Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Nutr.

Sec. Food Policy and Economics

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1613236

Estimating the value of an early childhood education nutrition program

Provisionally accepted
Ruchira  MahashabdeRuchira Mahashabde1Allen  M SmtihAllen M Smtih1Taren  SwindleTaren Swindle1Julie  RutledgeJulie Rutledge2Zhang  DongZhang Dong1Jacob  PainterJacob Painter1*
  • 1University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
  • 2Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, Louisiana, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To estimate the cost, effectiveness, and value of the WISE (We Inspire Smart Eating) intervention compared to usual nutrition education (UNE) in Arkansas's Head Start programs participating in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)..A pre-post-study design with non-randomized group assignment was used to compare cost, body mass index (BMI), and fruit and vegetable intake (measured by the Food Frequency Questionnaire, FFQ) among children aged 3-5 between September 2015 and April 2018.Results: Children at WISE sites showed greater increase in FFQ scores (0.29 units; p<0.01) compared to those at UNE sites (0.05 units; p=0.15), with no significant BMI differences between groups. WISE costs $2.16 per child per month, compared to $3.52 for UNE. WISE was both more effective and less expensive 25% of the time, costing $0.26 per 1-unit increase in FFQ scores. The WISE intervention remained favorable even when sites were unwilling to pay for the intervention.WISE promoted healthier diets at a lower cost than UNE, as evidenced by improving FFQ scores. These findings provide insight for decision-makers regarding the intervention's cost, potential savings, and overall value.

Keywords: early childhood nutrition, Nutrition program evaluation, Cost-Effectiveness, childhood health outcomes, Health Economics

Received: 16 Apr 2025; Accepted: 29 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Mahashabde, Smtih, Swindle, Rutledge, Dong and Painter. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jacob Painter, jtpainter@uams.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.