ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Nutrition and Metabolism
Common genetic polymorphisms define one-carbon metabolite response to different forms of choline in healthy adult males
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
- 2Department of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Responsiveness to nutrients can be determined by many types of variations including single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Choline is an essential nutrient critical for proper organ function and exists in different forms such as free choline or as derivatives including phosphatidylcholine (PC). Although genetic variations in genes encoding enzymes that influence choline metabolism have been identified, little is known regarding individual responses to free choline and PC in relation to SNPs. Here, we determined the effect of different forms of choline, genotype and their interaction on one-carbon metabolite concentrations in urine, which has utility in capturing the overall change in choline metabolism. Methods: A randomized, double-blinded, crossover study was conducted in healthy adult males (n=37) who were provided with a standardized meal containing 600 mg choline either as choline bitartrate (CB) or PC, or no choline (NC) control. Urine was collected at study baseline and pooled throughout the 6-h study duration. Choline dehydrogenase (CHDH) rs12676, betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase (BHMT) rs3733890, choline kinase alpha (CHKA) rs10791957 and phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT) rs4646343 were genotyped. Results: There was a main treatment effect for urinary choline change from baseline reflective of differences in absorption by free choline versus PC (p<0.01). A reduction in responsiveness to CB was found with genetic variations in CHDH rs12676 manifested as lower choline oxidation (p<0.05) and downstream pathways in the methionine cycle (p<0.01) whereas a reduction in responsiveness to PC occurred with genetic variations in BHMT rs3733890 (p<0.05). Genetic variations in CHKA rs10791957 and PEMT rs4646343 reflected differences in the partitioning of choline in response to CB and PC (p<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that groups with accumulated number of effect This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article alleles across all SNPs have contrasting responses to CB and PC that deviate from the patterns derived from treatment effect alone (p<0.05). Conclusion:Unique metabolite signatures in one-carbon metabolism arise in response to supplemental intake of different forms of choline driven by genetic variations that regulate choline homeostasis. Our findings highlight the importance of nutrient-gene interactions in deciphering the complexity of individual metabolic responses supporting the emerging concept of precision nutrition.
Keywords: Choline, Phosphatidylcholine, Single nucleotide polymorphisms, One-carbonmetabolism, multivariate analysis
Received: 02 May 2025; Accepted: 05 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Butt, Dong, Shelp, Poole, Keathley, Marica and Cho. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Clara E Cho, claracho@uoguelph.ca
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
