- 1Faculty of Sports Sciences, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Türkiye
- 2Department of Physical Education, School of Sport Sciences, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- 3Faculty of Sports Sciences, Bandirma Onyedi Eylül University, Balikesir, Türkiye
- 4Department of Movement Sciences and Sports Training, School of Sport Sciences, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- 5Faculty of Sports Sciences, Tekirdağ Namik Kemal University, Tekirdağ, Türkiye
Introduction: This study aimed to examine the relationship between caffeine use disorder and attitudes toward healthy nutrition in relation to individuals' body mass index (BMI) and physical activity levels. It also explored the influence of sociodemographic variables such as age, gender, marital status, and education level.
Methods: Data were collected from 509 adults who completed three instruments: the Caffeine Use Disorder Questionnaire (CUDQ), the Attitudes Scale for Healthy Nutrition (ASHN), and a demographic and behavioral survey. BMI was calculated from self-reported height and weight, and participants were classified according to WHO guidelines (underweight, normal, overweight, and obese). Physical activity level was self-reported and categorized as sedentary (0 days/week), low (1–2 days/week), moderate (3–4 days/week), and high (5+ days/week). Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson correlation analyses were conducted using SPSS 25.
Results: Statistically significant differences were found in ASHN scores based on gender (p = 0.010), marital status (p < 0.001), education level (p < 0.001), BMI category (p < 0.001), and physical activity frequency (p < 0.001). Women and married individuals exhibited more positive emotional and behavioral nutrition attitudes. Higher education and physical activity levels were associated with improved attitudes across all ASHN subdimensions. CUDQ scores were higher among participants with high physical activity (p < 0.05) but significantly lower among those classified as obese (p < 0.001). Negative correlations were identified between CUDQ scores and ASHN total (r = −0.20), positive nutrition (r = −0.20), and malnutrition (r = −0.23).
Discussion: The findings highlight the role of demographic and lifestyle factors in shaping caffeine consumption patterns and nutritional attitudes. Public health strategies should consider these variables when developing dietary and stimulant-use interventions. Promoting healthy nutrition and responsible caffeine consumption particularly among physically active individuals may enhance long-term health and behavioral outcomes.
Introduction
Caffeine, as one of the most extensively consumed psychoactive substances worldwide, plays a significant role in modern dietary and behavioral patterns (1, 2). Naturally found in coffee, tea, and cocoa, and increasingly present in processed beverages such as energy drinks and sodas, caffeine's widespread use has prompted substantial interest in its physiological and psychological effects (3, 4). Its stimulant effects can increase mental alertness, reduce fatigue, and enhance performance in a wide range of cognitive and physical tasks (5, 6). However, when people drink too much caffeine or do it too often, it can have harmful effects, such as trouble sleeping, stomach problems, anxiety, a fast heart rate, and mental dependence (1, 7, 8). These maladaptive patterns of use have been formalized under the emerging clinical construct of Caffeine Use Disorder (CUD), a classification that underscores caffeine's capacity to disrupt normal functioning in certain individuals (9–11).
Parallel to the increasing concerns over excessive stimulant use is the global emphasis on healthy dietary behaviors, foundational to preventing chronic diseases and enhancing the quality of life (12, 13). Similarly, the use of performance-enhancing substances, such as anabolic steroids, is influenced by knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral factors, highlighting the role of psychosocial determinants in shaping health-related practices (77). Proper nutrition, which provides balanced intake of macro- and micronutrients, is fundamental not only for athletes but for the general population as well, and is a cornerstone of maintaining health and preventing disease (14). Healthy eating is not solely dependent on food choices; it encompasses a broader psychosocial construct that includes beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, emotions, and behavioral consistency toward nutrition (15–17). Empirical evidence shows that sports nutrition knowledge plays a significant role in shaping food habits, with higher levels of knowledge predicting healthier dietary choices (18).The attitudes individuals hold are critical in shaping dietary behaviors (19).The attitudes individuals hold regarding nutrition such as valuing balanced meals, understanding nutritional content, and experiencing positive or negative emotional reactions to food are critical predictors of dietary adherence (20–22). These attitudes also increase the likelihood of adopting unhealthy eating habits, such as eating when upset, following a strict diet, or compulsively consuming foods high in sugar, fat, or stimulants (23–25).
Understanding the complexity of eating attitudes requires considering the influence of biological and behavioral determinants, notably Body Mass Index (BMI) and physical activity level. BMI, which reflects body composition and weight categorization, has been widely associated with dietary habits, psychological wellbeing, and metabolic risk profiles (26–28). Recent evidence indicates that dietary intake, including added sugars, salt, and oils, can significantly influence BMI and body composition, even among physically active populations (29, 30). People with different BMIs often have different thoughts and feelings about food (31–33). Research indicates that nutrition knowledge, even when moderate or variable, plays a significant role in influencing dietary habits and promoting healthy body composition, regardless of BMI or training experience (76). For example, people who are overweight or obese may feel more dietary restraint or dissatisfaction. This tendency may be associated with behaviors such as higher caffeine consumption for appetite suppression or energy (2, 34). People with a lower BMI, on the other hand, may drink coffee for different reasons, like habit, taste, or the need to focus (35, 36). Physical activity is also an important part of health attitudes and behaviors. Health enhances cognitive function, reduces stress levels, and supports better regulation of eating behaviors (37, 38). However, it is challenging to understand the connection between caffeine use and exercise. On the one hand, physically active individuals may demonstrate a stronger orientation toward health-promoting behaviors, including healthier dietary choices and reduced intake of harmful substances (39, 40). On the other hand, caffeine may be strategically used in physically active populations for its ergogenic benefits, suggesting that increased physical activity does not necessarily equate to reduced caffeine dependency (41–43).
