Sem or Cb-Sem: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int J Multivar Data Anal. (2017) 1:107–23. doi: 10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
78. Hair JF, Black W, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson (2010).
79. Bagozzi RP. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: A Comment. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. (1981). doi: 10.2307/3150979
80. Bagozzi RP, Fornell C, Larcker DF. Canonical correlation analysis as a special case of a structural relations model. Multi Behav Res. (1981) 16:437–54.
81. Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. When to use and how to report the results of Pls-Sem. Eur Bus Rev. (2019) 31:2–24. doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
82. Hair J, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser V. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (Pls-Sem) an emerging tool in business research. Eur Bus Rev. (2014) 26:106–21. doi: 10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
83. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res. (1981) 18:39–50.
84. Saba A, Messina F. Attitudes towards organic foods and risk/benefit perception associated with pesticides. Food Qual Prefer. (2003) 14:637–45. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00188-X
85. Qiuyan Y, Kun X. Review of wild mushroom poisoning incidents and development of health prevention and control management work. Edible Fungi Chin. (2019) 3.
86. Anderson EN. In: Liu D, editor. The food of China. Nanjing: Jiangsu People's Publishing House (2003).
87. Evans KS, Teisl MF, Lando AM, Liu ST. Risk perceptions and food-handling practices in the home. Food Policy. (2020) 95:101939. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101939
88. Soon JM, Vanany I, Wahab IRA, Hamdan RH, Jamaludin MH. Food safety and evaluation of intention to practice safe eating out measures during COVID-19: cross sectional study in Indonesia and Malaysia. Food Control. (2021) 125:107920.
89. Kurniawan C, Dewi LC, Maulatsih W, Gunadi W. Factors influencing housing purchase decisions of Millennial generation in Indonesia. Int J Manag. (2020) 11.
91. Thaivalappil A, Papadopoulos A, Young I. Intentions to adopt safe food storage practices in older adults: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Brit. Food J. (2020) 122:181–97. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-07-2019-0483
92. Zhang Y, Fan S, Hui H, Zhang N, Li J, Liao L, et al. Privacy protection for open sharing of psychiatric and behavioral research data: ethical considerations and recommendations. Alpha Psychiatry. (2025) 26:38759. doi: 10.31083/AP38759
93. Liu D, Fan S, Huang X, Gu W, Yin Y, Zhang Z, et al. Study protocol: a national cross-sectional study on psychology and behavior investigation of Chinese residents in 2023. Health Care Sci. (2024) 3:475–92. doi: 10.1002/hcs2.125
Keywords: attitude, eating wild mushrooms, perceived benefit, self-efficacy, subjective norms
Citation: Gong F, Zhuang J, Liu H, Li Z, Jia Y, Du J, Huang X and Chen S (2025) Predictors of willingness to eat wild mushrooms: extended theory of reasoned action. Front. Nutr. 12:1553392. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1553392
Received: 07 January 2025; Accepted: 01 May 2025;
Published: 20 May 2025.
Edited by:
Reza Rastmanesh, American Physical Society, United StatesReviewed by:
Dany Yudet Millones-Liza, Peruvian Union University, PeruManuel Escobar-Farfán, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Chile
Copyright © 2025 Gong, Zhuang, Liu, Li, Jia, Du, Huang and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Si Chen, Y2hlbnNpMTk4MzAyQG91dGxvb2suY29t