ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr.

Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1599851

Identification of Optimal Cutoffs for Obesity and Lipid-Related Indices in Screening Activities of Daily Living Disability in Chinese Middle-Aged and Elderly Adults

Provisionally accepted
Jian  JiangJian Jiang1*Shun  LiuShun Liu2Nan  WeiNan Wei2Zhifeng  LinZhifeng Lin2Yiming  HuYiming Hu2Xiaoqi  ChenXiaoqi Chen2Ling  YaoLing Yao2Zhiying  YaoZhiying Yao3Qingquan  ChenQingquan Chen2
  • 1Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China
  • 2Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China
  • 3Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of 13 obesity-and lipid-related indices in screening and predicting activities of daily living (ADL) disability, as well as to determine the optimal cutoffs for these indices in the middle-aged and elderly population in China. Methods: This study was based on cross-sectional data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), which included 4,784 participants aged 45 years and older. Thirteen obesity-and lipid-related indices, including body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), the waist-height ratio (WHtR), the visceral adiposity index (VAI), the body shape index (ABSI), the body roundness index (BRI), the lipid accumulation product (LAP), the conicity index (CI), the Chinese visceral adiposity index (CVAI), the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and its correlation index (TyG-BMI, TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR), were analyzed. Unadjusted and adjusted correlations between these indices and ADL disability were assessed via logistic regression analyses, and the area under the curve (AUC) of each index as a predictor of ADL ability was calculated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to compare the predictive efficacy and determine the optimal cutoff value. Results: After adjustment for confounders, all 13 obesity-and lipid-related indices were independently associated with the risk of ADL disability (p < 0.05). All 13 indices had predictive value for ADL disability according to the ROC analysis (all AUCs > 0.7). The LAP index exhibited the highest predictive efficacy in men (AUC = 0.793, 95% CI: 0.704--0.882, and optimal cutoff = 35.669), and BMI was optimal in women (AUC = 0.721, 95% CI: 0.678--0.765, and optimal cutoff = 26.142). The TyG-BMI performed well in both sexes (men AUC = 0.790, female AUC = 0.720). The risk of ADL disability increased significantly with each unit increase in obesity and lipid indices. Conclusion: All 13 obesity-and lipid-related indices were effective predictors of ADL disability risk in Chinese middle-aged and older adults. LAP and BMI emerged as the best predictors of ADL disability in men and women, respectively. These indices can serve as simple screening tools to identify the risk of ADL disability and facilitate early intervention.

Keywords: Activities of Daily Living, Obesity and lipid-related measurement indices, Cross-Sectional Studies, CHARLS database Activities of daily living, logistic (logit) regression

Received: 25 Mar 2025; Accepted: 19 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jiang, Liu, Wei, Lin, Hu, Chen, Yao, Yao and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jian Jiang, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.