Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr.

Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1674577

Association between nutritional status and food texture levels in older patients with stroke-related sarcopenia in the subacute phase: A retrospective cross-sectional study

Provisionally accepted
Momoko  SakuraiMomoko SakuraiNorikazu  HishikawaNorikazu Hishikawa*Koshiro  SAWADAKoshiro SAWADASuzuyo  OhashiSuzuyo OhashiHiroshi  MaedaHiroshi MaedaYasuo  MikamiYasuo Mikami
  • Kyoto Furitsu Ika Daigaku Daigakuin Igaku Kenkyuka Rehabilitation Igaku Kyoshitsu, Kyoto, Japan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Stroke-related sarcopenia (SRS) frequently emerges in the early phase of stroke and is associated with poor functional recovery and prolonged hospitalization. Identifying modifiable risk factors, such as nutritional status and food texture, may be important for early treatment in SRS. This study aimed to investigate the association between SRS and malnutrition diagnosed using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria, with the primary aim of examining how the prevalence of SRS and malnutrition and the individual GLIM components vary among food texture levels. Methods: This study included 340 older adults (median age: 77.0 [66.0–83.0] years; median time since stroke onset: 22.0 [16.8–31.3] days) who were admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation ward during the subacute phase of stroke. SRS was diagnosed based on the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia criteria, while malnutrition according to the GLIM framework. Food texture was categorized into three levels: standard, texture-modified, and tube feeding. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the association between SRS and GLIM-defined malnutrition, adjusting for relevant covariates. The Cochran–Armitage trend test assessed trends in the prevalence of SRS and malnutrition and in the proportions of individual GLIM components among food texture levels. Results: The prevalence of SRS and GLIM-defined malnutrition was 56.8% and 51.5%, respectively. Malnutrition was independently associated with SRS (odds ratio = 3.00; 95% confidence interval: 1.70–5.30; p < 0.001). The prevalence of both conditions increased progressively with more restrictive food textures (p for trend = 0.002 and < 0.001, respectively). Additionally, among the GLIM components, the proportions of patients with low body mass index, reduced muscle mass, and disease burden/inflammation increased with food texture restriction (q for trend = 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.007, respectively, after adjustment using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate correction). Conclusions: Older adults in the subacute phase of stroke who consume more restrictive food textures may be more prone to malnutrition, potentially due to stroke-related inflammation, which in turn may contribute to the development of SRS. Early tailored nutritional treatments that consider food texture restrictions and disease burden may help prevent SRS and enhance functional recovery in post-stroke rehabilitation.

Keywords: Stroke, Sarcopenia, Malnutrition, Food texture, Inflammation, older adults

Received: 30 Jul 2025; Accepted: 18 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Sakurai, Hishikawa, SAWADA, Ohashi, Maeda and Mikami. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Norikazu Hishikawa, hisikawa@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.