Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr., 23 September 2025

Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1670111

This article is part of the Research TopicInterplay between Environmental Drivers and Genetic or Epigenetic Predispositions on Gastrointestinal Cancer EvolutionView all 4 articles

The global epidemiology of gastrointestinal cancers attributable to high-BMI: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

Laiang YaoLaiang YaoTao JiTao JiHailian MuHailian MuXiangming Xu
Xiangming Xu*
  • Department of Gastroenterology, Linyi People’s Hospital, Linyi, China

Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers collectively account for over 30% of global cancer-related mortalities. Obesity is a well-established risk factor for GI cancers. We aim to investigate the temporal trends of GI cancer attributable to high BMI between 1990 to 2021 on global, regional and national levels.

Methods: Data was obtained from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Deaths, Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and age-standardized rates (ASRs) were used to measure disease burden. Estimated annualized percent change (EAPC) were used to assess the temporal trend. We explored the association between SDI with high BMI-attributed GI cancer burden across 21 regions, 204 countries over the three decades.

Results: Globally, between 1990 and 2021, all GI cancers had rising trends of deaths and DALYs attributable to high BMI. Colorectal cancer constituted the largest disease burden, with 99,268 (95% UI: 42,596–157,948) deaths and 1.17 (95% UI: 0.51–1.87) million DALYs in 2021. Liver cancer and pancreatic cancer had the sharpest increase in age-standardized rates, with EAPC exceeding 4 and 2%, respectively. Substantial heterogeneity was observed among the disease burden and temporal trends across regions. Higher SDI countries reported higher ASRs of GI cancers but showed declining trends with risk-attributable colorectal cancer, gallbladder and biliary tract cancer. Nearly all regions had increasing trends with the ASRs of high-BMI caused liver cancer and pancreatic cancer.

Conclusion: The global burden of gastrointestinal cancers attributable to high BMI has increased substantially over the past three decades. We observed significant disparity with the temporal trends of different gastrointestinal cancers at various regions. Multi-level interventions, including lifestyle modification and tailored screening practice is required at global and regional levels to address the burden of gastrointestinal cancers attributable to high BMI.

Background

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are malignancies originating in the gastrointestinal tract, including the esophagus, stomach, liver, pancreas, gallbladder, small intestine, colon, rectum and anus (1). Global estimates have indicated that GI cancers collectively comprise over one-fourth of all cancer incidences and more than one-third of all cancer-related mortalities (2, 3). A previous population-based systematic analysis indicated the lifetime risk of the development and mortality of GI cancers was 8.2 and 6.2%, respectively (4). Notably, five GI cancers ranked among the 10 deadliest cancers globally as of 2022, reflecting their particularly poor prognosis (3). Despite advancements in therapeutic strategies, projections suggest an escalating disease burden of GI cancers in the coming decades, underscoring the urgent need for improved preventive and management approaches (5, 6).

There are several shared risk factors for GI cancers, with obesity being a well-established risk factor (7, 8). Previous meta-analysis and pooled analysis revealed that high-BMI was associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancers, stomach cancers and hepatocellular cancers by 40, 20, and 90% respectively, compared to normal BMI (body mass index) individuals (911). The prevalence of obesity has risen in all world regions over the past three decades, with 43% of adults being overweight and 16% of adults living with obesity in 2022 (12). In addition, with the combined effect of sedentary lifestyles and consumption of processed and unhealthy foods, the prevalence of obesity is likely to continue to increase globally (13).

It is evident that the epidemiological patterns of GI cancers and obesity-related risks exhibit substantial heterogeneity across geographic regions, demographic groups, and organ sites. Variations in socioeconomic development, healthcare access, and lifestyle factors further complicate this relationship. Leveraging the most recent and comprehensive data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2021, which offers the widest scope of global epidemiological data, our study provides a novel and systematic investigation into the high-BMI attributable burden of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. While previous studies, including earlier GBD analyses, have primarily focused on the general epidemiology and overall disease burden of GI cancers, our work specifically quantifies the risk-attributable burden by assessing the temporal trends, geographical and demographic disparities. We aim to provide critical insights for targeted public health initiatives aiming at mitigating the growing impact of obesity on GI cancer burden worldwide.

Methods

Data source

Data was obtained from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021, which is a systematic effort to estimate the burden of 371 disease and 88 risk factors across 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2021 (14, 15). All data regarding the disease burden of GI cancers attributable to high-BMI was publicly available through the online query tool Global Health Data Exchange (https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-results/). Our study followed the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting Guidelines for cross-sectional studies (GATHER) (16).

Definitions

The detailed data sources, estimation methodology, and risk-attributed burden of the GBD 2021 has been previously published (15). In brief, high BMI was defined as BMI, calculated as dividing an individual’s weight in kilograms by the square of their height in meters (kg/m2) greater than 25 kg/m2 for adults aged 20 years and older (15, 17). Representative studies reporting data with overweight and obesity prevalence, or mean BMI was included to ascertain the exposure. In our study, we used deaths and DALYs (Disability-adjusted life years) to measure disease burden. Mortality data was primarily obtained from population-based cancer registries, vital registration systems and verbal autopsy studies. DALY is a metric that sums the years of life lost with premature mortality and years of life with disability, with each DALY representing 1 year of loss of optimal health. A comparative risk assessment method was leveraged to quantify the burden of GI cancers attributable to high BMI. Briefly, the exposure and distribution of risk factors are estimated by Bayesian meta-regression modeling and spatiotemporal Gaussian process methods to calculate the relative risk (RR) for each risk-outcome pair. The attributable disease burden was based on the concept of the theoretical minimum risk exposure level (TMREL), which represents the level of risk exposure that minimizes the risk at population levels. The disease burden is multiplied by the deaths and DALYs with the population attributable fractions (PAFs), whereas PAF indicates the proportion of risk that would be reduced if BMI was reduced to TMREL. In our study, four GI cancers were identified with high-BMI attributed disease burden, which are colon and rectum cancers (CRC), gallbladder and biliary tract cancers (GBTC), liver cancers and pancreatic cancers. We observed negative estimates of the death and DALY rates of pancreatic cancer attributable to high-BMI among certain Asian and African regions. This is likely due to the effect modification and differences in relative risks of the high BMI and pancreatic cancer pair, which was primarily derived from data of Western countries and regions. In addition, for high BMI, the TMREL is established within the normal weight range (e.g., 21–23 kg/m2). The negative estimates may indicate that the prevalent BMI distribution was lower than the TMREL on average; consequently, the model calculates that a shift toward the TMREL would result in an increase in disease burden, not a reduction. The Socio-demographic index (SDI) is a composite measure derived from three indicators: the total fertility rate among women under 15, educational attainment for individuals aged 15 and above and per capita income adjusted for time lag. The index ranges from 0 (indicating low development) to 1 (indicating high development), categorizes countries and territories into five quintiles, from low to high developmental status, and provides an essential understanding of the association between socioeconomic factors and various health outcomes.

