ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Clinical Nutrition
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1565107
This article is part of the Research TopicMaternal Metabolic Health: From Preconception to PostpartumView all 3 articles
Dietary Patterns and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Comparison of the American Heart Association Diet, Mediterranean Diet and Others
Provisionally accepted- Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) presents a major challenge in reproductive medicine, with lifestyle factors, especially dietary patterns, potentially influencing pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to explore the relationship between adherence to preconception dietary patterns and pregnancy outcomes in women with RPL.The study included 475 women with RPL at Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Participants completed a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to assess adherence to six pre-defined dietary patterns at preconception: the American Heart Association Diet (AHA), Trichopoulou Mediterranean Diet (TMED), Panagiotakos Mediterranean Diet (PMED), Alternate Mediterranean Diet (AMED), Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015), and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH). Pregnancy loss, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), and other adverse pregnancy outcomes(APO) (e.g., preterm birth, low birth weight) were ascertained using medical records.Results: Significant associations were observed between adherence to the AHA diet and reduced risks of pregnancy loss [adjusted RR (95% CI), highest quartile (Q4) vs. lowest quartile (Q1): 0.36 (0.17, 0.78), P-trend = 0.043], GDM [adjusted RR (95% CI), highest quartile (Q4) vs. lowest quartile (Q1): 0.28 (0.10, 0.75), P-trend = 0.006], HDP [adjusted RR (95% CI), highest quartile (Q4) vs. lowest quartile (Q1): 0.12 (0.03, 0.57), P-trend = 0.008], and other adverse pregnancy outcomes [adjusted RR (95% CI), highest quartile (Q4) vs. lowest quartile (Q1): 0.04 (0.01, 0.35), P-trend = 0.001]. Similar associations were found for the AHEI, AMED, and TMED diets regarding pregnancy loss, GDM, and HDP, while the PMED and DASH diets showed no significant associations.Additionally, higher levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and lower energy and fat intake were associated with increased live birth rates Conclusions: Greater adherence to the AHA diet during the preconception period was linked to lower risks of pregnancy loss, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. These findings support the AHA diet for patients with recurrent pregnancy loss, indicating that healthy dietary patterns may improve pregnancy outcomes and highlight the need for further research on their impact on fertility.
Keywords: Recurrent pregnancy loss, Dietary patterns, Adverse pregnancy outcomes, American heart association diet, mediterranean diet, gestational diabetes
Received: 22 Jan 2025; Accepted: 19 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 ,Ma, Li, Li and Liangjing. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Lu Liangjing, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.