Because of changes in modern lifestyles that include sedentary behaviors, dietary imbalances, and too much caffeine, the intersection of caffeine use disorder, healthy eating attitudes, BMI, and physical activity is a critical area of research (44–46). In this context, eHealth interventions have gained attention as promising tools to promote both physical activity and healthy dietary intake, highlighting their potential role in preventing chronic diseases and supporting healthier lifestyles (47).These factors may not work alone; they may affect each other in larger models of health behavior that include biological predispositions, lifestyle habits, and mental frameworks. Furthermore, these interactions may be influenced by sociocultural and demographic variables such as gender roles, educational background, and familial or occupational stress, which shape how individuals relate to food and stimulants. Despite the salience of these variables in health psychology and nutritional science, few academic investigations have holistically addressed the interdependence of caffeine use tendencies and nutritional attitudes within the framework of physical health indicators, such as BMI and physical activity. A comprehensive understanding of these connections is essential for informing the design of integrated health interventions, guiding public health messaging, and refining clinical strategies for behavioral risk reduction. By situating caffeine consumption within the broader context of lifestyle and attitudes, it becomes possible to explore the prevalence of maladaptive habits and the psychological and physiological mechanisms that sustain them.
Accordingly, the present study aims to examine the nuanced relationships among caffeine use disorder, attitudes toward healthy eating, body mass index, and physical activity level. These variables are not viewed in isolation, but rather as components of a dynamic system that influences individual health outcomes and behavioral consistency. Investigating these associations contributes to a deeper understanding of how cognitive, emotional, and physiological processes interplay in shaping modern health behaviors and, ultimately, offers insights into developing multidimensional strategies for promoting sustainable wellbeing.
Method
Model
This study is descriptive research conducted using a correlational survey model. It aims to examine the relationship between individuals' caffeine use disorder and their attitudes toward healthy eating in relation to their physical activity level and BMI. Although correlational studies do not provide definitive evidence of causality, it is possible to make causal inferences using advanced statistical techniques in such research (48). The conceptual framework of the study is presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Visual representation of the methodological framework used to examine the relationship between caffeine use disorder, nutritional attitudes, BMI, and physical activity.
Study group
The study group was formed using a convenience sampling method, which is often preferred in research requiring rapid data collection (49). A total of 509 adult participants aged 18 years and older were recruited. Inclusion criteria required voluntary participation and the ability to complete an online survey. Data were collected using an online form, which included demographic questions (age, gender, marital status, and education), body mass index (BMI), and physical activity level. The demographic characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1.
Data collection tools
Caffeine Use Disorder Questionnaire (CUDQ)
The Caffeine Use Disorder Questionnaire (CUDQ), originally developed by Agoston et al. and adapted into Turkish by Kaya et al. (50), evaluates symptoms related to problematic caffeine use in individuals aged 18 and older. The scale consists of 10 items scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 4 (very often), with no reverse-coded items. The total score ranges from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating a more severe caffeine use disorder. Items assess various aspects such as repeated unsuccessful attempts to cut down on caffeine, tolerance, withdrawal symptoms, continued use despite physical or psychological problems, and interference with daily life activities. The Turkish adaptation of the scale demonstrated strong psychometric properties, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86 indicating high internal consistency and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.83 indicating strong test-retest reliability. The results of confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensional structure of the scale, with fit indices indicating good model fit (χ2/df = 0.54, RMSEA = 0.08, CFI = 1.00, NFI = 1.00, GFI = 0.99, AGFI = 0.99, TLI = 1.00, NNFI = 1.00, RFI = 0.98). These results suggest that the CUDQ is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing caffeine use disorders in Turkish-speaking populations.
Attitude Scale for Healthy Nutrition (ASHN)
The Attitude Scale for Healthy Nutrition (ASHN) was developed by Tekkurşun Demir and Cicioglu (51) to assess individuals' attitudes toward healthy nutrition. The scale consists of 21 items grouped under four dimensions: Information on Nutrition (IN)—items 1 to 5; Emotion for Nutrition (EN)—items 6 to 11; Positive Nutrition (PN)—items 12 to 16; and Malnutrition (MP)—items 17 to 21. Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “Strongly Disagree” to “Strongly Agree”. Positive items are scored from 1 to 5, whereas negative items are reverse-coded from 5 to 1. The lowest total score is 21, and the highest is 105. Scores are interpreted as follows: 21 = very low attitude, 23–42 = low, 43–63 = moderate, 64–84 = high, and 85–105 = ideally high attitude toward healthy eating. Internal consistency coefficients for the subscales were calculated as follows: IN = 0.90, EN = 0.84, PN = 0.75, and MP = 0.83. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the scale had acceptable fit indices: χ2/df = 1.71, RMSEA = 0.04, PGFI = 0.74, PNFI = 0.82, GFI = 0.92, AGFI = 0.90, IFI = 0.98, NFI = 0.95, and CFI = 0.98. These results indicate that the ASHN is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring healthy eating attitudes.
