Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr.

Sec. Clinical Nutrition

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1666339

This article is part of the Research TopicNutritional Status and Nutritional Support in Hospitalized PatientsView all articles

Analysis of outcome indicators in clinical trials related to feeding intolerance in ICU patients receiving enteral nutrition feeding

Provisionally accepted
Chaokai  HeChaokai HeXiaorong  LiXiaorong LiFan  LiFan LiYing  XiaYing Xia*Kunrong  YuKunrong Yu*
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CAMS), Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome indicators of clinical trials related to feeding intolerance in patients receiving enteral nutrition feeding in ICUs published in the past 10 years, and to provide data support for the construction of a core outcome set for clinical trials on feeding intolerance in ICU patients. Methods The databases of Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Embase, SinoMed, Wanfang Data and China Knowledge Network (CNKI) were searched using a combination of free and subject terms. The time limit was from January 2013 to September 2023. Literature screening and data extraction were carried out independently by two researchers strictly according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and in case of disagreement, the decision was discussed by a third party. Results A total of 52 papers reporting 138 different outcome indicators were included in this study. Indicators were categorized into 8 domains based on their functional characteristics. In descending order of frequency of reporting, they were symptoms and signs (82.7%), physical and chemical tests (75%), indicators related to nutritional support (63.5%), safety events (59.6%), long-term prognosis (34.6%), economic assessment (21.2%), functional status (5.8%), and satisfaction (3.8%). The top 10 most frequently reported outcome indicators were diarrhea, vomiting, bloating, gastric remnants, reflux, aspiration, gastric retention, mortality, albumin and constipation. The main problems with the indicators included a lack of systematicity, clinical utility, and standardization of reporting, as well as inconsistency in the time point of measurement and misuse of the indicators. Conclusions The lack of core outcome sets had led to significant variability and non-standardization in the outcome indicators reported by Enteral Feeding Intolerance clinical studies. Enteral Feeding Intolerance is an important factor affecting the prognosis of critically ill patients, and the outcome indicators of its clinical studies need to be standardized. It is recommended that a core outcome set for Enteral Feeding Intolerance be constructed to standardize the reporting of outcome indicators in future studies, reduce inter-study heterogeneity, and improve the utility of study results and the quality of clinical decision-making.【Keywords】 ICU; enteral nutrition; feeding intolerance; outcome indicators; core outcome set; clinical trials

Keywords: ICU, Enteral Nutrition, Feeding intolerance, Outcome indicators, Core outcome set, clinical trials

Received: 15 Jul 2025; Accepted: 28 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 He, Li, Li, Xia and Yu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Ying Xia, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CAMS), Beijing, China
Kunrong Yu, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CAMS), Beijing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.