Statistical analysis

We explored the disease burden of GI cancers attributable to high BMI across various demographics, including age, sex, temporal trends and geographical locations. The total number of deaths and DALYs, along with the age-standardized rates (ASRs) were reported with the 95% uncertainty intervals (95% UI). ASRs were calculated using the director method based on population estimates. 95% UIs were calculated as the 2.5th and 97.5th ranked values from a posterior distribution of 1,000 draws. We assessed the temporal trend of GI cancers attributable to high-BMI from 1990 to 2021 with estimated annualized percent changes (EAPCs) of the ASRs. EAPC were estimated using log-linear regressions, with assumptions of the natural log of rate following a Poisson distribution, expressed as ln rate = α + β year + ε . The Beta-coefficient represents the positive or negative trends of the ASRs. EAPCs and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated with the formula 100 × ( exp β 1 ) . ASRs were considered to have an increasing trend with the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of EAPCs were greater than 0 while ASRs were considered to have a decreasing trend with the upper limit of the 95% CI of EAPC to be less than 0. Further, we investigated the association between SDI with the disease burden of GI cancers attributable to dietary risks across different locations and years. We performed all data analysis, visualizations with RStudio (v.2024.04.2).

Results

In 2021, there was an estimated burden of 99 thousand deaths and 2.36 million DALYs of CRC, 46 thousand deaths and 1.24 million DALYs of liver cancer, 20 thousand deaths and 0.45 million DALYs of GBTC, 9 thousand deaths and 0.22 million DALYs of pancreatic cancer attributable to high BMI globally (Table 1; Figure 1). All GI cancers showed rising trends with the total deaths and DALYs since 1990, with pancreatic cancer showing the largest increase (Table 1; Figure 1). The four GI cancers showed different changes with the ASRs between 1990 and 2021. With no significant changes of the EAPC in ASMR (0.00, −0.04 to 0.04%) and a slight increase of the ASDRs (EAPC: 0.12, 0.08–0.16%), CRC remained the highest ASRs over the period. Pancreatic cancer had the lowest ASRs globally, but witnessed the most rapid increase, with the EAPCs of ASMR and ASDR 4.63% (4.42–4.84%) and 4.84% (4.6–5.09%) respectively. There was also an significant increase of the ASRs of high-BMI attributed liver cancer globally, with the EAPCs exceeding 2% globally. On the other hand, gallbladder and biliary tract cancer was the only GI cancer that showed a declining trend globally (EAPC: −0.46% [−0.53 to −0.38%] in ASMR and −0.44% [−0.52% to −0.37%] in ASDR). By 2021, 9.65% of CRC age-standardized DALYs, 12.05% of GBTCs age-standardized DALYs, 9.48% of liver cancer age-standardized DALYs and 1.96% of pancreatic cancers age-standardized DALYs were attributable to high BMI (Supplementary Figure S1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Deaths, DALYs and age-standardized rates (ASRs) of gastrointestinal cancers attributable to high-BMI in 1990, 2021 and the estimated annualized percent change (EAPC) from 1990 to 2021.

Figure 1
Four-panel chart showing cancer mortality and DALYs from 1990 to 2019. Panel A: Stacked bar chart of total deaths by cancer type, increasing over time. Panel B: Line graph of age-standardized mortality rates for five cancer types; liver cancer shows the steepest rise. Panel C: Stacked bar chart of total DALYs, increasing over time. Panel D: Line graph of age-standardized DALY rates for cancer types; liver cancer shows a significant upward trend. Color code: yellow (GI cancer), orange (colon and rectum cancer), blue (liver cancer), green (gallbladder and biliary tract cancer), purple (pancreatic cancer).

Figure 1. The number of deaths (A) and DALYs (C) of gastrointestinal cancers attributable to high BMI globally, from 1990 to 2021; The age-standardized mortality rate (B) and age-standardized DALY rate (D) of gastrointestinal cancers attributable to high BMI globally.

The significant global increase in deaths and DALYs from high BMI-attributed GI cancers from 1990 to 2021 was consistent in both sexes (Supplementary Figures S2, S3). In 2021, the burden was higher among males for liver (28.5 k vs. 17.7 k deaths; 0.80 M vs. 0.43 M DALYs) and colorectal cancers (51 k vs. 48 k deaths; 1.3 M vs. 1.1 M DALYs). In contrast, females bore a higher burden for gallbladder and biliary tract (7.95 k vs. 6.6 k deaths; 0.27 M vs. 0.18 M DALYs) and pancreatic cancers (5.6 k vs. 3.6 k deaths; 127 k vs. 96 k DALYs). ASRs increased for all GI cancers in males but decreased for colorectal and gallbladder/biliary tract cancers in females (Supplementary Figures S4, S5). Pancreatic cancer exhibited the most substantial rise in ASRs for both sexes.

