Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Nutr.

Sec. Clinical Nutrition

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1645211

Energy-Dense versus Routine enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a systematic review and metaanalysis

Provisionally accepted
Zonghong  ZhangZonghong Zhang1,2Chuanlai  ZhangChuanlai Zhang1*Huiling  PanHuiling Pan1,2Ruiqi  YangRuiqi Yang1,2Yin  FangYin Fang1,2
  • 1The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
  • 2Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Critically ill patients often experience low target attainment rates with enteral nutrition (EN), leading to malnutrition and poor clinical outcomes. Energy-dense EN may improve caloric delivery and reduce the risk of malnutrition. However, its effects on other clinical outcomes remain unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of energy-dense EN in critically ill patients.A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases from inception to December 2024. Two researchers independently screened studies and extracted data.Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing energy-dense EN with routine EN in critically ill patients were included. Outcomes assessed included diarrhea, gastric residual volume (GRV), vomiting or reflux, mortality, total hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, duration of mechanical ventilation, and nutritional status. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.A total of 378 studies were identified, and 10 RCTs comprising 4,473 patients were included. Compared with routine EN, energy-dense EN significantly reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD = -37.41, 95% CI: -60.57 to -14.25, I² = 75%) and ICU LOS (MD = -1.24, 95% CI: -1.49 to -0.99, I² = 17%). Nutritional indicators such as albumin (MD = 4.92, 95% CI: 2.69 to 7.16, I² = 89%) and prealbumin (MD = 55.97, 95% CI: 39.04 to 72.90, I² = 86%) were significantly improved. However, there were no significant differences in total hospital LOS, mortality, or gastrointestinal complications such as diarrhea and vomiting/reflux. A slight increase in the risk of high GRV was observed (RR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.37, I² = 2%).Energy-dense EN appears to be safe and effective for critically ill patients, with benefits in nutritional status and reductions in ICU LOS and mechanical ventilation duration.However, this study has limitations, including potential bias in the included RCTs and inconsistent definitions of GRV. Future large-scale, high-quality, multicenter RCTs with rigorous methodology are needed to validate these findings.

Keywords: Energy-dense, Enteral Nutrition, critically ill patients, routine, System review

Received: 11 Jun 2025; Accepted: 08 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Zhang, Pan, Yang and Fang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Chuanlai Zhang, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.