ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Nutrition and Metabolism
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1658286
This article is part of the Research TopicNutrient Metabolism and Complications of Type 2 Diabetes MellitusView all 20 articles
Association Between Higher Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate and Reduced Prevalence of Hyperuricemia and Gout
Provisionally accepted- 1Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, China
- 2Department of Cardiology, Jining No.1 People's Hospital, Jining, China
- 3Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University,, Urumqi, China
- 4Clinical Medicine College, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
- 5Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- 6Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- 7Emergency Department, Jining No.1 People's Hospital, Jining, China
- 8Emergency Department, Jining No.1 People’s Hospital, Jining, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: Insulin resistance (IR) is closely associated with hyperuricemia (HUA) and gout; however, the relationship between the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), a novel comprehensive indicator of systemic IR, and the prevalence of HUA and gout in the general population remains unclear. Methods: This study analyzed data from 29,340 participants included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database. Multivariable logistic regression models and restricted cubic splines were employed to assess the association between eGDR and HUA and gout. Subgroup analyses were conducted to examine potential variations in the findings across different subgroups stratified by age, sex, race, and diabetes status. Results: The prevalence rates of HUA and gout among participants were 17.51% and 3.95%, respectively. Fully adjusted multivariable logistic regression models revealed that for each 1-unit increase in eGDR, the prevalence of HUA decreased by 17% (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.81–0.85, p < 0.001), and the prevalence of gout also decreased by 17% (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.79–0.87, p < 0.001). Compared to participants with eGDR < 4 mg/kg/min, those with eGDR levels of 4–6, 6–8, and > 8 mg/kg/min exhibited significantly lower OR values for both HUA and gout. Furthermore, subgroup analyses for HUA demonstrated significant interaction effects between eGDR and age, sex, race, and diabetes status (p < 0.05), while subgroup analyses for gout indicated significant interactions between eGDR and age and diabetes status (p < 0.05). Conclusions: A significant inverse association was observed between eGDR and the prevalence of HUA and gout. Maintaining higher levels of eGDR plays a positive role in reducing the risk of HUA and gout in the general population. Moreover, this association was particularly pronounced in middle-aged and younger populations as well as in non-diabetic individuals.
Keywords: Estimated glucose disposal rate, Hyperuricemia, Gout, Metabolism disorders, diabetes, NHANES
Received: 02 Jul 2025; Accepted: 28 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Kadier, Wu, Xiangyu, Zhang, Liu, Song and Cui. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Chunying Cui, Emergency Department, Jining No.1 People’s Hospital, Jining, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.