The age-specific rates of high BMI-attributable GI cancer burden increased with age in both sex 9 (Figure 2). However, the specific age groups with the highest DALY rates varied by cancer type: 85 years and above for CRC and GBTCs, and 65–74 years for liver and pancreatic cancers. Males demonstrated higher DALY rates across all age groups for CRC and liver cancer, whereas females exhibited higher rates for GBTCs. A sex-specific disparity was observed for pancreatic cancer, with higher rates in males under 60 and in females aged 60 and above. Noteworthy is the substantial gender disparity in liver cancer, with males displaying approximately twice the ASRs compared to females (ASMR: 0.7 vs. 0.38 per 100,000 population; ASDR: 19.05 vs. 9.52 per 100,000 population).

Figure 2
Four bar charts compare cancer rates by age and gender. Top left: Colon and rectum cancer; rates increase with age, higher for males. Top right: Gallbladder and biliary tract cancer; rates higher in females, increasing with age. Bottom left: Liver cancer; rates peak in older age groups, higher for males. Bottom right: Pancreatic cancer; increases with age, higher in females.

Figure 2. Age-specific DALY rates of gastrointestinal cancers attributable to high BMI between sex in 2021.

Colorectal cancer

High SDI and high-middle regions had the highest ASRs of high BMI attributed CRCs in 2021, with Central Europe, Eastern Europe and Southern America exhibiting the highest ASRs (ASMR exceeding 2.5 per 100,000 population and ASDR exceeding 50 per 100,000 population) (Figures 3, 4; Supplementary Table S1). Low SDI regions had the lowest ASRs, with the lowest ASRs observed in South Asia. Three high-SDI regions, including Australasia, Western Europe and high-income North America showed significant decline of the ASRs of CRC attributable to high-BMI from 1990 to 2021 (Supplementary Table S1; Figures 5, 6). Southeast Asia experienced the most significant increase, with EAPCs of 3.04% (2.93–3.15%) in ASMR and 2.84% (2.72–2.97%) in ASDR, followed by South Asia, East Asia and Sub-Saharan African regions. High BMI corresponds with the largest fraction of CRC age-standardized DALYs in High-income North America (16%), followed by North Africa and Middle East (15%) while Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia had the smallest fraction at approximately 5%.

Figure 3
Four world maps depict age-standardized death rates (ASDR) per 100,000 for different cancers. Top left: Colon and rectum cancer with shades of brown. Top right: Gallbladder and biliary tract cancer in green. Bottom left: Liver cancer in red. Bottom right: Pancreatic cancer in blue. Darker shades indicate higher ASDR. Each map provides a color gradient scale.

Figure 3. Age-standardized DALY rates of gastrointestinal cancers attributable to high BMI across 204 countries and territories for both sex in 2021.

Figure 4
Two bar charts depict the ASMR and ASDR of gastrointestinal cancer attributed to high BMI across various regions. Each chart breaks down cancer types: GI, colon and rectum, liver, gallbladder and biliary tract, and pancreatic. Regions include Central Europe, Southern Latin America, and Eastern Europe, among others. The top chart shows the age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR), while the bottom chart depicts the age-standardized disability rate (ASDR). Both charts demonstrate regional and cancer type variations with clear color coding.

Figure 4. The age-standardized mortality rate and age-standardized DALY rate of gastrointestinal cancers attributable to high BMI across regions in 2021.

Figure 5
Heatmap showing Estimated Annual Percentage Change (EAPC) for gastrointestinal cancers across various regions. Panel A and B display EAPC data for different cancer types: colon, gallbladder, liver, and pancreatic. Color intensity varies with EAPC values, darker shades indicate higher values. Regions are listed vertically, and cancer types are listed horizontally.

Figure 5. The estimated annual percent changes in ASMR (A) and ASDR (B) of gastrointestinal cancers attributable to high BMI across GBD regions from 1990 to 2021.

Figure 6
Four scatter plots depict the relationship between socio-demographic index and age-standardized death rates for different cancers: colorectal (upper left), pancreatic (upper right), gallbladder and biliary tract (lower left), and liver (lower right). Each plot shows trend lines with confidence intervals. Colorectal and pancreatic cancers have strong positive correlations, gallbladder and biliary tract cancer show moderate correlation, and liver cancer shows a weak correlation. Data points are labeled by country.

Figure 6. The trends in ASDR of gastrointestinal cancers attributable to high BMI across 21 GBD regions by SDI from 1990 to 2021.

Hungary, Slovakia, and the Republic of Nauru had the highest ASDR of CRC attributable to high BMI in 2021, with estimated ASDR exceeding 80 per 100,000 population (Figure 7). As SDI increases, the ASDR of CRC increases steadily until SDI reaches around 0.8, which begins to decrease with higher SDI values exceeding 0.8. Austria, San Marino, and Czechia displayed the most significant declines in ASDR trends, while Cabo Verde, Vietnam, and Lesotho exhibited the most substantial increases over the period.

Figure 7
Four scatter plots display the correlation between socio-demographic index (SDI) and age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) for colorectal, gallbladder and biliary tract, liver, and pancreatic cancers across global regions. Each plot has colored points representing different locations and years, with regression lines indicating trend correlations, ranging from 0.331 to 0.797. The key identifies regions like Europe, Asia, and Africa, and years from 1990 to 2020. Each plot shows varying strengths of correlation, statistical significance, and cancer-specific trends.

Figure 7. The ASDR of gastrointestinal cancers attributable to high BMI across 204 countries and territories by SDI in 2021.

Liver cancer

In 2021, the regions with the highest ASDR of liver cancer attributed to high Body Mass Index (BMI) were Southern Sub-Saharan Africa (ASMR: 1.26, [0.53–2.11] per 100,000 population; ASDR: 34.16 [14.22–57.28] per 100,000 population), followed by North Africa and the Middle East, Central Asia, Australasia and high-income North America (Supplementary Table S3; Figures 3, 4). In contrast, South Asia, the Caribbean, Tropical Latin America, Southeast Asia and Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa exhibited the lowest ASRs. All regions experienced an increase in the ASRs of liver cancer attributed to high BMI over the past three decades, except for high-income Asia Pacific, with an EAPC of −0.39% in ASMR and −0.89% in ASDR (Figures 5, 6; Supplementary Table S3). South Asia experienced the most rapid increase, with both the ASMR and ASDR of liver cancer attributable to high-BMI increasing 5% annually. East Asia, Australasia, high-income North America and Southern Latin America also witnessed significant increase, with an approximate 4% EAPC for both the ASMRs and ASDRs.

