PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Clinical Nutrition
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1641234
Dietary guidance on plant-based meat alternatives for individuals wanting to increase plant protein intake
Provisionally accepted- 1Nutrition Matters, Pittsfield, United States
- 2University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- 3University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada
- 4retired, Santa Cruz, United States
- 5Vegan Outreach, Sacramento, United States
- 6consultant, Los Angeles, United States
- 7New York University, New York, United States
- 8consultant, La Grange, United States
- 9Protein Industries, Regina, Canada
- 10Soy Nutrition Institute Global, Jefferson City, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
A new generation of plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) has entered the mainstream. These products contain concentrated sources of plant protein and are formulated to mimic the taste and texture of their meat-based counterparts, especially red meat. The increased availability of these products coincides with calls from health agencies to increase the dietary plant-to-animal protein ratio for health and environmental reasons. The role of PBMAs in achieving the goal of consuming more plant protein may be particularly important since consumption of whole plant foods, such as legumes, which includes pulses (e.g., beans, peas and lentils), is unlikely to increase without major public policy initiatives. Nevertheless, there is debate about the healthfulness of PBMAs and about whether the benefits associated with traditional plant-based diets emphasizing whole plant foods apply to PBMAs. These products are heavily processed, often high in sodium, and contain lower levels of compounds (e.g., fiber, resistant starch, polyphenols) typically associated with the benefits of plant-based diets. On the other hand, PBMAs are excellent sources of protein, and many are fortified with nutrients of concern in plant-based diets. Collectively, the evidence suggests that while they may not provide all the benefits of whole legumes, PBMAs have health and environmental advantages over comparable animal-derived foods. For most individuals, a daily serving of a PBMA fits well within the context of an overall healthy diet. Higher intakes may also be compatible with healthy eating, especially for those whose protein and/or calorie needs are increased.
Keywords: environment, vegetarian, ultra-processed foods, legumes, plant-based meat CVD, cardiovascular disease, EPIC, European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition, LTC, leukocyte telomere length, LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination survey, PBMA, plant-based meat alternatives, RDNs, registered dietitian nutritionists, TVP, textured vegetable protein
Received: 04 Jun 2025; Accepted: 07 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Messina, Guest, Duncan, Mangels, Norris, Ruscigno, Glenn, Wolfram, Marinangeli and Messina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Virginia Messina, Nutrition Matters, Pittsfield, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.