Error in Figure/Table
In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 2 as published. The original Figure 2 contained a typo in Figure 2. The sentence “These advances mean that they might be UNABLE” should have read “These advances mean that they might be ABLE”. This typo was solely in the Figure. The correct version of the vignette was presented to participants. The corrected Figure 2 appears below. The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.
Figure 2
Statements
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Summary
Keywords
genetic modification, online survey, Mechanical Turk, metaphor, CRISPR
Citation
Weisberg SM, Badgio D and Chatterjee A (2017) Corrigendum: A CRISPR New World: Attitudes in the Public toward Innovations in Human Genetic Modification. Front. Public Health 5:161. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00161
Received
23 May 2017
Accepted
21 June 2017
Published
06 July 2017
Volume
5 - 2017
Edited and reviewed by
Paul Russell Ward, Flinders University, Australia
Updates
Copyright
© 2017 Weisberg, Badgio and Chatterjee.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Steven M. Weisberg, stweis@mail.med.upenn.edu; Anjan Chatterjee, anjan@mail.med.upenn.edu
Specialty section: This article was submitted to Public Health Policy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.