In 2021, Mongolia had the highest ASDR of liver cancer attributed to high BMI, standing at 243.77 per 100,000 population, followed by Tonga and Egypt, both exceeding 100 per 100,000 population (Figure 7). There was no significant change between the ASDR of liver cancer as SDI increases. Some countries, such as Mauritius, Kuwait, and Czechia, witnessed a reduction in the ASDR of liver cancer, whereas Nepal, India, and Australia experienced the most significant increase during the same period.

Gallbladder and biliary tract cancer

Between 1990 and 2021, Latin America regions exhibited the highest ASRs of GBTCs attributable to high-BMI while Sub-Saharan regions consistently reported the lowest ASRs (Figures 3, 4; Supplementary Table S2). Southern Latin America, the region with the highest ASRs, witnessed a decline of both the ASMR and ASDR, with EAPCs of −1.5% (−1.59% to −1.41%) and −1.53% (−1.64% to −1.41%) respectively (Figures 5, 6; Supplementary Table S2). Central Latin America and Western Europe had the most rapid declining trend of the ASRs, with an annual decreasing rate of more than 1.7%. A total of 12 out of 21 GBD regions reported declining trends with the ASRs. Low SDI and low-middle SDI regions reported lower ASRs compared to higher SDI regions but most of these regions had increasing temporal trends. The most rapid increase was observed in South Asia, with the EAPC of 2.86 (2.79–2.92%) in ASMR and 2.79% (2.73–2.84) in ASDR, followed by the Sub-Saharan regions and Southeast Asia.

An increase in the ASDRs of GBTCs attributable to high BMI was noted until the SDI reached approximately 0.75, with reductions observed after SDI exceeded 0.75 (Figure 7). From 1990 to 2021, Turkmenistan, Guatemala, Australia, Bermuda, Greenland, Germany, Sri Lanka, Israel, Hungary, France, Chile, United States Virgin Islands, Ireland, and Czechia witnessed a reduction in the total percent change of ASDR with more than 50%. Conversely, Cabo Verde, Lesotho, and India experienced the most substantial increases with 318, 166, and 153%, respectively.

Pancreatic cancer

Throughout the past three decades, all countries with available data exhibited an increasing trend with the ASRs of pancreatic cancer attributable to high BMI (Figures 5, 6; Supplementary Table S4). Andean Latin America had the most rapid increase, with the EAPC of 10.13% (8.41–11.89%) in ASMR and 6.41% (5.82–6.99%) in ASDR respectively, followed by Caribbean, Oceania and Tropical Latin America. By 2021, the highest ASRs were observed among high SDI regions, notably high-income North America, Southern Latin America, Central Europe and Eastern Europe.

In 2021, the United Arab Emirates, Hungary, and Greenland reported the highest ASDRs, with estimated values of 15.04, 12.25, and 12.17 per 100,000 population, respectively (Figure 7). As the SDI increases, the ASDR of pancreatic cancer shows a steady rise until the SDI reaches approximately 0.8, after which it begins to decrease as SDI values exceed 0.8. Over half of the countries and territories reported increasing trends with the ASRs of pancreatic cancer attributable to high-BMI.

Discussion

Our study provides the most up-to-date investigations regarding the burden of gastrointestinal cancers attributable to high BMI, with analysis of the longitudinal trends and geographical disparities of four major digestive malignancies globally. All GI cancers exhibited significant increases in both deaths and DALYs, with liver cancer showing the most dramatic increase from 955 deaths and 21,952 DALYs in 1990 to 9,215 deaths and 223,368 DALYs in 2021, and pancreatic cancer showing a four-fold increase. Over the three decades, colorectal cancer remains as the leading cause of mortality and morbidity among all GI cancers, with steady age-standardized rates. Liver cancer and pancreatic cancer had dramatic rising age-standardized rates while gallbladder and biliary tract cancers showed an annual declining rate of 0.4% with the age-standardized rates globally. Despite the general rising burden of high BMI attributable GI cancers, there is substantial socio-demographic heterogeneity. High SDI and high-middle countries consistently reported higher age-standardized rates of risk-attributed GI cancer in 2021. The age-standardized rates of colorectal cancer, along with gallbladder and biliary tract cancers tended to decrease or increase at a slower pace in high SDI and high-middle SDI countries compared to low SDI and low-middle SDI countries. On the contrary, the age-standardized rates of risk attributable liver cancer and pancreatic cancer showed rising trends in nearly all regions.

Both males and females had significant increases with high BMI attributable GI cancer burden between 1990 and 2021. This rise was characterized by distinct sex-specific patterns: males consistently demonstrated higher ASMR and ASDR for colorectal cancer and liver cancer, whereas females had higher rates for gallbladder and biliary tract cancer. These disparities are underpinned by a combination of behavioral and biological mechanisms. Epidemiologically, the higher burden of CRC and liver cancer in males is strongly correlated with a greater prevalence of obesity-driven metabolic dysfunction, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)—a key precursor to hepatocellular carcinoma—and pro-carcinogenic shifts in the gut microbiome (18, 19). For instance, previous reviews have identified male sex as an independent risk factor for NAFLD progression, even after adjusting for BMI (20). Conversely, the sexual dimorphism in GBTC is largely attributed to hormonal influences. Estrogen, through its effect on cholesterol metabolism and gallbladder motility, significantly increases the risk of cholelithiasis, which is present in the majority of the GBTC cases (21, 22). Furthermore, while estrogen is recognized for its protective role against CRC and liver cancer via anti-inflammatory and insulin-sensitizing pathways, its role in GBTC pathogenesis highlights the complex, tissue-specific nature of sex hormone action (23, 24). Our findings on pancreatic cancer, which show a sex-age interaction, further support the need for nuanced investigation. The higher DALY rates in males under age 60 may reflect a stronger cumulative impact of lifestyle factors, while the reversal in older age groups could point to the loss of protective hormonal effects post-menopause. These observed disparities underscore the critical need for sex-stratified research and the future implementation of sex-specific public health interventions and treatment paradigms.