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated from self-reported height and weight using the standard formula.
Participants were categorized as underweight (< 18.5), normal weight (18.5–24.9), overweight (25.0–29.9), or obese (≥30.0) (52). These categories allowed comparisons of caffeine use and nutrition attitudes across BMI groups. BMI was also used to test whether differences existed in caffeine use disorder and nutrition attitudes between weight groups.
Physical activity level
Physical activity level was assessed using a frequency-based self-report question to capture participants' routine engagement in physical activity. This approach relied on a single-item self-report rather than a validated multi-item questionnaire, which should be taken into consideration when interpreting the findings. Respondents were asked: “During the past 7 days, on how many days did you perform any physical activity (e.g., walking, running, sports, or exercise) for at least 30 min per day?” Based on their answers, participants were classified into four categories: sedentary (no activity in the past week), low activity level (1–2 days), moderate activity level (3–4 days), and high activity level (5 or more days per week). These classifications are consistent with established public health and exercise science guidelines and are commonly used to estimate physical activity levels and their associations with physical and mental health outcomes (53–56). This categorization enabled the comparison of caffeine use disorder scores and healthy eating attitudes across different physical activity levels.
Data analysis
Before analysis, the dataset was examined for entry errors, outliers, normality, and multicollinearity. No data entry errors were detected. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25. To assess the normality of the distribution, the Shapiro-Wilk test, as well as the values for skewness and kurtosis, were evaluated. The data were found to be normally distributed (p > 0.05). Independent samples t-tests were conducted for comparisons between two groups, while one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparisons involving more than two groups. For post hoc analyses, the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test was selected due to its sensitivity in detecting group differences in exploratory research. However, we acknowledge that more conservative corrections, such as Bonferroni, could reduce the risk of Type I error, and this limitation is noted. The relationships between variables were assessed using the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Ethical considerations
Prior to the commencement of the study, ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Social and Human Sciences at Istanbul Aydin University (Decision No: 2025/3, dated March 20, 2025). The committee reviewed all relevant documents and approved the research by institutional and international ethical standards for human subjects research. Participation in the study was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all individuals. The confidentiality of participants and data integrity were upheld throughout the research process.
Findings
Of the 509 participants, 39.3% (n = 200) were female and 60.7% (n = 309) were male. Regarding education level, 57.2% (n = 291) were high school graduates, 26.1% (n = 133) had undergraduate degrees, and 16.7% (n = 85) had postgraduate education. In terms of marital status, 65% (n = 331) were single and 35% (n = 178) were married. The mean age of participants was 29.5 years.
As shown in Table 2, females scored higher on EN, while males scored higher on MP (p < 0.05); no significant gender differences were observed for CUDQ, ASHN, IN, or PN.
Table 2. Independent samples t-test results for caffeine use disorder and healthy eating attitude scores by gender.
As shown in Table 3, significant differences were observed in ASHN total, EN, and MP scores in favor of married individuals (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found between marital status and CUDQ, IN, or PN scores (p > 0.05).
As shown in Table 4, no significant difference was found between CUDQ total scores and educational level (p > 0.05), suggesting that education level is not a determining factor in caffeine use disorder. However, significant differences were observed in ASHN total, IN, EN, PN, and MP scores across educational levels (p < 0.05). According to the results of the LSD test, it was determined that for all parameters where a significant difference occurred, healthy eating attitudes increased in parallel with higher educational attainment.
As shown in Table 5, a significant difference was found between CUDQ total scores and BMI categories (p < 0.05). According to the LSD test results, obese individuals had lower CUDQ scores compared to underweight, normal weight, and overweight individuals. Additionally, significant differences were observed in ASHN total, EN, PN, and MP scores across BMI groups (p < 0.05). The LSD test indicated that for all parameters with significant differences, higher BMI was associated with higher scores. However, no significant difference was found between IN scores and BMI categories (p > 0.05).
As shown in Table 6, a significant difference was found between CUDQ total scores and physical activity frequency (p < 0.05). According to the LSD test results, individuals who did not engage in any physical activity had lower CUDQ scores compared to those with low, moderate, and high activity levels. Additionally, significant differences were observed in ASHN total, IN, PN, and MP scores across physical activity groups (p < 0.05). The LSD results indicated that participants with high physical activity frequency had higher scores than those with no, low, or moderate physical activity levels. However, no significant difference was found between EN scores and physical activity participation (p > 0.05).
As shown in Table 7, positive and significant correlations were found between age and ASHN total (r = 0.24), EN (r = 0.39), PN (r = 0.11), and MP (r = 0.14) scores (p < 0.01). These results suggest that as age increases, individuals tend to exhibit more favorable attitudes in these dimensions. However, no significant relationship was observed between age and CUDQ or IN scores (p > 0.05).
As shown in Table 8, significant negative correlations were observed between CUDQ total scores and ASHN total (r = −0.20), PN (r = −0.20), and MP (r = −0.23) (p < 0.01). These findings suggest that as CUDQ scores increase, indicating more severe caffeine use disorder, individuals exhibit lower healthy eating attitudes and behaviors. No significant correlations were found between CUDQ and IN (r = −0.06) or EN (r = −0.05) scores (p > 0.05).
