Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr.

Sec. Clinical Nutrition

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1639230

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Role of Nutrition in Enhancing Surgical Recovery and OutcomesView all 4 articles

Construction of a risk prediction model for postoperative pneumonia based on the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and analysis of related factors in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage Author information

Provisionally accepted
Luo  LiLuo Li1,2*Tingxuan  WangTingxuan Wang3Haitao  WuHaitao Wu3Yue  BaoYue Bao2Bin  LuBin Lu2*
  • 1Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, China
  • 2青岛市市立医院, 青岛市, China
  • 3青岛大学, 青岛市, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is a common complication following hematoma extraction in patients with cerebral hemorrhage, contributing to poor prognosis. Prognostic nutritional index (PNI), a composite index combining serum albumin (a marker of nutritional status) and lymphocyte count (a marker of immune function), reflects both nutritional reserve and immune competence. Impaired nutritional status and immune dysfunction are key drivers of postoperative infections, making PNI a theoretically plausible indicator for predicting POP. This study aimed to explore the relationship between POP and nutritional indices (with a focus on PNI) after hematoma clearance and to develop a predictive model for POP. Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on 325 patients who underwent hematoma removal, including 133 patients diagnosed with POP. The PNI was calculated using the formula: PNI = 5 × lymphocyte count (×10⁹/L) + serum albumin (g/L).Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for POP. The performance of the predictive model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), internal validation, and visualization via a Nomogram. Results: Significant POP risk factors: low PNI (P<0.001, OR=0.84, 95%CI 0.77-0.90), hypoproteinemia (P=0.008, OR=2.91), low admission GCS (P=0.009, OR=2.92), tracheotomy (P=0.002, OR=3.92), and obstructive lung diseases (P=0.014, OR=4.22). The model (incorporating these factors) had an AUC of 0.87, passed validation, and was visualized as a Nomogram. This is the first identification of PNI as a POP risk factor in this population. Conclusion: The predictive model, which integrates PNI and four other clinical factors, demonstrates favorable discriminative ability in identifying patients at high risk of POP following hematoma extraction for cerebral hemorrhage. By quantifying the risk of POP preoperatively, this model can assist clinicians in stratifying patients, prioritizing targeted preventive interventions (such as nutritional optimization or respiratory care) for high-risk individuals, and thereby contributing to the reduction of postoperative complications.

Keywords: Cerebral Hemorrhage, Postoperative pneumonia, Nutritional index, Prognostic nutritional index, Prediction model Cerebral hemorrhage, Prediction model

Received: 01 Jun 2025; Accepted: 02 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li, Wang, Wu, Bao and Lu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Luo Li, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University Medical College, Qingdao, China
Bin Lu, 青岛市市立医院, 青岛市, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.