ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Clinical Nutrition
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1641539
Value Analysis of Preoperative NRS2002 and GLIM Screening in Predicting Postoperative Complications in Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies
Provisionally accepted
- Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To investigate and compare the predictive efficacy of the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002) and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria for postoperative complications in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with gastrointestinal malignancies scheduled for surgical resection at our institution from December 2019 to December 2024. Nutritional risk and status were assessed using NRS2002 and GLIM criteria within 24 hours of admission. Data on postoperative complications, hospitalization expenses, length of hospital stay, and unplanned 30-day and 60-day readmissions were meticulously collected and analyzed using logistic regression and ROC curve analysis. Results: A total of 471 patients were included. Nutritional risk (NRS2002 ≥3) was identified in 45.01% (n=212) of patients. According to GLIM criteria, 43.10% (n=203) were diagnosed with malnutrition. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that nutritional risk (adjusted OR 7.58, 95%CI: 4.75-12.05, P<0.001), GLIM-defined malnutrition (adjusted OR 5.62, 95%CI: 3.59-8.76, P<0.001), moderate malnutrition (adjusted OR 4.78, 95%CI: 2.78-8.17, P<0.001), and severe malnutrition (adjusted OR 6.71, 95%CI: 3.82-11.78, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) for NRS2002 in predicting complications was 0.735, which was significantly greater than the AUC for GLIM diagnosis (0.706; P=0.003). No significant difference in AUC was observed between NRS2002 and GLIM severity grading (0.712; P=0.215). Neither NRS2002 nor GLIM assessments were significantly associated with unplanned readmissions in adjusted models. Conclusions: Both NRS2002-defined nutritional risk and GLIM-defined malnutrition are significant independent predictors of postoperative complications in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. The NRS2002 demonstrated slightly superior predictive ability for postoperative complications compared to the dichotomous GLIM diagnosis. These findings support the routine use of both tools for preoperative risk stratification to guide targeted nutritional interventions.
Keywords: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002), Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM), gastrointestinal malignancies, Postoperative Complications, Prognostic value, Nutritional assessment
Received: 05 Jun 2025; Accepted: 28 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xu, Bi, Wang and Zheng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Dongping Xu, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.