ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Clinical Nutrition
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1609032
This article is part of the Research TopicClinical Nutrition in Newborns and Children with DisabilitiesView all 5 articles
Validity and predictability of Mid-Upper Arm Circumference for nutrition screening in outpatient preschoolers with cerebral palsy
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 2Neonatology department of The Women and Children's Medical Center affiliated with Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- 3Department of Sport Rehabilitation, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
- 4School of Nursing, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China
- 5Division of Birth Cohort Study, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Aim: Evaluating the nutritional status of children with cerebral palsy (CP) is difficult due to spasticity and contractures. Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is a potential screening tool for malnutrition in children with CP, but its effectiveness is unproven. This study aims to provide evidence on the psychometric qualities of MUAC for clinical use and establish optimal cutoffs for preschoolers with CP.Methods: Children with CP aged 12-60 months (n=937) were recruited from 24 hospitals across 13 provinces in China for the cross-sectional study, while those had genetic or metabolic diseases were excluded. Weight, length/height and MUAC were obtained from participants. Weight and length/height were calculated into Z scores by using WHO Anthro software to assess the nutritional status. The sensitivity and specificity of the WHO-recommended MUAC cutoffs were calculated. The Spearman's rank correlation, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Youden Index were conducted to establish the optimal MUAC cutoffs for preschoolers with CP.Results: Compared to Z score cutoffs, WHO-recommended MUAC cutoffs showed high specificity but low sensitivity for malnutrition. MUAC significantly correlated with weight-for-length/height Z score (r=0.606), weight-for-age Z score (r=0.557), length/height-for-age Z score (r=0.276), and BMIfor-age Z score (r=0.575). The optimal MUAC cutoffs for mild, moderate, and severe undernutrition were 15.35cm, 15.05cm, and 14.35cm, respectively; the optimal cutoffs for overweight and obesity were 17.55cm and 20.4cm, respectively.Our study suggests that MUAC is a useful tool for screening the nutritional status of children with CP. However, the WHO-recommended MUAC cut-off may not be suitable for preschool with CP. We estimated that the optimal MUAC cutoffs were 15.35 cm for mild undernutrition, 15.05 cm for moderate undernutrition, and 14.35 cm for severe undernutrition, and 17.55 cm for overweight and 20.4 cm for obesity in preschool with CP.
Keywords: Cerebral Palsy, Malnutrition, undernutrition, Overnutrition, Mid-Upper Arm Circumference, Cutoffs, preschoolers
Received: 09 Apr 2025; Accepted: 21 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhou, Peng, Wei, Zhang, Zhao, Le, Fan, Qiu, Zheng, Lin, Zheng, Ma, Jinling, Lu, Tang, He and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kaishou Xu, Department of Rehabilitation, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.