Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr.

Sec. Clinical Nutrition

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1617930

Prognostic Value of the Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio (NHHR) in Patients With RAS-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Provisionally accepted
Wenxia  XieWenxia Xie*Huizhuo  LiuHuizhuo LiuYunjiao  ShiYunjiao ShiBingxin  ZhangBingxin ZhangRuoyun  WangRuoyun WangShayan  WangShayan WangBin  LiangBin Liang*
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) generally have a poor prognosis, and treatment strategies are highly dependent on the RAS mutational status. During disease progression, patients often exhibit dynamic changes in serum lipid profiles. However, the prognostic significance of cholesterol-related biomarkers remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the association between the non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (NHHR) and clinical outcomes in patients with RAS-mutant mCRC. Methods: This retrospective study included 169 RAS-mutant mCRC patients, all of whom received at least three cycles of chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab. Pearson's correlation coefficient and Spearman's rank correlation test were used to assess the relationships between continuous variables. The optimal cutoff value for the NHHR was determined using the maximum selection rank statistic, categorizing patients into high and low NHHR groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess survival in the high and low NHHR groups, with differences between groups compared using the log-rank test. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) were employed to analyze the nonlinear relationship between NHHR and mortality risk. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess the independence of NHHR in predicting survival outcomes, with stepwise adjustment for confounders and stratified analysis. A nomogram was constructed based on the final model. Results: After adjusting for confounders, the high NHHR group (>3.45) had a significantly higher mortality risk than the low NHHR group (HR=2.23, 95% CI: 1.46-3.40, p<0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed a stronger association in female patients (female, HR= 4.24, 95%CI: 1.85-9.71; male, HR= 1.72, 95%CI: 1.09-2.73; P for interaction = 0.037). The RCS analysis showed a linear increase in mortality risk with increasing NHHR (P for overall P<0.001, P for nonlinearity = 0.090). NHHR showed significant positive correlations with white blood cells, monocytes, neutrophils, fibrinogen, CA199, and CEA (all P < 0.05), and significant negative correlations with albumin, sodium, and chloride (all P < 0.05). The nomogram demonstrated robust predictive performance. Conclusion: NHHR may serve as a potential prognostic biomarker in patients with RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. Its putative role in promoting tumor progression through modulation of chronic inflammation warrants further investigation.

Keywords: Metastatic colorectal cancer, Non-HDL-C/HDL-C, NHHR, prognosis, RAS-mutant

Received: 25 Apr 2025; Accepted: 13 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Xie, Liu, Shi, Zhang, Wang, Wang and Liang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Wenxia Xie, 13587618358@163.com
Bin Liang, liangbin1992@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.