ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Nutrition and Sustainable Diets
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1678809
Investigation of the Relationship Between Adoption of Minimalist and Sustainable Lifestyle, and Individuals' Views on Artificial Meat
Provisionally accepted- 1Çankırı Karatekin University Faculty of Health Sciences, Çankırı, Türkiye
- 2Gazi Universitesi Tip Fakultesi, Ankara, Türkiye
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: In sustainable nutrition, individuals consume only what they need; in other words, they have a healthy and balanced diet. Artificial meat is also considered a form of nutrition that is environmentally sustainable, because its negative environmental effects are minimal, and it ensures food safety. The Minimalist Lifestyle, where simple living and consumption only for needs are at the forefront, is also closely related to environmental sustainability goals. Methods: In this study, the possible relationship between individuals adopting a minimalist and sustainable lifestyle, and their views on artificial meat were investigated. Two scales were used in the study. One of them is the Scale for Determining the Minimalist Lifestyle from the Point of Environmental Bioethics, and the other one is the Scale for Behaviors towards Sustainable Nutrition. In addition to these scales, the participants were asked open-ended questions about artificial meat. Results: In this study, it was determined that the majority of people who embrace minimalist lifestyle also embrace a sustainable diet. It was investigated that 65% of the participants did not have knowledge about artificial meat and 83.4% did not have knowledge about the production process. Regarding consumption preferences, 87.6% indicated that they would not choose to consume artificial meat, and approximately half of the participants (51.6%) either did not or would not hold a positive opinion about it. Furthermore, it was found that the preference for artificial meat consumption is lower among participants embracing a minimalist lifestyle. Conclusion: The research results indicate that some cultures may have a negative view of artificial meat. It is believed that awareness of the potential beneficial effects of artificial meat on the ecosystem could gradually change this perspective over time. Due to the growing world population and decreasing global resources, it is expected the need for alternative and sustainable protein sources will increase in future years. In this context, the issue of artificial meat is expected to become increasingly prominent. Various bioethical issues and dilemmas are predicted to arise. Therefore, further research should be conducted on this topic.
Keywords: Artificial meat, Bioethics, Environmental sustainability, Minimalist lifestyle, simpleliving, sustainable nutrition
Received: 03 Aug 2025; Accepted: 21 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 TUNÇAY and ÇOBANOĞLU. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Güzin Yasemin TUNÇAY, gyasemintuncay@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.