SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1652598
This article is part of the Research TopicInnovations in Food Digestion and Fermentation StrategiesView all 5 articles
The gut microbiota of Indigenous populations in the context of dietary westernization: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Laval University, Quebec, Canada
- 2Universite Laval, Québec City, Canada
- 3Universite Laval Bibliotheque, Québec City, Canada
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Indigenous populations worldwide are undergoing dietary transitions from traditional patterns toward westernized diets, influencing gut microbiota diversity and composition, with potential implications for health. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare gut microbiota diversity and composition among Indigenous populations following traditional versus westernized dietary patterns. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in March 2024 and updated on February 25, 2025 across databases, including All Ovid MEDLINE®, Embase, Web of Science, CAB Abstracts, and Food Science and Technology Abstracts, along with searches of grey literature sources. Eligibility criteria included observational studies comparing gut microbiota diversity and composition between traditional and westernized diets among healthy Indigenous adults (≥16 years) without chronic diseases. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the ROBINS-E tool. Data were synthesized using random effects models, specifically applying the restricted maximum likelihood estimator to calculate between-study variance (τ²). Results: Of 19,836 articles identified, nine studies (N = 657 participants) met inclusion criteria. Traditional diets tended to be associated with higher microbial diversity, although results varied across diversity metrics and studies. Shannon diversity was higher in traditional groups, but this difference was not statistically significant (standardized mean differences = 0.67; 95% CI: –0.26 to 1.60; I² = 92.9%). Other diversity indices (Chao1, Simpson, observed species richness) did not show clear differences between diet groups. Descriptive taxonomic analyses also revealed substantial heterogeneity across populations, reflecting the context-specificity of microbiota differences between traditional and westernized groups. Nonetheless, most westernized groups exhibited a higher Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio at the phylum level and a lower Prevotella/Bacteroides ratio at the genus level. Conclusions: The observed heterogeneity likely reflects methodological differences, ecological variability, and the diversity of traditional diets and varying patterns of dietary transition. Longitudinal research is needed to better understand how dietary transitions affect gut microbiota over time in Indigenous populations.
Keywords: Traditional diet, Westernized diet, Gut Microbiota, Indigenous populations, Systematic review, Meta-analysis, Observational studies
Received: 24 Jun 2025; Accepted: 29 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Daunizeau, Franck, Boutin, Ruel, Poliakova, Ayotte and Bélanger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Camille Daunizeau, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
Maximilien Franck, Universite Laval, Québec City, Canada
Richard Bélanger, Universite Laval, Québec City, Canada
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.