Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Nutr.

Sec. Nutritional Immunology

This article is part of the Research TopicRevolutionizing Personalized Nutrition: AI's Role in Chronic Disease Management and Health Improvement-Volume IIView all articles

The Global Immune-Nutrition-Inflammation Index (GINI) Predicts Pathological Response and Survival in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy

Provisionally accepted
Zhouxv  FengZhouxv Feng1,2Huihan  YiHuihan Yi2Jiazhou  XiaoJiazhou Xiao2Zhixin  HuangZhixin Huang2Yifei  TuYifei Tu2Bo  LiuBo Liu2*
  • 1Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
  • 2The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: The Global Immune-Nutrition-Inflammation Index (GINI) is a new composite indicator that assesses nutrition and inflammation and has been linked to prognosis in various cancers. Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) is becoming more common for treating locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the potential of GINI to predict outcomes for ESCC patients undergoing nICT has not yet been explored. This study aims to examine the predictive value of the pretreatment GINI in relation to pathological response and prognosis for ESCC patients receiving nICT Methods: A total of 138 patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent nICT followed by radical resection at our institution between 2022 and 2024 were retrospectively included in this study. The GINI index was calculated from pretreatment blood parameters. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine the optimal cutoff value of the GINI index for predicting pathological response, which was defined using the Becker tumor regression grade (TRG). Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze the associations between the GINI index and both pathological response and survival outcomes. Results: The optimal cutoff value of GINI for predicting pathological response was 73.47 (AUC = 0.912). Multivariate analysis identified high-GINI as an independent risk factor for both poor pathological response (OR = 1.05, P < 0.001) and shorter overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.01, P = 0.012). Compared to the low-GINI group, patients in the high-GINI group had significantly poorer tumor differentiation, more advanced pathological stage, and a higher incidence of complications (all P < 0.05). Survival analysis demonstrated that the low-GINI group had significantly better 3-year OS (87.8% vs 68.7%, P = 0.014) and disease-free survival (DFS) (82.7% vs 63.3%, P = 0.011) than the high-GINI group. Conclusion: Pretreatment GINI is a promising biomarker for predicting pathological response and survival outcomes in locally advanced ESCC patients treated with nICT. A high GINI level is significantly associated with treatment resistance and poorer prognosis, suggesting its potential utility in risk stratification and guiding individualized treatment strategies.

Keywords: Global immune-nutrition-inflammation index (GINI), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, prognosis, biomarker

Received: 09 Oct 2025; Accepted: 18 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Feng, Yi, Xiao, Huang, Tu and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Bo Liu, 328221720@qq.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.