SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Nutrition and Sustainable Diets
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1651945
Definition of the Traditional African Diet: a scoping review
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- 2University of Bristol School of Biological Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Traditional diets are increasingly studied for their purported health and environmental benefits. Promoting the traditional African diet (TrAfDi) could be a promising means of addressing the impacts of rapid dietary transitions in African countries. However, there is no consistent definition of this traditional dietary pattern. The aim of this scoping review was therefore to systematically explore, for the first time, the definition of the TrAfDi, as reported in the literature to date. Methods: Seven databases were searched, up to January 16th, 2023, for peer-reviewed studies and grey literature describing the TrAfDi. One reviewer screened articles, extracted data and assessed article quality; an independent reviewer screened 10% of titles, abstracts and full-text articles. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Results: We included 45 studies that defined a TrAfDi. The food groups characterising the TrAfDi include cereals and their products, pulses, seeds and nuts and their products, and vegetables and their products. Other groups, cited less frequently, include fruits and their products, and roots, tubers, plantains and their products. Maize was the most highly cited food item. Other, lesser cited food items include cassava, cowpeas, fish, fruit, legumes, millet, and sorghum. Minor regional differences in the TrAfDi were observed when studies were segregated according to United Nations classifications. Differences were mainly observed between Western Africa and all other African regions, which, between them, do not appear to exhibit significant variation in the most frequently cited food groups. Few studies reported the quantities of foods consumed and frequency of consumption. Conclusions: These findings provide important initial evidence on what may constitute a TrAfDi and indicate features of its regional characteristics and are relevant to the development of public health policies seeking to tackle challenges of food insecurity, obesity and non-communicable diseases in Africa. These will underpin future research to assess the TrAfDi's health and environmental impact, and to understand cultural implications of shifting dietary patterns resulting from climatic, economic, and other factors. Future studies should also aim to strengthen regional representativeness and establish the quantities of foods that characterise this dietary pattern.
Keywords: African diet, Traditional diets, definition, Diet habit, Scoping review, food pattern
Received: 22 Jun 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Niu, Ockendon-Powell, Alonge and Papadaki. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Nina Frances Ockendon-Powell, University of Bristol School of Biological Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.