Discussion
The findings of this study reveal a complex interplay between caffeine use disorder, attitudes toward healthy eating, BMI, and physical activity levels. Rather than acting independently, these variables are linked through shared behavioral, physiological, and lifestyle pathways.
One of the most important things this study found is that participants who have caffeine use disorder are less likely to have healthy eating attitudes, especially when it comes to behavioral subdimensions like positive nutrition and negative eating habits. Individuals with higher caffeine dependence were more likely to engage in unhealthy dietary behaviors and showed reduced adherence to health-promoting practices. Interestingly, no significant associations were observed between caffeine use and nutritional knowledge or emotional attitudes toward food. The results suggest that high caffeine use is not necessarily a result of ignorance or a lack of information, but rather a behavioral tendency that coexists with inconsistent or unregulated eating patterns (57, 58).
The role of BMI in shaping both caffeine consumption and nutritional attitudes emerged as a critical dimension of the study. Participants who were overweight or obese showed fewer signs of caffeine use disorder but had more positive attitudes toward eating healthy. This pattern should be interpreted with caution. It may reflect greater health awareness and medical follow-up among individuals with higher BMI. However, alternative explanations are also possible, including reverse causality (health concerns prompting better-reported attitudes), social desirability bias in self-reporting, and unmeasured confounding factors such as comorbid conditions. Another possibility is that reported attitudes toward healthy eating may not fully correspond with actual dietary practices, reflecting the complexity of the relationship between perceptions of nutrition and body weight. These results indicate that a positive attitude toward healthy eating does not necessarily correspond with lower body weight. Instead, healthy eating attitudes should be considered separately from an individual's appearance or BMI (59, 60).
Higher activity levels were associated with more favorable attitudes toward nutrition, particularly in dietary knowledge and positive behavior. These findings support the view that health behaviors often co-occur and that physically active individuals are more likely to eat consciously and in a balanced manner (61–63).In our study, participants with higher physical activity levels also reported elevated CUDQ scores. This result is consistent with previous research, which has shown that physically active individuals often consume caffeine for functional or ergogenic purposes, such as enhancing endurance, concentration, or perceived energy (64, 65). However, because our study did not directly assess motivations for caffeine use, these interpretations should be considered with caution. It is plausible that those who exercise frequently use caffeine strategically to boost energy or concentration before workouts, which may elevate their scores on caffeine use assessments without necessarily indicating problematic usage (43, 65, 66).
There were also significant differences between men and women. Women were much more likely than men to have positive feelings about healthy eating, while men were more likely to have bad eating habits. These findings may reflect broader differences in health consciousness, emotional engagement with food, or cultural expectations. Such differences highlight the importance of designing gender-sensitive health education programs that account for varying motivations and behavioral patterns (67–69). Marital status plays a meaningful role in shaping nutritional attitudes. Marital status appears to influence dietary behavior, with married individuals often demonstrating stronger emotional and behavioral alignment toward healthy eating (70–72). These results suggest that relational and social factors are protective in sustaining positive eating behavior. Educational attainment is consistently linked to stronger nutritional attitudes, highlighting the role of education in fostering knowledge and self-regulation. Participants with higher levels of education consistently reported greater knowledge about food, stronger emotional alignment with healthy eating, and more positive behavioral choices. This highlights the importance of education in developing cognitive resources and self-regulation in health-related behaviors (73–75). Age tends to shape attitudes toward nutrition, with older adults often placing greater emphasis on healthy eating, likely due to health concerns and life priorities. This may reflect a natural progression in which individuals emphasize their health more, especially as they encounter age-related physiological changes or responsibilities that shift priorities toward wellness. Interestingly, no significant correlation was found between age and caffeine use disorder, suggesting that caffeine-related behaviors may be more deeply ingrained and less subject to change over time (9, 44).
Finally, while nutritional knowledge was relatively stable across different levels of caffeine use, the key insight here is that awareness alone does not necessarily lead to healthier behavior (76, 78). Participants may possess sufficient information but fail to act due to lifestyle constraints, emotional triggers, or habit-based consumption. This finding underscores the importance of addressing knowledge gaps and motivational and environmental factors that influence food and stimulant choices. In sum, the results of this study reinforce the idea that caffeine use disorder, dietary attitudes, physical activity, and BMI are interconnected components of a broader health behavior matrix. Their interaction reflects a web of biological, psychological, and social influences that must be considered holistically when developing health promotion strategies.
Study limitations
This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, as a correlational study, it does not establish causality but rather highlights associations that warrant further longitudinal investigation. Second, the use of a convenience sampling method limits the generalizability of the findings, as voluntary participation may have led to an over-representation of more health-conscious individuals, introducing potential selection bias. Third, BMI and physical activity levels were based on self-reported measures, which are subject to recall errors and social desirability bias, potentially resulting in misclassification. These limitations should be taken into account when interpreting the results.
Conclusion
This study looked at how caffeine use disorder, healthy eating attitudes, BMI, and levels of physical activity are all connected. The results show that people who consume more caffeine tend to have worse eating habits, especially in terms of the behavioral aspects of nutrition. However, their knowledge about nutrition and feelings about food do not change. People with a higher BMI had better attitudes toward healthy eating but drank less caffeine. This suggests that they were more aware of what they were eating and did not need stimulants to do so. Physically active participants demonstrated stronger nutritional attitudes, yet reported higher caffeine use, likely reflecting functional consumption for energy or performance enhancement. Sociodemographic variables, including gender, marital status, education, and age, also had an influence. Women, married individuals, and those with higher education consistently showed more positive attitudes toward healthy eating, while age correlated positively with emotional and behavioral dietary awareness.
