SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Sport and Exercise Nutrition
This article is part of the Research TopicSports, Nutrition and Public Health: Analyzing their Interconnected ImpactsView all 35 articles
Acute effects of exercise snacks on postprandial glucose and insulin metabolism in adults with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted- Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: To quantify the acute effects of brief, frequent interruptions to prolonged sitting ("exercise snacks") on postprandial glucose and insulin in adults with obesity, and to explore potential effect modifiers. Data Sources and Methods: Following PRISMA 2020, seven sources (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, ICTRP, CINAHL) were searched to July 10, 2025. Randomized crossover or parallel trials in adults with obesity comparing activity breaks with uninterrupted sitting were included. Co-primary outcomes were glucose and insulin incremental area under the curve (iAUC); secondary outcomes were total AUC (tAUC) and mean levels. Random-effects meta-analyses synthesized standardized or mean differences (95% CI); heterogeneity was quantified by I². Prespecified subgroup and sensitivity analyses were undertaken; small-study effects were examined when k≥10. Risk of bias was appraised with Cochrane RoB 2.0. (Fixed-effect estimates were additionally inspected when heterogeneity was low to moderate.) Results: Seventeen trials (261 unique participants; predominantly randomized crossover) were included. Versus uninterrupted sitting, activity breaks reduced glucose iAUC (SMD = –0.49, 95% CI –0.85 to –0.14; I² = 76%) and reduced insulin iAUC (SMD = –0.26, 95% CI –0.50 to –0.03; I² = 44%). Glucose tAUC and mean glucose showed non-significant downward trends. Mean insulin decreased (SMD = –0.54, 95% CI –0.97 to –0.10), albeit with high heterogeneity (I² = 76%). Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested larger effects with higher-frequency (≤30-min) and short-bout (≤3-min) interruptions and with walking or simple resistance, although tests for subgroup differences were generally non-significant. Meta-regressions showed age predicted glucose iAUC, BMI and interruption frequency predicted mean insulin, no moderator predicted insulin iAUC, and intervention intensity (daily MET) had minimal, non-significant effects. Findings were robust in leave-one-out and model-assumption sensitivity analyses, with no clear small-study effects for glucose outcomes. Conclusions: In adults with obesity, interrupting sitting about every ≤30 minutes with 2–5 minutes of light-to-moderate walking or simple resistance acutely attenuates postprandial glucose and insulin responses. These findings support exercise "snacks" as a pragmatic behavioral strategy, while longer-term randomized trials are needed to define durability and refine dose parameters. Registration: PROSPERO CRD420251144139.
Keywords: sedentary behavior, Exercise snacks, Interrupting sitting, Obesity, Glucose iAUC, Insulin
Received: 18 Sep 2025; Accepted: 06 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Chang, Wang, Zhang and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Haiyuan Liu, a821532376@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.