SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Public Health Policy
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1446497
Health care provider payment reforms in African states of the Commonwealth-a scoping review
Provisionally accepted- Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This scoping review explores provider payment reform for strategic purchasing in 21 African Commonwealth countries using a scoping review method. It examines factors influencing these reforms through a health policy framework: context, content, process, and actors. Studies were retrieved from scientific databases and supplemented with gray literature. Thirty-five full-text publications were included (29 empirical studies, four technical reports/policy briefs, and two reviews). The evidence spans eight countries, with six focusing on performance-based financing (PBF). Reforms often added new payment methods to existing ones (62.85%, n=22/35), replaced existing methods (typically fee-for-service (FFS) with capitation in primary care (28.57%, n=10/35)), or adopted mixed methods (37.14%, n=13/35), with blending FFS and capitation being the most common. Various factors influenced different reform dimensions. Political inattention and inadequate policy, legal, and regulatory frameworks hindered the reform context. Reform content depended on clear core elements such as performance indicators, guidelines, tariffs, financial rewards, and provider autonomy. Factors such as a lack of reform piloting, chronic underfunding, fragmented funding flows, and inadequate monitoring and evaluation mechanisms hindered the reform process. The actor dimension was impacted by a lack of a holistic approach to stakeholders and limited stakeholder capacity to implement reforms. Current evidence for implementing provider payment reforms remains limited—concentrated in a few countries and often focused on specific reform types or evaluations from a single perspective. Future studies could focus on more comprehensive reform evaluations, incorporating multistakeholder perspectives and links with other elements of strategic purchasing.
Keywords: Healthcare provider, Strategic purchasing, Payment reform, commonwealth, Africa
Received: 09 Jun 2024; Accepted: 28 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ndayishimiye, Sowada and Dubas-Jakóbczyk. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Costase Ndayishimiye, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.