Gastrointestinal cancers are typically a disease of the elderly population. Our analysis indicated increasing rates of risk-attributed GI cancers as age advances. Substantially higher age-specific DALY rates were documented for all GI cancers among individuals aged 50 years and older. However, recent findings suggest a decline in the incidence rates of several GI cancers in individuals over 50, likely stemming from advancements in early detection, diagnosis, and treatment protocols (2527). Conversely, a concerning rise in early-onset GI cancers (diagnosed before the age of 50) is being observed globally. For instance, between 2004 and 2016, colorectal cancer incidence increased annually by 7.9, 4.9, and 1.6% among individuals aged 20–29, 30–39, and 40–49 across 20 European nations (28). Similarly, data from 9 high-income countries reported the incidence of colorectal cancer to increase by 0.8–4% per year among those younger than 50 (29). While the underlying causes for this shift are multifactorial, the parallel timelines of the rising trends of early-onset GI cancer and the global obesity epidemic are striking and unlikely to coincidental. Data from the Nurses’ Health Study revealed that increased BMI at age 18 years, and weight gain of 40 kg or more since 18 were associated with increased risk of early-onset CRC (30). Similarly, a large population-based case–control study concluded increased risks for early-onset CRC with high BMI, with estimated odds ratio ranging from 1.9 to 2.6 (31). Additionally, previous research found rising incidence of several early-onset GI cancers aligning with the global obesity epidemic with global and country-level data (32). Although increased screening practices may contribute to the rise of some early-onset cancers, it is insufficient to explain the trend for most digestive malignancies (33). The increasing prevalence of early-onset GI cancers is now largely attributed to the early life exposure to behavioral and metabolic risk factors, with obesity being a primary driver (33, 34). Obesity acts as a potent promotor of carcinogenesis through mechanisms including chronic inflammation, insulin resistance, hyperleptinemia, and alterations in the gut microbiome (33, 34). Furthermore, recent research have proposed novel obesity indices that offer more granular risk assessment to capture the metabolic dysfunction driving carcinogenesis. For example, data from longitudinal cohorts in China and US have shown that obesity indices, such as triglyceride glucose index (TyG), are strongly associated with GI cancer risk (35, 36). Other indices integrating metabolic parameters, such as biomarkers of insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and inflammation are providing powerful predictors for early-onset GI cancers, even in individuals with normal BMI (37). The combined impact of diverse risk factors, coupled with potential epigenetic interactions, gut dysbiosis, and metabolic disruptions, contributes to the onset and progression of distinct GI cancers.

Colorectal cancer had the greatest disease burden of all GI cancers attributable to high BMI, with approximately 100 thousand deaths and 2.4 million DALYs in 2021. In alignment with previous research, we found that the risk-attributed burden of colorectal cancers is positively associated with SDI (38, 39). A similar trend was observed for risk-attributed pancreatic and biliary tract cancers, showcasing increased ASRs in higher SDI countries where obesity prevalence is higher compared to lower SDI nations. Accordingly, GBD reported an age-standardized summary exposure value of 32.55 for high BMI in high SDI regions, contrasting with 12.46 in low SDI regions, indicating a nearly three-fold difference. This variation is likely influenced by lifestyle factors such as sedentary behaviors and consumption of processed foods (38, 39). On the other hand, the age-standardized rate of risk-attributed liver cancer did not show significant association with SDI. Primary liver cancer had different etiological risk factors, including hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) (40, 41). The global burden of liver cancer varies geographically due to variations in the distribution of these risk factors and disparities in screening and treatment accessibility. While Asian and African countries report higher incidence and mortality rates of liver cancer primarily driven by HBV and HCV infections, our results highlight the global public health concern posed by obesity-related liver cancer (41, 42).

Our study also showed that the ASRs of risk-attributed colorectal cancer and biliary tract cancers decreased in higher SDI countries and increased in lower SDI countries, which is likely due to improved diagnosis, treatment and healthcare resources among higher SDI countries (43, 44). These findings align with broader epidemiological shifts in obesity and Westernized lifestyle adoption—historically concentrated in high SDI nations—toward lower SDI regions, where rising ASRs mirror these transitions (45, 46). On the other hand, risk-attributed liver cancer exhibited increasing ASRs across nearly all regions, with the most pronounced rises occurring in both high and low-middle SDI regions. Advances in HBV immunization and antiviral therapies for HBV and HCV have contributed to a shifting etiology of liver cancer, transitioning from viral hepatitis-related cases to non-viral etiologies (41). Data from previous GBD studies indicated rising incidence and mortality rates of MASLD-related liver cancer while HCV and HBV related liver cancer showed declining rends (47, 48). This shift is further underscored by our analysis, which identified a doubling in the proportion of age-standardized DALYs for liver cancer attributable to high BMI—from 6.97% in 1990 to 14.16% in 2021. Notably, projections suggest MASLD-related liver cancer incidence will continue to increase until 2030 (49, 50). We also found that pancreatic cancer showed higher increasing rates in higher SDI countries compared to lower SDI countries. Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest cancers, with an overall 5-year survival rate around 5%, and the majority of patients diagnosed at advanced stages (51). The steeper increase in high SDI settings may reflect the growing burden of modifiable risk factors, including tobacco use, alcohol consumption, diabetes, and pancreatitis. Previous GBD studies highlight that high SDI regions exhibit the highest diabetes prevalence, with age-standardized rates in high-income super regions surging by 114.8% over the past three decades (52, 53). Similarly, pancreatitis rates correlate positively with SDI (54). Nevertheless, the drivers of rising pancreatic cancer burden in high SDI contexts warrant further systematic investigation.