These findings emphasize that lifestyle, physiological, and psychosocial factors shape dietary behavior and caffeine use. Interventions should therefore adopt a multidimensional approach, addressing not only knowledge but also behavioral patterns, emotional regulation, and contextual influences to promote healthier living.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Social and Human Sciences at Istanbul Aydin University (Decision No: 2025/3, dated March 20, 2025). The committee reviewed all relevant documents and approved the research by institutional and international ethical standards for human subject's research. Participation in the study was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all individuals. The confidentiality of participants and data integrity was upheld throughout the research process. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
BO: Data curation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. WA: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AK: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AA: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. UC: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all participants who took part in this study for their time and cooperation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Saimaiti A, Zhou D-D, Li J, Xiong R-G, Gan R-Y, Huang S-Y, et al. Dietary sources, health benefits, and risks of caffeine. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2023) 63:9648–66. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2074362
2. Starling-Soares B, Pereira M, Renke G. Extrapolating the coffee and caffeine (1,3,7-trimethylxanthine) effects on exercise and metabolism—a concise review. Nutrients. (2023) 15:5031. doi: 10.3390/nu15245031
3. Arguedas-Soley A, Townsend I, Hengist A, Betts J. Acute caffeine supplementation and live match-play performance in team-sports: a systematic review (2000–2021). J Sports Sci. (2022) 40:717–32. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.2003559
4. Saavedra Velásquez N, Cuadrado Peñafiel V, de la Vega Marcos R. Can caffeine improve your performance? Psychophysiological effects — A systematic review. Nutr Hosp. (2024) 41:677–85. doi: 10.20960/nh.04820
5. Pujalte GGA, Narducci DM, Smith MS, King R, Logan K, Callender SS, et al. Athletes with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: position statement of the american medical society for sports medicine. Clin J Sport Med. (2023) 33:195–208. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000001152
6. O'Shea OK, Lawley N, Azzopardi A, Gutkowski A, Niedziela MM, Horn R, et al. Acute beneficial effects of a functional energy shot on cognitive performance and mood states during cognitively demanding task performance: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Front Nutr. (2025) 11:1496092. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1496092
7. Sholeye O, Akinyemi O, Oyewole B. Caffeinated beverage consumption among adolescents in Sagamu, Nigeria: implications for health promotion. Pan Afr Med J. (2022) 41. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.202.31696
8. Unsal S, Sanlier N. Longitudinal effects of lifetime caffeine consumption on levels of depression, anxiety, and stress: a comprehensive review. Curr Nutr Rep. (2025) 14:26. doi: 10.1007/s13668-025-00616-5
9. Abdoli F, Davoudi M, Momeni F, Djafari F, Dolatshahi B, Hosseinzadeh S, et al. Estimate the prevalence of daily caffeine consumption, caffeine use disorder, caffeine withdrawal and perceived harm in Iran: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:7644. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58496-8
10. Bodur M, Kaya S, Ilhan-Esgin M, Çakiroglu FP, Özçelik AÖ. The caffeine dilemma: unraveling the intricate relationship between caffeine use disorder, caffeine withdrawal symptoms and mental well-being in adults. Public Health Nutr. (2024) 27:e57. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024000399
11. Kristjansson AL, Lilly CL, Mann MJ, Smith ML, Kogan SM, Layman HM, et al. Adolescent caffeine use and problematic school behavior: A longitudinal analysis of student survey data and teacher observations. J Adolesc. (2024) 96:1834–42. doi: 10.1002/jad.12383
12. Khan H, Umeozor D, Zubin J, Horowitz J, Yuvanavattana N, Scott N, et al. The association between quality of diet, frequency of caffeine consumption, mental distress, and illicit ADHD drug use. FASEB J. (2022) 36. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.S1.R4391
13. Geraets AFJ, Heinz A. The associations of dietary habits with health, well-being, and behavior in adolescents: a cluster analysis. Child Care Health Dev. (2023) 49:497–507. doi: 10.1111/cch.13064
14. Amawi A, AlKasasbeh W, Jaradat M, Almasri A, Alobaidi S, Hammad AA, et al. Athletes' nutritional demands: a narrative review of nutritional requirements. Front Nutr. (2024) 10:1331854. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1331854
