Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr.

Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1619613

Association Between Life's Crucial 9 and Sarcopenia: Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate as a Key Mediator

Provisionally accepted
Xialian  TangXialian Tang1Bin  LiBin Li1Dexin  LiDexin Li2Yingji  WangYingji Wang3*
  • 1Department of Geriatric Endocrinology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu City, China
  • 2Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu City, China
  • 3Department of Geriatric medical center, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China., Chengdu City, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Studies indicate an association between cardiovascular health and sarcopenia (SP). Insulin resistance is significantly linked to both cardiovascular disease and diabetes. The estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), a reliable marker of insulin sensitivity, has an unclear relationship with SP, yet it may hold predictive value. Methods: Data from 7,769 participants in the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2018 were analyzed. All analyses incorporated appropriate NHANES sampling weights, primary sampling units (PSUs), and stratification variables to ensure national representativeness and correct variance estimation. Multivariate logistic regression, restricted cubic splines (RCS) with specified knot placement, subgroup analyses with multiple comparison corrections, and mediation analysis were employed to examine the association between LC9 and SP prevalence. Mediation analysis was conducted to evaluate the role of eGDR levels in the LC9-SP relationship. Results: Among the 7,769 participants, 647 had sarcopenia. In crude models, each 10-point increase in LC9 was associated with a 4.9% decrease in sarcopenia odds (OR: 0.951, p<0.001). Similarly, each 1-unit increase in eGDR was associated with a 26.5% decrease in the odds of sarcopenia (OR: 0.735, p<0.001). However, after adjusting for all covariates including BMI, this association became non-significant (OR: 0.994, p=0.282). Compared to the lowest tertile, participants in the highest tertiles of LC9 and eGDR had significantly lower odds of SP, with reductions of 83.4% (p < 0.001) and 86.0% (p < 0.001), respectively. RCS and threshold effect analysis revealed a non-linear relationship between LC9 and SP risk, with an inflection point identified at LC9 = 73.33. Mediation analysis indicated that eGDR partially mediated the association between LC9 and SP, accounting for 48.5% of the total effect (p < 0.001). Conclusion: In crude models, an inverse association was observed between LC9 and sarcopenia prevalence in US adults. However, this association became non-significant after full adjustment including BMI. The estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) showed statistical mediation of this relationship.

Keywords: NHANES, Life's Crucial 9, Estimated glucose disposal rate, Sarcopenia, Insulin Resistance, Mediation analysis

Received: 28 Apr 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Tang, Li, Li and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Yingji Wang, wyj2662@qq.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.