Our study emphasizes the urgent need to address the rising burden of high BMI attributed gastrointestinal cancers, especially among resource-constrained settings. To address this challenge, we propose a multi-tiered intervention framework integrating obesity prevention through lifestyle modification, revision of evidence-based screening guidelines, and development of personalized early detection strategies tailored to specific GI malignancies. Lifestyle interventions, which mainly consist of physical activity and dietary changes, could significantly contribute to reducing the burden of obesity-attributed GI cancers (55, 56). Colorectal screening has been proven with cost-effectiveness and recommended by various international guidelines (57). However, emerging risk factors and the rising incidence of early-onset cases necessitate earlier screening initiation and enhanced risk stratification. The American Cancer Society, for instance, now recommends initiating average-risk screening at age 45, with earlier screening for high-risk populations (58). In contrast, cancers of the gallbladder, biliary tract, liver, and pancreas pose unique challenges due to their late-stage diagnosis and the impracticality of universal screening (51, 59). For these malignancies, early detection hinges on improved risk stratification and adoption of novel tools such as blood-based biomarkers, metabolomic profiling, and AI-driven imaging analytics. A randomized controlled trial demonstrated that semi-annual ultrasonography in patients with HBV infection or a history of chronic hepatitis enhanced early liver cancer detection and reduced mortality, illustrating the potential of targeted surveillance (60). Ultimately, curbing the GI cancer burden demands coordinated efforts among policymakers, healthcare providers, and researchers to address modifiable risks, eliminate barriers to screening access, and enhance public awareness among high-risk populations.

There were several limitations with our study. One major limitation was the variations in data quality given the data sources and collections across countries, especially the lack of high-quality data from cancer registries in certain low and low-middle income countries. Further, due to the inherent methodological limitations, we were unable to quantify the disease burden based on the anatomical or histological subtypes of gastrointestinal cancers, such as the anatomical subtypes of colorectal cancer (proximal, distal and rectum) and the major molecular subtypes of liver cancer subtypes (hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma). Recent research indicated that high-BMI showed limited heterogeneity within the association of high-BMI with colorectal cancer according to either anatomical or molecular subtypes (61, 62). GBD 2021 defined high BMI for adults over 25 kg/m2, which is likely to result in biased estimates of risk-attributed gastrointestinal cancer burden due to the heterogeneity of cut-points of high BMI based on different race and ethnicities (63). The universal BMI cut-off value may underestimate the disease burden in certain Asian countries, given their lower BMI cut-off values. Last but not least, our study was unable to capture various confounding factors, including genetic predispositions and potential environmental risk factors.

In conclusion, our comprehensive analysis reveals a rising global burden of gastrointestinal cancers attributable to high BMI. All four GI cancers demonstrated increased mortality and DALYs, with colorectal cancer remaining the largest contributor. Liver and pancreatic cancers showed the most pronounced increases in age-standardized rates. While high SDI and high-middle SDI countries bear the highest ASRs of GI cancers attributable to high-BMI, they have shown declining trends in colorectal cancer, along with gallbladder and biliary tract cancer. On the other hand, nearly all regions have shown increasing trends with the ASRs of risk-attributed liver cancer and pancreatic cancer. These findings underscore the urgent need for multi-level interventions, including lifestyle modifications and tailored screening protocols to address the growing burden of obesity-driven GI cancers.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Our work was a secondary data analysis from the publicly available Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The ethical approval of GBD 2021 was obtained from the University of Washington. Our study did not require ethical approval.

Author contributions

LY: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. TJ: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Writing – review & editing. HM: Data curation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. XX: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work is supported by the Shandong Second Medical University Affiliated Hospital General Fund Project (2024FYM082).

Acknowledgments

Our data was obtained from the publicly available database Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. We appreciate the work from the GBD 2021 collaborators.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Gen AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2025.1670111/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Thomas, RM, and Sobin, LH. Gastrointestinal cancer. Cancer. (1995) 75:154–70. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950101)75:1+<154::AID-CNCR2820751305>3.0.CO;2-Z

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Arnold, M, Abnet, CC, Neale, RE, Vignat, J, Giovannucci, EL, McGlynn, KA, et al. Global Burden of 5 Major Types of Gastrointestinal Cancer. Gastroenterology. (2020) 159:335–349.e15. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.068

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Sung, H, Ferlay, J, Siegel, RL, Laversanne, M, Soerjomataram, I, Jemal, A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2021) 71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Wang, S, Zheng, R, Li, J, Zeng, H, Li, L, Chen, R, et al. Global, regional, and national lifetime risks of developing and dying from gastrointestinal cancers in 185 countries: a population-based systematic analysis of GLOBOCAN. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2024) 9:229–37. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00366-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Rahib, L, Smith, BD, Aizenberg, R, Rosenzweig, AB, Fleshman, JM, and Matrisian, LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. (2014) 74:2913–21. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Xi, Y, and Xu, P. Global colorectal cancer burden in 2020 and projections to 2040. Transl Oncol. (2021) 14:101174. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101174

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Lauby-Secretan, B, Scoccianti, C, Loomis, D, Grosse, Y, Bianchini, F, Straif, K, et al. Body Fatness and Cancer - Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. New Engl J Med. (2016) 375:794–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1606602

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. O'Sullivan, J, Lysaght, J, Donohoe, CL, and Reynolds, JV. Obesity and gastrointestinal cancer: the interrelationship of adipose and tumour microenvironments. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2018) 15:699–714. doi: 10.1038/s41575-018-0069-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Larsson, SC, and Wolk, A. Overweight, obesity and risk of liver cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Br J Cancer. (2007) 97:1005–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603932

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Moghaddam, AA, Woodward, M, and Huxley, R. Obesity and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 31 studies with 70,000 events. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. (2007) 16:2533–47. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0708

