ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Clinical Nutrition
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1617069
Association between inflammation-and nutrition-related indicators and mortality in patients with heart failure: a cohort study
Provisionally accepted- Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective Inflammation and malnutrition are critical in heart failure (HF) progression. This study evaluated the prognostic value of inflammation-and nutrition-related indicators for mortality in HF. Methods Retrospective analysis of 1999–2018 NHANES data (101,316 participants; 1,500 HF patients) assessed indicators including advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI), monocyte-to-albumin ratio (MAR), neutrophil-to-albumin ratio (NAR), red cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio (RAR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), hemoglobin-albumin-lymphocyte-platelet (HALP) score and controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score. Associations with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression, restricted cubic spline, time-dependent ROC, and random survival forest (RSF). Results A total of 1,500 HF patients were included in the final analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that elevated MAR, NAR, RAR, and CONUT scores were linked to higher mortality, whereas elevated ALI, PNI, GNRI, and HALP scores were associated with lower mortality in HF patients. After false discovery rate (FDR) correction, the majority of indicators (including ALI, RAR) remained significantly associated with mortality in multivariable Cox models. Time-dependent ROC analysis demonstrated that RAR exhibited the strongest predictive ability for 1-year all-cause mortality (AUC = 0.768, 95% CI: 0.718–0.819) and cardiovascular mortality (AUC = 0.788, 95% CI: 0.725–0.851). In contrast, ALI showed the best predictive performance for mortality at 3 years (all-cause: AUC = 0.690, 95% CI: 0.654–0.726; cardiovascular: AUC = 0.705, 95% CI: 0.655–0.756), 5 years (all-cause: AUC = 0.679, 95% CI: 0.647–0.711; cardiovascular: AUC = 0.677, 95% CI: 0.633–0.721), and 10 years (all-cause: AUC = 0.691, 95% CI: 0.657–0.725; cardiovascular: AUC = 0.699, 95% CI: 0.656–0.742). These findings were consistent with the C-index results. RSF analysis, validated by an internal hold-out test, consistently identified ALI as a leading predictor of mortality risk. Conclusion Compared with other inflammation-and nutrition-related indicators, RAR and ALI may provide superior predictive value for short-term and long-term mortality risk, respectively, in HF patients.
Keywords: Heart Failure, inflammation- and nutrition-related indicators, Mortality, Nutritional Status, Inflammation
Received: 23 Apr 2025; Accepted: 13 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Fu, Deng, Cai, Zhan and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Hongmin Zhu, zhm0004@163.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.