SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Sport and Exercise Nutrition
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1608634
This article is part of the Research TopicEffects and Mechanism of Diet, Exercise and Lifestyle on Eye Health and DiseasesView all articles
Network meta-analysis of the effects of combined exercise and vitamin intervention on insulin resistance and related indicators in patients with type 2 diabetes
Provisionally accepted- 1Kashgar University, Kashgar, China
- 2Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- 3Civil Aviation Flight University of China, Guanghan, Sichuan Province, China
- 4Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of vitamin supplementation, exercise, and their combined interventions on insulin resistance and related outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Additionally, it examined the dose‒response relationships between vitamin dosage, exercise intensity, and improvements in insulin resistance.Methods: Relevant studies investigating the impact of vitamin supplementation and exercise interventions on insulin resistance in T2D patients were systematically retrieved from authoritative domestic and international databases, followed by comprehensive synthesis and analysis.Results: Traditional meta-analyses revealed that both short-term (<12 weeks) and long-term (>12 weeks) interventions significantly improved insulin resistance and related outcomes. The exceptions included vitamin supplementation alone, which did not significantly improve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c); neither exercise alone or vitamin supplementation alone, which failed to significantly reduce fasting blood glucose; and combined exercise interventions, which had no significant effects on insulin levels. All other interventions yielded significant benefits.Network meta-analysis revealed that, compared with the control group, probiotics provided the greatest improvement in insulin resistance. Vitamin D was most effective at improving HbA1c, whereas vitamin C had the strongest effects on fasting blood glucose and insulin indices.Dose-subgroup analysis indicated that vitamin supplementation up to 2000 IU/day most effectively reduced fasting blood glucose (P < 0.01) but had no significant effects on HbA1c or insulin (all P > 0.05). A dosage of 2100–4000 IU/day produced the most pronounced improvements in HbA1c (P < 0.01) and insulin (P < 0.05) but did not significantly affect insulin resistance or fasting blood glucose (all P > 0.05). Supplementation at 4100–7500 IU/day yielded the greatest improvements in insulin resistance (P < 0.01) but had no significant effect on HbA1c (P > 0.05).Exercise interventions with an intensity of ≤4 METs, performed three times per week, significantly improved insulin resistance, HbA1c, and insulin indices. Sessions lasting ≤60 minutes produced optimal benefits for insulin resistance and insulin measures, whereas sessions ≤45 minutes were most effective for HbA1c and fasting blood glucose.
Keywords: type 2 diabetes, Insulin Resistance, vitamin intervention, Exercise Intervention, Network meta-analysis
Received: 09 Apr 2025; Accepted: 21 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Deng, Ji, Kong, Fu, Zhang and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Fangquan Deng, 2952188801@qq.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