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Yang, P, Zhou, Y, Chen, B, Wan, HW, Jia, GQ, Bai, HL, et al. Overweight, obesity and gastric cancer risk: results from a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Cancer. (2009) 45:2867–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.04.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Collaboration NCDRF. Worldwide trends in underweight and obesity from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 3663 population-representative studies with 222 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. (2024) 403:1027–50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02750-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Ward, ZJ, Bleich, SN, Cradock, AL, Barrett, JL, Giles, CM, Flax, C, et al. Projected US state-level prevalence of adult obesity and severe obesity. New Engl J Med. (2019) 381:2440–50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1909301

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Collaborators, GBDF. Burden of disease scenarios for 204 countries and territories, 2022-2050: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. (2024) 403:2204–56. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00685-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Collaborators GBDRF. Global burden and strength of evidence for 88 risk factors in 204 countries and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. (2024) 403:2162–203. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00933-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Stevens, GA, Alkema, L, Black, RE, Boerma, JT, Collins, GS, Ezzati, M, et al. Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement. Lancet. (2016) 388:e19–23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30388-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Zhou, XD, Chen, QF, Yang, W, Zuluaga, M, Targher, G, Byrne, CD, et al. Burden of disease attributable to high body mass index: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. EClinicalMedicine. (2024) 76:102848. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102848

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Mantovani, A, Petracca, G, Beatrice, G, Csermely, A, Tilg, H, Byrne, CD, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and increased risk of incident extrahepatic cancers: a meta-analysis of observational cohort studies. Gut. (2022) 71:778–88. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-324191

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Mantovani, A, Dauriz, M, Byrne, CD, Lonardo, A, Zoppini, G, Bonora, E, et al. Association between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and colorectal tumours in asymptomatic adults undergoing screening colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Metabolism. (2018) 87:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.06.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Ballestri, S, Nascimbeni, F, Baldelli, E, Marrazzo, A, Romagnoli, D, and Lonardo, A. NAFLD as a sexual dimorphic disease: role of gender and reproductive status in the development and progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and inherent cardiovascular risk. Adv Ther. (2017) 34:1291–326. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0556-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Wang, HH, Liu, M, Clegg, DJ, Portincasa, P, and Wang, DQH. New insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying effects of estrogen on cholesterol gallstone formation. Biochim Biophys Acta. (2009) 1791:1037–47. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.06.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Jackson, SS, Adami, HO, Andreotti, G, Beane-Freeman, LE, Berrington de González, A, Buring, JE, et al. Associations between reproductive factors and biliary tract cancers in women from the Biliary Tract Cancers Pooling Project. J Hepatol. (2020) 73:863–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.04.046

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Barzi, A, Lenz, AM, Labonte, MJ, and Lenz, HJ. Molecular pathways: estrogen pathway in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. (2013) 19:5842–8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0325

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Williams, C, DiLeo, A, Niv, Y, and Gustafsson, JÅ. Estrogen receptor beta as target for colorectal cancer prevention. Cancer Lett. (2016) 372:48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.12.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Murphy, CC, Sandler, RS, Sanoff, HK, Yang, YC, Lund, JL, and Baron, JA. Decrease in incidence of colorectal cancer among individuals 50 years or older after recommendations for population-based screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2017) 15:903–909.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.037

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Schreuders, EH, Ruco, A, Rabeneck, L, Schoen, RE, Sung, JJY, Young, GP, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes. Gut. (2015) 64:1637–49. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-309086

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Sung, H, Siegel, RL, Laversanne, M, Jiang, C, Morgan, E, Zahwe, M, et al. Colorectal cancer incidence trends in younger versus older adults: an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet Oncol. (2025) 26:51–63. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00600-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Vuik, FE, Nieuwenburg, SA, Bardou, M, Lansdorp-Vogelaar, I, Dinis-Ribeiro, M, Bento, MJ, et al. Increasing incidence of colorectal cancer in young adults in Europe over the last 25 years. Gut. (2019) 68:1820–6. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317592

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Araghi, M, Soerjomataram, I, Bardot, A, Ferlay, J, Cabasag, CJ, Morrison, DS, et al. Changes in colorectal cancer incidence in seven high-income countries: a population-based study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2019) 4:511–8. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30147-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Liu, PH, Wu, K, Ng, K, Zauber, AG, Nguyen, LH, Song, M, et al. Association of obesity with risk of early-onset colorectal cancer among women. JAMA Oncol. (2019) 5:37–44. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4280

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Li, H, Boakye, D, Chen, X, Jansen, L, Chang-Claude, J, Hoffmeister, M, et al. Associations of body mass index at different ages with early-onset colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. (2022) 162:1088–1097.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.12.239

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Chen, J, Dalerba, P, Terry, MB, and Yang, W. Global obesity epidemic and rising incidence of early-onset cancers. J Glob Health. (2024) 14:04205. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04205

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Ben-Aharon, I, van Laarhoven, HW, Fontana, E, Obermannova, R, Nilsson, M, and Lordick, F. Early-onset cancer in the gastrointestinal tract is on the rise—evidence and implications. Cancer Discov. (2023) 13:538–51. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-22-1038

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Patel, SG, Karlitz, JJ, Yen, T, Lieu, CH, and Boland, CR. The rising tide of early-onset colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, clinical features, biology, risk factors, prevention, and early detection. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2022) 7:262–74. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00426-X

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Zheng, X, Wang, Y, Chen, Y, Liu, C, Liu, T, Lin, S, et al. Temporal relationship between chronic inflammation and insulin resistance and their combined cumulative effect on cancer risk: a longitudinal cohort study. BMC Public Health. (2025) 25:1501. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22632-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Zha, B, Cai, A, and Wang, G. Relationship between obesity indexes and triglyceride glucose index with gastrointestinal cancer among the US population. Prev Med Rep. (2024) 43:102760. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102760

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Xiang, S, Yang, YX, Pan, WJ, Li, Y, Zhang, JH, Gao, Y, et al. Prognostic value of systemic immune inflammation index and geriatric nutrition risk index in early-onset colorectal cancer. Front Nutr. (2023) 10:1134300. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1134300

