REVIEW article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Clinical Nutrition
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1608558
This article is part of the Research TopicNutrition and Aging: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Address Nutritional Deficiencies and their Impact on Health OutcomesView all 4 articles
Nutrition Literacy Assessment in Older Adults: A Scoping Review of Measurement Tools
Provisionally accepted
- School of Nursing, Yanbian University, Yanji, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Nutritional diseases, common among the elderly, are profoundly affected by nutrition literacy. Nutrition literacy influences dietary habits and behaviors; therefore, developing nutrition literacy is essential for alleviating various illnesses and enhancing quality of life. This study sought to perform a scoping review to find and compare techniques for assessing nutrition literacy in older persons and identify any gaps in this area of scholarship.Materials and methods: A comprehensive search of seven internet databases, including Pubmed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang, China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP), resulting in 1,995 articles. In addition, additional relevant studies were retrieved from the identified articles' references. Ultimately, fourteen publications were included, encompassing a total of twelve nutrition literacy evaluation instruments.Result: The Simplified Nutrition Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ), and Nutrition Literacy Assessment Tool (NLAT) were identified as unidimensional instruments, while the other tools had multidimensional attributes. Of the eleven instruments assessed for reliability, the Portuguese version of the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA Portuguese Version) was validated exclusively for validity, lacking a reliability evaluation. Moreover, the NLAT underwent just reliability testing, with no validity assessment performed. We observed that current assessment tools have shortcomings in terms of cultural appropriateness and need further validation. Most current techniques primarily focus on fundamental nutritional knowledge, overall nutritional status, and dietary choices, providing wideranging applicability. However, the existing assessment tools exhibit limitations regarding their applicability, indicator systems, and assessment content for elderly patients with chronic diseases, inadequately addressing the specific issues associated with these conditions. Conclusion: To address clinical nutritional requirements, it is essential to enhance the cross-cultural validation of tools via multidisciplinary translation teams and adherence to international guidelines, thereby improving their applicability across diverse populations. There is an immediate necessity to develop adaptable and customizable assessment instruments for certain diseases in the senior population. These tools should incorporate indicators of nutritional knowledge relevant to particular diseases, along with dynamic monitoring indicators of nutritional status, to enhance personalized nutritional management support for elderly.
Keywords: older people, Nutrition literacy, Nutritional Status, Assessment tools, Scope review
Received: 09 Apr 2025; Accepted: 26 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ren, Liu, Liu and Jin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Run-hao Jin, School of Nursing, Yanbian University, Yanji, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.