ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1594626
The association between dietary obesity-prevention score (DOS) and Type 2 diabetes (T2D): a case-control study
Provisionally accepted- 1Mansoura University, Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt
- 2University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
- 3King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
- 4King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
- 5DY Patil Deemed to be University, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- 6Chitkara Institute of Engineering & Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, Punjab, India
- 7Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
- 8Chaitanya (Deemed to be University), Hanamkonda, Andhra Pradesh, India
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The global prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) continues to rise, with dietary patterns recognized as a major contributing factor in its development. The Dietary Obesity-Prevention Score (DOS) is a validated tool designed to evaluate adherence to dietary behaviors associated with obesity prevention. This case-control study aimed to examine the association between adherence to the DOS and the risk of developing T2D.Method: Participants were recruited from individuals attending medical clinics affiliated with King Khalid University in Abha, Saudi Arabia. The study included adults aged 18 to 60 years, comprising 250 newly diagnosed T2D cases (diagnosed within the past six months) and 250 healthy controls. Dietary intake was carefully assessed using a validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), which covered a comprehensive list of 152 food items. The DOS is a validated index derived from 14 food groups known to be associated with changes in body weight.Results: Participants diagnosed with T2D exhibited significantly higher mean body weight (71.5 kg vs. 65.3 kg) and BMI (29.4 kg/m² vs. 26.2 kg/m²) compared to the control group (p < 0.05).Participants in the highest tertile of the DOS exhibited significantly greater intakes of energy, carbohydrates, various micronutrients, fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and legumes, alongside lower consumption of saturated fatty acids, refined grains, and sugar-sweetened beverages (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed for these dietary components between the case and control groups. Higher adherence to the DOS was linked to a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes. After adjusting for potential confounders-including age, sex, energy intake, education, marital status, waist circumference, Waist-to-height ratio )WHtR(, physical activity, and BMIthose in the highest DOS tertile demonstrated a 42% reduction in the odds of developing T2D compared to individuals in the lowest tertile (OR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.38-0.87; P-trend = 0.038).Discussion: Higher adherence to DOS score associated with a lower risk of T2D among Saudi adults. To validate these findings and clarify the underlying causal mechanisms, further longitudinal studies and randomized controlled trials are warranted.
Keywords: type 2 diabetes, T2D, dietary obesity-prevention score, DOS, case-control
Received: 17 Mar 2025; Accepted: 30 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Abdelgawwad El-Sehrawy, Alharbi, Maashi, Ahmad, Menon, Thakur, Anand and Sahoo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Irfan Ahmad, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.