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Collaborators GBDCC. Global, regional, and national burden of colorectal cancer and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2022) 7:627–47. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00044-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Danpanichkul, P, Suparan, K, Tothanarungroj, P, Dejvajara, D, Rakwong, K, Pang, Y, et al. Epidemiology of gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Gut. (2024) 74:26–34. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333227

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Rumgay, H, Arnold, M, Ferlay, J, Lesi, O, Cabasag, CJ, Vignat, J, et al. Global burden of primary liver cancer in 2020 and predictions to 2040. J Hepatol. (2022) 77:1598–606. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Singal, AG, Kanwal, F, and Llovet, JM. Global trends in hepatocellular carcinoma epidemiology: implications for screening, prevention and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. (2023) 20:864–84. doi: 10.1038/s41571-023-00825-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Singal, AG, Lampertico, P, and Nahon, P. Epidemiology and surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma: New trends. J Hepatol. (2020) 72:250–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.08.025

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. de Souza, JA, Hunt, B, Asirwa, FC, Adebamowo, C, and Lopes, G. Global Health Equity: Cancer Care Outcome Disparities in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries. J Clin Oncol. (2016) 34:6–13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.2860

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Petrova, D, Spacirova, Z, Fernandez-Martinez, NF, Ching-López, A, Garrido, D, Rodríguez-Barranco, M, et al. The patient, diagnostic, and treatment intervals in adult patients with cancer from high- and lower-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. (2022) 19:e1004110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004110

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Ford, ND, Patel, SA, and Narayan, KM. Obesity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Burden, Drivers, and Emerging Challenges. Annu Rev Public Health. (2017) 38:145–64. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044604

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Jaacks, LM, Vandevijvere, S, Pan, A, McGowan, CJ, Wallace, C, Imamura, F, et al. The obesity transition: stages of the global epidemic. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2019) 7:231–40. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30026-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Huang, DQ, Singal, AG, Kono, Y, Tan, DJ, El-Serag, HB, and Loomba, R. Changing global epidemiology of liver cancer from 2010 to 2019: NASH is the fastest growing cause of liver cancer. Cell Metab. (2022) 34:969–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2022.05.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Choi, S, Kim, BK, Yon, DK, Lee, SW, Lee, HG, Chang, HH, et al. Global burden of primary liver cancer and its association with underlying aetiologies, sociodemographic status, and sex differences from 1990–2019: a DALY-based analysis of the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study. Clin Mol Hepatol. (2023) 29:433–52. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0316

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Estes, C, Anstee, QM, Arias-Loste, MT, Bantel, H, Bellentani, S, Caballeria, J, et al. Modeling NAFLD disease burden in China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States for the period 2016-2030. J Hepatol. (2018) 69:896–904. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.05.036

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Estes, C, Razavi, H, Loomba, R, Younossi, Z, and Sanyal, AJ. Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease. Hepatology. (2018) 67:123–33. doi: 10.1002/hep.29466

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Klein, AP. Pancreatic cancer epidemiology: understanding the role of lifestyle and inherited risk factors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2021) 18:493–502. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00457-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Ong, KL, Stafford, LK, Mclaughlin, SA, Boyko, EJ, Vollset, SE, Smith, AE, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of diabetes from 1990 to 2021, with projections of prevalence to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. (2023) 402:203–34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01301-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Saeedi, P, Petersohn, I, Salpea, P, Malanda, B, Karuranga, S, Unwin, N, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9(th) edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. (2019) 157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Ouyang, G, Pan, G, Liu, Q, Wu, Y, Liu, Z, Lu, W, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of pancreatitis in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMC Med. (2020) 18:388. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01859-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Keum, N, and Giovannucci, E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2019) 16:713–32. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Lu, L, Mullins, CS, Schafmayer, C, Zeissig, S, and Linnebacher, M. A global assessment of recent trends in gastrointestinal cancer and lifestyle-associated risk factors. Cancer Commun (Lond). (2021) 41:1137–51. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12220

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Bretthauer, M, Loberg, M, Wieszczy, P, Kalager, M, Emilsson, L, Garborg, K, et al. Effect of colonoscopy screening on risks of colorectal cancer and related death. New Engl J Med. (2022) 387:1547–56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2208375

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Wolf, AMD, Fontham, ETH, Church, TR, Flowers, CR, Guerra, CE, LaMonte, S, et al. Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. (2018) 68:250–81. doi: 10.3322/caac.21457

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Zhang, L, Sanagapalli, S, and Stoita, A. Challenges in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. (2018) 24:2047–60. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i19.2047

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Zhang, BH, Yang, BH, and Tang, ZY. Randomized controlled trial of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. (2004) 130:417–22. doi: 10.1007/s00432-004-0552-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Murphy, N, Ward, HA, Jenab, M, Rothwell, JA, Boutron-Ruault, MC, Carbonnel, F, et al. Heterogeneity of colorectal cancer risk factors by anatomical subsite in 10 European countries: a multinational cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2019) 17:1323–31. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.030

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Murphy, N, Newton, CC, Song, M, Papadimitriou, N, Hoffmeister, M, Phipps, AI, et al. Body mass index and molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. (2023) 115:165–73. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac215

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Barba, C, Cavalli-Sforza, T, Cutter, J, Darnton-Hill, I, Deurenberg, P, Yap, M, et al. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. (2004) 363:157–63. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: gastrointestinal cancer, high-BMI, cancer epidemiology, Global Burden of Disease, overweight and obesity

Citation: Yao L, Ji T, Mu H and Xu X (2025) The global epidemiology of gastrointestinal cancers attributable to high-BMI: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Front. Nutr. 12:1670111. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1670111

Received: 26 July 2025; Accepted: 11 September 2025;
Published: 23 September 2025.

Edited by:

Caihong Wang, Peking University People's Hospital, China

Reviewed by:

Chuanwang Miao, Shandong Cancer Hospital, China
Bowen Zha, National Cancer Center of China, China

Copyright © 2025 Yao, Ji, Mu and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Xiangming Xu, eHhtMDg4OEAxMjYuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.