15. Alolabi H, Alchallah MO, Mohsen F, Marrawi M, Alourfi Z. Social and psychosocial factors affecting eating habits among students studying at the Syrian Private University: a questionnaire based cross-sectional study. Heliyon. (2022) 8:e09451. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09451
16. Cheikh Ismail L, Osaili TM, Mohamad MN, Hashim M, Stojanovska L, Al Daour R, et al. Psychosocial factors affecting dietary habits of university students: A cross-sectional study. Heliyon. (2022) 8:e09768. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09768
17. Walker-Clarke A, Walasek L, Meyer C. Psychosocial factors influencing the eating behaviours of older adults: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. (2022) 77:101597. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101597
18. AlKasasbeh WJ, Akroush S. Investigating the interrelationships among food habits, sports nutrition knowledge, and perceived barriers to healthy eating: a study of adolescent swimmers. Front Nutr. (2024) 11:1381801. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1381801
19. Amawi AT, Moualla DS, Alshuwaier GO, Al-Nuaim AA, Bursais AK, Aljaloud KS, et al. Knowledge and attitude of dietary supplements among Arab Olympic athletes and coaches in preparation program for Tokyo 2020 Olympic games. Int J Hum Mov Sports Sci. (2023) 11:368–77. doi: 10.13189/saj.2023.110214
20. Nguyen TH, Pletsch-Borba L, Feindt PH, Stokes CS, Pohrt A, Meyer NMT, et al. The effect of individual attitude toward healthy nutrition on adherence to a high-UFA and high-protein diet: results of a randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. (2024) 16:3044. doi: 10.3390/nu16173044
21. Sahin Bayram S, Kiziltan G. The correlation between knowledge of food sustainability, sustainable eating attitudes, and adherence to the mediterranean diet among blue- and white-collar employees. Sustainability. (2024) 16:8644. doi: 10.3390/su16198644
22. Tamir T, Nigussie J, Endawoke M. Bridging the gap between recommendation and reality: Improving dietary adherence of heart failure populations a cross-sectional study in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. (2024) 19:e0311663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311663
23. Alharbi RM, Alharbi HF. The indicator of emotional eating and its effects on dietary patterns among female students at Qassim University. Nutrients. (2023) 15:3553. doi: 10.3390/nu15163553
24. Dakanalis A, Mentzelou M, Papadopoulou SK, Papandreou D, Spanoudaki M, Vasios GK, et al. The association of emotional eating with overweight/obesity, depression, anxiety/stress, and dietary patterns: a review of the current clinical evidence. Nutrients. (2023) 15:1173. doi: 10.3390/nu15051173
25. Javadi Arjmand E, Bemanian M, Vold JH, Skogen JC, Sandal GM, Arnesen EK, et al. Emotional eating and changes in high-sugar food and drink consumption linked to psychological distress and worries: a cohort study from Norway. Nutrients. (2023) 15:778. doi: 10.3390/nu15173834
26. Chew HSJ, Loong SSE, Lim SL, Tam WSW, Chew NWS, Chin YH, et al. Sociodemographic, behavioral and psychological factors associated with high BMI among adults in a southeast asian multi-ethnic society: a structural equation model. Nutrients. (2023) 15:1826. doi: 10.3390/nu15081826
27. Talib NZ, Ang SQ, Shamsudin J, Mohd Nor Z. Associations between body mass index and physical activity level with mindful eating behaviour among undergraduate medical students of Universiti Sains Malaysia. Malays J Nutr. (2023) 29. doi: 10.31246/mjn-2022-0040
28. Zhao J, Zhao J, Yuan H, Gao Z. Body shape concerns and behavioral intentions on eating disorders: a cross-sectional study of Chinese female university students using an extended theory of reasoned action model. Front Nutr. (2024) 11. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1501536
29. Amawi A, Alshuwaier G, Alaqil A, Alkasasbeh WJ, Bursais A, Al-Nuaim A, et al. Exploring the impact of dietary factors on body composition in elite Saudi soccer players: a focus on added sugars, salt, oil consumption. Int J Human Movem Sports Sci. (2023) 11:1305–12. doi: 10.13189/saj.2023.110614
30. Amawi AT, Alkasasbeh WJ, AlSaoud H, Alshuwaier GO, Alaqil AI, Alnimer L, et al. Assessment of dairy products and protein intake: implications for body composition in saudi soccer elite athletes. Pal Med Pharm J. (2025) 10:213–20. doi: 10.59049/2790-0231.10.4.2429
31. Bozkurt O, Çamli A, Kocaadam-Bozkurt B. Factors affecting food addiction: emotional eating, palatable eating motivations, and BMI. Food Sci Nutr. (2024) 12:6841–8. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4333
32. Timkova V, Katreniakova Z, Mikula P, Nagyova I. The role of weight stigma and food literacy in eating behaviour. Eur J Public Health. (2024) 34. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1536
33. Özbay A, Kahraman S. Weight's impact on life's quality: a comparative study of emotional appetite and psychological health across BMI categories. Soc Work Health Care. (2025) 64:65–83. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2025.2467110
