Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr.

Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1706487

This article is part of the Research TopicEating Behavior and Chronic Diseases: Research Evidence from Population Studies, Volume IIView all 20 articles

Patterns of meat and vegetable consumption among community-dwelling adults aged 18 years and older in China

Provisionally accepted
Xiaojing  DengXiaojing Deng1Hui  ChengHui Cheng1Wenjun  WangWenjun Wang1Yalin  HongYalin Hong1Xin  YuanXin Yuan2Huiqing  XuHuiqing Xu3Yunting  XuYunting Xu3Guofeng  AoGuofeng Ao3Jian  XuJian Xu1*Bian  Ye PingBian Ye Ping1*Qing  YeQing Ye3
  • 1Geriatric Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
  • 2Jiangsu University School of Medicine, Zhenjiang, China
  • 3Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

ABSTARACT Background Meat and vegetable consumption were each vital for maintaining human health condition. Periodic surveillance and assessment of population-level meat and vegetable consumption are critically important for tailored healthy eating intervention. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the consumption patterns of meat and vegetable among community-dwelling adults in regional China in 2023. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the first year of post-COVID-19 pandemic in Nanjing Municipality of China. Participants were those residents aged 18 years or above and randomly selected from the whole municipality. The recommendations recently released by China Nutrition Society in 2022 were used to assess participants’ meat and vegetable consumption level. Logistic regression models were introduced to identify potential influencing factors of meat and vegetable consumption. Results Among the 60945 participants analyzed, the medians of meat and vegetable consumption were 700.0 g/wk (interquartile range =375.0, 1100) and 200.0 g/d (interquartile range =100.0, 300.0), respectively. Moreover, 13.7% (95%CI=13.4, 13.9), 18.1% (95%CI=17.8, 18.5), and 68.2% (95%CI=67.8, 68.6) of participants consumed meat under, within, and beyond the recommended level, separately, whereas 71.1% (95%CI=70.7, 71.4) and 28.9% (95%CI=28.6, 29.3) consumed vegetable under and reaching recommended level, respectively. Selected socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle and behaviors, and chronic conditions were associated with meat and vegetable consumption. Conclusions A large proportion of community-dwelling adults consumed meat exceeding the recommended level, whereas a small proportion consumed vegetable reaching the recommendation in regional China in 2023. Moreover, disparities of meat and vegetable consumption existed in socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle and behaviors, and selected chronic conditions. However, no causality could be inferred due to the nature of cross-sectional study. For future tailored population-level interventions of healthy eating of meat and vegetable, particular attention shall be paid to participants’ socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle and behaviors, and specific chronic conditions.

Keywords: Meat, vegetable, Consumption pattern, adults, Chinese

Received: 16 Sep 2025; Accepted: 14 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Deng, Cheng, Wang, Hong, Yuan, Xu, Xu, Ao, Xu, Ye Ping and Ye. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Jian Xu, yinfengchris@163.com
Bian Ye Ping, yepingbian@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.