34. Wang J, Yang Y, Li L, Yang X, Guo X, Yuan X, et al. Comparative efficacy of physical activity types on executive functions in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Sci Med Sport. (2024) 27:187–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2023.11.006
35. Henn M, Babio N, Maria R, Vázquez-Ruiz Z, Konieczna J, Vioque J, et al. Abstract P622: increase from low to moderate consumption of caffeinated coffee is associated with favorable changes in body fat. Circulation. (2023) 147. doi: 10.1161/circ.147.suppl_1.P622
36. Tian Y-L, Liu X, Yang M-Y, Wu Y-H, Yin F-Q, Zhang Z-T, et al. Association between caffeine intake and fat free mass index: a retrospective cohort study. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. (2025) 22. doi: 10.1080/15502783.2024.2445607
37. Liu Y, Li Z, Yuan L, Zhou Z. The bidirectional correlation between fundamental motor skill and moderate-to-vigorous physical activities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Children. (2023) 10. doi: 10.3390/children10091504
38. Clavero-Jimeno A, Dote-Montero M, Migueles JH, Camacho-Cardenosa A, Oses M, Medina JE, et al. Impact of lifestyle moderate-to-vigorous physical activity timing on glycemic control in sedentary adults with overweight/obesity and metabolic impairments. Obesity. (2024) 32:1465–73. doi: 10.1002/oby.24063
39. Fernandes V, Rodrigues F, Jacinto M, Teixeira D, Cid L, Antunes R, et al. How does the level of physical activity influence eating behavior? A self-determination theory approach. Life. (2023) 13:298. doi: 10.3390/life13020298
40. Shilton T, Bauman A, Beger B, Chalkley A, Champagne B, Elings-Pers M, et al. More people, more active, more often for heart health – taking action on physical activity. Glob Heart. (2024) 19. doi: 10.5334/gh.1308
41. Scapec B, Grgic J, Varovic D, Mikulic P. Caffeine, but not paracetamol (acetaminophen), enhances muscular endurance, strength, and power. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. (2024) 21. doi: 10.1080/15502783.2024.2400513
42. Wu W, Chen Z, Zhou H, Wang L, Li X, Lv Y, et al. Effects of acute ingestion of caffeine capsules on muscle strength and muscle endurance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. (2024) 16:1146. doi: 10.3390/nu16081146
43. Saremi M, Shahriari F, Hemmatinafar M, Rezaei R, Niknam A, Nordvall M, et al. Low-dose caffeine supplementation is a valuable strategy for increasing time to exhaustion, explosive power, and reducing muscle soreness in professional male kickboxers. Curr Dev Nutr. (2025) 9:104538. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104538
44. Faris ME, Al Gharaibeh F, Islam MR, Abdelrahim D, Saif ER, Turki EA, et al. Caffeinated energy drink consumption among Emirati adolescents is associated with a cluster of poor physical and mental health, and unhealthy dietary and lifestyle behaviors: a cross-sectional study. Front Public Heal. (2023) 11. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1259109
45. Protano C, Valeriani F, De Giorgi A, Angelillo S, Bargellini A, Bianco A, et al. Consumption of Energy Drinks among Italian University students: a cross-sectional multicenter study. Eur J Nutr. (2023) 62:2195–203. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03140-w
46. Farber J, Dikdan S, Ruge M, Johnson D, Shipon D. Relationship between caffeine consumption and young athletes' comorbidities, exercise-related symptoms, baseline electrocardiogram. Sport Heal A Multidiscip Appr. (2024) 16:448–56. doi: 10.1177/19417381231168828
47. Alawamleh T, AlKasasbeh WJ. Exploring the landscape of eHealth in promoting physical activity and healthy dietary intake. Univer J Public Health. (2024) 12:120–7. doi: 10.13189/ujph.2024.120113
48. Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE. How to Design And Evaluate Research In Education. New York, New York, McGraw-Hill. (2009).
49. Büyüköztürk S, Akgün ÖE, Demirel F, Karadeniz S, Çakmak EK. Bilimsel Araştirma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi (2015).
50. Kaya S, Bodur M, Esgin MI, Çakiroglu FP, Özçelik AÖ. Validation of the Turkish version of the caffeine use disorder questionnaire in an adult population. Int J Ment Health Addict. (2023) 21:1770–81. doi: 10.1007/s11469-021-00688-8
51. Tekkurşun Demir G, Cicioglu HI. Saglikli Beslenmeye Ilişkin Tutum Ölçegi (SBITÖ): Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalişmasi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Spor Bilim Derg. (2019) 4:256–74. doi: 10.31680/gaunjss.559462
52. World Health Organization. Body Mass Index – BMI. Geneva: World Health Organization. (2020). Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015128
53. Jørgensen LB, Bricca A, Bernhardt A, Juhl CB, Tang LH, Mortensen SR, et al. Objectively measured physical activity levels and adherence to physical activity guidelines in people with multimorbidity—A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. (2022) 17:e0274846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274846
54. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization. (2022).
55. Matthews CE, Patel S, Saint-Maurice PF, Loftfield E, Keadle SK, Chen KY, et al. Physical activity levels (PAL) in US adults-−2019. Med Sci Sport Exerc. (2023) 55:884–91. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003102
56. Vancampfort D, Van Damme T, McGrath RL, Machado VA, Schuch F. Physical activity levels among people with fibromyalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskeletal Care. (2023) 21:623–32. doi: 10.1002/msc.1771
57. Turner S, Ali A, Wham C, Rutherfurd-Markwick K. Secondary school students and caffeine: consumption habits, motivations, and experiences. Nutrients. (2023) 15:1011. doi: 10.3390/nu15041011
58. Yamasaki S, Kawasaki H, Cui Z. Use of caffeine-containing energy drinks by japanese middle school students: a cross-sectional study of related factors. Nutrients. (2023) 15:1275. doi: 10.3390/nu15051275
59. Ushula TW, Mamun A, Darssan D, Wang WYS, Williams GM, Whiting SJ, et al. Dietary patterns and young adult body mass change: a 9-year longitudinal study. Eur J Nutr. (2023) 62:1657–66. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03101-3
60. King A, Glaister M, Lawrence K, Pilic L, Mavrommatis Y. Factors influencing the intention of young adults to adopt genotype-based personalized advice on diet and physical activity according to perceived weight status. J Nutr Sci. (2024) 13:e54. doi: 10.1017/jns.2024.50
61. Ewing AP, Chang GC, Henry AV, Brown JA, Alalwan MA, Boyd DT, et al. Lifestyle related cancer risk and protective behaviors vary among a convenient sample of physically active, young-to-middle-aged adults 18–49. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2023) 20:6305. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20136305
62. Liu R, Menhas R, Saqib ZA. Does physical activity influence health behavior, mental health, and psychological resilience under the moderating role of quality of life? Front Psychol. (2024) 15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349880
63. Orhan BE, Alkasasbeh W, Karaçam A, Govindasamy K. Exploring motivation and enjoyment as key determinants of sustained physical activity across diverse demographics. Sport Mont. (2025) 23:63–9. doi: 10.26773/smj.250610
64. Ramírez-delaCruz M Esteban-García P Abián P Bravo-Sánchez A Piñas-Bonilla I and Abián-Vicén J. Effects of different doses of caffeine on cognitive performance in healthy physically active individuals. Eur J Nutr. (2024) 63:3025–35. doi: 10.1007/s00394-024-03486-9
65. Khodadadi D, Azimi F, Eghbal Moghanlou A, Gursoy R, Demirli A, Jalali P, et al. Habitual caffeine consumption and training status affect the ergogenicity of acute caffeine intake on exercise performance. Sport. Heal. A Multidiscip. Approach. (2025) 17:930–41. doi: 10.1177/19417381251315093
66. West KS, Helwig NJ, Schwager LE, Hart TW, Zucker AC, Venenga JS, et al. Habitual preexercise caffeine supplementation prevents exercise training-induced attenuation of exercising systolic blood pressure and double product. J Appl Physiol. (2025) 138:358–65. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00874.2024
67. Egele VS, Stark R. Specific health beliefs mediate sex differences in food choice. Front Nutr. (2023) 10:1159809. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1159809
68. Feraco A, Armani A, Amoah I, Guseva E, Camajani E, Gorini S, et al. Assessing gender differences in food preferences and physical activity: a population-based survey. Front Nutr. (2024) 11:1348456. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1348456
69. Lombardo M, Feraco A, Armani A, Camajani E, Gorini S, Strollo R, et al. Gender differences in body composition, dietary patterns, and physical activity: insights from a cross-sectional study. Front Nutr. (2024) 11:1414217. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1414217
70. Elmira ES, Chichaibelu BB, Qaim M. Marriage customs and nutritional status of men and women. Food Policy. (2024) 128:102734. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102734
71. Kong D, Lan Y, Lu P, Jin L. Dietary Knowledge and preference among middle-aged and older chinese couples. Asia Pacific J Public Heal. (2024) 36:493–9. doi: 10.1177/10105395241254879
72. Mehranfar S, Madani Civi R, Plunkett R, Murphy RA, Cohen TR, Conklin AI. The longitudinal evidence on social ties and fruit and vegetable intake among aging adults: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. (2025) 83:1047–60. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae134
73. Ma L, Xu H, Zhang Z, Li L, Lin Z, Qin H. Nutrition knowledge, attitudes, and dietary practices among parents of children and adolescents in Weifang, China: a cross-sectional study. Prev Med Reports. (2023) 35:102396. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102396
74. Deng W-J, Yi Z, Lee JC-K. The demographic variation in nutrition knowledge and relationship with eating attitudes among Chinese university students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2024) 21:159. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020159
75. Sandri E, Pardo J, Cantín Larumbe E, Cerdá Olmedo G, Falcó A. Analysis of the influence of educational level on the nutritional status and lifestyle habits of the young Spanish population. Front Public Heal. (2024) 12. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1341420
76. Alkasasbeh WJ, Alawamleh T, Alrahahleh WA. Investigating nutrition literacy levels among adolescent swimmers. Int J Human Movem Sports Sci. (2024) 12:403–13. doi: 10.13189/saj.2024.120215
77. AlKasasbeh WJ, Shlool H, Alnaimat S. Anabolic steroid consumption among gym-goers in Amman: Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Front Sports Active Living. (2024) 6:1404551. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1404551
Keywords: caffeine, body mass index, physical activity, feeding behavior, health attitudes, socioeconomic factors, lifestyle
Citation: Orhan BE, Alkasasbeh WJ, Karaçam A, Amawi AT and Canli U (2025) Exploring the impact of BMI and physical activity on caffeine use disorder and nutritional attitudes among adults in Türkiye. Front. Nutr. 12:1639852. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1639852
Received: 09 July 2025; Accepted: 14 October 2025;
Published: 14 November 2025.
Edited by:
Shihua Shi, Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research (FMI), SwitzerlandReviewed by:
Satabdi Mitra, KPC Medical College and Hospital, IndiaAndri Matos, Eastwick College and the HoHoKus Schools, United States
Copyright © 2025 Orhan, Alkasasbeh, Karaçam, Amawi and Canli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Bekir Erhan Orhan, YmVraXJlcmhhbm9yaGFuQGF5ZGluLmVkdS50cg==; Walaa Jumah Alkasasbeh, d2FsYWFrYXNhc2JlaDE5OTFAeWFob28uY29t
Aydin Karaçam3